In an unexpected turn to the widely publicized story surrounding Catherine Kassenoff’s suicide, her husband, Allan A. Kassenoff, has taken legal action against TikTok star Robert Harvey.
Kassenoff alleges that Harvey’s videos were instrumental in his dismissal from a high-paying position as a patent lawyer.
The lawsuit offers the public insight into Allan’s perspective on this widely discussed story, previously centered on a woman who, allegedly driven to despair by numerous setbacks in family court and severed ties with her three children, took her own life.
Allan’s narrative, as detailed in the complaint, starts with the events that led to the adoption of their first child:
Allan and Catherine married on November 13, 2006. Shortly after marrying, Catherine insisted on starting in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments without attempting natural conception.
Following unsuccessful IVF treatments, on July 15, 2009, they adopted A.K. in Tampa, Florida. They returned to New York with the child a month later.
Allan and Catherine, both lawyers, worked during the day. They hired Kimberly Hull as a nanny to care for A.K.
When AK was four weeks old, Catherine instructed Hull to keep A.K. up all day so she would sleep through the night and not disturb Catherine’s nighttime rest.
Despite Hull’s best efforts, the baby fell asleep during the day.
Catherine instructed the nanny to “drip water on her face” to keep A.K. awake.
One night, Allan came home to find Hull crying in the kitchen. He told her not to dribble water on her face but let her nap as needed. But Hull was terrified of Catherine, so Allan went to her. She demanded that since Allan stopped the H2O efforts to keep A.K. awake, Allan would have to get up during the night when A.K. woke up.
Allan agreed, explaining to Catherine that “that is what parents of newborns do.”
Within months of adopting A.K., Catherine wanted to start IVF again. Allan thought they should wait, given that their marriage had become contentious. Catherine said she would proceed without Allan, using a “donor’s” sperm. Allan relented.
After several IVF attempts, C.K. was born in February 2011.
Shortly after C.K. was born, Catherine began another IVF cycle. J.K. was born in August 2013.
When AK was four, Catherine informed her she was adopted.
Allan gave instances in his complaint of how Catherine treated A.K. (her adopted child) differently than C.K. and J.K. (her biological children).
For example, Catherine preferred to eat dinner only with C.K. and J.K. in the kitchen, while A.K. was ordered to eat dinner alone in her room.
Catherine would watch T.V. and sleep with C.K. and J.K., in the master bedroom while excluding A.K., who slept alone in her own room. Catherine however would allow A.K. to enter the master bedroom where Catherine and her two biological children slept, he following day to make the bed.
Mylene Gry was the Kassenoffs’ nanny for 13 months in 2015-2016. She submitted an affidavit (dated June 4, 2019) to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, as part of the divorce proceedings.
Gry wrote:
- I witnessed Catherine punish [A.K.] by removing toys and books from her room….
- I also witnessed Catherine remove [A.K.’s] fancy bed from her room and … only permit her to sleep on a mattress on the floor. . ..
- I witnessed Catherine scream at [A.K.] for almost 10 minutes after she misbehaved. She said things such as ‘you will never have friends,’ and ‘you’ll never succeed in life or get married and have your own kids.’… Catherine insisted that I stay and watch.
- Catherine refused to allow [A.K.] to have playdates with other kids. Since I picked up [A.K.] from school, I was often asked by other moms to coordinate a playdate – I would always ask Catherine, and she would make up excuses.
- [A.K.] would ask for playdates, and Catherine would tell her, ‘no one has asked for playdates because you have no friends.’…
- Catherine would return [from] work… she would insist that [A.K.] go to her room or … do chores. The other children were never asked to do chores.
- When Catherine would return [from] work, I noticed [A.K.] become agitated and scared. … [W]hen she would see her car pull up, she would stand up if she was relaxing and say ‘mommy, do you need me to do anything?’
- Catherine never allowed [A.K.] to eat the same food as the other kids – [A.K.] was never allowed to have chocolate or treats, or even milk. The other kids were regularly allowed to eat whatever they wanted….
In March 2018, an au pair, Laura, whom the Kassenoffs employed after Gry, through the Cultural Care agency, made a Facebook post about Catherine.
Laura wrote: ‘Careful to all au-pairs who are looking for a family, I won’t advise you to work for the Kassenoff family, the mother is a psychopath…. They have been kicked out of every agency except ours. I don’t know if with my leaving them, whether they were kicked out of Cultural Care as well.'”
In October 2016, the Kassenoffs hired Celine Dublanchet as a nanny. On March 7, 2020, Dublanchet submitted a declaration to the court-appointed forensic custody evaluator, Marc Abrams, in the divorce case.
Dublanchet is a native of France, and her manner of writing English is not always grammatically correct:
Dublanchet wrote, “I noticed how Catherine treated [A.K.]. I was truly shocked. I know [A.K.] could lie, and it was a really problem. But I think, her problem was not treated in the right way. When my friends and my family asked me how things were going, the better way to describe the situation in which I was living was the story of Cinderella.
[A.K.] was Cinderella, her two sisters Anastasia and Drizella, and Catherine the horrible stepmother.
[C.K.] and [J.K.] were not mean as much as in the Disney story but Catherine controlled their relationship of the three sisters.
Most of the time [A.K.] was ‘stealing’ food in the closet, because she was ANGRY. At the breakfast, or even dinner [A.K.] could not eat as much as she need. She was scared to ask her to have food again, because she knew that Catherine was going to say NO or yell at her if she takes more food (it happened at the breakfast).
Her sisters could eat whatever they wanted, even other food that Catherine brought home for them. But [A.K.] could not have it. . . . [A.K.] was simply scared of Catherine. She was also lying because she was scared to say the truth.
Every time, Catherine took something from her.
[A.K.] was sleeping on a mattress on the FLOOR – she did not have a BED! And her sisters were sleeping in the bed of the mother, [A.K.] was always sleeping apart, she could not watch T.V. with [C.K.] and [J.K.] at night. She spent most of her time alone in her bedroom. She only could read (… before her mother took away her books). Once, she had nothing in her bedroom her dresses were tak[en] away, her books, toys…
With months, the situation got worst. Punitions were getting worst. I was so shocked, and I felt so powerless….
While we were taking snacks, Catherine found again that [A.K.] lied… She put [A.K.] in the basement, [A.K.] wore only a pajama. It was during the winter. And downstairs, it was REALLY cold.
I had to take [C.K.] for her French class, when I left, I looked at the door of the basement, Catherine went upstairs with [J.K.] and left [A.K.] alone and in a really cold place. I felt my heart broken and powerless. When I came back later, I learned she stayed 2 hours…. This situation happened twice.
Another day, at night, Catherine asked [A.K.] to ‘clean up’ the garden in the dark. It was on very low temperature period. She was also only on a pajama…
[A.K.] always wanted the attention and love from Catherine, she always shared her school but Catherine did not listen to her (Once, in the kitchen [A.K.] was speaking to Catherine, and she told me she did not listen to [A.K.] – It was always like that.
[A.K.] always asked if Catherine wanted some help to do anything, it was a way to show her, she was there, to get attention and love. While her sisters were getting spoiled, [A.K.] was doing everything to ‘exist’ to her mother’s eyes. This situation was really hard to live. . . .
Allan argued often with Catherine. Sometimes she wanted to have his support about [A.K.’s] lies, or sometimes for her, everything he did was wrong. He could be very angry because she really pushed him in his emotions, and she wanted the girls to see how [their] father could be so angry, she did it on purpose, to have the children on her side. . . . But he was never violent with the girls.”
To round out Allan’s version of Catherine, according to Allan:
- Catherine cut A.K.’s long hair really short as punishment. Allan told Catherine that cutting a child’s hair like that was a form of child abuse.
- Catherine told A.K. that she was not really part of the family.
- She allowed C.K. and J.K. to tell A.K. that she wasn’t their real sister and to treat A.K. like she didn’t belong
- She would tell A.K. that she would “send her back to Florida,” which is where A.K. was adopted from;
- When A.K. was 7 or 8 years old, Catherine made her wear a diaper to school as a punishment
- Catherine made A.K. sleep in the basement as a punishment when Allan traveled out of town for work
- Catherine would wake A.K. up in the middle of the night, demanding that A.K. make her a vodka with grapefruit juice.
- Catherine once got so angry she threw the vodka with grapefruit juice at her. The glass shattered and cut A.K.
- Catherine pushed A.K. into a radiator, causing burns on her body.
Catherine caught in a reflection taking a video of Allan getting angry.
Catherine filmed by Allan getting angry at A.K. over whether she ate a chocolate bar.
In addition to her treatment of A.K., Allan alleges that Catherine abused him mentally and emotionally and, on occasion, acted violently. In his complaint, Allan alleges that Catherine punched him in the face in May 2016. He included a picture of himself taken the next day.
From his complaint, Allan emerges as a husband who fights for custody to protect A.K. from Catherine’s abuse.
Catherine, who committed suicide, informing her children of her death through a public Facebook posting while bequeathing to them a dozen damaging videos of their father getting angry.
In the next post in this series, we will examine Allan’s version of why he filed for divorce and how he wound up with sole custody of the children.
Catherine, who claimed she had terminal cancer, a claim that may have been false, said Allan used his wealth and power to cheat her out of custody.
FR has a few questions at this point:
- If Catherine loved her children, why destroy the father’s reputation since he is the only one left to care for them?
- Are the nannies telling the truth?
- Was Catherine a mentally ill mother who abused her adopted daughter?
- Was Allan the girl’s savior?
- Is this a case of DARVO and who is who?
- Was Catherine’s dramatic departure not meant to help anybody but to destroy her kids’ father?
- Or was she a benighted victim who went to her grave – at an assisted suicide clinic in Switzerland – saddened and led gently to a hoped-for better place where good mothers are honored, yet not before she revealed what a bad man her husband was?
These are questions that may never be answered. At the very least, in the interest of fairness, they ought to be posed because the father now alone remains to support his children.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Records Reveal Suspicious Timing Surrounding Divorce Attorney Deathhttps://www.davisvanguard.org/2023/11/records-reveal-suspicious-timing-surrounding-divorce-attorney-death/
Still no death certificate.
Alan prays that if he just keeps playing along with her Swiss death spa demise that it will keep the abusive witch gone for as long as possible. Going along with Cathy playing possum seems to be the strategy of all the people who had to suffer Cathy being in their lives. If they call it out they risk having to deal with her again and absolutely nobody wants that, not even her mother or brothers.
This Catherine sounds like some kind of malicious unhinged demoness !
That’s what Alen would like you to believe.
No, believe people when they tell you who they are.
Since you claim to have not read the complaint how would you know its without merit and based on a power struggle?! Robbie Harvey instructed his followers to go after Allan by contacting his job and subsequently his clients in an effort to get him fired. Harvey then tweeted with great pride that he successfully accomplished his goal. Harvey also claimed everything to be “fact” even though there was enough publicly available evidence to prove that Catherine posted very calculated filings and negated the majority of filings that were damaging to her and much of what Harvey said was false (eg Allan “paid off” everyone).
Read the complaint before opining on its merits.
https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/2023-09-19-Dkt-7-Amended-Complaint.pdf?token=AWwxdVH8cEGNl0id6zMYOF1b1tWOq2-au5JyoJMpe0f-vDKsU2cS0V8G_6sBDqQ4TMXSlc5ByKyAjU7_DZnibHZnTEEAvk2JaAs389s1qnyWhA0GylcFn_QQFs5wAy971B2hPlIPEmVIQYlOnFu_KGpriieaJfzZLjhLCP-GJ59wK4GX0tTMsyM-n79S7HwceYvcvfRZ9KCpvNEXzahJAEd0JHprZD1_f2gwZbDZ9SUWw3rI6AkD-pxGX0zTrypugJOMmdWOu41YJ2sSiNhf3QD4
The link does not even work. Sad to see Frank report can so easily be paid off. Lost all respect for you that you post such horse crap all to try save face of an abuser when the other person cannot refute. Catherine left a drop box behind with actual court files, videos and evidence, so he’s butt hurt he was exposed in the raw. Guess it is true all you narc abusers stand together.
As someone who believes that our first concern should be the children’s welfare, I don’t blame FR for presenting whatever evidence, allegations, or facts are available — rather than simply picking one parents’ side or another. However, let’s not forget that this is no longer an issue simply between Allan and Catherine: once Allan chose to pursue Robbie Harvey with a defamation lawsuit, the net has been cast wider and Allan’s behavior, too, needs to be subject to closer scrutiny. Robbie Harvey was not privy to accounts that Allan himself released only after his termination from Greenberg Traurig, such as suggestions from the babysitters that Catherine sometimes acted inappropriately when parenting AK. One can’t blame Robbie Harvey from being critical of Allan based on what he had seen at the time. Nor was it wrong for him to post about the Kassenoffs in the first place; as the continued coverage here and elsewhere shows, this is a case which people are interested in.
Irregardless of Catherine’s behavior, reasonable people would say that Allan also deserves to be condemned for at least some of his decisions. Grant for argument’s sake that both Allan and Catherine regressed into an old-school mentality — they acted more like alpha wannabees in a Chimp troop than like wolves carrying food for their pups. How did the courts help with that? They didn’t intervene benevolently to steer Allan and Catherine toward a lupine ideal. They ended up weaponizing Catherine’s episodic transgressions (but not Allan’s) in a scorched-earth campaign against her. Comments to effect that Catherine was “hunted” by the courts might sound melodramatic, but there’s a grain of truth to them. McKay’s evaluation that Catherine “prioritized her needs over the children’s” seems credible based on evidence, but reasonable people can’t ignore legitimate doubts about the experts’ and court’s impartiality. Whether or not doing so was really necessary to “protect” the children, Allan and the courts used financial and legal tactics to wage a protracted battle against Catherine, and that precipitated emotional trauma which probably accelerated the decline of the Kassenoff marriage and household.
It’s one thing for the general public to criticize Catherine for falling short of theoretical ideals, but courts need to deal in reality as well as ideality, and prosecuting someone for “non” ideality is only fair if it is, well, fair, as in balanced — meted equally to both parents.
Here’s something that bothers me: FR indicates that Allan made ~800K as a patent attorney, which corroborates with other reporting. Now, an engineer or academic scientist would make, what, not much more than 6 figures, if that? I get that you need special training for Allan’s line of work, but how could a lawyer protecting against patent infringements earn 8 times the salary of the people who develop patentable technology in the first place? It certainly seems like money has corrupted the family courts, and Allan was able to win because he outspent Catherine. If salaries were more in line with actual expertise, maybe he would have had to reach a fairer settlement years ago.
When I criticize things like bizarre compensation imbalances people tend to counter that income inequality is inevitable under “Capitalism”. But here, what businesses did Allan or Catherine create? If anything, patents are monopolistic, with companies claiming ownership of technologies or science that synthesize prior research from many different sources. Granting large businesses the means to drive out their smaller peers isn’t really Capitalistic; it doesn’t foster innovation and entrepreneurship. If anything it elevates a small cohort of companies (and those who control them) into something like oligarchs or (figuratively speaking) warlords, creating an anti-market society akin to Russia, China, or Afghanistan more than the EU or the US/Anglosphere. It’s not a power we should be encouraging in democracies that value free, fair, creative, and (admittedly more controversially) egalitarian markets.
I think a small-scale version of this dynamic is exemplified by Allan’s lawsuit against Robbie Harvey. Here’s the big shot who worked for Samsung and Greenberg Traurig coming after some random dude on tiktok. Somebody said something that made him look bad, so it’s time for them to give him thousands of dollars! Allan’s treating Robbie Harvey with the same demeanor as Catherine had when she yelled about the chocolate bar, only writ large — not about being punished for 1 night; it’s about trying to shut down Robbie Harvey’s business entirely. (Granted, the latter is an adult; it may be inappropriate to compare that case to treatment of a child, unless we note that badgering a defenseless pre-teen should be considered more emotionally traumatic — which I just did).
Allan’s lawsuit reveals a vengeful and self-absorbed personality that doesn’t jive with the image of a caring and nurturant father that his defenders want to create. Even if hagiographic portrayals of Catherine are fictions in their own right, the focus is on Allan more because he was awarded sole custody — and, besides, he’s the one who’s still alive.
Clearly you have no idea what the lawsuit is about and clearly you haven’t read it. Regarding the lawsuit, Allan is not suing Robbie Harvey bc he simply “reported” on Catherine’s choice to unalive herself as one last act of vengeance against Allan and the girls, Robbie by his own words stated “these are the fact” when indeed they weren’t. Robbie decided to narrate not knowing the full story and call Allan an abuser when he wasn’t. He was a guy being tormented by Catherine as she recorded when he would respond. Abusers don’t run away, they get in your face (kind of like Catherine with her camera in his face). You say Robbie wasn’t privy to certain information. That’s correct and Allan has and still maintains his silence bc he’s still trying to protect his kids. What sane parent would put this out there in the public domain for scrutiny?! What sane parent would encourage the demise of the sole remaining parent to lose his job and not be able to care for the children, your own children?! Robbie if he were a true journalist would’ve known there’s more to this story and before “reporting” things as fact actually looked it up. He shouldn’t have encouraged his minions to go after Allan’s job. Free speech is a right but it’s also a weapon and if you want to play with fire you may get burned yourself. The suit isn’t denying Robbie his right to free speech it’s denying him the the right to blatantly defame a man and go after his job and therefore cause emotional distress to him and more importantly the 3 girls who have been in his care for over 3 years.
Now regarding who outspent who. Another thing you know nothing about. Catherine outspent Allan in court. The whole is cheaper than its parts. Catherine had multiple lawyers on her payroll at once while Allan only had Gus. If she was truly destitute or concerned about money you do what most of us and Allan did you hire one lawyer to handle it all. Not our Catherine. She had a sense of entitlement that rivaled no one and had no shame. She had a finance lawyer, she had a contempt lawyer, she had a lawyer to sue Gus and Allan. You know what she didn’t hire? A custody lawyer. There she was pro se. If you clearly can afford multiple lawyers why wouldn’t you hire the most experience lawyer to help you gain custody of your kids. Oh, bc Catherine as a federal prosecutor with her connections as she had more than allan did in this state court, felt she could do a better job. When your access kept getting more limited for bad behavior and the judge gave you over $300k for the sole purpose of hiring a custody lawyer wouldn’t you hire one if you’re so concerned for the safety of your girls and you live and miss them so much?!
I’m calling bullshit because you don’t know the whole story and you know what? We don’t know yours and we shouldn’t and you shouldn’t know mine and none of us should know about the Kassenoff’s as previously stated there’s over 3000 filings in this case Robbie Harvey if he was a journalist or a responsible citizen with over 4M followed should’ve been more careful in his reporting or accounting of these u proven claims against Allan Kassenoff
Sorry, discussions about the case shouldn’t simply amount to one parent’s “side” over another. Perhaps my language that Allan “outspent” Catherine was off-key for that reason. There are many cases where fathers *do* leverage greater financial resources to win sole custody. Advocates for family court reform have identified details in this case which resemble larger patterns, and neutral observers have in many cases argued that courts showed improper deference to fathers, overlooking suggestions that fathers themselves abused or mistreated the children. FR’s recent overviews of Parental Alienation reflect that activism; the whole Parental Alienation trope has been seized to punish parents (mostly mothers, apparently) merely for expressing concerns about the other parent’s behavior (even when it’s backed by social workers, medical professionals, etc.). Accusations do not automatically imply guilt, to be sure, and sometimes people might deliberately or unconsciously exaggerate or misinterpret behaviors. But I think’s its almost certain that some mothers are stressed out because they fear — based on prior history in their cases — that they will be subject to retaliation even for just suggesting that their ex-partners are acting inappropriately with the children.
The distinction between innocent and abusive behavior depends a lot on context, and it’s certainly possible that divorce’s adversarial nature predisposes parents to perceive or amplify malicious intent. But that cuts both ways; the current reporting alleges incidents where Catherine basically assaulted AK, but similar stories have been told about Allan. They might all be true, or all be exaggerations; pressing someone against a radiator could be accidental, etc. Video evidence demonstrates that both parents lost their temper, and I think it’s fine for us as the outside public to describe how seeing such scenes make us angry on the children’s behalf.
What bothers me is how Allan (plus even Catherine’s supporters, to an extent) has decided to respond to how his usually-private family life has come into the public eye. I *have* read some of Allan’s claims against Robbie Harvey explaining the lawsuit (not able to access actual documents from KASSENOFF et al v. HARVEY, AFAICT sites like law360 need a paid subscription) and from what at least I *can* find there’s nothing that seems to legitimate legal action. I think it’s fair for Allan to share his side of the story, and sites like FR have done a good job of balanced reporting — pairing critical stories about Allan with posts like this one that are not favorable to Catherine.
It would probably be appropriate for Robbie Harvey to make an updated video or include links somewhere that would present a more nuanced review of the Kassenoff case than he had initially. But Allan has gone beyond just giving his version of events; he seems intent on turning all interactions into a power struggle, to treat everyone involved in this case as a potential rival to be defeated. Both of the Kassenoffs seem to have a propensity to escalate interactions into conflicts, where they appear to channel some sort of inner aggression as if they want to just start punching people but instead yell, or shove, or sue… It certainly feels like the defamation suit just perpetuates this combative paradigm.
WELL DONE! Thank you for responding to the comment using the best tools of all: rationality and facts!
A few of Kathleen McKay reviews from 2018-2023:
Tgis is the evaluator who never did anything thoroughly in the best interest of any child, only in the best $$$; Especially on Catherine’s case, She just loved seeing that money come in from Allan into her bank account.
(1).
“Dr. McKay is arrogant is and markedly inappropriate. She declared a child was lying based on the denial of a charming mother (whose psychological testing showed serious anger problems) although multiple therapists, a court appointed social worker, siblings and the judge all found the child credible. The problem goes well beyond her arrogance and ignoring the mass of data and opinion of everyone else. She was invalidating to the child leaving the child an emotional wreck after the session.
2
April 30, 2018”.
(2).
“AVOID HER!
SHE SHOULD HAVE HER LICENSE REMOVED
SHE GATHERS HER INFORMATION WITHOUT EVIDENCE AND DOCUMENTATIONS.
SHE BASES IT ON HEARSAY .
10
January 6, 2020”.
(3).
“Avoid this doctor unless you want conflict. I had to pay to get another evaluation as this doctor is basically owned by the county, as they refer work to her
7
July 2, 2018”.
(4).
“Very dishonest doctor. Had communications with opposing social worker and attorney without permission. Opposing social worker admitted recently (in court) that Dr. Mckay has a near exclusive referral and routinely adjusts her evaluations to meet their requests.
Wish I knew before I saw her.
8
May 26, 2018”.
(5).
Dr. Kathleen Mckay, she became the last neutral evaluator before Catherine Youssef Kassenoff ended her life with assisted suicide.
“After the Committee disqualified Dr. Abrams, the Court appointed Dr. Kathleen McKay for a second custody evaluation.
In the interim, Dr. Abrams’ recommendation of no unsupervised contact between Catherine and her children remained in effect.
Dr. McKay worked on her forensic evaluation for more than a year.
Dr. McKay saw Catherine with the oldest girl, Ally, but never had a parent-child visit with Catherine and her two younger children.
After several meetings with Catherine, Dr. McKay cut off communications with her, though she continued to see Allan for 17 appointments”.
Her license SHOULD BE REVOKED!
0
Telehealth
•
October 2, 2023
**GO READ THE 3 PAGES OF REVIEWS BY OTHER PARENTS WHOSE CHILDREN WERE HARMED BY THIS EVIL MONEY HUNGRY WITCH.**
Dr Mckay only made $20k on the Kassenoff’s and took over a year to investigate and write her report. Both parties paid EQUALLY for the report. As far as most forensics go this price was bargain basement given the amount of time she spent.
Can’t use the excuse she followed the money because besides both parties paying equally, she barely made any money off this family especially considering the amount of time she spent investigating which is a lot more than any of you did
I don’t give much credence to the reviews. I’m sure the reviews were written by disgruntled parents like Catherine who lost custody of their kids because of a less favorable report to them and are therefore seeking revenge. It’s the line of work where you know someone would not be happy or satisfied. And in this day and age writing a bad review is liken to revenge so I don’t believe that it holds much weight
FACTS:
Only someone scared of the truth would attack a dead woman’s evidence.
The fact that you continue to go the length that you are to talk so horribly about the mother of your children is all that everyone needs to show you are the abusive person in this family dynamic, Allan.
If you were telling the truth and such an amazing husband and such an amazing father you would not be going the lengths that you are and gathering up friends to try to discredit the woman that you loved and created children with…DARVO.
In fact if you were being honest you really would not need anybody to back you up you wouldn’t need people to try to discredit Catherine’s facts on this case…. Most people that are honest would just go forward with their lives and continue to be honest and just not even respond to the people that are calling you a liar and a horrible father….
The public did not make you lose your job your actions made you lose your job. I know that as an abusive man you find it hard to accept accountability for your own choices and behavior caught on camera that you were very well aware of, But I can assure you that this is a Public concern seeing that you are an attorney and you represent the public.
I am sure that companies and individuals would like to know the kind of person who is representing them in any legal manner….. And I am sure that most good decent people would not want a lawyer who verbally physically emotionally and financially abuses their wife and children.
The public has a right to information so that they can make the best decision possible for themselves….. Therefore the actions of attorneys who are abusive or doing criminal ask is a public concern and The public should be well aware of this information so that they can make a good honest decision for themselves.
When you are a representative of the law and representing the public in cases, Even representing companies, Upholding the best manners, ethical standards, and respect is required as a licensed attorney…. And those requirements don’t end or get put on pause when Allan enters his own home, and these requirements of Allan’s behaviors don’t then begin again when he walks out of his home, back into the public.
These requirements of his behavior and how he is to act towards others is a constant whether he is in his home or in the public or in a courtroom.
Nowhere in a attorney’s ethical requirements and standards does it say you are to act ethically in public but when you go home in your private house you are allowed to be right abuse and destroy your wife and children.
It doesn’t take being an investigator to actually read the truth and the facts that have been shared pertaining to this case.
Nor does it take much investigation to connect the dots on the players involved in this case and involved in other cases concerning children and mothers trying to protect their children from the abusive fathers.
If you actually read the reviews you would actually get the point of what the bad reviews are about, instead of just assuming…. It’s also mis-information to the public for YOU and anyone else to be commenting on things that you know nothing about, and are all based on your own personal assumption… Your personal assumptions do not reflect The best information that should be provided to the public.
And my investigative reporting is actually top-notch, you should ask a bunch of the newspapers that I have worked with, they will agree.
Oh and one last thing remember per our messaging a couple of weeks ago Allan, you continuing to try and discredit people by calling them “crazy”, Doesn’t work anymore…. It’s an old trick in the book that society really doesn’t about, nor care to listen to; unless youre an abusive man and need to use it as a abusing tactic to deflect from your own shit lonely miserable life. Which no big shocker, describes you ALLAN perfectly.
Number one facts don’t lie and neither do these reviews.
Dozens of people who had this woman involved in there personal court cases Explain there lived experience going back to 2018, well before Catherine was in court for her divorce with Allan which didn’t start until may of 2019.
So it is proof to show that collusion is a typical normal action done by this COURT APPOINTED AND ALLAN PAID ACTOR, and the reviews show the this bitch goes against good unabusive parents and pretty sure it shows she sides with whoever has the most money which is usually the abusive parent…
It also proves a pattern.
Now why would this court-appointed idiot make false allegations on transcript in people’s custody cases… Why would she support abusive parents to gain access to their children… Money.
By allowing the court case to continue in high conflict and remember it only takes 1 person to make it high conflict and it was not Catherine… She made a lot of money.
If the court case went smoothly and she was only on it for a brief period she would not have made as much money and Allen has a lot of money.
Remember he only claims to make a million dollars a year….. But we know that he makes a halibaa lot more. Don’t forget those PP loans that they never have to pay back that they can get in the millions….
But if you wanna go on hunches and guesses and think that that is fact….. Well I guess it’s pretty clear who would be the crazy one, and it’s not me.
Facts are facts, guessing is guessing….
But only someone with a sound mind would know that, unlike you.
Keep attacking a dead woman, and don’t lose your day job because you’re really good at trying to discredit a dead person with no voice, lol….
Facts have been proven showing that Allan is the ultimate worst kind of an abuser towards women and children.
If anything the videos should be used in the future for court training so that judges and attorneys and court-appointed actors/specialists can pick up on this behavior and recognize it and actually do their jobs efficiently and effectively.
I have a lot more FACTS to share about WHO ALLAN IS, so just sit tight buttercup.
Everything is being documented for the upcoming court case, and I can’t wait for it to be put in the public!!!
Omg this is straight out of Catherine’s Facebook group. I can even guess which person it is. This is full of non truths and no the public doesn’t have a right to delve into peoples personal lives. NO ABUSE ON THE PART OF ALLAN WAS EVER FOUNDED. NOT BY CPS (8 Reports) l, NOT BY THE POLICE, NOT BY SCHOOL OFFICIALS AND NIT BY A COURT OF LAW. There were findings of abuse by Catherine especially of her adopted daughter. That’s why she lost custody. And Robbie Harvey instructed his minions to go after the sole provider of these children. Again I keep asking and not one person has answered me yet. How does that help you he children. If you indeed believe Catherine loved her children, then how leaving their only means of support without a job to care for them help. It doesn’t. You’re a fraud just like Catherine who lost custody of her kids for one simple reason. You probably didn’t follow the court orders. I know many women who were in Catherine’s position and they regained custody. You know how? By following the fucking orders. It’s not a magic formula it’s simple
So a dead woman can unleash her lies and a living man can’t protect himself and his children against these lies?! You don’t know the facts and the fact is he has a right to protect his family from people like you who perpetuate the lies
Where is the death certificate?
“I have a lot more FACTS to share about WHO ALLAN IS, so just sit tight buttercup.” Who in the world write a sentence like that but a crazy person.
Frank-
In the future please use the following photo of Catherine Kassenoff:
https://msmagazine.com/2023/06/12/allan-kassenoff-resigns/
It’s five paragraphs down.
***
The public is drawn to the superficial.
A cute photo of Catherine should get more people interested in her story and thereby force the authorities to investigate things.
(As you know already know)
Thank you!
Great advice. Use a cute pic of her from her phony days of trapping Allan than a real photo that shows her truly narcissistic ugly self.
Great advice that way everyone can keep pretending that she was this beautiful loving mother instead of the monster she truly was
That’s how she fooled you
So many fool so many. Did anyone fool Catherine? (just wondering)
— Use a cute pic of her from her phony days of trapping Allan.
Boohoo! Get some balls! You were trapped, how so?
Alan, you’re not the victim you protest to be.
The only narcissist is you, Allan. Scouring the internet for a mere mention of your name. Schmuck!
BTW:
How’s the new shicksa?
***
Frank-
Here is another link to a beautiful pic of Catherine with her children:
https://www.liveaction.org/news/catherine-kassenoff-assisted-suicide-abuse/
You really have to go back in time to find a beautiful picture of Catherine as her ugliness on the inside started to show on her outside
What shiksa is he dating now?! He’s been with the same girlfriend for a long time and my understanding is she’s Jewish. I guess you’re another person that doesn’t know how to read
Allan-
I don’t need to read. I can see.
Wherever is the mezuzah?
Shiksa sticks!
This is the girlfriend. ” trapping Alen”. They are 24 hrs on line. What are the kids doing.
Alert. Alen’s friend Gabbi Hai is now attacking Karen Riorden on Facebook. Gabbi apparently has decided that the women coming forward are a threat to exposing the truth about family court. She is carrying a lynch mob touch to discredit women and gain a one sided narrative in the legal system. Who ever Gabbi is she is another one of Alen’s gang of bullies attacking women in Facebook. Wonder if Gabbi is a real person or Alen attacking the woman? The woman Alen found in Catherine’s Facebook page trying to change the legal system. Alen and his girlfriend I am sure have gone through the list. Alen doesn’t want the world to know what is happening in family court.
Catherine is dead. Alen and the girlfriend want the last word. These two people didn’t bring the best out in one another. Divorce court is a battle ground. Alen the bottom line is the hiring of hitmen and women to alter the outcome of cases. The devils play group. The sport of destroying lives for monitary gain. Child welfare is not the focus in family court system. House of smoke and mirrors. Bad judges, bad attorneys, bad psychologist. Bad news big business.
This is the reviews from 2018 to 2021 of Kathleen McKay Hartsdale who is responsible for removing Catherine from her children’s lives.
The reviews are not good and point out everything Catherine was saying about this BITCH lying on reports to the judge’s in favor of PSYCHOTIC ABUSIVE LYING MANIPULATIVE LITTLE BOY NAMED;
ALLAN KASSENOFF!!!!!
https://www.ratemds.com/doctor-ratings/2843759/Dr-KATHLEEN+E.-MCKAY-Hartsdale-NY.html/?page=2&fbclid=IwAR1KnoDaDhRvWOWK8Lk3doFuzdhmJqBVwNDewr6jVgs9Xp38Twd6Xv9EG0s
Like seriously?! Half those reviews are from crazies like you who never even used her but believed Catherine’s bullshit Dropbox. My guess is the other ones prior didn’t get a good report. Don’t lose your day job your investigative reporting skills are worse than Robbie Harvey’s and Frank’s
Keep guessing Allan or Suri lol,
That is why idiots LIKE YOU are DANGEROUS to women who are actually honest and actually care about prevention of abuse upon the most vulnerable; women and children.
Don’t quit your day job, Keep being an abuser supporter and a wolf leading the sheep.
Your decent at it.
How would you know if the reviews that go back years are from people that never used this b****?
You don’t.
Useless wasteless time responding to people who make comments on their own feelings….
Please shut up and take a seat in the back.
I looked at the reviews. Many are pre Catherine and they echo what she said.
Shocking. Reviews by disgruntled parents who probably deserved to lose custody
Obviously you did not read it because Catherine was not complaining about this person in 2018 2017 2016 which is what the years are on the complaints…. If anything Catherine was echoing there complaints because she has a long history of citing with a parent who has the most money like she did with Allan.
You lame nuts just coming on here and making comments without even actually reading, AKA making false statements is not gonna work
You are not gonna sit here and make false statements over and over again until people believe them to be true
Us mothers and good fathers are going to do everything to make sure that this case never dies we will always keep it in the spotlight.
And we will expose all the people who went along with Allen to destroy Catherine and steal those children.
Has anyone looked at the video of Alen calling his daughter a liar. ” I told you I would take you on a special trip if you were good” ” you couldn’t even make it through dinner” . Alen goes on to call her a liar. Alen. You had to pay for a family medical plan. It didn’t cost you anything to put Catherine on it. You are not a good man. Your wife is dead. You and your girlfriend are despite to spin it. Catherine may have had some issues. You tormented her and used the courts to play the victim.
If foot odor could take human form, it would look like Allan Kassenoff.
Or it would look like you ugly pilgrim. Allan is a great guy who unlike most men is trying to protect his children now from the likes of you and before that from their own mother who was worse than smelly foot odor.
And grow up these kind of statements are childish and show your immaturity
The statement Pilgrim made was quite witty. Your response shows a very mature retardation.
The man is always wrong. I know fro. Experience. Allan may have been a good father. But he weren’t a good husband or she never would have left him to go to Switzerland.
If he loved her more he would have win her heart. He broke her heart. I don’t know either of them. But I know men He Poe a lot sweet talked her right into the bedroom. I know how these men operate. Poor innocent woman. She was broken hearted. When he she got the great heaven above there are not many men. I hope she finds a good one.
Trust me that bitch ain’t going to heaven
Catherine deserved what she got. She abused Ally and she is a bitch on wheels or was. Who knows if her sorry ass is dead. If she is dead the happiest moment of her life was when she pushed tue button on the poison because when she did it she was thinking I just damned Allan. That’s all she cared about.
Tragic and true. Spite seems to have been the driving force behind this tragedy.
This whole episode shows us nothing except what happens when you have a troubled and dysfunctional couple, add in a ton of $, social media and an adversarial family court system.
Cathy was clearly a vindictive and mentally ill woman who due to her intelligence, legal skills ad use of social media was uniquely able to torture anyone who got in her way.
Allan is an weak but angry man with terrible judgement.
These two never should have gotten married and certainly never had children under the circumstances described (much less 3) but with the money to litigate everything , a court system perfectly happy to take in the $, and social media – first Cathy posting everything to facebook for years to then a dramatic fb Swiss assisted death, moving on to Rob Harvey drumming up outrage for clicks, culminating in Allan losing his job and now trying to use litigation and social media to regain his reputation; all we have is a recipe for expensive and pointless destruction.
You have to feel bad for the three kids, but you really have to feel bad for all of us because we truly have a ridiculous and non-serious society
PREACH!! Thank you for sharing a comment that didn’t come straight from the mouth of a “flying monkey”! I’m amazed at how rabid this topic has made some people, I would like to think that no one is supportive of abuse whether that abuse is of a spouse, a child or the courts. People who are truly interested in the best outcome for the ACTUAL LIVING HUMANS that the Kassenoff children are would be well served to steer clear of histrionics and one sided arguments and instead take a (honest) journalistic approach and look at ALL SIDES, giving each equal weight and credibility.
Frank Report family court is better than New York and Connecticut family courts.
Spot in
I’m sorry for any party in a divorce who suffer what they feel is corruption inside Family Courts . A lot of questions w/out any of the court officers to have to answer to & take accountability! I agree the Judges seem to more often divide a family- but I don’t know the numbers so I can’t say that statement is factual ! I
Regarding the Kassenoff case first off the girls are safe , they have lived w/ him for over 3 years & love him !
The Kassenoff case has had many misleading facts bec no one truly read the court transcripts bec all they relied on were videos over 6 yrs old & manipulated & played over & over again to program people to believe anything stated narrated is truth & we must follow along
A major problem & delays in this divorce wasn’t like most divorces where the wife is destitute , both parties here were attorneys . Allan a patent attorney deals in Federal Court unlike Catherine an attorney w/ the Governors office working in the state court where custody battles are heard!
Catherine was a brilliant attorney who played the courts judges & spun her web of lies that were catching up to her . Catherine delayed the divorce by delaying be able to set a trial date ! She knew violating court orders would cause delays bec they call for extra hearings . She knew the judges didn’t sanction her bec she’s an attorney , an officer of the court so they did her a disservice by just giving her a slap on the wrist ! The wealthy father everyone shouts !!! . How much money do you think Allan had – he didn’t make a million dollars a year as stated & his salary was based on performance . How much money would he have being into a divorce for 4 years while maintaining 2 homes one which they were having difficulty selling ! Allan ordered by the court was required to maintain both homes & Catherine contributing nothing . And at some point she lived in the empty home not having to pay towards any of the expenses . And bec Allan isn’t the person you make him out to be never.his money , never took her name off of the deeds of the home or their joint banking accounts which allowed her to wipe them out . Poor Catherine the judge ordered Allan to pay her over $500,000 towards legal fees to even the playing field ! You say the judge sides w/ the wealthier parent , really ?!? When Allan told the judge he’s paying all the expenses (he doesn’t get child support nor spousal support ) private school , after school activities etc he appeals to the charge I can’t keep paying all this , you’re disseminating me ? The Corrupt Judge as you refer to them told Allan it wasn’t his problem . His concerns are for the children & Allans problems are his problems & the order stood for Allan to send another $150,000 to Catherine . Catherine cried poverty always presenting herself as the victim – some victim she passed w/ money in the bank , having a month before her death buy a home mortgage free for over $800,000. That’s not a poor woman . This is a woman who manipulated the courts , enjoyed trying to destroy her husband that trumped her love or responsibility to her girls !!! Allan , the Courts , a few friends , even her family begged her to get help . She refused ! She drove herself to be in the situation she was in . Unaliving herself was her big launch the ultimate revenge against her ex having NOTHING to do w/ serious slanted family court custody battles ! And as I stated earlier my heart goes out for those in the family court corrupt cycle & time to get rid of Parent Alienation to be used as a cause in a divorce custody battle !!
Reading this story is heartbreaking.
It makes me want to cry.I Can relate to this kind of physotic behavior to alienate the other parent.
Only very sick people who are evil and want total control over you and everything you do.When they dont have the control the abuse starts.
They make false accusation to gain full control and power only to hurt you so you dont have access to your children and alienate you against the children to the court system.
Shame on the evil people who have no self esteem and his so insecure to do such evil fraudulent accusation. And shame on every court system to allow this behavior.
And not try to implement that children need both parents.
The children are always the one with suffering as well as the accused.
I would love to say more as till today i suffer tremendously with nightmares ocd depression and scaring in my brain from all the abuse.I am a survivor and i will continue to stand up as god 🙏 is watching over.
Unexpected turn? I totally expected legal action. Wouldn’t you sue if someone did that to you?
This is exhausting. A hit job on Catherine when she is no longer around to defend herself.
There were valid medical reasons that on advice of medical professionals the eldest was told to limit intake of those “treats.”
Having short hair is punishment? Really? She struggled with keeping her hair untangled for a time, short hair was easier to manage.
Can’t go through every ridiculous allegation here. But the point is that the eldest was the most aware of the situation and most willing to speak out. She was the one who found her way to Catherine after prolonged separations, begged to stay with her and not go back to her father and was ignored despite being extremely distraught at the situation. Her attorney had an ethical obligation to advocate her wishes to the court and failed to do that. Instead she was painted as some kind of “delinquent” instead of simply a Child who missed her mother terribly. Her father was in no way, shape, or form her savior.
Also there was no requirement for Catherine to be a perfect, unflawed individual to have the right to any contact whatsoever with her children. You are losing sight of this larger point. People with criminal records, substance abuse problems and yes domestic abusers maintain rights to a relationship with their children free from interference by the other parent. Allan has done his damndest to sever any bond between Catherine and the children.
Wow are you Catherine ?!?
Nobody expected Catherine or expects any parent to be perfect … except you all act like your perfect & judged ,ruled that Allan should lose his job ! How many times did Catherine write to his place of work , tried to have him disbarred ? Sued him w/in the course of an ongoing divorce case
It is a known fact , established by friends of Catherine , that Catherine treated the eldest daughter differently bec she was adopted ! And the child has said it herself often . She ran away to Catherine bec she was told to ! How would she have known how to call for a cab , the schools address even Catherine’s home address ? How would the child know if Catherine was home ? This child was so deprived of her love & wanted to treated like her 2 younger sisters were ! She even states that mommy is only nice to me when I’m mean to you (she’s talking w/ Allan)!
Even if the child isn’t supposed to eat certain kinds of food – will waking her up after 10 at night raging at her solve the problem . The child is hysterical crying ! Does allegedly her sneaking the chocolate bar equate to once again threatening to send her back to Florida – that’s abusive .
She made it a point to say as punishment she’s cutting her hair . She didn’t say your hair tangles we will need to cut it . Catherine chopped it off sending her to school knowing she will feel embarrassed- as she did when at 8 years old she sent her as a punishment to school wearing a diaper – what’s your reasoning behind that one ?
Allan isn’t heard telling a friend he will use the oldest child to lie & say Allan abuses her
However , Allan would drive the girls to visitations w/ Catherine . He encouraged them to see her this past Mother’s Day when she was a no show! She made it hard for Allan bec as she violated court orders the girls bec afraid of her & felt stalked .
During a visitation Zoom meeting
Allan made sure when he entered the room to make his presence known so that Catherine would have privacy & say something she didn’t want Allan to hear ! In return she chooses to speak to the girls in French . The girls start laughing as if what she said was a joke playful ! Catherine forgetting the meetings are taped , she was caught telling the girls to go to the police station & tell them their father abuses them ! Catherine knew that would then mean the police must call CPS again to come out to the home ! She knew what she was doing . CPS came & complaint was UNFOUNDED
Now I’ve heard it all
A HIT JOB ON CATHERINE?!?
Seriously – she can’t defend herself not bec she passed away from natural causes , rather she chose to un alive herself ! She was banking on throwing all this shit about Allan her kids out in the open sprinkle it w/ a terminal cancer diagnosis & think people will say “poor Catherine “ not question her ,as who would question a dead woman not just any dead woman but one driven to kill herself ! It’s all taboo! She underestimated how long people would believe her lies & what her ultimate goal was !!!
I don’t feel badly that she’s not here to defend herself against a Dropbox she left to be viewed after her death – that’s not a victim rather an aggressor
The one’s we need to feel badly for & nobody cared to hear them defend their family are the 3 minor daughter’s Catherine left behind in a cruel manner to CLEAN UP HER MESS !
Thank you so much for your comments.
“(The eldest child’s) attorney had an ethical obligation to advocate her wishes to the court and failed to do that. Instead she was painted as some kind of “delinquent” instead of simply a Child who missed her mother terribly. Her father was in no way, shape, or form her savior.
Also there was no requirement for Catherine to be a perfect, unflawed individual to have the right to any contact whatsoever with her children. You are losing sight of this larger point. …”
I totally agree with you, 8:05 am.
The video of Allan skating up to Catherine at the skating rink (this past April?) when he was in total control of his children shows him telling Catherine in the cruelest way, “Your children don’t want you here Catherine.” He punished all three for wanting to see her. The visits were going well and the eldest wanted to live 1/2 the time with her. She bought the home hoping that would happen.
Unraveling the corruption and addressing the crimes in Westchester family courts will help the most.
No one expects a parent to be “perfect”. But Catherine claimed that her choice to commit suicide was driven by the anguish of being denied any contact with her children — the loss of her relationship with the children was so painful that she found it hard to continue. But it’s hard to square up that sentiment with credible reports of how she treated those same children, maybe especially (but not exclusively) the eldest daughter. I mean, I can understand a parent feeling that his or her connection to their kids is the most important; the one thing you least want to lose — that you’re plugged in to their emotions and uplifted by those relationships. But if you do feel that way, why treat your kids in the demeaning manner this article (and others) have summarized — unless all these reports are false or exaggerated? If it was so easy for Catherine to tune out A.K.’s suffering, how can she then say that she can’t bear to live without the experience of connecting with A.K. and the other daughters? That’s not a rhetorical question; I’m honestly struggling to reconcile all this …
You are correct “the father stand alone”, however not just monetarily as most people think . He has a few supported friend , but many couldn’t take the pressure standing by his side, he lost professional friends , many he helped grow on the work ladder (he was eager to help asking for nothing in return ) . He had worked 25 hard years with many sacrifices & within hours one man who believed a woman bec she said so and w/out due diligence decided to make it personal (even though he never met Allan or his girls. Or even Catherine as he stated . The big question Frank is not to follow the Kassenoff divorce – rather to follow Robbie Harvey’s behavior & as the NY Post questioned :
*why do people revel in seeing great people , any person , stumble & fall ? People we know & even people we don’t know & have nothing to do with our lives
*?why does a salacious story of unsubstantiated facts draw people in & they jump on the bad wagon to destroy not knowin the facts . We know this bec where the evidence supports the truth , the truth we chose not believe , gets pushed aside . Ehh maybe it’s seen as boring
*why as adults do we still feel like the young child we once were & will do anything to fit in , be noticed & set aside our own thought process & morals to follow a heard mentality regardless of merit & the damage it will leave behind ?!? The Kassenoff case showed an UGLY side of human nature , but also revealed how we as a nation are shocked how far gangs go to protect their turf , how far people will go to even be initiated into a gang, & the excuses like in the Kassenoff case defend their actions w/ no real facts so words to have a conversation , ask why , becomes a one way vulgar screaming attack against the people who simply asked “WHY”
Who cares anymore about this divorce except the safety of the girls & their safety &! thank gd they are safe & healing ) ? We need to reflect , ask ourselves “was I part of crucifying a stranger , was I misled ,& now how will I be able to champion undoing a wrong to make it right ? If I choose to just accept it is what it is then I was part of the GANG the Crypts to destroy Allan Kassenoff & his 3 minor girls w/ no mercy !!! Keep telling yourself you were right , keep patting yourself on the back flattering yourselves until the next dagger is aimed at you! And your cries should fall on deaf ears !
There’s no suit here against Free Speech ! We are still governed by laws & Free Speech today to destroy Allan & his prestigious career as a #1 patent attorney , if Free Speech is the right to say do what you want , then YES tomorrow it will be YOU !!!
Sidewalk histrionics.
What are you going on about?
Gangs? Crypts?
This is terrible. These poor children.
Here is the problem. These parents had a vicious relationship.
Putting these parents under duress for over four years in the court system is criminal and needs to be treated as such. Lawyers who take advantage of the law and are drag cases on for longer than a year need to be criminally charged with what they are doing: vexatious litigation – they are solely filing motions and having “legal” meetings with intent to induce terror and financially gang rape their clients.
Guttridge and Cambareri have a long vicious history in Westchester of financially gang raping opposing clients – so the they are without attorneys when it’s time for trial – stripping them of their 14th amendment rights. Completely disregarding any child that is caught up in the mix.
This is the big take away from the Kassanoff case. It doesn’t matter which team you are on – you need to open your eyes to the legalized abuse and terror these lawyers and judges are inciting by unnecessarily prolonging these cases.
Will anyone of you start to notice how this is effecting the children of these caes ???
Bravo.
Maybe unlike Catherine, I can prove all the fact allegations — dozens of them— made during the litigation I had to start when my Big Law ex moved in with an addiction patient felon prostitute he said was “like a landscape architect “ were 100% false. But I learned that there was no respect for laws or truth in Family Court. But a lot of people made a lot of money covering up the truth and putting lies before the court, which I was discouraged from calling what they were because ‘you don’t want him to lose his job’ ‘the judge will punish you’ ‘it will be alright’ ‘he will calm down after the divorce’. But he got coercive control and it was not alright. And when I reported well founded felonies to the police, the judge interfered and she eventually transferred my son out of my primary custody (which he didn’t want in the divorce trial) without a single evidentiary hearing, lied that she had heard evidence, and issued a final order without the required trial. I haven’t had him a day in my home for over 3 years. And no agency that claims they enforce the law and protect us from bad judges would act on obvious crimes against justice. The bizarre false allegations continued well after the divorce leading me to be so fearful for my son with only that kind of parent running his show.
There is no law for us.
Unfortunately the AFCC and federal funding have ruined the family court system. They are cruel and inhumane. It’s all about the money. No one is protecting the people.
Number one that’s not a punch that’s a scratch on Allan’s face.
Number 2 where are all of these school reports where Theis child was sent to school under such abuse… Where are all of the law enforcement and CPS reports since Allen is claiming Catherine to be so horribly abusive in these statements….
Why are these statements coming out so much later and they’re all based on hearsay evidence, or truly lack of evidence…
Show us the reports show us the evidence show us the school reports show us the CPS reports show us the law enforcement reports that prove that these allegations are fact show us the videos show us the photos…..
That’s right there are none.
Again all here say and remember who had the most money Allan he could pay anybody to say anything.
And the money that he claims he was forced by the court to pay Catherine is c*** he did not directly give that money to her.
Are you a complete idiot?! How did she pay $900k for a house in cash if he didn’t pay her the money?! How did this “destitute” woman pay $11k to go to Switzerland to unalive herself?!
The scratch on his face came from the ring she was wearing when she punched him but u wouldn’t know that. I ask you all the videos from over 6 years ago show a man yelling in frustration but where are her signs of physical abuse that she claims to have been the victim of?!
Like SF said how did the then 11 year old know how to get a cab and better yet pay for it?! How’d she know Catherine would be home after all she was working in the governor’s office then?! Did you know she then told her attorney mommy made me do that?! In fact she told anyone that would listen that she does these things because she just wants a little love and attention like her other 2 sisters.
But none of this matters anymore and as you Allan haters can continue to hate him he’s still the parent and the lone surviving one to these girls and the lynch mob did them no service having him fired and their own mother in her lay dying wish and ultimate fuck you to both Allan and the girls didn’t care about them either
Are you paying for a roof over their head?
Are you paying for their food? Clothes? College?
Cut the shit none of you actually care about the kids if you condone Allan being fired.
The nanny posted on Facebook a year before the filing for divorce.
I don’t think that was a sinister set up.
Carherine sounds like Chris Ambrose.
Taking all belongings, deprivation, isolation, triangulation amongst the children.
These are tactics of abusers.
She’s a twisted person.
There were many cases like this, and as always, the father is always thrown under the bus first.
Why is Alen and his girlfriend criticize Karen Riordan in their Facebook page? Alen is trolling Catherine Facebook friends and attacking them. Look at the post of Alen yelling at the daughter. Calling her a liar.
Have you seen Allan or his girlfriend comment anywhere?! I haven’t. To state something like that show proof. I’ve navigated both groups on Facebook and have never seen either comment. Maybe you’re part of the problem perpetuating untruths to fit a narrative.
The court exploit these families. Had they been left to work it out themselves the girls would have both parents.
The criminals in this case are the custody evaluators. The saw Allan with huge money and wanted it for themselves.
If everything is true, a parent doesn’t get an indefinite no contact order. They are helped to improve the situation. That wasn’t the case here.
The court actions were ruthless which, if Catherine was struggling or stressed- this only made her worse.