Frank Parlato
The next in our series of exquisite patents by that sterling inventor Keith Alan Raniere promises nothing less than a portal to a new you.
This is a true patent application from 2003.
Dubbed modestly, “Method and apparatus for improving performance” it is patent application US9421447B2.
It lamentably never won approval, and the application has now expired. But the enduring genius of the invention will never expire, not even if it took 120 years to bring it out to the world.
Raniere’s invention, which is dubbed the Raniere’s Efficiency Endurance Enhancer (REESE™) proposes a method and apparatus for improving performance in athletics (with or without equipment), mental activities, and emotional endeavors.
The actual method is termed in the patent application as “Raniere’s Maximal Efficiency Principle™” or “Raniere’s Law™,” focusing on continuously challenging what the person wants to improve, such as distance for runners, speed on a treadmill, problem solving, or thoughts or feelings about anything.
The principle of the invention is training (body, mind and feelings) based on continuous challenges.
Raniere’s Law can be used for emotional endeavors like acting, or selling, by continuously and gradually increasing emotional stressors or mental challenges to enhance emotional resilience and mental performance.
The patent application suggests training mental faculties (like memory recall, mental calculations) using a method that continuously increases the challenge. Normally continuous mental and emotional challenges without adequate support and recovery time could lead to psychological disaster. Supporters of Raniere say if anyone other than Raniere suggested it, it would be concerning and dubious to undertake an experimental and unproven program that puts increasing stress on the mind and emotions.
The Raniere’s Maximal Efficiency invention includes methods:
- Determining if a subject is trainable for a particular activity,
- Finding their point of efficiency for a particular accomplishment,
- Train them at or near this breaking point until inefficiency or exhaustion occurs.
- Measuring a continuous variable related to the subject’s performance
- Training them to change the value of this measurement.
- Utilizing a performance system to record parameters,
- Determine points of efficiency
- Train the subject to maintain efficiency over varying periods.
Specific Examples:
Running on a Treadmill:
As the runner uses the treadmill, sensors measure heart rate, stride length, or VO2 max.
The treadmill’s speed is automatically adjusted faster and faster to continuously challenge the runner, moving the point of efficiency until the runner is exhausted.
Other Applications:
The concept can be applied to mental tasks (e.g., performing mathematical calculations at increasing speeds), and even training of microorganisms or computer programs.
The product itself is a performance system with sensors to measure parameters and a control system (The Raniere FlexiPace Training Module (RFPM ™) for adjusting performance system parameters and collecting data.
It includes Raniere’s Variable Velocity Protocol (VVP), which is the system’s method of continuously adjusting speed.
The Raniere Endurance Evolution Algorithm (REEA) is the theory behind extending performance duration.
The Raniere FlexiForce Functionality Unit is the part of the system that adjusts to different force outputs.
Unleash Your Potential
The physical components of Raniere’s invention consist of:
The Raniere Variable Velocity Protocol Performance System (RVVPPS ™): This attaches to various devices, such as a treadmill, stationary bike, or hooked up directly to monitor the heart and brain.
The Raniere AdaptiMetrics Sensor Suite (RASS™) measures various parameters of the subject being trained. The sensors monitor heart rate, muscle activity, respiratory rate, brain waves and other metrics.
One admirer said it is like experiencing feedback, like the whisper of a great ethicist guiding your destiny!
Transform With Raniere’s Genius at Your Side!
The Raniere OptiTrain Dynamic Control System (ROTDCS™) manages the parameters of the performance system. It includes a processor, user interface (touchscreen control panel), and the Raniere EnduroEnhancer Software to process data and adjust the performance system accordingly.
The Raniere ContinuMax Performance Evaluator Data Acquisition System (RCMPEDA) collects data from the sensors and includes wiring, transmitters, and other technologies for data communication.
The Raniere PerpetuGrowth Performance System Feedback and Data Visualization (RPGPSFDV™) is a high definition monitor.
The Raniere Performance Optimizer!
Commit to a brave new world of athletic and mental enhancement with the Performance Optimizer, the brainchild of legendary visionary, Keith Raniere!
Adaptive Genius:
The power of Raniere’s “Continuous Challenge” methodology is that every second you are pushed to your limits until mental or physical exhaustion sets in!
Controlled by the Best: The control system, a marvel of engineering, is like having Raniere cheer you on, adjusting and fine-tuning your life towards the zenith of human performance.
Keith Raniere – A Mind Beyond Compare!
Embrace the wisdom of a man who redefined what’s possible. Raniere, the maestro of human potential, has distilled his unparalleled genius into this system.
Ascend to Vanguardian Heights!
Philosophical Pioneer: Not just a training system, the Raniere Performance Optimizer offers the possibility of controlling the human spirit, as envisioned by one of the most brilliant minds of our time.
Some critics might argue that the emphasis on continuously pushing limits could pose health risks. Training without adequate rest or pushing beyond safe thresholds could lead to injuries or burnout.
But remember that Keith Raniere was an eastern coast judo champ at age 11 and tied for New York State record for the fastest 100 yard dash.
He had the athleticism of Jim Thorpe, the brain of Albert Einstein, and the moral values of Gandhi.
Witness transformation as every stride, every thought becomes a step closer to the Vanguard.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Warning against visiting the website Marc Elliot: Home (marcelliot.com). It jeopardizes the security of your computer. Security software warns against this site.
Marc stands for “human decency”. He is such a brave, bold guy. Not.
He supports a child-rapist. Also, he threatened Isabella, saying if she did not support Squarefoot, her Tourettes would get worse.
Marc Elliot is a piece of shit.
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Eastern District of New York
MKM:TH
F. #2017R01840
271 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York 11201
December 15, 2023
By ECF
The Honorable Nicholas G. Garaufis
United States District Judge
United States District Court
225 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York 11201
Re: United States v. Keith Raniere
Criminal Docket No. 18-204 (S-2) (NGG)
Dear Judge Garaufis: The government respectfully submits this response to the defendant Keith Raniere’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s denial of Raniere’s motion to compel. The Court’s Memorandum and Order concluded that Raniere had no “legal justification for his argument that he has a post-conviction right to access the evidence he requests.” Mem. and Order at 5, ECF Docket No. 1224. Raniere now moves for reconsideration of the Court’s order.
Raniere’s motion for reconsideration fails to identify any “controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked—matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court.” Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). The burden is on Raniere to demonstrate that the Court “overlooked controlling decisions or material facts that were before it on the original motion and that might materially have influenced its earlier decision.” United States v. MorilloVidal, No. 10 CR. 222, 2011 WL 4072173, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted), aff’d, 547 F. App’x 29 (2d Cir. 2013). A party seeking reconsideration “may neither repeat arguments already briefed, considered and decided, nor advance new facts, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); see generally Local Civil Rule 6.3.
Raniere argues that the Court overlooked “two critical pieces of data,” which are “the government’s use of ‘secret evidence’ in current proceedings,” and his claim that the conclusions of Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) Senior Computer Scientist David Loveall II are “incorrect and unsubstantiated and the government’s representations regarding so-called corroborating trial evidence are insignificant and unsubstantial.” Mot. at 1-2. In doing so, Raniere “does not argue that the Court overlooked controlling precedent, but instead attempts to relitigate issues already presented to and decided by the Court.” United States v. Basciano, No. 05-CR-060 (NGG), 2009 WL 8673013, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 20, 2009) (denying motion for reconsideration).
First, Raniere’s complaints regarding his lack of access to so-called “secret” evidence are nonsensical and circular because that evidence is the subject of Raniere’s motion to compel. His motion cites only United States v. Abuhamra, 389 F.3d 309, 332 (2d Cir. 2004), which concerns the consideration of evidence submitted ex parte and in camera in the context of bail determinations and provides no support for Raniere’s motion. Second, Raniere challenges the findings of FBI Senior Computer Scientist Loveall, recycling the same arguments he made in his motion to compel. For example, Raniere argues that the presence of additional files in one examiner’s forensic report of the camera card that did not appear in another examiner’s report indicates that the two reports were “different” and the card “tampered.” Mot. at 3. But as Loveall already explained in his declaration, which the Court considered before issuing its Order, both reports were created using different settings and configurations of the FBI forensic processing tool, which resulted in the generation of additional files in one report. Loveall Decl. ¶ 9, ECF Docket Entry No. 1213-3. Raniere also contends that the Court erred in finding that Raniere had access to the digital and forensic evidence prior to trial because “Raniere’s trial counsel had asked for, and been denied, a severance to examine the digital evidence” related to the child exploitation counts. Mot. at 3. This claim is utterly without merit. Raniere does not appear to dispute that government made all electronic evidence available to Raniere and a defense expert for inspection prior to trial and that Raniere was offered numerous opportunities to adjourn trial to allow him additional time to conduct a forensic review of the child pornography evidence. The fact that Raniere’s motion to sever was denied by the Court has no bearing whatsoever on the Court’s conclusion that Raniere had full access, before and during trial, to the digital evidence, and was afforded any additional time he might need to review the evidence.
Raniere also appends several exhibits and appendices containing new reports regarding the digital evidence. Even if these exhibits were properly considered as part of a motion for reconsideration, they do not establish Raniere’s claim that the child pornography evidence was fabricated. As set forth in the government’s opposition, ECF Docket Entry No. 1213, it was undisputed at trial that the metadata associated with some of the digital evidence recovered in this case contained various anomalies, including, for example, a “creation date” in 2003, a “modified” date in 2005, and an “accessed” date in 2010. These anomalies are not surprising, given that the child pornography evidence was recovered from a backup folder on a hard drive that contained files from multiple computers, and some of the digital evidence appeared to have been accessed using software, including Adobe Photoshop. The digital evidence recovered in this case had remained in Raniere’s control for over a decade, between
2
2005 and 2018, before it was recovered by law enforcement. Therefore, although Raniere repeatedly uses the terms “planted,” “staged,” and “manipulated,” Raniere makes no claim regarding when the alleged “manipulation” of the child pornography evidence took place, and the Kiper Report states that it is “impossible” to do so—reinforcing the conclusion that they occurred while in Raniere’s possession. Kiper Report, ECF Docket Entry No. 1169-1 at 204. For the reasons set forth in the government’s opposition and the Court’s Memorandum and Order, Raniere’s claim that these anomalies in the child pornography evidence are attributable to law enforcement misconduct is baseless.1 As the Court has already determined, Raniere’s motion to compel “cites to no cases where a court has allowed post-conviction access to digital evidence to which a defendant could have had access to prior to trial and which he could have adequately reviewed with diligence.” Mem. and Order at 5. Raniere’s motion for reconsideration fails to point to any controlling law or material facts that could justify reconsideration of the Court’s decision, and must be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
BREON PEACE
United States Attorney
By: /s/ Tanya Hajjar
Assistant U.S. Attorney
(718) 254-7000
cc: Counsel of Record (by ECF and email)
____________________
1 The government is deeply troubled by Raniere’s decision to publicly file personal letters from Camila, the victim he began sexually exploiting when she was a 15- year-old child. Camila has filed a sworn declaration in this case stating that the child pornography exhibits introduced at trial were of her and were taken in 2005. ECF Docket Entry No. 1213-1 at ¶¶ 8-9. The declaration also describes Camila’s belief that she was dissuaded from contacting law enforcement prior to trial in an attempt to prevent her “from having an opportunity to be a witness and have a voice in Raniere’s criminal trial.” Id. at ¶ 3. The letters Raniere has now filed only underscore the nature and depth of his control over Camila, to which Camila referenced and detailed in her victim impact statement to the Court at sentencing. ECF Docket Entry No. 965-1.
3
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.416187/gov.uscourts.nyed.416187.1229.0.pdf
Allison’s sister, Robyn Mack, became a U.S. citizen on Sept. 29, 2023.
See photo with background.
Today, I am an American. US Department of Homeland Security.
My question is: Is Allison Mack a US citizen?
https://www.instagram.com/robyn.mack/p/CxwzobuMvsE/?hl=de&img_index=1
My question is: Is Allison Mack a US citizen?
toninatalie1017 Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/toninatalie1017/p/CqrESPNLcWF/?hl=de
When a book changes your life, you should share it.
I have listened to Believing Me three times, and I am sure I will do so again. I, too, have CPTSD and have seen multiple therapists. I have never had a shift like this. The ability to understand fawning gave my body a visceral reaction and stopped me in my tracks the next time it happened.
I now know it’s linked to long-term childhood grooming—a survival technique ingrained in me as a child that I carried into my adult life—allowing Keith Raniere, a predator and psychopath, to take advantage of me effortlessly along with Nancy Salzman, a woman who I thought was my friend and therapist, together they used my childhood trauma as a weapon.
It has taken years of therapy to try and undo what these two people did to me and many others. Anyone involved with nxivm or in a coercive relationship should read this book.
I now understand my need for perfection, sometimes working my body to a breaking point before stopping, and how that benefits abusers. We, the producers, are what abusers look for.
This book is more than a memoir; for many people like myself, it’s a roadmap to healing and the answers to many questions.
________________________________________________________________________
FHEHealth
FEBRUARY 22, 2022 BY KRISTINA ROBB-DOVER
Prolonged Trauma and C-PTSD: What You Need to Know
https://fherehab.com/learning/prolonged-trauma-and-c-ptsd/
The rise and fall of NXIVM: A social network analysis
Resource type
Thesis
Thesis type
(Thesis) M.A.
Date created
2023-07-27
Authors/Contributors
Author: Massingale, Kelley
Abstract
Once believed to be a self-help organization, NXIVM has impacted how we traditionally perceive new religious movements (NRMs), opening the dialogue to further explore the relationship between NRMs and criminal behavior. This study employs social network analysis to explore the evolution of criminal behavior, including within-group violence, that occurred over NXIVM’s life course. Network data was obtained from autobiographical and biographical data, court documents, and secondary sources, and triangulated for validity and reliability. The current study explores the role turning points play on the movement’s trajectory, measuring network cohesion and actor centrality across NXIVM’s Onset, Persistence, and Escalation and Desistance. Results showed that each turning point elicited significant change in the network, decreasing NXIVM’s overall density and cohesion. The study also examines the evolution of criminal behavior in the network by testing the relationship between offending, victimization, (e.g., enslavement, sexual assault, exploitation, etc.) and centrality. Bivariate results showed that influential actors—specifically women—in the network were and continued to be, victimized whilst victimizing fellow members. Select women took an active role in the exploitation and victimization of others, while being victimized themselves. As of current, no studies have used social network analysis to study new religious movements. Pursuing network studies would be invaluable for understanding the evolution of criminal behavior and group persistence in NRMs.
https://summit.sfu.ca/item/36595
________________________________________________________________________
Extent
96 pages.
Keywords
Identifier
etd22686
Copyright statement
Copyright is held by the author(s).
Permissions
This thesis may be printed or downloaded for non-commercial research and scholarly purposes.
Supervisor or Senior Supervisor
Thesis advisor: Frank, Richard
Language
English
Member of collection
Criminology Theses
https://summit.sfu.ca/_flysystem/fedora/2023-09/etd22686.pdf
________________________________________________________________________
This comment comes from someone who met Keith Raniere at RPI in 1978 when he was taking the same course:
NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere Speaks Out From Prison Ahead Of Sentencing | NBC Nightly News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmEOPOwZ_Ys
@weiner1961
2 years ago
I was in a graduate mathematics course with him at RPI in Fall 1978 (Real Analysis, in case you wondered). Yes, he was smart, but not nearly as smart as he thought (and acted like) he was. But he certainly attracted women there, some of whom I knew quite well as friends. He went out of his way to make other people feel stupid or small whenever he could, when he was not charming you with his charisma…So, the most famous person I ever knew personally in my entire life ends up being this guy, go figure…
The WORST Cult You Never Heard Of NXIVM Of Keith Raniere and Nancy Salzman
Unveiling Beliefs
2,125 views 12/07/2023
https://youtu.be/RRhyr-Fhcdg
INVESTOR TIMES
Bronfman Sisters Net Worth
IT by INVESTOR TIMES in People
Title: Exploring the Bronfman Sisters’ Net Worth: 7 Fascinating Facts Revealed (2023)
[ … ]
1. The Bronfman Sisters’ Net Worth:
As of 2023, the Bronfman sisters, Clare and Sara, boast a combined estimated net worth of approximately $2.6 billion. While Sara Bronfman holds a substantial portion of this wealth, Clare Bronfman’s net worth has been impacted by legal proceedings related to her involvement in the NXIVM cult.
[ … ]
https://investortimes.com/bronfman-sisters-net-worth/
I want this product but can I and the average buyer afford it? This is the important question. A product may be fantastic but if no one can afford it it for the elite only. Keith Raniere should make his principles available for everyone.
If you have to ask you can’t afford it chump
What is on the Christmas menu at the Tucson prison? Is it the same food every year?
They get extra bread and water on the holidays.
There’s no Christmas spirit if that’s true.
Will Fiji Water or Beverly Hills 9OH2O be served in prison at Christmas?
Lots and lots of cock. Cock all around!
Save some for Luthmann!
Pointer.
Local journalists uncovered sex cult
Nxivm years before Hollywood paid
attention
https://www.poynter.org/the-sex-cult-next-door/
PRESIDING JUDGE ELIZABETH BYRNE HOGAN WINS JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE AWARD
September 12, 2023
https://stlcitycircuitcourt.com/News_Blog/?p=535
https://stlcitycircuitcourt.com/News_Blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Presiding-Judge-Elizabeth-Byrne-Hogan.jpg
St. Louis Circuit Court
2322-CC09423 – MARC BRANDON ELLIOT V HBO HOME ENTERTAINMENT ET AL (E-CASE)
ELLIOT, MARC BRANDAN – Plaintiff Acting Pro Se
Address: 5655 PERSHING AVE APT 529 ST LOUIS, MO 63112
HBO HOME ENTERTAINMENT CORP – Defendant
Address: THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY 1209 ORANGE ST WILMINGTON, DE 19801
NOJAIME, JEHANE – Defendant
Address: 14 E 4TH ST UNIT 1107 NEW YORK, NY 10002
AMER, KARIM – Defendant
Address: 14 E 4TH ST UNIT 1107 NEW YORK, NY 10002
THE OTHRS LLC – Defendant
Address: 201 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE SUITE 1205 C/O LEE J OSIASON CORAL GABLES, FL 33134
THE OTHRS LICENSING CORP – Defendant
Address: 201 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE SUITE 1205 C/O LEE J OSIASON CORAL GABLES, FL 33134
THE SQUARE LLC – Defendant
Address: LISA WISLEY, RAGT 160 VAN BRUNT ST THIRD FL BROOKLYN, NY 11231
CONSTANTINO, ISABELLA – Defendant
Address: 625 LAFAYETTE AVENUE BUFFALO, NY 14222
JOHN DOES 1-10 – Defendant
12/04/2023Return Service – Other
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4131; Served To – THE SQUARE LLC; Server – ; Served Date – 04-DEC-23; Served Time – 00:00:00; Service Type – Special Process Server; Reason Description – OtherSummons Returned Non-Est
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4128; Served To – AMER, KARIM; Server – ; Served Date – 04-DEC-23; Served Time – 00:00:00; Service Type – Special Process Server; Reason Description – Non-estSummons Returned Non-Est
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4127; Served To – NOJAIME, JEHANE; Server – ; Served Date – 04-DEC-23; Served Time – 00:00:00; Service Type – Special Process Server; Reason Description – Non-estSummons Personally Served
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4132; Served To – CONSTANTINO, ISABELLA; Server – ; Served Date – 04-DEC-23; Served Time – 00:00:00; Service Type – Special Process Server; Reason Description – ServedAffidavit Special Process Serv
affidavitAffidavit Special Process Serv
affidavitAffidavit Special Process Serv
affidavitAffidavit Special Process Serv
affidavit12/01/2023Alias Summons Issued
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4507, for THE SQUARE LLC.Alias Summons Issued
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4506, for AMER, KARIM.Alias Summons Issued
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4505, for NOJAIME, JEHANE.Request Filed
REQUEST FOR ALIAS SUMMONS ON DEFENDANTS JEHANE NOJAIME, KARIM AMER, AND THE SQUARE LLC
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOT11/29/2023Affidavit Filed
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE RETURN ON ISABELLA CONSTANTINO
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOTAffidavit Filed
AFFIDAVIT OF NON SERVICE/ BAD ADDRESS ON DEFENDANT JEHANE NOJAIM
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOTAffidavit Filed
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT THE SQUARE LLC
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOTAffidavit Filed
AFFIDAVIT OF NON SERVICE RETURN ON DEFENDANT KARIM AMER
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOT11/27/2023Corporation Served
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4129; Served To – THE OTHRS LLC; Server – ; Served Date – 27-NOV-23; Served Time – 00:00:00; Service Type – Other; Reason Description – ServedCorporation Served
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4130; Served To – THE OTHRS LICENSING CORP; Server – ; Served Date – 27-NOV-23; Served Time – 00:00:00; Service Type – Other; Reason Description – ServedNotice of Service
2322-CC09423Notice of Service
notice of service11/17/2023Summons Personally Served
Document ID – 23-SMOS-4126; Served To – HBO HOME ENTERTAINMENT CORP; Server – ; Served Date – 15-NOV-23; Served Time – 14:45:00; Service Type – Special Process Server; Reason Description – Served; Service Text – ROBIN HUTT BANKS MANAGING AGENT11/08/2023Jury Trial Scheduled
Scheduled For: 04/22/2024; 9:00 AM; ELIZABETH BYRNE HOGAN; City of St. Louis11/02/2023Correspondence Filed
A LETTER MAILED TO PLAINTIFF WITH 2 COPIES OF SUMMONS AND A COPY OF PETITION TO SEND TO NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DE, THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, NY, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL, BROOKLYN COUNTY, NY, AND ERIE COUNTY, NY FOR SERVICE ON DEFENDANTSSumm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4132, for CONSTANTINO, ISABELLA.Summ Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4131, for THE SQUARE LLC.Summ Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4130, for THE OTHRS LICENSING CORP.Summ Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4129, for THE OTHRS LLC.Summ Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4128, for AMER, KARIM.Summ Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4127, for NOJAIME, JEHANE.Summ Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S
Document ID: 23-SMOS-4126, for HBO HOME ENTERTAINMENT CORP.Judge/Clerk – Note
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOES 1-10 DUE TO NO ADDRESS GIVEN ON CIVIL FILING INFORMATION SHEET FOR SERVICE10/31/2023Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOTPet Filed in Circuit Ct
Filed By: MARC BRANDAN ELLIOTJudge Assigned
Judge/Commissioner Assigned
HOGAN, ELIZABETH BYRNE
Case Type: CC Other Tort
Party Type: Plaintiff Acting Pro Se
County: City of St. Louis
Circuit: Circuit 22
Address On File: ST LOUIS MO
Style of Case: MARC BRANDON ELLIOT V HBO HOME ENTERTAINMENT ET AL
Case Number: 2322-CC09423
Filing Date: 10/31/2023
Location: City of St. Louis
NXIVM from the Courtroom: What “The Vow” Won’t Tell You.
Roberta Glass True Crime Report
I saw this “invention” a while back. It cracked me up then as well!
As I’ve stared before, this is something a five old could have come up with. It seems so silly. He basically wants to attach two existing products. I’m sure the increase/decrease based on heart rate is slightly tricky to program, but not really. Definitely something an intermediate developer could engineer in a short period of time.
I cannot believe his followers believe(d) he was/is “the smartest man in the world”.
Dead-enders/DOS, what is your opinion of this patent entry? Do you not think “the smartest man in the world” would try to patent something a little more innovative than this?
I remember seeing a video where he was being introduced and part of the introduction was “Mr. Raniere is a holder of dozens of patents…” . Imagine following and finding out, things like this are his patents.
Some believed he had supernatural powers. Again, how would such a creative person, be so uncreative and “invent” such stupid, useless shit?
Danielle Roberts, please follow up with your current feeling about Squarefoot. You seem to be the most hardened true believer.
His stupidity knows no bounds and is record-breaking. His stupidity is as infinite as the universe. Will Keith finally get into the Guinness Book of Records again? But this time for good. Is stupidity even listed as a category in the record book?
This invention works. I am presently worker with V to bring this to the public. It is still a bit pricey because the parts are expensive.
How much does it cost ?
Would you like to buy this product? Is it something you need? Keith must be a genius if he found and appealed to a potentially large buyer market with his innovative invention. His product seems to have great potential if the first people are seriously inquiring about the price.
Damn those expensive parts!
To get close to Keith Raniere, you only have to commit a federal offense. After being found guilty, let the court know, through your own legal counsel, that you’d like to serve your sentence at USP Tucson. You will have come very close to your idol Keith Raniere if this wish is granted. Try it out! It will work.
There’s a race of allien women Abducting men with large penises, but don’t worry, you readers are safe. I just wanted to let you know this space ship is amazing and I won’t be seeing you for a while 😉
My wife says I am “hung like an elevator button”
How gracious of her, what does she use to keep the finger prints cleaned of?
“My wife(mom) says I am “hung like an elevator button.”
The lady running the wrong way on the treadmill made me laugh out loud.
Didn’t know that Vanguard was a fan of The Goons!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RJOEvt_goIc
The treadmill is a special design by Keith’s brilliant mind. It is designed to make his stupid followers fall on their faces faster. After all, his followers were supposed to suffer. And suffering makes you strong. These stupid women believe that.
His arrogance knows no bounds.