Guest View
Frank Report is still waiting for confirmation of Catherine Kassenoff’s death.
Catherine Kassenoff is/was the daughter of the late Dr. Nazih Youssef, an oncologist. He was also a Coptic Christian, born in Egypt.
Youssef moved to England, where he met his wife, Heather Ann. The couple emigrated to Canada, where Catherine was born [1969], and finally to the USA in 1977.
Catherine married an Orthodox Jew, Allan Kassenoff, who was four years younger than her. And Catherine converted to Judaism.
After the couple had children, Catherine renounced her conversion and began to introduce the girls to the Christian holidays of Easter and Christmas.
One of Allan’s supporters told Frank Report:
“Catherine converted to Judaism. She not only converted, she did an Orthodox conversion. Right after, when they lived in Brooklyn, she went to services on Shabbat. It was only after they had children did Catherine decide to renounce her conversion and begin to introduce Christian holidays to the girls behind Allan’s back. She was no wallflower. She’s a scheming woman who would do whatever she wanted to get whatever she wanted.”
A friend of Catherine’s told Frank Report something opposite:
“Catherine did convert to Judaism and later decided that it wasn’t right for her. It had nothing to do with scheming or lying. The holidays (Easter, Christmas, etc.) were not celebrated behind Allan’s back. At the New Rochelle house, they had a xmas tree, presents, etc. Allan seemed fine with it.”
There was tension over religion, no doubt.
The visitation supervisor, whom the court required to monitor every word between mother and child, social worker Jennifer Cully, wrote in her December 27, 2022 report for the court:
“During the girls’ extreme acting out, both younger girls screamed comments about not having a Christmas visit as they are Jewish. This fits into comments Ally has shared with this writer about feeling a great deal of pressure for choosing to have unsupervised visits with her mom. She stated that the small Christmas tree she had asked for from her mother for her own room was not allowed in the house and has remained on the front porch since she received it per her father’s directives.
“Ally stated that she was made to throw out the leftovers she had brought home from a previous dinner with her mom as the meal was not Kosher.”
Dr. Amy Neustein, Ph.D., an authority in speech technology and preventing child sexual abuse, presents another idea in the family court case of Kassenoff v Kassenoff.
That it was not money alone that actuated the family court actors in this vicious battle. It was religion used in the most harmful way.
Dr. Neustein, who is Jewish, established HURT (Help Us Regain The Children), a legal research and advocacy center dedicated to exposing the flaws within the family court system. She has provided expert witness testimony in child abuse/custody cases – and in 2005, Dr. Neustein co-authored with attorney Michael Lesher the landmark book From Madness to Mutiny. This groundbreaking work, published as the lead title of the University Press of New England and part of Northeastern University’s Gender, Crime, and Law Series, shed light on the woeful injustices of the jury-less, judicial, tyrannical, family court system.
Jews make up 2.2 percent of the US population and 14 percent of Westchester County, but as Dr. Neustein points out, Jews seemed to have had nearly 100 percent control of the custody war between Orthodox Jew Allan Kassenoff and his Egyptian Christian wife, Catherine, who went through the elaborate conversion to Judaism and then renounced it to return to Christianity.
Some might think it is anti-Semitic to publish a Jewish Ph.D., an expert in her field, pointing this out, and making an appeal to Jewish men who marry non-Jewish women to stop using the family court to “de-motherize” the mothers of their children.
Those who wish to oppose and claim her voice should not be heard are invited to make a response. And if anywhere a group of Christians, or Muslims, or any people aligned with common interest combined to take custody away from a Jewish father, or anyone, those who point it out would have a voice and should be heard.
By Dr. Amy Neustein
It is with great pain that I write this column. My intent is not to offend my fellow Jews. My late father was a prominent Orthodox Jewish rabbi. I write this piece because I know the damage done by silence is far worse than confronting the truth.
A mother who was tormented and tortured is now dead.
I am a Jew and I am responsible for the actions of my fellow Jews. I am my brother’s keeper. I ask for my fellow Jews to join me in bringing about a healthy change. I received permission from a rabbi to write this piece, below.
I felt from Allan Kassenoff’s emails shared with the public that he had a sense of angst that he’d lose his progeny in a divorce. He was fighting for the future as well as for his past – his heritage, his tradition, his identity.
I also perceived a possible sense of unconscious guilt or shame in his marriage choice. In fact, he came out with it in that famous car door slamming video scene!
Coming from an Orthodox background, Allan crossed into a foreign world when he married Catherine, a shiksa (Yiddish for a non-Jewish woman) and a woman whose father came from an Arab-speaking country that wanted, during Egypt’s Gamel Abder Nassar’s administration, to “drive Israel into the sea.”
Like most Jewish men who married shiksas, they felt if the marriage went bad that they wasted their seed on a Christian.
However, he did everything properly by insisting on an Orthodox conversion. The conversion process required Catherine to study the Torah for at least two years and, when completed, to take off all her clothes and immerse herself in a Mikvah (ritual bath with one-fortieth of natural rainwater according to Talmudic precepts) in front of a panel of three Orthodox rabbis to watch her to make sure the water was above her head in order to qualify as a kosher conversion.
She lit Sabbath candles and attended Shabbat dinners and Shabbat services.
But one could easily opine that when she learned of his alleged affairs and was subject to suspected beatings, including hospitalization for a fistful of grass and mud that caused trauma and infection to her eye, and when her husband sang a song, not a sacred Jewish song, but a sick nursery rhyme calling the mother of his children “a dead duck,” she eschewed the Jewish faith and clung to her memories of Jesus Christ.
She bonded with her daughters and wanted to share that anchor in Christ with them. She was beaten, arrested, evicted, and left bereft of her children.
Yes, yes, yes, the shiksa, once he was through with her in the bed (every Jewish woman knows she can never compete with a man’s desires for a shiksa because they are known to be accommodating in certain ways, whereas Jewish women generally are not) is deserving of beatings, arrest, eviction, and seizing her children from her breast.
Catherine was an apostate and deserved the four plagues, and she was an informant (Moser) – against her Jewish husband for speaking to CPS, a non Jewish government-funded agency.
The Talmud says the informant should be murdered at the earliest opportunity.
Catherine wrote, “On December 20, 2021, despite Judge Lubell’s earlier recusal, he issued what can only be described as a retaliatory ruling to further restrict (Catherine’s) access time with the children at Christmas time and thereafter. (Catherine) was given no contact whatsoever with the Children for Christmas, which was devastating to her.”
This was done to save Allan’s Jewish progeny, and Judge Lewis Lubell and his coterie knew the UNSPOKEN agenda here.
The People Who Took Catherine Out of Her Children’s Lives
I will be discreet but you all know why you took the girls away from her and how you had the alacritous help of a Jewish judge, Jewish therapists, Jewish law guardian, and a Jewish custody evaluator and his replacement, who is the training director at a Jewish agency. Since there was no history of mental illness with Catherine, nor any evidence that she failed to feed, clothe, educate, and provide proper medical care for the children, the motives smack of prejudice and nothing more.
I know of many Christian mothers whose children were taken away by their Jewish husbands and turned brutally against them.
She had the vehicle of a corrupt family court against her.
The Family Court players all recommended the de-motherizing of Catherine. This was not just about money. This was a religious war against Catherine, who was crucified and ended her life as a result.
Not only is Judge Lubell a Jew, but he is very much identified with Jewish themes, such as Holocaust remembrance.
Lewis Lubell was a keynote speaker on a program with all Jews sponsored by Chabad (Lubavitch) – the world’s largest Hasidic organization. Chabad apparently cozies up to Jewish judges to secure favors on all fronts, from adult guardianship to child custody.
Here is another event where Lubell was a keynote speaker. All the speakers are Jewish at this event.
The second custody evaluator Dr. Kathleen McKay works for Westchester Jewish Commuity Center, which proudly states on its website that its entire agency is founded on the Jewish precept of “Tikkun Olam” (correcting/repairing the world).
Mesirah is the action in which one Jew reports the conduct of another Jew to a non-rabbinic (“goyisha” – a non-Jewish) authority, in a manner and under the circumstances forbidden by rabbinic law.
The term for an individual who commits mesirah is moser .
A person who repeatedly violates this law by informing on his fellow Jews is considered subject to “Din Moser” (law of the informer) and it prescribes death for the offender.
The ban comes from the Bava Kamma section of the Babylonian Talmud and is discussed in Babylonian Talmud, by Rambam and in Shulchan Aruch.
Maimonides states: Whoever adjudicates in a non-Jewish court … is wicked and it is as though he has reviled, blasphemed and rebelled against the law of Moses.
Maimonides further explains: “It is forbidden to hand over a Jew to the heathen, neither his person nor his goods, even if he is wicked and a sinner, even if he causes distress and pain to fellow-Jews. Whoever hands over a Jew to the heathen has no part in the next world. It is permitted to kill a moser (informant) wherever he is. It is even permitted to kill him before he has handed over (a fellow Jew).”
Catherine is DEAD, and her story will NEVER fade!!
She will bring about redemption for ALL afflicted and persecuted mothers and children.
Now, I ask the Kassenoff crowd to be kind and ask an Orthodox rabbi and an interfaith panel to help the children. They will learn their mother was a martyr – killed because she taught Christianity to her children “behind Allan’s back.”
What did she teach that was so bad?
Love, kindness, and caring for all. Please help bring an end to this suffering.
I pray no Jewish man ever again drives his Christian wife to suicide. We can make it stop! I beg the Jewish men to allow their shiksa ex-wives to see their children.
I know many Christian mothers were salivating and yearning to see their children fathered by Jewish men.
Is it not hypocritical to expunge a mother from the lives of her children, and then to blame her for killing herself, claiming her children will be without a mother?
Thousands of mothers have been bereft of their children, who have been severely brainwashed against their mothers due to the corrupt family court.
Thus, if their mothers would die of suicide, it wouldn’t bother the children one iota because they are already turned against them.
The children were torn from their mothers at a young age and learned to identify with the aggressor and winner in the family courts.
It’s mere lip service and utter hypocrisy to say that Catherine damaged her children by taking her life because the love they had for her was ALREADY obliterated by the Kassenoff Klan and their Jewish auxiliaries in the family court.
They succeeded in wiping out any love the child had for their mother. I’m afraid we cannot escape the social reality that demographics and religion played a big role in this case.
In Catherine’s FB post, she wrote how much she longed to share Christ with her daughters, at least for them to know that she was Christian.
He can’t simultaneously enjoy the flesh, yet expel her Christ in her — and throw her out into the street and take her children from her breast. And then have her arrested THREE times for yearning to see her children.
Those who persecuted Catherine will live to see the ire of those in America and Europe for the Kassenoff Klan.
I understand that discourse on the mangling and murdering of this Christian woman by her Jewish lawyer husband has already begun in Switzerland, England, Holland, and beyond.
I heard it here in America. It hurts me very much. If I remain silent, it won’t stop. But if I confront it and show compassion for the other Catherines crucified by the family courts, then maybe we can come together to end this scourge.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
I don’t know how many people will actually read this comment since this article is not new but I intent on writing a full response to this article. This article is truly disturbing and dangerous In a time where antisemitism is at an all time high.
The fact that these court actors are Jewish has zero to do with what happened to Catherine. None of them are practicing Jews and rule against Jewish mothers every single day. I should know being that I am one of them. This article did nothing but cause people to blame Jews for their problems, again. Please be more responsible.
I’m looking forward to reading your article, 2:20 pm
💐
It’s time for family courts to respect all religions.
Maybe that respect should come with leaving religion out of divorce procedsing. It diverts the best interest of children. Many many cases are based on the parents. One or both screaming about themselves. No one should have to be punished for bringing up abuse in family court system when there is evidence. Many people are attempting to discredit each other. Focusing on themselves instead of the cause of fixing family court . It’s very telling when the main focus is on access. No one is really focused on the needs of the children. There is absolutely almost no focus on the importance of motherhood. All the focus is on the absence of a father. In most religions women are still considered second class and of lesser value. This is doing very little to help children.
“Who would want to run interference for pedophiles and human traffickers? That’s the more important question in all of this. Why would you want to lie to push an agenda whose goal is to have children in captivity? It’s kind of sick.”
https://www.newsweek.com/sound-freedom-movie-creator-tim-ballard-responds-qanon-allegations-sick-1812204
“As an attorney, Vachss represented only children and adolescents. In addition to his private practice, he served as a law guardian in New York state. In every child abuse or neglect case, state law requires the appointment of a law guardian, a lawyer who represents the child’s interests during the legal proceedings. …“
“… I believe that many people who were abused as children do themselves—and the entire struggle—a disservice when they refer to themselves as “survivors.” A long time ago, I found myself in the middle of a war zone. I was not killed. Hence, I “survived.” That was happenstance … just plain luck, not due to any greatness of character or heroism on my part. But what about those raised in a POW camp called “childhood?” Some of those children not only lived through it, not only refused to imitate the oppressor (evil is a decision, not a destiny), but actually maintained sufficient empathy to care about the protection of other children once they themselves became adults and were “out of danger.” To me, such people are our greatest heroes. They represent the hope of our species, living proof that there is nothing bio–genetic about child abuse. I call them transcenders, because “surviving” (i.e., not dying from) child abuse is not the significant thing. It is when chance becomes choice that people distinguish themselves. Two little children are abused. Neither dies. One grows up and becomes a child abuser. The other becomes a child protector. One “passes it on.” One “breaks the cycle.” Should we call them both by the same name? Not in my book. (And not in my books, either.) …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Vachss
If you actually read through the fatherhood initiative proposal they are giving funds to religious organizations. So there is definitely a religious connection. It would appear to be a positive program. However it’s directed at the institution of marriage. To strengthen the nation financially. Welfare reform. It’s all about money. The fatherhood initiative is not just affecting the young unwed. There is a growing population of middle and upper socioeconomic people that are unwed. Many women educated choosing to stay home. Two incoming households. With a continued gap in salary between men and women. It’s all about money. A significant amount of wealthy and middle class men. There is no focus on healthy marriage. Chronic infidelity. Placing marriage partner at risk for dease and emotional hardship. Laws once making infidelity a punishable offense and taken into consideration. Allan declaring open marriage. Using new partner to establish a two person household with the government is looking for. Punishing many women who are single. Fathers/mens rights groups trying to make it a dangerous situation when women/mothers create new partnership. The term material gatekeeper coined by the fatherhood initiative targeted at women. A gender bias term that has evaluated into parental alienation. Much effort has been done in the last several years to smear and discredit the character of women. A large amount of these paler much wealthier father’s have jumped on the fatherhood initiative. Not for the right reasons. Attorneys, GALs and Judges screaming access, access access. With a blind eye as these father’s don’t use access time. Turn a blind eye as to who is really with the children during access time. A significant amount of money has been given to the fatherhood initiative. It solely focused and benefiting men. In particularly paler men with larger income. Try to get out of child support and alimony. Parental alienation is often used by uneithical attorneys to distract from abusive men. Creating and generating funding to the state. Connecticut has a heavy investment and hand in leading to the discrimination and oppression of women in the United States. Is feverishly attempting to cover it up. The government is aware of it. The department of health and human services at Uconn has done little to nothing to promote healthy marriage and parenting as a whole to the state of Connecticut. The program based on videos and philosophy has blamed white people. Some how blaming school shootings on single mother household. Because the were aggressive troubled youth. Some coming from intact two parent households. Dispute the information of the misuse of parental alienation the doctor of philosophy has yet to address the white privilege father’s misusing the fatherhood initiative to discredit mothers and allow for litigation, physical and financial abuse. Driving mother’s into poverty and snatching children away. If you want to describe white women of privilege look no further than several elected female officials running Connecticut. Have been appointed to the heads of various agencies. These women of privilege are focused on the funding. Have little concerns for child well-being. Rubber stamping laws and agreements based on monitary gain. If you want to figure out what is happening in family courts through out the land. Look no further than the promotion of healthy marriage and fatherhood. Used as a weapon against women and placing children in damaging situations. Catherine and the girls falling victim to a financially driven country to divide people and create revenue for the states. An excuse for a lot of white men not to take responsibility. Leaving their former spouses battered, traumatized and broken. The effects on the children are starting to be seen. However the government is not paying attention.
It’s amazes me how people repeat things without a shred of evidence . Allan was not a cheater . In court documents it talks about how Catherine reignited an affair she had with a married man before she was married . Now married , when the guy was dumping her she asked Allan her abusive husband to help connive a sting operation so that her boyfriends wife would find out about her & dump her husband leaving him for Catherine !
Catherine was not driven to poverty she had her own monies and the courts were always awarding her more money over a half a million !
Catherine and Allan are prime example of court gone wild. The above comments are not particularly targeted directly at Allan. Catherine appears to have cheated once. Allan became a serial cheater with the open marriage. This is an overall review of the healthy marriage and fatherhood funding. Allan and Catherine have a demonstration of bits and pieces of the on going legal system malfunction. The above stated is a general picture of what is really going on in the court system.
In response to Yaakov Schmerl:
Yaakov Schmerl has written two comments now responding to other posts. I’m going to respond to the responses. Let me add, I did not write either one — just a neutral observer here.
Yaakov takes a belligerent tone that doesn’t jive with what he actually writes. First he takes issue with Attorney David Zaslavsky’s discussion of Jewish people who are Brooklyn judges that hear divorce cases. According to the attorney, 3 of these 5 judges are Jewish. Yaakov points out that only about 1 in 5 Brooklynites are Jewish. Yes, there is a statistical discrepancy here. But it’s only a difference of 2 individuals. The Attorney also says that the 3 Jews are “senior” — presumably the younger 2 judges are not Jewish, so it’s not as if some Jewish organization is maneuvering to recycle a Jewish majority.
Is it interesting that Jews are overrepresented in Brooklyn divorce court? Maybe. It’s OK to point out the discrepancy. But these numbers hardly justify language like “stranglehold of religious Jews on divorce courts” and putting “three out of five” in all-caps or talking about a “Jewish cabal”. Why does he say that “courts that handle divorce and custody” being “stacked with practicing Jews” make them “treacherous for women”? Is he assuming that just because a judge is Jewish he is “treacherously” misogynistic?
Yaakov writes with a similar tone of feigned outrage responding to the post criticizing Amy Neustein for writing about Jew’s and Christian’s sex lives. Someone who describes himself as a “real sociologist” complained about the “salivating and yearning” language, and Yaakov took issue with how the “real sociologist” summarized the original. Mr. or Ms. real sociologist said that Neustein claimed “Christian women are ‘salivating and yearning’ to share their bed with Jewish men.” Only the words “salivating and yearning” were directly quoted. According to Yaakov, “share their bed with Jewish men” distorts the original “see their children fathered by Jewish men.”
A man “sharing a bed with” and “fathering the child of” a woman are both polite expressions for sex, right? Mr. or Ms. real sociologist did not write “share their bed” as a quote from the original. Neustein herself wrote about a man being “through with her in the bed,” so the self-declared Sociologist was adopting slang similar to the original author. Yaakov Schmerl exaggerates when he says this is “distortion” and “prevarications and lies.”
Yaakov was right to call out David Zaslavsky’s hateful language at the end of Zaslavsky’s post. But he writes as if a two-person statistical discrepancy is equally bad as obscenities which, in their literal meaning, threaten to rape someone.
I assume that Yaakov Schmerl is a different person than Yakov Smirnoff, the comedian. But the Yaakov with two a’s sounds a little like the straight men in a comedy sketch who can’t understand why people are laughing.
In response to Yaakov Schmerl:
Yaakov Schmerl has written two comments now responding to other posts. I’m going to respond to the responses. Let me add, I did not write either one — just a neutral observer here.
Yaakov takes a belligerent tone that doesn’t jive with what he actually writes. First he takes issue with Attorney David Zaslavsky’s discussion of Jewish people who are Brooklyn judges that hear divorce cases. According to the attorney, 3 of these 5 judges are Jewish. Yaakov points out that only about 1 in 5 Brooklynites are Jewish. Yes, there is a statistical discrepancy here. But it’s only a difference of 2 individuals. The Attorney also says that the 3 Jews are “senior” — presumably the younger 2 judges are not Jewish, so it’s not as if some Jewish organization is maneuvering to recycle a Jewish majority.
Is it interesting that Jews are overrepresented in Brooklyn divorce court? Maybe. It’s OK to point out the discrepancy. But these numbers hardly justify language like “stranglehold of religious Jews on divorce courts” and putting “three out of five” in all-caps or talking about a “Jewish cabal”. Why does he say that “courts that handle divorce and custody” being “stacked with practicing Jews” make them “treacherous for women”? Is he assuming that just because a judge is Jewish he is “treacherously” misogynistic?
Is it interesting that Jews are overrepresented in Brooklyn divorce court? Maybe. It’s OK to point out the discrepancy. But these numbers hardly justify language like “stranglehold of religious Jews on divorce courts” and putting “three out of five” in all-caps or talking about a “Jewish cabal.” Why does he say that “courts that handle divorce and custody” being “stacked with practicing Jews” make them “treacherous for women”? Is he assuming that just because a judge is Jewish he is “treacherously” misogynistic?
A man “sharing a bed with” and “fathering the child of” a woman are both polite expressions for sex, right? Mr. or Ms. real sociologist did not write “share their bed” as a quote from the original. Neustein herself wrote about a man being “through with her in the bed,” so the self-declared Sociologist was adopting slang similar to the original author. Yaakov Schmerl exaggerates when he says this is “distortion” and “prevarications and lies.”
Yaakov was right to call out David Zaslavsky’s hateful language at the end of Zaslavsky’s post. But he writes as if a two-person statistical discrepancy is equally bad as obscenities which, in their literal meaning, threaten to rape someone.
I assume that Yaakov Schmerl is a different person than Yakov Smirnoff, the comedian. But the Yaakov with two a’s sounds a little like the straight men in a comedy sketch who can’t understand why people are laughing.
I made a mistake when copying this post over. One paragraph was doubled and one deleted. Maybe no one cares, but I’m going to correct it as a reply. If people here want to talk past one another, at least we should try to write readable and error-free language. Sorry I didnt!
In response to Yaakov Schmerl:
Yaakov Schmerl has written two comments now responding to other posts. I’m going to respond to the responses. Let me add, I did not write either one — just a neutral observer here.
Yaakov takes a belligerent tone that doesn’t jive with what he actually writes. First he takes issue with Attorney David Zaslavsky’s discussion of Jewish people who are Brooklyn judges that hear divorce cases. According to the attorney, 3 of these 5 judges are Jewish. Yaakov points out that only about 1 in 5 Brooklynites are Jewish. Yes, there is a statistical discrepancy here. But it’s only a difference of 2 individuals. The Attorney also says that the 3 Jews are “senior” — presumably the younger 2 judges are not Jewish, so it’s not as if some Jewish organization is maneuvering to recycle a Jewish majority.
Is it interesting that Jews are overrepresented in Brooklyn divorce court? Maybe. It’s OK to point out the discrepancy. But these numbers hardly justify language like “stranglehold of religious Jews on divorce courts” and putting “three out of five” in all-caps or talking about a “Jewish cabal”. Why does he say that “courts that handle divorce and custody” being “stacked with practicing Jews” make them “treacherous for women”? Is he assuming that just because a judge is Jewish he is “treacherously” misogynistic?
Yaakov writes with a similar tone of feigned outrage responding to the post criticizing Amy Neustein for writing about Jew’s and Christian’s sex lives. Someone who describes himself as a “real sociologist” complained about the “salivating and yearning” language, and Yaakov took issue with how the “real sociologist” summarized the original. Mr. or Ms. real sociologist said that Neustein claimed “Christian women are ‘salivating and yearning’ to share their bed with Jewish men.” Only the words “salivating and yearning” were directly quoted. According to Yaakov, “share their bed with Jewish men” distorts the original “see their children fathered by Jewish men.”
A man “sharing a bed with” and “fathering the child of” a woman are both polite expressions for sex, right? Mr. or Ms. real sociologist did not write “share their bed” as a quote from the original. Neustein herself wrote about a man being “through with her in the bed,” so the self-declared Sociologist was adopting slang similar to the original author. Yaakov Schmerl exaggerates when he says this is “distortion” and “prevarications and lies.”
Yaakov was right to call out David Zaslavsky’s hateful language at the end of Zaslavsky’s post. But he writes as if a two-person statistical discrepancy is equally bad as obscenities which, in their literal meaning, threaten to rape someone.
I assume that Yaakov Schmerl is a different person than Yakov Smirnoff, the comedian. But the Yaakov with two a’s sounds a little like the straight men in a comedy sketch who can’t understand why people are laughing.
Mr Yaakov Schmerl May I humbly point out that you are not humble rather aggressive & a Mr. Know it All who knows nothing !
Allan Kassenoff does not profess to be a practicing religious do ! However you as a Jew should know something we learn in school at a very young age , “Dan L’Kaf Zechut” we are taught to give each person the benefit of the doubt & to judge fairly ! You like Frank & Robbie Harvey have taken on the role JUDGE & JURY
Allen & Catherine were married she had converted to Judaism & they were to raise their children with Jewish identity ,culture , & traditions. Just bec she unilaterally decides in the midst of her divorce to start professing her Christian faith.
Allan doesn’t have to follow along as when one signs their marriage Ketubah it’s a contract that both are Jewish & children will be raised Jewish ! The fact that Catherine only decided to try to indoctrinate the children to be involved in Christmas etc was to gaslight her husband !
You write Allan wouldn’t want a tree in his window -“what would the neighbors say ?” Do you know Allan’s neighborhood? It wasn’t a town like Monsey Brooklyn who would shun you for having a tree rather he lived in a small Westcher non orthodox town where no one gives a crap if you have a Christmas tree & walk around w/out a kippa ! So that narrative is false ! This wasn’t an ongoing deal rather now while they are in divorce proceedings & another chance to hurt her ex . Only one child stayed to be with her Christmas bec as a child she was abused by Catherine bec she was adopted . Now was her chance for once to have her mother’s attention that she accepted bread crumbs from her ! She was so excited that her mother finally noticed her only to curse her out another time & threaten not give her something she bought for her ! Allan knew this is what was happening & didn’t want Ally to get hurt again , having false hope ! Ironically this past Chanukah & Christmas were on the same date ! After Ally saw Catherine she was excited to be at a Chanukah party with other children & people who didn’t play games w/ her . It is not for you to tell another Jew that he must bring a Christmas Tree into their home or treif food ! And your statement that Allan wanted the security of being accepted by his fellow Jew , SERIOUSLY are you kidding as I stated above Allan didn’t live or hang around in a town where everyone judges how religious you are – his main concern was for his child not to be hurt like so many times before where she believed in Catherine to wanting to be a mother to her like her siblings & was left disappointed!
These children never pined for their mother bec Catherine liking a certain supervisor would have all three drive far (miss their Sunday activities) & each one had to sit around & wait for the other sibling to finish their session . So much time wasted ! Remember Catherine chose this supervisor & the courts acquiesced ! These children pined for their mother to remove her Facebook posts (which was one of the many court violation that as an officer of the court she didn’t care ) Catherine violated the girls trust by posting their personal medical records (they are minors there are HiIPPA laws – in her eyes they apply to everyone else just not her!
Sorry sir but in my humble opinion your analogy of quoting the Rambam was really stretching ! The girls were not starving & missing their mother . They made it hard for Allan to get them to visitations bec it was all BS & all they were asked was to tell her everything about Allan only to twist their words . She even broke into the email account that she set up for the kids knew the password & then sent herself emails claiming they wrote it ! One child (& there’s an audio recording of the conversation) where the child tells her mother “you lied and wrote those emails ! Catherine then would call her a liar how could I do that I don’t even have your password . The child lets her know “yeah you do bec you set the password “ We all know kids these days don’t email their parents rather they text and they certainly don’t email from an IPsd at such a young age !
Btw in terms of the courts Brooklyn is not Westchester & you are comparing oranges to apples . The Jewish Judges & Court Officers do not care with the same intensity as in Brooklyn , Monsey to who gets custody based on Religion ! I would highly doubt that Allan Kassenoff has the knowledge or what it takes to buy a Judge . In fact I think that would be 5 Judges & all the court officials I don’t think you really believe that ! I have been to Westchester court and from what I saw happening in the court room were Judges disdain for Jewish plaintiffs & defendants ! They look down at us (even though they are Jewish)!! They look down at both parties ! I’m sure after 11 lawyers , suing everyone , the Judges evaluator’s the judges maybe saw she was a dangerous person ! She loved her kids why didn’t she stop respect their request to stop posting on Facebook ! Many posts were lies distortion , but her final post of her going to have assisted suicide she couldn’t help herself she posted in on Facebook without letting her girls know ! They found out just like everyday people . In fact some of their friends and their parents knew before them ! And then to leave 4 year old tapes that have nothing to do with case but rather to once again get back at her ex hurt them more than it hurt them ! Same as this death notification which her lawyer had weeks ago didn’t bother to inform Allan so he could tell the kids & they not find out from social media or a friend who sees a post ! She has left the girls whom she loves so much nothing to help them in life a letter , school supplies … that are at an age to becoming into their bodies getting their periods leave them sanitary pads or tampons – leave them anything that shows you care about their future even if she wasn’t going to be here.I
know mother’s who were unfortunately dying & bought their kids clothing for 3 plus years bec they wanted to make sure their kids would be taken care of . All that was left here was a big mess , embarrassment & more for these girls to clean up a mess both their parents made ! However, one tried to shield them !
Lastly , I ask you how can you be a Jew & judge another Jew when you were not there , did not walk in their shoes ! People claim she was driven to suicide he was clearly being egged on – a phone taping in his face – she keeps repeating herself , she doesn’t sound like a person afraid of her husband ! In fact on the video he asks her to put some clothes in that he’s not comfortable w/ her walking around in her underwear! She responds she doesn’t care it’s her home . Trust me if the situation were reversed everyone would be calling him out! But , Catherine is never called out or humbled herself to take accountability for her actions ! I find it amazing how all these trolls , followers ,& herd mentality ever say that just maybe she did something , anything wrong ! We are humans & all err except for Catherine she was an Angel . She never as shown on the FR video woke up her tired child to rage at her bec she believed the girl ate her chocolate. Omg it was chocolate for gd sake. According to you maybe she was starving ?!?
Thurs was a fast day bec the the walls of the 2nd Beit Hamikdash (Temple) were captured and then coming up will be another fast on the Hebrew date it faced destruction. We are the taught that the destructions of the temples were brought about bec the Jewish people were living lives of sinat chinam – jealousy , gossip , disrespect for our fellow man !
Rosh Hashana , Yom Kippur will also be coming up before we know it – I hope gd doesn’t judge us as hard as we judged Allan & even Catherine ! I hope gd finds in his heart to show us mercy bec it wasn’t shown in this case . Everyone writes as if they have never yelled or had turmoil in their home . Everyone professes to be “holier than thou” Instead of “loving thy neighbor as thy self !” In my humble opinion I feel all those who jumped on the band wagon to have Allan resign from his job professing to care about their kids , yet not realizing who is to support them now ? The gofundme page set up for them has yield maybe $7000 ! That’s pretty pathetic coming from the amount of clicks and views the FR & Robbie Harvey received & profited from exploring this family tragedy !
Now another lastly you talk about vile language ! A few months ago while leaving Israel my cell rings & I answer thinking it’s my kid , when a woman a Catherine follower , calls me a CUNT ! I have been left messages calling me a sick BITCH as well as wishing me BAD KARMA along w/ threatening messages wishing me death ! I had called Allan’s place of work & the receptionist was so glad to receive a pleasant call stating that people were calling screaming vulgarities into the phone they were left shaking . So Mr . Yaakov their behavior in my humble opinion is worse ! And that they used bulky tactics like the ones they complain are used by the courts . If they can’t behave & this case doesn’t involve them I could only imagine how they behaved in court when they didn’t get their way ! These trolls owe the receptionists at Greenberg & Traurig an apology ! They were doing their job answering phones & have nothing to do with who gets hired or fired ! Shame on these people ! Don’t throw stones when you live in glass houses
People often reevaluate their religion beliefs during the end of a marriage. Maybe Allan should not have taken it as a personal attack. It is not always about someone else. If you find Jesus, you are apparently unfit to be a parent?
Yes people do leave their religion , could you imagine if it was a Greek Orthodox man whose wife reverts to her faith her children would stay with the religious family . She can still see them but courts tend to give children usually to the mother but also to the parent that will continue to raise them according to the faith the couple agreed upon ! Allan prob took it personally because he knew anything Catherine did was manipulative & to hurt him . A fool he wasn’t !
Catherine children weren’t taken away from her bec she found Jesus but rather bec of her erratic behavior disrespect to the court , lies she was caught telling and more . She should have swallowed her pride and seek help ! In one email tells her to seek help , get your life back . Her own brother who works in Healthcare told her unless she gets help he must disassociate from her !
It seems to have been a common problem
May gd (Jesus) bless you
Dear Doctor,
Upon reading this, it’s overwhelmingly clear who you are. It’s unfortunate that you have received these phone calls. It’s unfortunate that Allan’s former employers did also. After reading through your rant and religion speech. I think it’s clear you are not capable of being neutral and your religious beliefs are tainting your judgement. Many people reexamine their religion after divorce. Many women who convert for the marriage convert back. Bringing up the Jewish marriage contracts are a sign you are not objective. Why did you not discuss with Allan, Catherine’s right to raise the children in her faith as well? . If the roles were reversed? I think it’s no secret deeply religious people are not objective. Probably why you should not have been on this case. Probably why they chose you. Thanks for the rant on religion. We see how it affects judgement. If Allan wasn’t religious, then the whole Christmas tree thing would have not been an issue. You wouldn’t be going on about it. Going on about Jewish marriage contracts. Which are irrelevant. Should not have anything to do with divorce court.
In response to: Maybe a real sociologist should weigh in?
Wow! I can’t believe the distortion seen in this poster! Perhaps he/she needs a new pair of reading glasses??? Nowhere in this sociologist’s editorial did she state:“…Christian women are ‘salivating and yearning’ to share their bed with Jewish men.” Instead she said: “I know many Christian mothers were salivating and yearning to see their children fathered by Jewish men.” How is “see their children” the same as “share their bed”?
It appears that in your world of lies and pomposity — the same upside down world of the corrupt courts that drove Catherine to kill herself — a poster can actually twist the words of an editorialist, say whatever they want, and then actually believe their own prevarications and lies! This is not in accordance with Torah principles.
Upon reflection, what lies at the bottom of this heated discussion is that Dr. Neustein has undoubtedly hit a raw nerve. She has brought to public discourse a painful truth.
Starting in the 1980s news articles and legislative committees would report on Orthodox men coopting the family court system to award them full custody of their children in the face of the father’s brutal physical abuse of their children, merciless beating of their wives, evicting their wives from the family home (not allowing them the privilege to even collect their personal items and photos of their children), stripping their wives of custody of their children, and in some instances (such as in Catherine’s) asking the court to handcuff, shackle, and incarcerate the mothers of their children. In one case a mother who tried to go down to the Israeli Day Parade to see her child was threatened with incarceration.
What we have done in the Orthodox community is set a paradigm or model for the non Jewish world to follow. I call this “divorce Orthodox style” and it has now become the norm throughout America. It’s roots are in Orthodoxy. I know it’s painful to hear that. I also know it’s far easier to blame the messenger. But when you hold the siddur (Jewish prayer book) in your hand you will realize that failure to atone will bring God’s wrath upon our People in a way that I cannot bear to imagine. Dr. Neustein is not the one who is spreading “blood libel”; you are the one causing a fire raging out of control by twisting the words of an editorial to suit your delusional thinking.
When you admit in your post that Jewish networking among the professionals augured well for Allan Kassinoff you are acknowledging the Jewish cabal was STRONGER and MORE INFLUENTIAL than evidence of child abuse, wife abuse, cheating on one’s spouse, and choosing a girlfriend whose family members were sued for fleecing their fellow Jews in a Bernie Madoff-like scandal!! In fact, the Jewish bonds among the seedy professionals were stronger than the pleas of the young daughters to be with their mother. The Jewish community has made Catherine into a martyr and the consequences worldwide will be something we will have to live with. Her suffering is not going to be in vain. I’m afraid the painful truth is that if this social evil is not addressed by the Jewish community we will see many more crucifixions of Christian mothers. After all, if Jewish mothers are stripped of custody, then a fortiori (even more so) Christian mothers, like Catherine, will be stripped of their precious children. Does Hashem (God) want this for the Jewish People? We are the Chosen because we must do the right thing, and if not God will show his wrath. We know that fate all too well. Do we want that for our People?
a poster can actually twist the words of an editorialist, say whatever they want, and then actually believe their own prevarications and lies! This is not in accordance with Torah principles.
That’s funny , aren’t you exactly that in your post along with disseminating false information
Amazing , everyone is Judge & Jury
Btw Allan did NOT have a Jewish attorney
That’s interesting. With so much access to so many legal networks, why didn’t he choose an Orthodox Jew to represent him in such a significant matter? Were no good orthodox Jewish attorneys available?
Reply to Attorney David Zaslavsky:
Mr. Zaslavsky, may I humbly point out that the reports of the visitation supervisor clearly show how Allan Kassinoff placed his religious revulsion toward Christian symbols ahead of the security and needs of his daughter. The child wanted to keep a small Christmas tree that her mother had given her in her bedroom. This would not be displayed in the living room where Allan’s community members could see it. The child had a need to cling to the Christmas tree as she pined away for her mother. Her security was cruelly undermined by her father who placed his needs to be accepted by his fellow Jews above the yearning of his daughter to hold dear to her the gift her mother had given her.
In addition as shown in the court record Allan threw out the doggie bag of food the girl brought home from her mother. We don’t know if the food was unkosher. That is in question. But what is NOT in question is the psychological damage done to the child by wrenching the food away from her. In fact, a true Jew, like yourself, should know better. The Rambam (Maimonides) states that a Jew is permitted to eat non kosher food if failure to eat will result in starvation. Catherine’s daughter was psychologically STARVED of her mother when her mother was evicted from the family home and restricted to limited supervised visitation, which was eventually cut off all together based on the strong recommendation of one of the directors at the Westchester Jewish Community Services. So the Rambam would have permitted Catherine’s daughter to eat her mother’s food lest she face starvation (albeit psychological and not physical) if she were to be deprived of her mother’s food.
I am so glad you opened the door to the hard stats on the Jewish religious control of the family courts. By virtue of your admission “There are only 5 judges in Brooklyn that hear divorce cases…Of those 5 the three most senior follow either the Conservative or Orthodox Jewish faith” you HAVE confirmed the stranglehold of religious Jews on divorce courts. Since the percentage of Jews in Brooklyn make up only 18.4% of the demographic population of Brooklyn, WHY is it that THREE OUT OF FIVE senior judges (which is 60%!!) handling the delicacy of divorce and custody matters are, as you state, “either the Conservative or Orthodox Jewish faith.” The top heavy courts that handle divorce and custody stacked with practicing Jews becomes treacherous for women, both Christian and Jewish women. Since you like to read transcripts, may I suggest you look at the legislative hearing record of the New York State Senate and Assembly wherein an Orthodox rabbi came down as the SOLE witness to testify on behalf of a family court judge that drove two mothers to commit suicide as reported in the newspapers. This rabbi spoke glowingly of the misogynist judge, who thank God was eventually booted from the bench. In addition, The Jewish Week cited a legislative memo that uncovered that courts and agencies in New York, were “assisting divorced Orthodox Jewish fathers in custody proceedings.”
Lastly, how can you be a Jew if you use such vile language to assault a fellow Jew and a woman who is Orthodox Jewish and a reputed scholar? To quote you: “Finally, and most pointedly, as far as Dr. Amy Neustein is concerned, fuck her, her dog and the horse she rode in on.” I am aghast that a Jew would use such deplorable language toward another Jew. In so doing, you have revealed how you feel about Jewish women. And you’ve given the readers a window into your soul. The ugliness projected by you will not solve the problem. Who are You? And from Whence do you Come?
Someone here quoted positive reviews from when Amy Neustein’s book on family court was published. The fact that she was able and willing to create a detailed and professional critique of family court is all the more reason why the antisemitic content in this essay is disturbing.
This post could have been an opportunity to present evidence that religious bias helped motivate Judge Lubell, Marc Abrams, and the others to favor Allan over Catherine. After all, their social interconnections have already been well-documented. It is not a stretch to claim that shared Jewish faith was part of that.
However, all of this “blood libel” talk totally obscures Neustein’s reasonable points. I have no idea what she was trying to accomplish by stereotyping Jews and Christians sex lives. First she says that Jewish men want Christian women because they are more “accommodating” in bed. (Really?) Then she says that Christian women are “salivating and yearning” to share their bed with Jewish men. This is not the kind of gossip one publishes as a sociologist. It’s the kind of guy-talk middle-aged men might say in their backyard after too many beers with too many chasers. Kinda like that “grab ’em by their [well, you know]” Access Hollywood tape.
Frank, you should be insulted that someone took advantage of the forum provided by FR to publish unprofessional, antisemitic, and sometimes incoherent mumblings like these about sex, Crucifixion, and the Talmud. This kind of writing would never be tolerated in a professional setting. Amy Neustein evidently believes that Frank Report is closer to a pornographic magazine than a source for serious investigative reporting. She has damaged her own credibility and yours.
Comparing this post to From Madness to Mutiny makes Neustein seem like a sociological version of John Nash. The only time I’ve seen someone I know go from writing solid, influential books to crazy fringe conspiracies was a colleague who, we soon found out, was starting to suffer from Dementia.
With all that said, I do think there are valid points and useful observations made in this post. At least these are issues that people following the Kassenoff case should talk about. It’s just unfortunate that she chose to make these points by attaching them to bizarre and antisemitic rhetoric which adds nothing except for shock value.
What propaganda! Nasser was not against the Jewish people.
He opposed Zionist settler colonialism and US-UK imperialism. Don’t conflate that with being anti-Semitic. Criticism of state violence and colonial ideologies is not racism.
Will the Frank report advocate for Palestinian children killed by Zionist settlers?
On the contrary, it would appear that Jewish ideology and religion has made its way into the court system. There is no place for religious bias. The fact Connecticut is willing to argue Jewish marriage contracts is further indication that there may be a problem. I didn’t think religion was the problem in family court. Based on reading the thread, I can see it is. It’s also a big problem in New York.
Jewish guys don’t chase “shiksas” – Jewish women are very sexy & titillating in bed . SHIKSAS chase Jewish men for their wealth , know they will be spoiled & extremely committed to their families
How many different kinds of Jewish guys, Jewish women and shiksas are there?
I was writing in jest to responding the ridiculous comment the article stated about sex and Jewish women not pleasing Jewish men! I think the author is projecting her own sexual insecurities in her post!
When you know how many there are of each let us all know! Personally, I hate and never use the word shiksa and most people I know don’t either
Exactly the opposite is the case. You’re delusional, indeed!
They are…until they get married…..then it’s all downhill.
Dr Amy Neustein please take your head out of the sand
Dr. Amy Neustein’s column of June 28, 2023 in the Frank Report should be a serious wake-up call to all American Jews, Orthodox or not. I am an American Jew, as is Dr. Neustein. As such, we care deeply about two principles: Tikun Olam (repairing the world) and combating antisemitism. Unfortunately, when a Jew publicly harms an innocent mother, and/or mistreats or deprives an innocent child, he commits an act that brings down shame, harm, disgrace and danger on all of us. We are a small minority in this country, and it is obvious that the acts of a few in a visible minority reflect upon the many. I have seen many cases from New York Family Courts where Orthodox men have used their undeserved clout in the system to victimize, brutalize, slander and almost annihilate perfectly good mothers, as if they were criminals for simply trying to protect their children and maintain a good relationship with their children after divorce. Unfortunately, the Orthodox community in some New York jurisdictions has often “demotherized” women and poisoned their own children against them for being too feminist, too outspoken, not submissive enough, not kosher enough, or even (G-d forbid!) for being Christian. It is as if the first amendment has no place in the Family Court system when the Orthodox community attacks a mother. Please, fellow Jews, please, my Landsmen, listen: When you hurt a mother and a child, Jewish or non-Jewish, the larger world marks the forehead of all your brethren, and seething resentment and hatred build up against all of us! We must stop this scourge; it is the responsibility of us as Jews to course-correct and to stop alienating mothers from children, and children from mothers, regardless of their faith. Don’t make it easy for antisemites to point out atrocious behavior against mothers and children perpetrated by prominent Jews. Let there never be another mother — Christian, Jewish, or other — hounded to her death by the punitive and cruel conduct of the family courts.
The comment section here proves that antisemitism will result from this kind of conduct.
Michelle Etlin, Maryland
This article is bs
Writer is projecting
Can I assume that “bs” stands for best source?
Where do I begin ? This article is a farce & no legitimate Rabbi gave her the go ahead to have it printed
Since when do 3 Rabbi’s witness a naked woman dunking in the Mikveh for one’s conversion
Dr. Nuestein is not in touch with society and the advancements the Ultra Ultra Orthodox have made when coming to custody issues . They have made many great advancements including accepting their non religious children & even gay children . There’s a Rabbi & son who speak about their relationship as the son is gay . In my neighborhood a chassideshe girl overdosed after years of her parents trying to get her help . She was always welcomed home & when she passed her grandfather a distinguished Rabbi in his community invited all her friends to her funeral & spoke to them from the heart
People who grow up in these communities are well aware of the restrictions that still need to be worked on
No disrespect to Ms Amy I don’t know her story but her article reads of sour grapes and an ax to grind !
She makes judgement on a situation she was not involved in ! Trust me these judges therapists aren’t religious & probably couldn’t care less if they remained with a Jewish Father or Converted Mother (once converted to Judaism Catherine & her children are considered Jewish). If you told me it was an ultra orthodox couple that argument might have more legitimacy.
So this case has gone from Kassenoff vs Kassenoff to Jew vs Christian . Antisemitism at its best .
Again as no disrespect to the Dr I think she is projecting her own lack of sexuality onto Jewish Women who have worked hard to elevate themselves educationally , business . & sexually . She tips them down with her nonsense of how shiksa’s will do more in bed – like I said I guess she’s projecting her own sexless encounters because I can tell you the Chassideshe women in my neighborhood talk about sex, pleasing their husband , & how they have the hots for their man . My waxing ladies told me how many have interesting wax designs done on their bikini or how many are into having a Brazilian Wax job . We have enough of the non Jews who they and their Jew Hatred tear us down we don’t need one of our own disseminating false information .
May I ask you when did you meet the Kassenoff’s and their children to be able to state your assumptions on this families situation ?
Instead of adding fuel to the fire & being a shit stirrer keep your personal opinions to yourself unless you have something constructive to offer !
We don’t need a Rabbi we need unbiased judges and court professionals. Ones who are not forcing religion on people. The courts are for all walks of life. Not just Jewish court professionals charging astronomical fees. It appears that the polar opposite is happening. Jewish community is attacking the Christians. Putting their religious beliefs first. These comments are eye opening.
Sage journal 2006 . Psychology of women quarterly. Ligious leaders perspective on marriage, divorce and intimate partner violence. The religious leaders Jewish, Christian and Islamic faith. The intersection of intimate partner violence. A grounded theory for the fatherhood initiative. Although they placed a greater blame on the perpetrator most thought women some blame. For inating the abuse or for not leaving the situation. Suggest divorce be the last resort. Urging reconciliation.
“The highest principles for our aspirations and judgments are given to us in the Jewish-Christian religious tradition.”
Albert Einstein
Someone here quoted positive reviews from when Amy Neustein’s book on family court was published. The fact that she was able and willing to create a detailed and professional critique of family court is all the more reason why the antisemitic content in this essay is disturbing.
This post could have been an opportunity to present evidence that religious bias helped motivate Judge Lubell, Marc Abrams, and the others to favor Allan over Catherine. After all, their social interconnections have already been well-documented. It is not a stretch to question whether shared Jewish faith was part of that.
However, all of this “blood libel” talk totally obscures Neustein’s reasonable points. I have no idea what she was trying to accomplish by stereotyping Jews and Christians sex lives. First she says that Jewish men want Christian women because they are more “accommodating” in bed. (Really?) Then she says that Christian women are “salivating and yearning” to share their bed with Jewish men. This is not the kind of gossip one publishes as a sociologist. It’s the kind of guy-talk middle-aged men might say in their backyard after too many beers with too many chasers. Kinda like that ‘grab em by their [well, you know]’ Access Hollywood tape.
Frank, you should be insulted that someone took advantage of the forum provided by FR to publish unprofessional, antisemitic, and sometimes incoherent mumblings like these about sex, Crucifixion, and the Talmud. Such writing would never be tolerated in a professional setting. Amy Neustein evidently believes that Frank Report is closer to a pornographic magazine than a source for serious investigative reporting. She has damaged her own credibility and yours.
Comparing this post to From Madness to Mutiny makes Neustein seem like a sociological version of John Nash. The only time I’ve seen someone I know go from writing solid, influential books to crazy fringe conspiracies was a colleague who, we soon found out, was starting to suffer from Dementia.
With all that said, I do think there are valid points and useful observations made in this post. At least these are issues that people following the Kassenoff case should talk about. It’s just unfortunate that she chose to make these points by attaching them to bizarre and antisemitic rhetoric which adds nothing except for shock value.
“Groff failed to report for assigned Sunday shifts. Postal Service officials sought to accommodate Groff by attempting to facilitate shift swaps, but were not always successful. His absences caused tension among other carriers who had to cover his shifts, the Postal Service said. Groff received several disciplinary letters and resigned in 2019.
The 3rd Circuit last year rejected his claims, finding that exempting Groff caused “undue hardship” because it strained co-workers and disrupted workflow.
Groups representing some religions that are in the minority in the United States including Islam, Judaism and Hinduism had backed Groff in the case, saying they are disproportionately denied religious accommodations, forcing them to choose between their religion and their jobs.
The dispute also sparked debate over whether religious people should be considered more legally deserving than others to have weekend days off from work.”
https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-buoys-religious-employees-who-seek-accommodations-work-2023-06-29/
Isn’t that sort of a creepy pseudonym for those hostile yet friendly comments? If you’d prefer to remain anonymous, please at least tell us if your goals involve one or more of the following:
to insult a certain race, DNA, culture, heritage, faith, politics and/or personal food preference
to persuade others to agree with your opinions
to lead FR readers astray
to receive payment from critics who feel threatened by Frank’s transcendent journalism
to help C.B. and/or S.B.
to misdirect attention away from the disaster that was of all those international “NXIVM” projects
to assist the corruptible bk guy
to assist someone else
to spread false information
to hijack conversations
to spread doubt
to promote fear, hurt and/or harass
to get a thrill from posting mean comments
to avoid introspection and examination of your own behaviors
As you might already know, there’s a cancellation of all kinds going on in America, lately.
If you’re a coordinator or participant of some kind in a cancellation campaign involving genocide as your name might suggest, will you please let us know at your earliest convenience? I’m asking for a friend.
To My Friend Frank-
Proof positive Sicilians aren’t Italian, but African.
The following DNA study was performed in 1989:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2480742/
PC and Woke Culture have prevented further research.
Frank I hope you embrace your new ancestral heritage.
This 4th of July:
Play dominoes and double Dutch!!!! Drink a 40oz and smoke a blunt!!!
Eat ribs and friend chicken!!!
Get’a bitch pregnant and take-off!!!
https://youtu.be/Kr0tTbTbmVA
I still love respect you.
Frank, you will not print my comments I have sent in. Many never seem to show up in the comments, but you print the above. Really?
Hundreds of comments every day are a lot of comments to process, 11:17 am
John Julius Norwich wrote in his book, The Kingdom in the Sun:
“Norman Sicily stood forth in Europe — and indeed in the whole bigoted medieval world — as an example of tolerance and enlightenment, a lesson in the respect that every man should feel for those whose blood and beliefs happen to differ from his own.”
The people of Sicily, journalists like Frank, foreign service officers like John Julius Norwich are like the rabbis, lawyers and feds who show such kind consideration for family court victims of all faiths. Truly some of our best people on earth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOCM478K3dQ
Mickie W. – Your unprovoked meritless attacks against both the author and Catherine serve no purpose other than to confirm your myriad gross inadequacies as a human being. Since Catherine’s beautiful daughters likely are reading your disgusting postings regarding their beloved Mother, kindly refrain from posting any further filth intended to further harm Catherine’s children. It is duly noted that you made No Contribution to Judge Monaco’s Go Fund Me page on behalf of Catherine’s children.
This is a absolute nonsense post. Complete dross.
Today is week 5 and still no death certificate. Seems like it’s time to move on to the next story and let this story rest
There will be no, “resting” on this story. It’s everywhere. The Frank Report had tons of excellent investigative journalism – but this story is getting the most attention – according to the number of comments. The death certificate is not relevant. It’s making waves because it’s bringing to light the truth about Westchester Supreme Court….judges make rulings without having to account for or acknowledge any evidence in the case. They also have not been trained or have any real knowledge of children’s mental health. They are not mandated too! How sad a place we are in when our children are not valued!
Again, 5 weeks and no proof of death?
Hoax
Christine,
Which groups of individuals in Westchester family courts aren’t mandated reporters?! 🤔
Are you implying that lawyers and judges aren’t – and that’s the problem?
Aren’t they all mandated reporters?
“The death certificate is not relevant.”
Wrong. If it emerges that katherine lied about having terminal cancer and faked her death, it is highly relevant.
… or, salt in a wound when the husband and girlfriend try to take everything Catherine owned.
Wait. I thought she was homeless. Wait I thought she bought a house for $900k. Wait I thought she killed herself because she was terminally ill. Wait I thought she killed herself because she knew she wasn’t getting custody and couldn’t handle it. Wait I thought she had no money and she has Canadian citizenship where MAS is free but wait she spent over $9k to kill herself in Switzerland. Wait the court was corrupt. But wait the court made Allan give her close to $1M in one year.
I can go on but one thing is clear this woman is a liar.
Stop the hate and let this family just be
The children still not knowing the fate of their mother is child abuse at the highest level ! What mother doesn’t make sure her kids will have closure ? She didn’t even explain herself to them, they only know from Facebook exactly what the everyday person knows … that’s all part of abuse and a clear demonstration that it was never about wanting or caring about her girls ! She is only seeking revenge towards her ex and if it mean hurting her children in the process , SO BE IT !
You couldn’t be more wrong ! You are completely missing the point. If it was a hoax – it proves that they terrorized a mentally ill woman for 4 years in litigation – a vexatious litigation. It’s going to be even more disgraceful.
She was the litigious one. Do your research. She was suing Allan and everyone else in multiple courts whether it’s a hoax or not she is mentally ill and wouldn’t admit it or get help. You can’t help a narcissist like her and you shouldn’t blame others for her choices. Now move on and leave this family alone
Wait Robbie Harvey says she isn’t mentally ill. 😂😂😂
You’re all being played by the master manipulator known as Catherine kassenoff
Nope frank is on a mission. This case is generating some good information. The American people need to know all the angles. There are many places that investigative journalism must go. Clean up the court and the government. The family court players are going on notice. Frank is spotlightimg. I bet Connecticut wishes they gave Karen her kids back. I’m sure New York wishes it as well. Soldier on Frank.
Frank like Robbie Harvey are only on a self serving mission. There’s no good coming out of any of this. A man last his job and now can’t provide for his children. The same children so many of u claim to care so much about. The only thing accomplished here and on TikTok is the loss of employment and the ability for him to provide for his children. All of u spectators and so called analysts of this case have done nothing positive for this family or society as a whole. It’s time to move on.
“can’t provide for his children“? Does anyone else know that?
He doesn’t have a job thx to the Lynch mob so yes he can’t provide for his children. He is by no means a rich man. Catherine had over $2M as her last statement of net worth so stop pretending like she was poor. Now you all made sure he lost his job so yes he can’t provide for his kids. How’s the go fund me going. Did Robbie Harvey contribute or he’s still just in it for the clicks. Sickening 🤮
He’s going to be fine. I’m sure he is doing something on the side. Someone will hire him. He just can’t be in the limelight. He will have to cut down on expenses. I’m sure he’s capable of earning a reasonable salary somewhere.
Allen needs to sue his divorce attorney. Gus did not protect his client or the children. This divorce completely decimated his family. Did he mention that in his retainer ? Does the retainer mention that this may decimate his family and may cause irreparable damage to the children?
100%
Catherine did the irreparable harm. Stop blaming everyone else she’s the guilty one. Alive or dead.
Really? If the people have a right to know, why does the FR only defend one side & doesn’t do due diligence?
Sadly, Catherine’s tragedy is symptomatic of that which Catherine herself termed “A strategic financial war against the less monied spouse and devoid of all accountability.” Having witnessed both Jewish spouses and Christian spouses engaged in similar weaponization of the courts against spouses of the same faith, regardless of motive, these scorched earth attacks against innocents like Catherine and her beautiful daughters must stop now.
What no one is informing all of you protective mothers even the organizations that claim to help and support you which they already know all about this is hr 1471……
Now unlike in me to tell you all the truth until why your children are being removed and my mothers are being murdered and children are being murdered by abusive fathers and why access is more important over everything even abuse….
It’s called HR 1471 that was introduced into the houseways of meetings back in June of 2001 and the Transcript is horrible to read if you are a mother because all it does is paint you as a heteric and a w**** and even worse….
You want to know how we got here you gotta do your history.
You want to prevent it from happening in the future you gotta do history and know how we got here in the first place….
And I promise all of you Mother’s when you read the actual language you will be horrified and there is a paragraph number 25 where it starts to say that even male abusers should do the BIP re therapy programs so that they can become more marriageable….
They want abusers to become more marriageable and they are pushing the marriage since 1999 and you will start to see the truth marriage is the final goal of all of this including the Republican party and the Democratic Party they want women to be married and produce children.
Please wake up and do your research and know how your governments are working stop going into family court until you understand how that family court functions and if you don’t understand it don’t f****** hire a lawyer and give them all of your money because you’re just gonna end up childless homeless and God knows what….
Here’s a little excerpt for you to read to understand how they want to make abusers more marriageable…..
“Indeed, marriage is a goal and a value shared by many low-
income parents.\25\ There is a risk, however, that requiring grantee
projects to promote marriage too aggressively or too early may make it
more difficult to reach the parents who need services the most, or
encourage relationships that pose risks to the other parent or
child.\26\ Programs that focus on helping young parents to improve
their job prospects, nurturing, and relationship skills, and address
domestic violence–as some have put it, making them more marriageable”
2001 Ways and Means.
Please feel free to leave a message and contact me should you want any more truth because I will not give you anything but the truth and you will understand why ask women really have no hope because the language and what was presented is completely bias and discriminative and they only invited father’s rights groups and father’s rights group supporters.
Jewish English Lexicon:
shiksa
https://jel.jewish-languages.org/words/516
pritse
https://jel.jewish-languages.org/words/443
Hey dummy it’s called slang!!!
Webster’s and Wikipedia don’t cover slang.
You’re dumber than a moulignon!
Jewish English Lexicon
moser
https://jel.jewish-languages.org/words/1700
This has absolutely nothing to do with religion. Congress during the Obama administration.
You’re lying it has everything to do with religion because during the Obama administration the funding that he okay it was to go towards only organizations that protained to the faithful faithful faith-based organizations meaning churches religion learn your truth do your research before you actually spew lies!!!!!
This is disgusting.
Thank you so much Dr. Amy Neustein for being motivated by the truth& feeling the pain of the abused. Although you’re surrounded by 70 wolves who seek to perpetuate evil & destruction, stand like David to destroy not only one Goliath , rather an army of Goliaths. G- bless you to continue your perseverance to bring down the armies of evil
Rabbi Menachem Shuchat
I don’t believe you’re a legitimate Rabbi. As if a rabbi is reading this smut.
“From Northeastern University Press:
From Madness to Mutiny
Why Mothers Are Running from the Family Courts — and What Can Be Done about It
Amy Neustein, Michael LesherNortheastern Series on Gender, Crime, and Law
Northeastern University Press
2005 • 316 pp. 6 x 9″
Gender Studies / Law & Society / Sociology$19.95 Paper, 978-1-55553-656-5
A powerful exposé of the family court system’s prejudice against mothers trying to protect their sexually abused children.
In this astonishing book, sociologist Amy Neustein and attorney Michael Lesher examine the serious dysfunction of the nation’s family courts — a dysfunction that too often results in the courts’ failure to protect the people they were designed to help. Specifically, the authors chronicle cases in which mothers who believe their children have been sexually abused by their fathers are disbelieved, ridiculed or punished for trying to protect them. All too often the mother, in such a case, is deemed the unstable parent, and her children are removed from her care, to be placed in foster care or even with the father credibly accused of abusing them.
Employing a special form of sociological inquiry known as ethnomethodology, they show how judges, private attorneys, law guardians, child protective service caseworkers and court-appointed mental health experts on a day-to-day basis collaboratively produce a closed and claustrophobic family court setting that makes practical sense to the system’s practitioners — but looks like madness to everyone else. They also describe the social interactive work of mothers trapped inside the system. Faced with judicial rulings that seem to violate their most basic parental values, these mothers litigate furiously, take their stories to the press, go on hunger strikes, or turn fugitive with their children through a modern-day “underground railroad.”
From Madness to Mutiny offers an overview of family court malfunction and the parental mutiny that results from it. The authors outline the new legal landscape that makes the madness possible and show how the system has failed to react to severe criticism from media and legislators. And they discuss ways to reform the family courts, with the goal of transforming them from instruments of punishment to true institutions of justice.
Reviews:
From Madness to Mutiny . . . is an emotionally tough but intellectually satisfying read; it is a volume that belongs on the bookshelf of every professional who deals with child custody and child abuse, from lawyers and judges to psychologists and social workers. — Journal of Child Custody
“There is extraordinary merit in the claims the authors make… [and] many of the reforms, suggested in the concluding three chapters, are worth consideration.” — Law and Politics Book Review
“This book is a must read for every feminist, especially mothers.” — Helen Grieco, Executive Director, California National Organization of Women
“A groundbreaking new book that is perhaps the most highly readable scholarly work I’ve encountered in my 14 years in academia . . . The very first to provide the historical and contextual chronology of this system’s steady decline into chaos and corruption over the past two decades. It is eminently accurate and rigorously documented — a book that will hit scholars, professionals, and lay persons right between their eyes. This is the book that mothers have been waiting for . . . I consider this book among the most important of the decade.” — Maureen Therese Hannah, Siena College
“I don’t believe” you know what a real Rabbi is. FYI I am a real Rabbi over 40 years! Therefore, I read with pain, awe & admiration Dr. Amy’s articles & books. FYI a real rabbi is one who cares about the plight of the oppressed & the abused.
To Dr Neustein, my prayer is that May G-d bless you to succeed in the mission that He anointed you for to eradicate the evils being done to these children & their so needed mothers.
With love & pain
Rabbi Menachem Shuchat
Dear Rabbi,
Thank you for posting your comments. I hope the recent focus on family court cases will prompt interfaith efforts to successfully fight evil armies, everywhere.
(every Jewish woman knows she can never compete with a man’s desires for a shiksa because they are known to be accommodating in certain ways.)
Cite your sources, Doctor. Be specific.
So dumb Jewish women are incredibly accommodating sexually, until you marry them anyway
Why do Jewish women love doggy style?
Because they hate to see a man with a smile on his face.
Really?! Because I’m a Jewish woman and men of all faiths have never complained. Quite the contrary
If you can, stomach reading this blog from a misogynistic Jew, I think he has something up what most Jewish men think about Shishka‘s https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=45680
Exactly Jewish women are slutty too
Reality doesn’t need sources! It just needs honest viewers
Writer is projecting her own sexual insecurities & lack of it . Jewish Women even the ultra orthodox to the chassideshe lady enjoy titillating their spouses – they dress beautifully & their stores carry the sexiest lingerie – their zip codes usually show tremendous mail order of Victoria Secret – my waxing lady told me they do Brazilian Waxing to even having designs created accentuated by rhinestones ! My neighbors love to talk about having sex with their husbands , how they have the hots for them etc
The Jewish man doesn’t chase the “shiksa” rather she chases him because they are known to have wealth , be good providers , & spoil their wives & children because family is important to them ! I think it’s time this Dr gets her head out of the sand !!!
Let’s not forget that abuse happens in every culture and religion. Sure this couple had issues regarding practicing religion which often can become an issue with interfaith couples. However abuse isn’t an excuse nor should pointing at ones religious beliefs be an excuse either.
Judge Lubell is a pay for play judge. He assigns his people to his cases, opines as they wish, they pay to re-elect him, the attorneys and evaluators rake in millions, he takes Jewish children from Jewish mothers too. He is lethal and corrupt. He talks off the record, propositions women and I witnessed him announce, off the record of course, that he has his fundraiser coming up and he expects all the attorneys to be there. The courthouse is his private fiefdom. When you write to the judicial committee to complain, you get a stock letter back, we did not find any wrongdoing.
Family court corruption usually involves only a few key players corrupting the same courts for years because most parents and guardians in the worst cases are so destroyed and without the strength or resources to coordinate and carry out campaigns. Respectable data collection shows trends and outcomes. Maps of collusion and conflicts of interest offer the visual many need to understand what’s happening. Letters and accompanying documents in public requests/responses to/from state and federal offices can inspire new oversight and effective accountability. Unified, organized responses to the corruption help the most. Small groups help, larger groups of smaller groups help more. Lots of good work happening now with that approach on both coasts!
https://www.pulitzer.org/page/2023-journalism-submission-guidelines-requirements-and-faqs#:~:text=How%20to%20submit%20an%20entry,using%20our%20online%20entry%20form.
So Frank you gonna put on that wig?
Ignoring the elephant in the room does not remove the elephant. To start with, in the video itself Catherine showed terrible distress over having been eclipsed from the Kassenoff Passover Seder. She mentioned that she was left behind for Passover. She said that on the videotape which is now part of the case study. You can’t deny it. Thus, the religious strife that existed in this tragic marriage was real and it made its way into court documents and forensic reports and the video. Times have changed. There is a growing sex abuse survivor movement in the Orthodox Jewish community today. What that means is that survivors are taking off the gloves and forcing their tormentors to face the truth. Religion was used as a sword in this marriage. Yes, there were other issues too. The excruciating pain of infidelities, the mocking of a mother to her children, the beating, jailing, evicting and finally the complete evisceration of this mother from the lives of her daughters.
As a Jew I know that the Talmud says the girls under the age of 12 must stay with the mother when parents divorce. The reason is that a female child needs her mother. After age 12 the Talmud says the girls can choose who they want to live with. Catherine saw to it that her daughters had an excellent education, good medical care, clothing, love and concern. Living under the roof of a man that has affairs was a dagger in her heart. The twice stricken cancer mother had too much to bear. My friend, I’m afraid that refusal to recognize the elephant won’t obliterate its existence. Similarly failure to recognize the power of Jewish judges and their accessories in the Westchester courts doesn’t make it go away. Yes, I know there was a Holocaust. I lost family members. I am very sorry it happened. But that is not an excuse for allowing a mother to be tortured by the removal of her daughters from her life. This was a crucifixion. The world sees it. And the world won’t show clemency because those who did it had a Holocaust.
No matter how much dirt you want to throw in Catherine’s face, the world knows what was done to her. This is not the Jewish way; it is not Hashem’s (God’s) way. The longer the community defends its wickedness in this case the worse will be their punishment. God registers everything. It says in the Talmud that God hears us particularly when we cry. Catherine was crying on the tape saying that her neck was terribly sore and her nails were broken to the quick from the “fight” she had with Allan. Why would a Jewish man lay a hand on his wife. We Jews know that in our religion we don’t beat our wives. But when they are a giyores (female convert to Judaism) we DO mistreat them because we know they are weak and dependent on us. This ugly truth is known. And I can talk about it. You can lie, deny, deflect all you want but the ADL is not going to stop me or anyone else from talking about the sins of my community that MUST be eradicated. The party is over. The New York Times that did the “hit job” on the Hasidic schools is now looking into the crucifixion of Catherine. If they expose the family court we are at the door of the United States Attorney General who will open this up. We’ve been waiting for a NYT article and now we are going to see it materialize because their Jewish writers won’t tolerate the misogyny and cruelty of a Jewish cabal against an innocent Christian mother who converted with all her heart until she was woefully betrayed by infidelities. Did the rabbis help her? Do you see them coming forward now?
I watched the animals today. Not one worshipped any God. Not one. The birds seem to sing for each other. Man seemed the only creature out of place.
If the birds are happy to sing, some might also be thankful that they can sing.
Wtf are you talking about?! Catherine wasn’t distressed that she couldn’t join Allan for Passover. She was distressed that he was going to his family for Passover. Once she decided she no longer wanted to be Jewish anymore she expected him to follow suit after all everyone always did whatever Catherine wanted or deal with her wrath. Which you all seem to justify but if you really watch the videos carefully she’s the aggressor in every one. Regardless all Talmud is up for interpretation as anyone who has studied it prolifically would tell you. And the notion that a girl must stay with her mother u til the age of 12 is one such interpretation. What if being with the mother put the child in danger? What if the mother decided she no longer wanted to be Jewish and now religion is an issue. The bottom line is there’s no concrete support for your comment.
Additionally, Allan did not cheat on Catherine. Quite the contrary, it was she who cheated on him. She had a boyfriend. And in court papers they talk about the sting operation in which she wanted Allan, her husband, to help her coerce […], her boyfriend, so she could trap him and show to his wife. Once Allan caught Catherine cheating he then said I guess we have an open marriage. People. There are over 3000 court filings stop commenting like you know the truth. Catherine was a known liar. She doctored evidence and lied under oath. Wake up and break the spell. Just because she’s dead doesn’t make her a saint. She’s probably enjoying a drink with satan in hell
11:52 am,
This isn’t a contest to compare and contrast the nitty gritty of her bad behaviors vs his bad behaviors.
Divorces that cost $3,000,000 and $4,000,000 are okay with you?
You’re okay with taking a mother away from her children and her home for three years?
You’re fine with “family court” professionals totally stressing out every member of that family for so long and doing so much harm?
Just because Catherine wrote that the divorce cost between $3-$4M doesn’t make it so. It appears she lies a lot. And yes I do believe sometimes you have to limit access to a parent for the child’s or children’s well beings over the desires of the parents. Court papers reveal that she abused and manipulated the children and therefore her access was supervised. Just because she claims corruption doesn’t make it so.
Check this link and then look through all the due diligence on this group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/6641116752577053/permalink/6657037844318277/?mibextid=S66gvF
Thank you, but no thank you, 9:17. You wrote, “Just because Catherine wrote that the divorce cost between $3-$4M doesn’t make it so. It appears she lies a lot.”
1. Both of those statements look like they might be your opinions.
2. Did you happen to find the primary source(s) of information for those two facts/opinions you wrote there?
I wrote in the comment above, “Divorces that cost $3,000,000 and $4,000,000 are okay with you?“ simply because:
1. I saw somewhere the Kassenoff divorce took about $3,000,000 from that family.
2. I read somewhere else a few of the same court players took about $4,000,000 from a different family in Westchester County.
If you happened to find the exact amounts of all money paid to each player in the Kassenoff case, please post that information here with your sources.
I’m not on Facebook and don’t spend time reading opinions about hearsay regarding second-hand information someone told someone else — and I don’t care for gossip.
All the best to you.
They both cheated and lied and abused each other and the girls. They were not meant to be together – it’s pretty common among divorcing couples. Perhaps they both were manipulative. They were certainly a toxic couple and it not a nurturing supportive relationship. We all get it. It does not mean that the parent child relationship should have been severed for one parent over the other. Allan did cheat and you are delusional if you think this isn’t true. Ultimately who cares. Lots of parents behave badly and still share custody. Those girls deserved 2 parents and one of them used every legal trick in the book, group bullying and a whole lot of money within a corrupt legal system to end the relationship with their mother. Your responses are petty and fail to grasp the bigger picture. My 2 cents.
Is this you Allen? is this you Gus? Where is the proof?
I’m sorry some of us look at court filings not just listen to an idiot tiktoker like Robbie Harvey who abuses women by preying on those most vulnerable and pretending like he cares about their cause when actually he only cares about his clicks. Robbie provide us with a list of charities you contribute towards
Starting sometime around the 1950s, some kind of tribe somewhere must have designed the global family court plan to be a gentler, more gradual and acceptable Generalplan Ost for all families and children around the world. People like Carroll Quigley might have known if the goal was to target all families in family courts or just certain types to start — such as conservative Jewish, Christian and Muslim families.
Trigger warning to get ready for the link below: Note the mention of three religions. The hypothesis here has nothing to do with “anti-Semitism”.
Dr. Neustein could have easily substituted the topic and a few words and phrases with all kinds of close-knit communities. Her assumptions and conclusions would be just as plausible. “Southern-style justice”/“good ol’ boy network”; “Masonic”/“fraternal oaths”; “Democratic”/“ActBlue folks”, “Conservative”/“totally sane” … along with respective associated words and phrases would have worked, too.
I know totally sane Jews of all kinds who would never commit any kind of horrible crime against any mother, children, friend or neighbor. The problem Dr. Neustein describes in Westchester County is the same problem with small toxic groups of any kind doing whatever they please with no consequences for criminal acts. The lack of oversight and accountability fo crimes committed in the family courts is the problem, not the religion of the perpetrators.
Whenever any group of people with shared interests and identities lets a normal healthy sense of tribalism get to the point of inflicting harm on others, that’s the problem. In Westchester County, Gus isn’t Jewish. If he was the ringleader in the Kassenoff case, he played the same part as a “mean girl” leader in high school, with no shame and no conscience managing complicated and obviously destructive schemes. With smart insider trading for those millions of dollars, Gus could easily schmooze with tyrannical world leaders. He and Bill Gates could build bioweapons and make billions from the cures. If Carol, Susan and Marc join him, they could all leave the world of family court warmongering to warmonger with other warmongers all over the world. The last hypothetical is far-fetched, for sure, but those scenarios fit easily in Dr. Neustein’s paragraphs with very little editing. If you subtract 1943 from 2023, the answer is 80.
Eighty years wasn’t that long ago.
“… The plan was a work in progress … deprived of their leaders and most of their intelligentsia (through mass murder, destruction of culture, the ban on education above the absolutely basic level, and kidnapping of children … It is a question of existence, thus it will be a racial struggle of pitiless severity … the full proposal has never been found, though several documents refer to it or supplement it … various percentages of the conquered or colonized people who were targeted for removal and physical destruction … The Plan stipulated that there were to be different methods of treating particular nations and even particular groups within them. …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
Dr. Amy Neustein’s column of June 28, 2023 in the Frank Report should be a serious wake-up call to all American Jews, Orthodox or not. I am an American Jew, as is Dr. Neustein. As such, we care deeply about two principles: Tikun Olam (repairing the world) and combating anti-Semitism. Unfortunately, when a Jew publicly harms an innocent mother, and/or mistreats or deprives an innocent child, he commits an act that brings down shame, harm, disgrace and danger on all of us. We are a small minority in this country, and it is obvious that the acts of a few in a visible minority reflect upon the many. I have seen many cases from New York Family Courts where Orthodox men have used their undeserved clout in the system to victimize, brutalize, slander and almost annihilate perfectly good mothers, as if they were criminals for simply trying to protect their children and maintain a good relationship with their children after divorce. Unfortunately, the Orthodox community in some New York jurisdictions has often “demotherized” women and poisoned their own children against them for being too feminist, too outspoken, not submissive enough, not kosher enough, or even (G-d forbid!) for being Christian. It is as if the first amendment has no place in the Family Court system when the Orthodox community attacks a mother. Please, fellow Jews, please, my Landsmen, listen: When you hurt a mother and a child, Jewish or non-Jewish, the larger world marks the forehead of all your brethren, and seething resentment and hatred build up against all of us! We must stop this scourge; it is the responsibility of us as Jews to course-correct and to stop alienating mothers from children, and children from mothers, regardless of their faith. Don’t make it easy for antisemites to point out atrocious behavior against mothers and children perpetrated by prominent Jews. Let there never be another mother – Christian, Jewish, or other – hounded to her death by the punitive and cruel conduct of the family courts.
The comment section here proves that antisemitism will result from this kind of conduct.
Michelle Etlin, Maryland
Thank you so much for posting your comments. About eighty years ago, German Nazis confiscated my Christian grandmother’s farm in Poland. During WWII, my relatives died trying to save as many people as possible. I recently learned about one relative who lost her life trying to save members of three Jewish families.
Years later in America, several attorneys and evaluators of Jewish heritage who were working in family courts in Connecticut almost destroyed my family. I barely survived that wide-awake nightmare and I still suffer from PTSD as a result of their blatant crimes and corruption in the “family courts”.
What’s been happening in the “family courts” in America and around the world since the 1980s is another onslaught on families and children of all faiths. Most children and families who survive the most horrible corruption and crimes in “family courts” are just as physically, emotionally and/or financially destroyed as they would be had they survived the Holocaust eighty years ago.
An interfaith group could conduct thorough and detailed studies of the most destructive “family court” cases, focusing on the role of faith and religion in those cases so people of all faiths can help the public understand what’s been happening in family courts. Good people of all faiths want to stop the crimes and corruption in family courts.
I wonder if such an effort was already tried — also wondering how to find out if that kind of work is happening now.
Is it simply coincidental that most of the participants in this case are Jewish or does just reflect the population of the area in Connecticut where this case took place?
Only 3.3 percent of the population in Connecticut is Jewish
I think this case is in Westchester County, NY, which is 15% Jewish.
West Hartford CT has the largest Jewish community in the state.
“… For Arbiters in Custody Battles, Wide Power and Little Scrutiny
By Leslie Eaton
May 23, 2004
When warring parents head to court to fight over child custody in New York, their lawyers often let them in on a little secret: The most powerful person in the process is not the judge. It is not the other parent, not one of the lawyers, not even a child. …”
https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/23/nyregion/for-arbiters-in-custody-battles-wide-power-and-little-scrutiny.html
This article is disgusting and the anti-Semitic undertones are deeply troubling.
First off, it’s important to note that the claims made in the article about Catherine Kassenoff’s marriage, motivations, and religious choices are all based on personal speculations. Dr. Neustein doesn’t really have any solid evidence to back up these claims, and it’s not fair to make assumptions about someone’s personal life without concrete knowledge.
One of the problematic aspects of the article is how it suggests that Jews involved in the family court system conspired against Catherine Kassenoff due to religious prejudice. This kind of assertion plays into harmful stereotypes and fosters the notion of Jewish control or influence in legal matters. We need to be cautious about using religious affiliation as a basis for assigning blame or assuming malicious intent.
Another concern is how the article selectively quotes religious texts to support its narrative, without providing a comprehensive understanding of Jewish law and beliefs. By cherry-picking these texts, it misrepresents Jewish teachings and promotes negative stereotypes. It’s important to consider the full context of religious texts and not use them to further harmful narratives.
It’s also worth mentioning that the article seems to make broad generalizations by implying that the actions of a few individuals involved in the case reflect the behavior of an entire religious or ethnic group. This kind of generalization is unfair and can fuel anti-Semitic sentiments. We should be cautious about attributing the actions of individuals to an entire group.
Lastly, family court cases are complex, and decisions are made based on a thorough examination of evidence and the best interests of the child. Suggesting that religious bias played a primary role in the outcome of this case oversimplifies the process.
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again, Amy Neustein’s license to practice should be revoked. To opine and write an article about people she has never met or treated and to fill it with blatant lies about the process of conversion is shameful. Unless Amy Neustein has read the thousands of court filings and the 2 forensic reports and has seen all the videos hen she’s just another predator trying to cash in on the kassenoff tragedy. There are children involved here. Children’s whose lives have been destroyed by a bunch of strangers who sit in judgment with very little facts but have seen Robbie Harvey’s TikTok’s and others proclamations of justice. I guess no one needs to go to school anymore because the uneducated seem to know it all.
Amy Neustein writes that rabbis watch a woman dunk in the mikvah Seriously?! Even when a woman goes to the mikvah monthly it is only another woman who watches her dunk and she holds the towel up so she can only see her once she’s submerged in the water.
I think it’s time for the Robbie Harvey’s and the Amy Neustein’s of the world to get a life so this family can have one and leave them alone already.
You all have done enough damage to this family.
Stop trying to put obstacles so that allan can’t get a job and provide for these girls that you want to save. Save them by leaving them alone because they ain’t getting far with that go fund me of $6500 that they’ll never see
STOP THE WRECKAGE NOW!!!!!
Oh my Lord or YHWH. How in the world was this even published here. This whole article is insane. As is the woman who wrote it. It is littered with crazy ideas. I wonder if FR just publishes this kind of nonsense to get more views and comments.
Same jewish story in Connecticut … anti-Christian ideology promoted by jew judges, jew vendors, jew lawyers, jew therapists, jew evaluators, in full public view. Elliot Solomon, Gerard Adelman, Holly Wetstone, Lynda Munro, Jane Grossman, Anthony Truglia, Daniel Klau, Donna Heller, Anna Schofield, Joette Katz all jew judges raping childhoods. Attorneys Steve Dembo, Nancy Aldrich, Reuben Midler, Jocelyn Hurwitz, Edward Nusbaum, Alex Cuda, Martin Libbin, Veronica Riech, Therapists/evaluators Bruce Freedman, Sydney Horowitz, Robert Horwitz, Andrew Hechtman, Jessica Caverly, Linda Smith. All jews, plundering family bank for shekels. There is a long history of jewish people and fascination with consuming Christian babies.
I personally would like to thank all the whores out there. No matter what religion you come from, I love each and every one of y❤️u. I like to tell, my wife how to do that thing the whores do. She complies, so I’m a happy Jimmy.
The religion of the players in the case is wholly irrelevant to this story.
Religion may have been an issue in the Kassenoff marriage, BUT that was NOT the reason their marriage fell apart. Further, religion did not play a role in why Ratner, Lubell, Abrams, and Most did what they did in the Kassenoff matter.
Please do not mix this issue in, as it takes away from the horrible conduct of all, which was orchestrated by Gus Dimopoulos (NOT Jewish).
Jonathan Davidoff. Who made you god with power to determine this issue? How exactly are you so certain this article’s argument has no merit? What makes you so all knowing?
What an arrogant buffoon you are.
Pretty funny coming from somebody who is anonymous. How do you know that I’m wrong?
Sounds like you have a personal
“ax to grind”
Jonathan, you forgot to say, in my opinion.
Thank you
So now the FR has gone full anti-Semitic:
“Not only is Judge Lubell a Jew, but he is very much identified with Jewish themes, such as Holocaust remembrance”
Commemorating the Holocaust makes him suspect? Wow. Just wow.
“This was a religious war against Catherine, who was crucified and ended her life as a result”
Crucified?
“their mother was a martyr – killed because she taught Christianity to her children”
“many Christian mothers were salivating and yearning to see their children fathered by Jewish men”
“the Kassenoff Klan and their Jewish auxiliaries in the family court”
Finally, time for vengeance. Calling for a pogrom:
“Those who persecuted Catherine will live to see the ire of those in America and Europe for the Kassenoff Klan”
Shortly after it began promoting the Chakravorty “tampering” tale, I stopped taking the FR seriously and followed it solely for entertainment value. Anti-Semiticism is not funny. It’s hateful garbage.
For four weeks, you’ve been trying to convince us that the judges, lawyers, psychologists, evaluators and other in this case have been ruling for Allan because he wrote the checks.
Now, you want us to believe that they’re all ruling for Allan because they’re part of a Jewish cabal.
If all you have is wacky conspiracy theories, it must be that they ruled for Allan because he made a better case on the merits.
Or the jews are actually after your children.
Anonymous @ 6:27 AM: Perhaps you didn’t notice that except for a short intro, this post was authored by Dr. Amy Neustein, Ph.D. All Frank Report is trying to do is present another opinion as to what happened in the Kassenoff divorce case.
K.R. Claviger-
Different opinion or perspective?!?
What’a crock of shit!!!!!
If that’s the case, Claviger….
I got another perspective I’d like to share with you…..
…..The perspective of you looking up at my balls and butthole as you lick my taint.
K.R Claviger & Frank,
You both know I’m a fan of the
Frank Report.
Claviger I have always enjoyed your articles/stories and have never said anything disrespectful to you before today.
***
“…Dr. Nuestain Ph.D present another opinion….”
Are you F’ing kidding?!?
My wife is 1/2 Silcian & 1/2 something else. Frank knows what.
Hate begets hate.
I say a ton of shit joking around.
This woman is 100% serious and 10,000% seriously insane.
What point of view is Newstain sharing?
She’s nuttier than Alonzo!
Some Westchester County judges considered Catherine to be an unreliable witness. Judges Adelman and Moukawsher in Connecticut considered Attorney Nickola Cunha to be an unreliable witness. Was it because Catherine was a Christian and because Nickola is Christian?
Do judges in New York and Connecticut use the same standards to determine who is and who isn’t a reliable witness?
During the Holocaust, did Jews surviving the massacres need to witness non-Jewish attempts to save Jews in order to honor the non-Jewish heroes as, “righteous among the nations” instead of noble failures?
Why did the Assistant Principal of Cos Cob Elementary School in Greenwich, Connecticut feel so strongly about his need to hire anti-Christian teachers?
If Allan left the Christmas tree (a pagan symbol) on his porch instead of bringing it into his home and Leonardo da Vinci was a Johannite who considered Jesus Christ to be “a usurper”, why do so many who love Leonardo da Vinci’s work hate Allan? How many influential people in The Department of Justice decided to tell the American people that some Christians should be considered to be “potential domestic terrorists”?
Here’s the point: Anti-Christian sentiment in Westchester County and elsewhere isn’t because of “the Jews”.
Anyone blaming “the Jews!” for all the problems in family courts are as misinformed as “The Family Court Circus” guy and “The Handsome Truth” social influencer.
Anyone still wondering why there’s been no oversight for Gus, Marc, Gerard and Chris as they spark and stoke fires in highly-profitable “family court” conflicts should look to the administrators in administrative offices paid tax dollars to provide oversight and accountability for family courts.
Allan wasn’t screaming like a “crazy guy” because of “the Jews!”. Taking $3,000,000 from Allan, torturing his family for four years and sending him close to the edge of a nervous breakdown didn’t happen because of “the Jews!”
Maybe it was The Templars. They were among the first bankers who owned large tracts of land and influenced world politics. Some Templars associated with the Johannites and some Johannites hated Jesus Christ. Some say, when some Freemasons associated with the Templars who associated with the Johannites, the symbol of “Bhaphomet” and “the holy grail” might have had something to do with the worshipping of John the Baptist.
It looks like Freemasons, Templars and Johannites had something to do with making people hate Jesus Christ. References to Jesus Christ and Christians in many Jewish texts isn’t kind. It’s extremely cruel and vicious — like so many of the comments targeting Catherine in comment sections of some articles here.
Some say those red crosses on the Nina, the Pinta and the Santa Maria were Templar crosses. Some say Freemasonry established Washington DC with cornerstones, oil, trowels, deceit and Luciferian symbolism.
Somehow, most people are still truly good people.
How did so many good people get tricked into hating all _______________________. ? (Fill in the blank.)
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/exposed-greenwich-ct-assistant-principals-hiring-discrimination-ensures/
“The fierce denunciation of Christianity by Irish Druids appears to have resulted in Simon Magus being associated with Druidism.“
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Magus
“Judges Adelman and Moukawsher in Connecticut considered Attorney Nickola Cunha to be an unreliable witness.”
If Mr. Adelman and Mr. Moukawsher are brothers in a Masonic fraternity, they and hundreds(?) of “brothers” who are judges, attorneys, legislators and those working in law enforcement might consider Attorney Cunha to be an unreliable witness — or as one who is “profane”.
Attorney Cunha certainly has the will, determination and ability to incapacitate the corrupted cabal in Connecticut family courts. She knows a small cabal of individuals has destroyed families and children in the state since the 1980s. Knowing that cabal has destroyed so many families in family courts upset Attorney Cunha, and rightfully so.
If Mr. Moukawsher and Mr. Adelman are members of the private organization called “Freemasonry”, they practice law in a two-tiered system of justice.
Attorney Cunha’s status on the lower tier in that system has been explained this way:
“Where the grant of relief to the profane would incapacitate us from granting similar relief to our brother, then must the preference be given to him who is ‘of the household.’ In its ordinary use profane signifies one who is irreligious and irreverent, but in its technical adaptation it is applied to one who is ignorant of sacred rites. The word is compounded of the two Latin words pro and fanum, and literally means before or outside of the temple; and hence a profanus among the ancients was one who was not allowed to enter the temple and behold the mysteries.”
Attorney Cunha is Christian, not a Freemason or a Luciferian — and Mr. Adelman’s black fedora hat doesn’t signify Judaism in the traditional sense if he eats BLT sandwiches (as he did a few years ago) and destroys children and families on purpose as he did for several decades.
If Mr. Adelman and Mr. Moukawsher are “brothers” who colluded with each other to repress and withhold information about corruption in Connecticut family court, it could be because Mr. Moukawsher couldn’t, wouldn’t or was too afraid to let Attorney Cunha incapacitate him from granting similar relief to Mr. Adelman.
Masonic loyalty oaths are brutal. Their threats of murder to all who break their loyalty oaths are as violent as the oaths of MS-13. Worse than the NXIVM DOS oaths and just as weird — and yet all the rich and famous people are involved, right?
What kind of fools did we let control this world? Why did the feds wait twenty years to prosecute the NXIVM cabal? Why don’t we consider Freemasonry to be the dangerous, divisive and destructive cult that it is?
Members of Freemasonry must keep secrets from their families. Their practice is the exact opposite of “Diversity Equity and Inclusion”.
Who would be surprised if such a supranational cabal of “brothers” began a few hundred years ago — or a few thousand years ago — to fool everyone and to take over the world. The destruction of families in “family courts” starting in the 1980s would make sense in that kind of plan. So would the opening of every western nations’ border to burn every western nation to the ground. The Bronfman sisters might call that “Ethical Science”. The Freemason cult would call it “order out of chaos”. George Bush, the New Haven Skull and Crossbones guy would call it, “The New World Order.”
Read all about it:
https://archive.org/details/encyclopdiaoffre00mack/page/n7/mode/2up
Nine religious buildings and churches are for sale in Connecticut. Eight Catholic parishes in New Haven are merging into one. Such a massive cultural shift away from traditional faiths and morals doesn’t happen overnight or by mistake. Norman Dodd spoke about the dangers of the non-profit Carnegie, Ford, Rockefeller and Guggenheim endowments and foundations.
Why wasn’t what he said in mainstream news headlines?
This year, the Microsoft company owns much of the world with help from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Multinational companies in BlackRock and Vanguard own whatever China doesn’t own. No one dares to think twice about Bill’s answer to that question about Mr. Epstein and Canada is now burning. Some say those fires will burn all summer long.
Look at a map of fires in Canada. If you’re in the northern states of America, open your windows and smell the air. France is apparently on fire, too.
“NEW HAVEN, Conn. — Eight parishes in the New Haven area will merge starting in July, the Hartford Archdiocese announced Wednesday.
Saints Aedan and Brendan, Saint Anthony, Saint Martin de Porres, Saint Michael, Our Lady of Guadalupe and Saint Stanislaus will be merged into Saint Mary Parish. Their separate entities will cease to exist at that time …”
https://www.fox61.com/article/news/local/new-haven-county/new-haven/eight-new-haven-catholic-parishes-to-merge/520-d00a8535-4ccc-4d7b-b292-c584ae5c342c
Didn’t Hitler warn the world about the jews?
Have you bothered to read the files labeled “Court Testimony”? Catherine violated numerous court orders, didn’t always exercise her visitation, and did a LOT of crazy stuff. She also lied several times to the court and in her fb posts, riling up the other parents at her daughters’ school to the point where the other parents were going to make a human chain.
You’ve already made a horrible mistake in reporting, causing an innocent woman to be harmed. Please investigate before posting
Dear “Catherine Kassenoff – Factual Analysis Facebook Group”,
Please send what you have to the feds. It looks like several crimes were committed.
It’s apparent that religious factors have been prejudicial to mothers. And herein lies a key to opening up a federal civil rights investigation into family court — because when Jewish cabals nest in the family courts there is no equal protection under the laws for the prejudiced party. This article by Dr. Neustein might be the long awaited and much anticipated federal remedy so many of the readers have been waiting for. And for those cases where there is not an evident Jewish cabal, if the Justice Department comes in for Catherine’s case, which has an overt Jewish conspiracy, they will find plenty of run of the mill due process violations in all the other cases. But we need Merrick Garland to start somewhere. And given the outcry worldwide for justice for Catherine persecuted, tormented, and reviled by the Kassenoff supporters a Department of Justice investigation of her case would be the galvanizing force to open up the entire venal system and save all the children.
As for setting the record straight, a reader decried the columnist claiming the term “shiksa” means whore. He or she was not only wrong but he/she was revealing their OWN prurient and denigrating posture toward Christian women — and hanging themselves in the process. Shiksa means a Christian or Gentile woman who is the person of romantic desire by a Jewish man, forbidden to have such desires because he must only desire a Jew. The reader who called a shiksa a “whore” is imputing their own very ugly biases onto the Christian population and certainly making the point for the columnist. Where do such vile, contemptuous thoughts come from? It’s frightening to think that this may have been someone Catherine had to associate with. Please let’s rid our souls of iniquities and make the Jewish people a better nation. We can try by first eliminating hatred for Gentile women. Is that too much to ask from the Orthodox Jews? I certainly hope not.
I’d recommend the catholic whore types.
No, a shiksa is simply the Yiddish word for a non-Jewish woman. It’s the feminine equivalent of sheigetz. It has nothing to do with romantic desire.
Over the years, the word has assumed negative connotations and is no longer used in polite company.
Jewish English Lexicon
sheygets
https://jel.jewish-languages.org/words/513
I’ve looked at all the evidence, accusations and theories including this latest [it was the jews] . theory And after reviewing everything this is my conclusion…..
multiole judges, multiple lawyers and multiple psychiatrists looking at a totally disfunctional marriage and some bad parenting, decided (somewhat controversially) that the mother was simply too erratic to have custody of the children. Then the mother validated the othewise controversial opinon of these multiple experts by engaging in the most public wacky suicide or fake suicide ever.
The End..
Anon 10:36 please list your credentials to make such an assessment that a mother should lose her 3 children.
I have come to the same conclusion after reading everything I could find online about this case. My guess is if you came up with a pro Catherine assessment no one would be asking for credentials.
10:37 am. I disagree. Removing custody from a parent is an extreme move. Convicted rapists are often still allowed parenting time. If a father lost *all* rights, there would surely be a clear basis for it. Let’s admit Catherine pissed some people off and they let her have it. Sick
It is an externe move. One that we might not understand since so much of the record is sealed. BUT by pulling this crazy FB suicide in Switzerland thing (real or fake) and the PUBLIC doc and video drop that went along with it, the woman has demonstrated that the decision was correct.No one who is of sound mind would put her kids/family through such a thing (under any circumstance)
Any mother who lets the court system have it is targeted. They don’t like women who are studying their rights. The judges often cut them off during hearing with transcript. They also tell them to talk to the GaL in which is off the record. These judges are crafty. They angle and maneuver. It hard to get the truth on record. I encourage the judicial committee to go sit in on random hearings. The judges don’t require proof from one and refuse evidence from another.
https://newsthatmoves.com/9292/in-memory-of-a-mother-family-court-activist
This is my article that refers back to the Frank Report on numerous occasions regarding Catherine Youseff Kassenoff’s untimely death.
Ms. Neustein’s background is very diverse. Her observations are acute and from a perspective of understanding the inner workings of her Jewish heritage and faith. I think it is courageous of Amy to bring her professional opinion to the fore as it pertains to the Kassenoff case. This awareness is key to creating positive change so Catherine Youseff Kassenoff’s death isn’t in vain.
Thank you,
Amy
Ms. Neustein also had a child custody case similar to this Catherine Youseff lady. You can tell every one of these women that have lost custody because as they tell the story NOTHING is their fault. It is the courts, the Jews, the catholics, space lasers, vaccines and every other excuse but accepting any responsibility for ANYTHING. I am a proud “shiksa” of over forty years. My husband calls me one at least once a week. I find it endearing.
This blood libel post belongs in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion; not on the blog of a self described ‘investigative journalist’ in the 21st Century.
Would you be similarly skeptical of, say, a black judge who ruled in favor of a black parent in a mixed race couple? Would you ascribe all kinds of ridiculous intentions to the black spouse for wanting, and then no longer wanting, a white mate?
Catherine herself didn’t tolerate anti semitic comments against Allan on her Facebook page.
Great article. In the Ambrose case, we seen how Karens lawyer was fired when trying to point out the religious embalance. It makes me think that there is a religious conspiracy within the family courts system.
They have attempted to argue Jewish family law in Connecticut. Anything is possible?
Anything is possible and people of each religion actually have the right to practice religious law under Constitutional law — except when crimes are committed. In the Kassenoff. Riordan and Dulos cases: Family court judges, attorneys and vendors committed crimes.
So why haven’t feds announced federal investigations of crimes committed in family courts?
Why aren’t mainstream news outlets investigating and reporting those crimes committed? When family court evaluators with no oversight committed fraud and/or medical malpractice, shouldn’t all of that fraud on the courts and medical malpractice with no oversight be BIG headline stories in such BIG cases? Where are those investigations and headlines?
As long as We the People allow the-powers-that-be play us for fools, no one will tell us. We’ll never know — especially in the Dulos case in which Norm Pattis is allowed to keep his secrets for the next thirty-something years.
Amen. It’s time to put some law and order back in the court houses.
To Everyone,
In case you don’t have the time to read this batshit crazy article Here is an awesome quote!!!!
/////////////////////////
“Yes, shiksa, once he was thru with her in the bed (every Jewish woman knows she can never compete with a man’s desires for a shiksa because they are known to be accommodating in certain ways.)
-Dr. Neustain
/////////////////////////////////////
Note:
A shiksa is a Christian whore. So apparently Dr. Neustain hates Christians too.
***********
Lastly,
I don’t think Frank is anti-Semitic.
This article was published to support Free Speech.
/////////////////
Cool down. The author of this Guest View, aside from her apparent real-life experiences within the Jewish faith, is very accomplished. “From Madness to Mutiny” was an influential book, one of the first to outline the extent of family court problems (i.e., it was published many years ago). As FR tells us, she’s an expert in her field! She holds a PhD in sociology. I mean, they don’t give PhD’s out to crackpots, do they — especially in a highly analytical field like sociology? You have to be pretty smart around the time you get that piece of paper allowing you to say PhD thereafter. Thanks to FR for sharing this thought-provoking piece, wherein the author’s expertise has led her to discern multi-prong coverups that ordinary laypeople could not pick up on. I hadn’t seen the data (the New York Times poll, I guess) where significant numbers of Christian mothers described their salivating and yearning to see their children fathered by Jewish men. And especially how Judge Lubell’s motivations for denying Catherine custody were the product of hate-filled talmudic interpretations. Before this we thought it was just banal corruption. Surely a DOJ investigation is all the more likely now!
/////////////////
Actually crackpots get phd’s all the time. She makes very good points.
Let’s let everyone have their say-
I stand corrected!
I ordered the and read it from cover to cover.
The wicked ordeal these women of piety have been put thru is gut wrenching.
I’m so sorry to Frank and Claviger for ever doubting their motives. They are the brave men indeed!
Modern day heroes!!!!
I apologize profusely!!!!!
… not to bury him.
(year, I’m misquoting intentionally).
You forgot to sign it Sig Heil.
Faith overrides the ability to report wrongdoing. This is evidenced in family court where no laws apply and due process is foreign.
Bruce Freedman, Jane Grossman, Gerard Adelman, Sidney Horwitz, Robert Horwitz, Linda Smith, Biren- Caverly, Lisa Knopf, Lisa Kerin, Randolph Richardson, Edward Nusbaum… profit driven and protected by the CT Bar- Alex Cuda!
B. Freedman ✅
G. Adelman ✅
S. Horowitz ✅
R. Horwitz ✅
Which state or federal office has the lists recording every divorce and custody “family court” case each one managed separately and/or with each other? All four have known each other for decades. They’ve passed cases to and from each other with no oversight, no tracking of outcomes and no accountability for the laws they broke.
How many perpetrators did they enable? How many children did they destroy?
In the “gay pride parades” this year, naked men are allowed to dance in front of children. Do we know what each of those four men think of naked men dancing in front of children?
It’s time for a few surveys in family courts. What questions should we ask family court judges, attorneys, guardians ad litem, evaluators, mediators and reunification supervisors?
Informed consent must be guaranteed in every family court proceeding, process and protocol.
Most parents aren’t okay with naked strangers dancing in front of their children. Parents and children forced through family court proceedings shouldn’t be forced to obey — under penalty of law —perverts on the bench and/or perverts in private offices.