Danesh Noshirvan casts himself as an unchecked arbiter of “accountability.” But who, then, holds the self-appointed monitors accountable? This series does not argue for censorship — it argues for oversight, sunlight, and consequences for the vigilantes who believe they answer to no one. In examining both Noshirvan and James McGibney, our goal is simple: accountability for the accountability enforcers.
A TikTok Empire With No Financial Muscle
FORT MYERS, Fla. — Danesh “ThatDaneshGuy” Noshirvan has not produced the $62,320 in court-ordered sanctions he owes.
He boasts more than two million TikTok followers and uses that as a badge to target people he calls “bad actors.” He calls it accountability culture.
One day, he went after Jennifer Couture and her husband, plastic surgeon Ralph Garramone.
Noshirvan sued them in May 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, seeking $5 million for defamation and stalking.
The lawsuit stemmed from a viral 2022 Dunkin’ Donuts parking-lot video he edited and posted, claiming Couture attempted to run over a woman named Anglyke Reed. Based on the misleading clip, deputies arrested Couture for assault with a deadly weapon. Prosecutors later reduced it to a misdemeanor.
Couture and Garramone sued, alleging defamation and that Noshirvan weaponized his TikTok audience to harass them. Conversely, Noshirvan claimed he was the victim—that Couture and Garramone hired “social media terrorist” Joey Camp to destroy his reputation.

The Judge’s $62,000 Message
Then two years later came the sanctions. $62k for being a bully. That’s what the judge said.
Noshirvan told his “audience,” “I should have asked you for help long ago, but now I really need it.”
A GoFundMe set up by Noshirvan brought in about $39,000 — roughly two cents for each of his two million followers. The shortfall renewed questions about the size and authenticity of his online support.
Some observers have also questioned whether he padded the fundraising total by making donations to himself to create the appearance of support, noting the unusually high number of anonymous contributions.
Court Slams Danesh and His Lawyer
The sanction was imposed Oct. 30 by U.S. District Judge John E. Steele for attorneys’ fees incurred “only because of [Noshirvan’s] misconduct.” Steele also issued a public reprimand to Noshirvan’s attorney, Nick Chiappetta, for failing to control his client — and to Noshirvan himself for spreading false accusations online about Garramone’s lawyer, Julian Jackson-Fannin.
The court found the posts were “intentionally made to incite followers to engage in foreseeable harassment and intimidation,” triggering a wave of threats.
The Deposition Meltdown
During his wife Hannah’s Zoom deposition, when Jackson-Fannin began asking questions directly bearing on the case — including an explicit photo from Noshirvan’s 12-subscriber, gay-leaning OnlyFans account, the very image underlying his “swingers” defamation theory —
Noshirvan burst into the room and intervened. He shouted over his wife, calling attorney Jackson-Fannin a “misogynistic piece of shit,” a “dumb shit,” and a “motherfucker,” and warned, “I’ll remember this shit at settlement.”
Afterward, he took it to his online courtroom — social media — accusing Jackson-Fannin, who is Black, of racism and “sharing revenge porn.”
A Storm of Threats
Within days, thousands of threatening messages and calls flooded Jackson-Fannin’s office. These were not angry comments — they were explicit threats:
“I’m gonna kill him. Want to come?”
“GET HIM !!!!!!!”
“oh, he’s meat.”
“Time to bring back Real Justice.”
“You are invited to end this piece of trash.”
“Find him and his wife… make sure she suffers.”
Voicemails to Jackson-Fannin included:
“We know where you live… we’re going to sexually harass every female relative you have… you’re a disgrace… Fuck you, you piece of fucking shit.”
This barrage of threats presents a contradiction: If thousands were motivated enough to call in threats, why did almost none donate even a dollar to his GoFundMe?
The messages were near-identical, delivered without conversation, then hung up. Many sounded eerily like Noshirvan himself, as if he had spoken through voice-alteration software.
Voice-cloning programs combined with call-spoofing services can allow a single person to generate hundreds of calls appearing to come from different people.
If he did so, Noshirvan did not merely incite his followers; he generated the threats himself, which could constitute felony cyberstalking.
When the Bill Came Due, the Bots Went Silent
This supposedly human online mob is what the judge cited in imposing the $62,000 sanction — yet they vanished the moment money was involved. The disparity suggests Noshirvan’s vaunted “audience” may be less a community than a menagerie of algorithmic echo bots, click-farm phantoms, and AI-generated callers. When the moment came for this supposed legion of supporters to show itself — to lift so much as a finger toward his $62,000 sanction — the silence was cathedral.
Judge Steele ordered Noshirvan to pay the sanction immediately. If he doesn’t, Garramone may collect through wage garnishment, liens, or bank levies. Federal sanctions remain enforceable for 20 years, with interest accruing. Non-payment could result in dismissal of his lawsuit.
The man who loves to bully sued someone he claimed bullied him, then tried to bully that man’s attorney — with bots — and got sanctioned. And his lazy, compliant bots vanished when the bill came due.

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.





Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] “Whoa, I’ll remember this at settlement,” he snapped, before unleashing a profanity-laced tirade at the attorney. That meltdown made headlines, led directly to the five-figure court sanction, and supports the narrative that Danesh’s entire case is really a “money whip” without substance, targeted at hard-working, white, non-Woke, traditional Americans. […]
James McGibney is well known for asking single mothers for money who “help” him track down pedos. He will claim to have left his wallet at home. He’s that much of a scumbag. He’s like the new stereotype lowlife boyfriend your mom brings home.
Who’s not laughing at this tool bag! .
‘ That Dandouche bag’ is a big time fag!
This piece perfectly captures the modern influencer lifecycle:
Weaponize audience
Claim victimhood
Rage meltdown
Cry poor
Fail to raise money because the ‘audience’ is a Ukrainian click-farm
The future of journalism is Parlato with a laptop.
More like Richard Luthmann typing with one hand while the other is occupied, so to speak.
Some people can type and wipe their butt at the same time who cares
$62,000 in sanctions should be an automatic dismissal of his case But because our courts are for profit they’ll continue to reap the $$$$$ and in the end the only rich ones will be the attorneys
I’m Reporting This to TikTok Legal. Danesh is a hero. He fights injustice. He speaks truth to power. He raised $39,000 which is almost $62,000 if you round up.
Disgusting hit piece.
Saw McGibbneys post about you yesterday – I used to follow him and danesh but it’s clear they are themselves bullies and honestly, seeing their texts was just icky and cringe. Keep your foot on their necks Frank, you’re making waves
Humans bad. Danesh good. Sanction unfair.
If a man wants to have a gay-adjacent OnlyFans with 12 subscribers, that’s his TRUTH. Leave him alone.
What clowns 🤣
Typical Percentage of Anonymous Donors on GoFundMe
Most GoFundMe campaigns have:
➤ 20–40% anonymous donations
This is the most commonly observed range across thousands of campaigns.
⸻
⭐ Why So Many People Donate Anonymously
People choose anonymity for a few predictable reasons:
• Privacy
They don’t want their name tied to the cause publicly.
• Social dynamics
They may not want others to see how much (or how little) they donated.
• Avoiding unwanted contact
Some donors don’t want the fundraiser or community to reach out to them directly.
• Embarrassment or sensitivity
If the fundraiser is about illness, tragedy, legal trouble, or any controversial topic, anonymity goes up.
⸻
⭐ Variation by Type of Campaign
The anonymous percentage shifts depending on the situation:
Higher anonymity (up to 50%+)
• Legal disputes
• Mental health or addiction causes
• Fundraisers involving public drama or controversy
• Support for online influencers (followers often want to avoid attention)
Lower anonymity (10–25%)
• Community & local fundraisers
• School, medical, or memorial fundraisers
• Cases where donors personally know the family
Penis. Tee Hee
Meowwww
What are you saying?
Given typical GoFundMe averages, this person probably had:
➤ 0.03% to 0.07% of followers donate
This is exactly in the normal conversion range for influencers:
• Normal: 0.01%–0.1%
• Strong story: 0.1%–0.5%
• Viral: 1%+
So $36,000 suggests engagement was typical, not unusually low or unusually high.
⸻
⭐ Is $36,000 good for a creator of that size?
Honestly: yes.
A lot of creators with millions of followers struggle to get even 0.01% to donate.
This fundraiser likely performed:
• Better than low-engagement influencers
• Below viral/emotional fundraisers
• Right in the sweet spot of “solid but not exceptional”
Danesh we know you are using mommy’s money to pad your gofundmes. Money gained illegally by renting properties for cash avoiding state and federal taxes… IRS tip off in 3…2…1.
Being a DANESHBOT mustn’t pay well.