This photo of Keith Alan Raniere was used as an exhibit at his trial.

Part 2: Gems From Trial: Raniere: On Sex With Children: ‘Is the Person a Child, or Is the Person Adult-Like?’

This is Part 2 of “Gems from the Trial” of Keith Alan Raniere.

It includes a clip from a longer video shown at trial to the jury. The entire video is about an hour long and it features Raniere speaking to his students on a number of topics.

One of the topics, shown in the clip below, features Raniere, known also as the Vanguard [the leader of thought for his community] ,speaking about children having sex with adults.

Keep in mind that Raniere called himself an “ethicist.”

“An ethicist,” by definition [Wikipedia] “is one whose judgment on ethics and ethical codes has come to be trusted by a specific community, and is expressed in some way that makes it possible for others to mimic or approximate that judgment. Following the advice of ethicists is one means of acquiring knowledge.”

So the context of this clip is that Keith is speaking as the ethicist for his Nxivm community. He has thought out for them the ethics of certain things and they – the ones he has allowed to follow him – have accepted that he knows better than they what is ethical and that they can become wise by following his advice on ethics.

For me, the value of publishing this clip, perhaps first and foremost, is to show his remaining 100 or so staunch followers – some of whom I am told are now reading the Frank Report for the first time – what happened in trial and why he was convicted.

They have likely heard his teachings on adults having sex with children before. But it may be of interest to them to understand how he flubbed it, by failing to heed his own words.

[For Nicki Clyne, Michelle Hatchette, Brian and Marc Elliot, Danielle Roberts, Samantha LaBaron, Dawn Morrison, and a cadre of Mexicans – listen up. And yes, I realize, that Brandon Porter, Edgar Boone, Jimmy Del Negro, Esther Carlson, Omar ‘Cuckie” Boone, Lucas Roberts, Clare Bronfman, Jimena Garza, Jack Levy, Loreta Garza, Carola Garza, Chris Pearson Smith, Dani Padilla, and others, will not heed this. At least for now.]

The clip is also for people studying this unusual case and how it impacted others. It is a case study on the human mind and the ability for one man to control so many seemingly good and intelligent people and ruin so many lives – while his followers all the while thought he was sincerely trying to help them.

Here is Keith at his most manipulative. Trying to justify adults having sex with children – something he did himself – but chose not to reveal to most of his followers.  Although it does seem he was preparing the way for their acceptance of it.

Here is the transcript of the clip.

Keith Raniere:

Abuse is inconsistent, depending on where you are, what cultural you are, and things like that.

And that doesn’t mean that the person is somehow ultimately abusive. They are abusive by some standard and you have to understand not only what that standard is, but the morality behind that standard.

How does this relate to human conduct in the world? 

You know, the thing, for example, with sexual abuse. In some states, there’s ages. There’s the age of consent. Some states, it’s 17. Some parts of the world it’s 12. Some parts of the world it’s– right? What’s abuse in one area is not abuse in another.

But what is it really? Abuse is – is the person a child, or is the person adult-like?

Does the person have a certain type of understanding of, cognition, morality, to make such a choice?

Because that choice has effects potentially on them physically but also on effects in society later.

Often when you counsel people who were say children of what you call abuse. You know the little child, some little children are perfectly happy with it until they find out what happened in later in life, then it’s more society that abuses them than actually the parent.  

Because in other societies in the past – like in Rome or whatever – the standards were completely different.  But we’re not in Rome and we should know that. So, it is an understanding, a wise understanding of the society and the morality in which we live. That’s part of it.

Part of it is cultural you know. Someone outing another person for being gay in certain societies leads to death. 

You might say that it’s an abusive friendship. If someone has a trust that, alright, they let their friend know that they’re gay and then that friend outs them for money, or for glory, or for revenge or for whatever it is, that’s an abuse of their power because they have the power literally to cause that person to be killed.

***

Commentary on the Clip

They were no friends of Keith Alan Raniere who outed him as a pedophile. But they did out him, and it sunk him. Those non-friends were the FBI and US Attorney’s office in the Eastern District of NY.

Probably more than any other criminal act, it was pedophilia that convicted Keith Raniere.

I think it was the evidence of pedophilia that caused his five codefendants, all females — Nancy Salzman, Lauren Salzman, Allison Mack, Clare Bronfman, and Kathy Russell – to take plea deals and not risk going to trial alongside him.

It was pedophilia more than any other thing that turned the stomachs of a jury of his peers.

Keith, residing in federal prison in Brooklyn, awaits sentencing for sex-trafficking and other crimes, including racketeering – where the predicate acts proven against him include possession of child porn and sexual exploitation of a minor.

That minor, Camila [or Cami], who was 15 at the time he took nude photos of her [November 2005], became one of his long-term harem members and, ultimately, a first line DOS slave. She is now 29.

Cami was the only First Line DOS slave whose last name was not used at trial. Her photo was redacted from exhibits released to the public. This was done in part because she was considered a victim of his sexual exploitation based on her being under the age of consent when he first began his sexual relationship with her.

Keith, however, and unfortunately for him, did not entirely practice what he preached in the video clip.

He said in it, “We are not in Rome and we should know that. It is an understanding, a wise understanding of the society and the morality in which we live. That’s part of it.”

His understanding evidently was not so wise. He had sex with Cami, a girl under the age of consent – even if she had, according to him, an adult-like persona. It was illegal. And he got nailed for it.

More than anything, Cami sunk him and this video – of him justifying it – was the icing on the pedophile cake.

He had kept nude pictures of Cami for more than a dozen years on a hard drive and it had the dates the photos were taken. And with this video clip, the prosecution had the alleged pedophile justifying pedophilia.

So let us take a moment to parse what Keith is telling his students in this video. His remarks are in bold.  My comments, in regular typeface.

***

Abuse is inconsistent, depending on where you are, what cultural you are, and things like that.

Keith is saying there is no fixed standard for sexual abuse. It varies based on geography, jurisdiction, etc..

And that doesn’t mean that the person is somehow ultimately abusive.

He is saying that a person who has sex with a child is not necessarily, ultimately, objectively abusive to the child merely because the society he lives in has an arbitrary standard of abuse which he violated.

They are abusive by some standard and you have to understand not only what that standard is, but the morality behind that standard.

Keith suggests that standards, made by society, which differ in different locales, create the standard of what is called “sexual abuse.” But, he says, it does not mean a person is actually a sex abuser. He might merely be living in the wrong place. Keith explains that a person has to understand what the standards are for the society in the area in which he lives – for his own protection.  If a person is going to have sex with a child under the age of consent in a certain area or jurisdiction, that person has to understand the standard [i.e. the law] and also whether that standard is moral or not.

How does this relate to human conduct in the world? 

Let’s make it practical for students. What kind of “sex with children” conduct can Raniere’s followers expect to engage in ethically?

You know, the thing, for example, with sexual abuse. In some states, there’s ages.

Actually, all 50 states have age of consent laws. These range from 16 – 18 years old.

Image result for age of consent in world

 

There’s the age of consent. Some states, it’s 17. Some parts of the world it’s 12. Some parts of the world it’s– right? What’s abuse in one area is not abuse in another.

In New York, for example, where he lived and had sex with children, the age of consent is 17. He had sex with girls from 12 to 16.  It would have been legal in Mexico or the Philippines.

 

Image result for age of consent in world

 

 

But what is it really? Abuse is – is the person a child, or is the person adult-like?

This is Keith’s ultimate justification for having sex with children below the age of consent:

“Is the person a child or is the person adult -like?

If a child is adult-like [and who judges this?] then, for Keith, there is no abuse. He is flatly saying the adult-like child is capable of deciding to have sex with an adult.

He is not saying, ‘adult”, he is saying “adult-like.” Note the use of language – he calls the child a “person.” “Is the person a child, or is the person adult-like?”

Does the person have a certain type of understanding of, cognition, morality, to make such a choice?

By choice, he means “to have sex.” By person, he means a child under the age of consent. He is here flatly saying a child – with a certain level of understanding – can choose to have sex.

The law states otherwise. That a child under a certain age – regardless of understanding  – and it varies from state to state, nation to nation – does not have the legal ability or right of self-determination to make the choice to have sex. The child will not be punished for engaging in sex, however.  The adult will.

But Keith is saying that a child with a certain type of understanding, an adult-like child, who has the cognition, the understanding of morality, can make the choice to have sex with an adult.

And the adult, by extension, also has the moral right to participate in sex with the child. Which is convenient for Keith since he chose to participate with several girls under the age of consent – in New York.

So, it is the child then, Keith claims, who can decide, regardless of the law, to have sex with an adult. But the child has to be careful in deciding to have sex with an adult, he adds.

Because that choice has effects potentially on them physically but also on effects in society later.

A child who is “adult-like” – who is perhaps 13 years old – should exercise care that she might not have a negative effect, physically. For instance, she might get pregnant or might get a venereal disease. [Keith was said to have herpes and spread it in his harem].

In addition to physical dangers, the child must also be cognizant that having sex with an adult [such as Keith] might also later cause emotional distress – because of society.

Often when you counsel people who were say children of what you call abuse. You know the little child, some little children, are perfectly happy with it until they find out what happened in later in life, then its more society that abuses them than actually the parent.

Here, Keith explains that many a “little child” was quite happy having sex with their parents or some other, wise and ethical adult [like Keith]. They were fine with it. It was good. But later, as adults, when they learn of society’s condemnation of adults having sex with children, they become distressed. It is society, Keith teaches, that abuses the child, [now an adult] – for having sex as a child.  The abuser was not the parent, or the wise adult [such as Keith] but it is society that abuses by having these arbitrary laws that punish adults for having sex with persons who are adult-like but happen to be under the age of consent.

Because in other societies in the past – like in Rome or whatever – the standards were completely different.  But we’re not in Rome and we should know that. So it is an understanding, a wise understanding of the society and the morality in which we live. That’s part of it.

Keith seems to have lacked that wise understanding of, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do”. For when in Clifton Park, where the age of consent it 17, and where a man goes to jail for violating this law, he had sex with 15-year-old Cami and then kept her nude pictures of her on a hard drive for the FBI to find.

Not wise at all.

Part of it is cultural, you know. Someone outing another person for being gay in certain societies leads to death. 

This is a slick analogy. Keith is comparing the brutal stoning of gays in some Muslim countries to the outing of an adult who has sex with children.

You might say that it’s an abusive friendship. If someone has a trust that, alright, they let their friend know that they’re gay and then that friend outs them for money, or for glory, or for revenge or for whatever it is. That’s an abuse of their power because they have the power literally to cause that person to be killed.

No. It was not for money, or glory, or revenge, but, I think, to protect little children from Raniere that he was outed – first in the Albany Times Union, then in Saratoga in Decline, then on the Frank Report – outed for having sex with children.

Finally, he was outed, and it was dispositive, by the Office of the US Attorney in the Eastern District of New York in their successful prosecution of Raniere.

When Raniere arrived in the courtroom just prior to hearing the verdict – he knew what it was going to be by the quickness with which the jury reached their verdict – he proclaimed, “This is not justice!”

But maybe it was. For it was Raniere who abused his power by raping little children.

And while the DOJ did not literally have the power to cause Raniere to be killed, in one sense they did.

They, through their splendid prosecution of him [they and the jury], have ensured he will be caged, most likely, until he dies, and no, never again, will he have the chance to have sex with children, even if they are, according to him, adult-like persons, ready, willing and able to decide to have sex with him, the monster, and be perfectly happy about it.

For most of us, we are happy that he will likely never see a child again for the rest of his life.

And that perhaps is something that the monster, in his head, may be just starting to realize. He may now be just beginning to have that certain type of understanding of, cognition, morality, a wise understanding – that he is utterly and totally, irrevocably fucked.  

MK10ART’s beautiful painting of Keith Alan Raniere, living in a secure and adult-like place – just where he belongs.

Rhiannon, Keith claimed, was adult-like when he started raping her when she was 12 years old. He once taught her to hug like an adult by pressing the pelvises together, and not just the upper body. The prosecution wanted Rhiannon to testify at the trial but Judge Nicholas Garaufis ruled that her testimony was not admissible because her alleged rape occurred prior to the time period which Raniere was charged with beginning his racketeering enterprise.

About the author

Frank Parlato

Frank Report’s founder and lead writer Frank Parlato is one of the internet’s most decorated investigative journalists. His writing and investigations have helped expose major criminal organizations and scandals.

Frank’s work has been cited in major publications all over the world, including The New York Times, New York Post, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CNN, Rolling Stone, and more.

He is also the publisher and editor-in-chief of Artvoice, The Niagara Falls Reporter, Front Page and the South Buffalo News.

55 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

  • His bottom lip grosses me out. Like a tobacco chewer trying to keep his wad in. Except it’s not tobacco, just a pool of drool sitting stagnant in there…yuck. He needs so much hygiene help.

  • The lead photo is by far the most disgusting image of KAR used on this website. He needs a haircut, shower, shampoo, and a chest wax, not to mention CLOTHES!!! Even glasses would help.

    This is the stuff nightmares are made of! Please have mercy!

  • I pray that you won’t use any more scratch n sniff photos of Keith Raniere like the one you used at the tp of this Article. A couple of swipes on the computer screen and we had to have our house fumigated. I think the dog now needs to go to the vet and the fish died (it’s official ) please be more considerate of your faithful readers.

  • or for just plain common decency – please do not post that image of Raniere again! You’ll traumatize any woman or teen that was forced, seduced, bamboozled, and misled into having sex with him. There are not enough vile and loathsome words in the whole of the English language to encompass that image. If I could summon digital flames, I would burn it into oblivion. Now excuse me while I go vomit.

  • Raniere’s lectures are like TED Talks for morons. Nonsensical, disjointed ramblings that might be delivered by some barroom bore after he’s had a couple too many. What is this– “in other societies in the past – like in Rome or whatever… ” In Rome or whatever? He can’t pin down a specific example? In a prepared talk, you plan out what you’re going to say beforehand if you want to be taken seriously.

    And the fools in Nxivm paid thousands of dollars to listen to this garbage.

    • Actaeon,

      “Raniere’s lectures are like TED Talks for morons.”

      LMFAO!!!!!!!! I do not know if you came up with that analogy completely on your own, but it’s comedic brilliance all the same.

      Thanks for the laugh!

    • At least TED Talks are free and available on Youtube.
      Allison Mack mentioned to Raniere in their 94 minute conversation that she had seen author (Eat, Pray, Love) Elizabeth Gilbert’s TED Talk.
      Apparently Mack could not tell the difference between a legitimate TED Talk and TED Talks for Morons.

      • Eat Pray Love was about an emotionally needy individual.

        It’s written by a woman re enforcing the stereotype of women being emotionally weak and needy…. and having to find themselves…. like Allison Mack who mentions she felt lost and searching for love. I am not surprised she was a fan of the book. Knowing she liked the book explains a lot.

        Half the women I know don’t like the book and the other half love it.

        I have not read the book.

        Shadowstate everyone agrees for the that Allison Mack should do some jail time.

        Not everyone agrees with you that Allison Mack is the antichrist.

        “And forgive us our trespasses,
        as we forgive them that trespass against us”.

        Shadowstate do believe Allison Mack should be put in front of a firing squad or get life in prison?

        ******

        I believe the victims should be compensated and should give victim impact statements at Allison’s sentencing.

        As mentioned before Clare Bronfman’s rich woman plea deal will significantly reduce all the other defendants sentences in my opinion.

  • The way Keith Raniere and his NXIVM followers behaved I would argue that their own personal psycho-sexual development probably ended when they were 13 years old.
    The whole leadership of NXIVM acted like juvenile delinquents.

  • I guess Raniere was right about one thing. Where he is going I don’t think he will get rained on.

  • Raniere is so gross…how could anyone have followed this dude. I don’t understand how manipulated he was able to manipulate his first line “slaves”??? What were they thinking??? Join a BSDM group instead of this wishy washy ethics and so called “tech”. Seriously, I would have laughed at such nonsense. And, I go to therapy but I pay them then leave. I don’t have threesomes with them. Now I’m wondering about all those Scientologist that are being abused and manipulated to cut off family and friends. (II, however, have some feelings about Camila the underage child that Raniere groomed with the full consent of his full grown adult female groupies – Pam C, Barbara J, Karen U, Nancy Salzman, etc (thank goodness these female pimps did not have any children to sacrifice to Raniere)) I barf thinking poor Dani had to give this dude BJ’s more than once a day. And, poor Cami was so abused she posed with a fishhook out of her mouth. More indictments are needed and anyone that didn’t testify for the prosecution should be given heavier sentences then the guidelines suggests. They should all have been testifying witnesses or no plea deal!!

  • Let’s not intellectualize or sugar coat the truth……

    …..As for “Nicki Clyne, Michelle Hatchette, Brian and Marc Elliot, Danielle Roberts, Samantha LaBaron, Dawn Morrison, and a cadre of Mexicans – listen up. And yes, I realize, that Brandon Porter, Edgar Boone, Jimmy Del Negro, Esther Carlson, Omar ‘Cuckie” Boone, Lucas Roberts, Clare Bronfman, Jimena Garza, Jack Levy, Loreta Garza, Carola Garza, Chris Pearson Smith, Dani Padilla, and others.”…….

    ……..They were all probably fuck-ups or nuts before Keith Raniere got to them.

    • I would like to clarify my previous comment……

      The trial is over and all the cards are on the table:

      1. Keith Raniere had sex with a minor. Keith Raniere is a child molester.

      2. Keith Raniere had a young woman confined to a room with human contact for over a year because she liver another man.

      3. Keith Raniere raped a 12 year old.

      4. Keith Raniere is guilty of many more crimes.

      If anyone at this point is still defending that monster fuck them.

      This is one time I am in complete agreement with Shadowstate1958.

      BTW please remember Jim Del Negro according to the victims husband raped his wife or fucked her while he and his children were sleeping.

      • Niceguy,
        The minute I read an article in the Frank Report saying that Raniere justified an adult having sexual relations with a 12 year old child, I knew he was either a pedophile or a wannabe pedophile.
        No normal adult talks like that.
        One does not have to be Sherlock Holmes to understand that Raniere is a pedophile or at least has those desires.

        The fact that so many adult women in NXIVM either justified or rationalized such statements has always shocked me and continues to shock me to this day.
        These women knew that pedophilia is illegal and they knew that there was no end of consenting adult women who would bend over backwards to accommodate Raniere’s sexual desires.
        But these NXIVM women fought until the last minute to defend Raniere and his perversions until it threatened to bring them down with him.
        I have no sympathy for any of the NXIVM women who covered for Raniere.
        If he deserves one hundred years, they each deserve twenty years.

  • Hey Frank the photo, “This photo of Keith Alan Raniere was used as an exhibit at his trial.”……

    …Is more disturbing than the snuff/murder/torture photos you posted previously.

    Just the photo alone means he’s guilty of something…..

  • What Keith is saying is morality is relative.
    That’s the first lie he gets you to accept.
    Once he convinces you of that you suspend judgement and are led down the morally bankrupt rabbit hole.

  • I would like to see this video in its entirety. Having left Nxivm long ago because of their hypocrisy, inconsistent logic, and outrageous beliefs, I am appalled that anyone with half a working brain cell could sit through this lecture and believe one word out of his lying filthy brain.

    I worked in a Domestic Violence/Sex Abuse crime unit in a DA’s office in NYS. I assure readers of FR that child victims of pedophiles are not happy little children merrily enjoying life until the adult society tells them otherwise. These children suffer severe emotional and psychological trauma and many times physical harm for the rest of their lives.

    Now that Raniere has been convicted along with the five that pleaded guilty, it is time to bring to justice the remaining followers (all 100) or however many remain.

    I sit here thinking. Vanguard and Prefect teaching this perspective on child sex PEDOPHILIA how many pedophiles lurk in this group of 100?

    The children enrolled in the Rainbow Cultural Garden need to be examined by child psychologists with expertise in identifying victims of pedophilia.
    NYS Department of Education needs to shut down this operation ASAP.

    Finally, in the video, Keith appears with bed head hair and in need of a bath. Typical appearance of most pedophiles I saw parade before me more times than I wanted to see.

    • “Having left Nxivm long ago because of their hypocrisy, inconsistent logic, and outrageous beliefs, I am appalled that anyone with half a working brain cell could sit through this lecture and believe one word out of his lying filthy brain.” You did.

      Can you provide the address and/or phone numbers of the RCG schools in Albany and Brooklyn? Don’t just complain about what others should do, help be part of the solution.

      • If I knew, I would. RCG didn’t exist when I left.
        Don’t be so quick to accuse and insult others expressing their thoughts on this blog.

        It shows insensitivity on your part. Not a nice trait.

  • Too bad the FBI/DOJ didn’t charge Raniere with being involved with RICO organizations when he was with Amway several years before starting his own racket, Consumers’ Buyline and then ESP/NXIVM. It wasn’t because of a lack of me trying to tell them, or Rhiannon’s testimony may have been admitted as evidence. Now it’s too late to prosecute Raniere criminally, and she has little reason to after him with a civil lawsuit, because he’s broke and it would be expensive and highly emotional for her. The RICO Act author went on the record that Amway operates similar to the Mafia, and here’s the document that Amway unsuccessfully attempted to suppress from being made public: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Amway/blakey_report.pdf

    The reason why laws define an age instead of “child-like” or “adult-like” is because those terms are too subjective. Being the smartest man in the world, Raniere knows that. Scientology an Mormonism also play loose with the facts when it comes to these issues. Scientology treats children as adults in little bodies and Mormonism has long assumed age is “optional,” and these are both sources that shaped Raniere’s thinking. Whether it’s child molestation or paying taxes, Raniere had his own rules, which eventually caught up with him.

  • The first part is perfectly okay actually and is just telling the truth. In my country the age of consent is 16 ( and age for marriage if parents consent) – UK. I don’t think it’s morally wrong to have sex with a 16 year old (nor 14 year old if the country’s age is 14 and there is not big age gap and plenty of 14 year olds want to be sexually active with other 14 year olds).

    In our current time in the UK/US it is certainly the accepted cultural standard that we protect young teenagers from predatory adults and that makes a lot of sense in our culture.
    KR would have been wiser not to discuss the issue as it tends to cause trouble if you talk about it and the arguments can be used by people to abuse children so it’s best to steer clear.
    Probahly m ost people think there is a huge difference between abuse of very small children and a teenage boy having consensual sex with a 15 year old girl beyond puberty.

    KR has been very unwise. It is just stupid to do what he did when there are plenty of very pretty women over 17 or 18 he could and did have and the branding, collateral etc was not necessary. Warren Jeffs had the same issue – had he in the FLDS stayed within the law no one would have bothered about polygamy. Yet as soon as the brides got younger and younger and other laws were broken then these kind of cult leaders get jailed.

    • In the US, state laws all differ. Many have laws with age differential provisions, so that it’s not statutory rape if for instance a 15 year old and a 16 year old have sex – but it is if a 44 year old has sex with a 15 year old. In some cases it is also criminal when a person in a position of authority or confidence is involved – if Raniere had been licensed as a counsel or therapist, as he should have been since he was acting in that role, he could also have been in trouble for having sex with even some of his older followers.

      A surprising number of US states don’t set any statutory minimum on age of marriage, though when it involves the very young it has to be approved by a judge in all cases, I believe. Some religious cults have reportedly exploited that provision to avoid pedophilia charges.

  • He’ll probably end up in a sex offenders unit.

    If he’s lucky.

    I don’t think he’d survive for long in the general prison population,

  • Assistant U.S. Attorney Moira Penza also played a video of NXIVM president Nancy Salzman speaking at a meeting at the former Apropos restaurant on Halfmoon. On the video, Salzman parroted what Raniere had previously said. Salzman made the remarks during a meeting of Jness, a women’s group within NXIVM.

    Salzman, who pleaded guilty in March to federal offenses connected to the federal investigation of NXIVM, suggested that the blame in cases of child sex abuse should, in some cases, be something NXIVM students “have to think out for themselves.

    –Times Union

    • Yeah, Nancy is that crossover victimizer with just the right amount of power that she desired. Come on. “PREFECT.” It would be laughable but for the taking money, manipulation, and destroying lives, including her own daughter. This is what seems odd about Prefect: she’s not sorry about the greater “good” that affected people outside of her parents/Lauren in her own words. Regardless of Raniere “punishing” her, she is a fraud who would resussitate the same fraud.

  • I read both of Keith’s books, watched his interviews with Alison Mack and followed the trial. Honestly, I think, while he is far from innocent, this blog is very much biased and unfair. What Keith says in this particular video clip makes sense in my opinion. In this clip, Keith is talking about girls that at least physically have developed to a point where they can have intercourse and become pregnant. He is NOT talking about little children. I am not saying that I am defending DOS, and of course he broke the law by having sex with a teenager below the age of consent, but I honestly don’t believe it is completely fair to portray Keith as a child molester…..

    • If you know anything about this scumbag KAR, you will know about Rhiannon. While I understand that its common for you Pedos to stick together, you would be more at home with this endeavour on the dark web. You won’t get any sympathy here. But, thankfully, with this attempt at making excuses for a truly vile human being, You will have ratcheted up your karma burden. Good Luck with that. @PatrickPedo.

      • First of all, I have no interest whatsoever in young girls. I’m just not as biased towards Keith as you seem to be. I see some value in his teachings. Did you actually ever read one of his books or watch his interviews?
        As for Rhiannon, to be fair, that is unproven and Keith denied it.
        But I get where you’re coming from: Legally speaking what Keith did was illegal because 15 years was below the age of consent. But biologically, sex and pregnancy are perfectly possible at that age. It happens in a lot of countries and there is no indication that all the girls it happens to in those countrier are traumatised. As to the argument with the age difference: Yes, Keith was 29 year older at the time, but I honestly don’t find that much weirder or “disgusting” than the idea of a 19 year old having a 70 year old “suggar daddy” – that happens often enough.

        So again: Was Keith selfish and stupid? – Yes
        Was he totally immoral – Maybe
        Does he deserve a life sentence – Absolutely no! Look at the prosecution’s argument and the way the Judge was biased against Keith since Day 1. That trial was rigged. I’m not saying Keith is innocent and did nothing wrong, but the accusations are totally overblown in my opinion. Seriously, give him 2 years in prison and that’s that. He’ll learn his lesson from it…..

        • Patrick-BackAss,

          My apologies if you find the morality and laws of the United States prudish or close minded. Go fucking live somewhere else you piece of fucking shit!!!!

          PatrickBackAass by your logic Raniere is no more guilty than Socrates……
          ……..Over 1000 years ago in Greece, Socrates practiced or dabbled in pedophilia according to most historians.
          …..

          It happened 1000 years ago in a foreign country.

          Your point is moot. Why?

          Because it is 2019 and Raniere according to New York State committed a crime.

          Go fuck yourself you pedophile troll!!!!

          • Actually, I don’t live in the US and I’m very happy about that honestly 🙂 I believe that the American justice system is deeply flawed, and I am not only saying that referring to this trial. Btw, I understand your arguments without the insults too 😉

        • With respect – You are leaving a great deal out of the story – monstrous acts that had nothing whatsoever to do with sex. It’s just that sex, female servility, and money were the ends. The means involved much more than that – extortion, intimidation, money laundering, tax evasion, false arrest, forced labor, immigration fraud, harassment, deception and more. He was proven guilty of racketeering, not rape.

          More charges are likely coming.

          Yes, give him two years and let him move in next door to you.

          • Yes, OCD, I realise that. If you read my original posts you will notice that I’m not saying Keith is innocent – although I admit finding some values in his teachings. My point here is a different one, namely: If all the charges you mentioned were strong enough to have him convicted, then why did the prosecution, the Judge and the press focus so strongly on the episode with Cami? In my opinion they did that mainly to portray Keith as a “child predator” and a pedophile. Once the jury saw him that way, they’d convict him of anything bc people hate pedophiles (or whatever they consider as a pedo).

            I believe we need to pay much more attention to how we label things in our society. If you want to discredit someone and ruin his life, what’s the easiest way to do so? Label him a pedo or a racist or whatever. Once the jury was feeling so sorry for poor Cami (who may not even have been so reluctant about entering a relationship with Keith at the time), it was easy to pin all the other things on Keith. Again, I’m not saying he’s innocent and that he deserves to walk out of this free. The whole thing about collecting collateral in DOS smells of coercion and blackmailing, and he definitely needs to be punished for that, even more so because it is completely against his own proposed ethics. But again, a life sentence for any of this isn’t only ridicolous, in my opinion it is a perversion of justice.

            It’s obvious that the Judge and the jury were totally and completely biased against Keith from the moment the trial started, especially the Judge. He showed the jury pictures of Keith that weren’t even relevant for the evidence, but just meant to humiliate him and show him as a “dirty old guy” that molests little girls (like the pic in the header here). And he blocked the cross-examination as soon as something might have come up that might have been more favorable to Keith’s case. Honestly, I’m glad that the justice system in my country doesn’t work the way it does in the US. Seriously, the judge himself is allowed to decide if something he did constitues grounds for a mistrial? Think for a moment about how hypocritical and how flawed that is!!

    • Keith is not a “dirty old man” type of child molester. He did not hang around public bathrooms in a raincoat and accost teenagers or children.

      Keith was a seductive, manipulative, coercive type of child abuser that worked his game slowly and intelligently. He sought to gain others trust so they would “volunteer” themselves. Nonetheless, it was harmful and devastating to the victims..

    • Consider a 15 year old girl having sex with a 44 year old man. That does not churn your stomach? He is adult who likes to have sex with children. Does that make him child-like? No. It makes him a child sexual predator. The pedophile mantra or justification is that the child wanted it. This is what this “lecture” about if you had to sum it up in a few words.

    • Umm…it’s pretty damn hard to make the case that “he is NOT talking about little children” when he says, “You know the little child, some little children, are perfectly happy with it until they find out what happened in later in life, then it’s more society that abuses them than actually the parent.” (Incest too.)

  • “Cami was the only First Line DOS slave whose last name was not used at trial. Her photo was redacted from exhibits released to the public. This was done in part because she was considered a victim of his sexual exploitation based on her being under the age of consent when he first began his sexual relationship with her.”

    Actually ,for the name , the judge stated that she was a co conspirator too but decided to not use her name to protect Dani (who was clearly a victim).

    Now ,don’t get me wrong, i see the victim part of cami (she was used while underaged), i’m just stating what the judge said about the “why cami’s name is not revealed”

    It was during a dispute about this fact with Agnifillo (arguing about this).

    For the photo, it could fit with what you said.

  • Wasn’t there (also) a recording/video of Nancy Salzman regurtitating this bs to a group that was played to jury?

About Frank Parlato

About Frank Parlato

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in major publications all over the world, including The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CNN, Fox News, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, and more.

Frank Report is dedicated to Frank's investigative journalism and the pursuit of truth.

Read more about Frank Report's mission.

Got A Tip?

If you have a tip for Frank Report, send it here.
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com
Phone / Text: (716) 990-5740

Archives

Loading cart ⌛️ ...
%d bloggers like this: