Frank Parlato
Christopher Ambrose, a suspended attorney and former Hollywood TV writer, has always sought to control the narrative. In Connecticut family court, where secrecy is the rule, not the exception, and court-appointed “experts” can be bought by the hour, he always succeeded.
He took his three adopted children from their mother and kept all the marital funds. He had won every motion. He silenced every outcry from his grieving children, deprived of their mother – made.
Victory was sweet.
Or was it?
In federal court — where filings are public, and perjury has consequences — his control slipped a little. All it took was $405 and a judge who refused to seal his sworn financial affidavit.
That refusal detonated the long, quiet war Ambrose has been waging against the mother of his children and his children for six years. Once that affidavit hit the public docket, his 18-year-old daughter, Mia, saw what her father had been telling a federal judge about her.
She decided to hold him accountable.
$405 MISTAKE THAT BLEW OPEN THE DOOR
Ambrose is a plaintiff in three federal defamation cases in the Connecticut District Court, with the same judge.
One of them is against me for reporting on his divorce and custody successes.
One is against psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee for her disclosure that she diagnosed him with psychopathic traits that make him positively dangerous to his children, a conclusion Ambrose claims is defamatory.
The third is against blogger Tina Swithin, who publishes a website called One Mom’s Battle and once wrote an article about him, saying his children and their mother said he was extremely abusive to them. Her defense is the truth. His children and their mother say he was savagely, ruthlessly abusive, in fact criminally abusive.
In the Lee case, Ambrose stumbled. He attempted to avoid the $405 filing fee by submitting an in forma pauperis affidavit claiming poverty. He then asked the Court to seal it.
Judge Sarala V. Nagala refused. In her order, she wrote that IFP affidavits carry a “strong presumption of public access.”
As a side note, in his subsequent lawsuits against Swithin and this writer, he paid the fee.
Mia Ambrose, now 18, read her father’s affidavit – the one he signed in March. She saw that he claimed she lived in his home, that he supported her financially, he bought her food and paid her phone bill, and counted her as part of a four-person household.
Mia — safe from his abuse, safely outside his control — made her own sworn affidavit that flatly contradicts what Ambrose swore before the court.
“I have not lived with him since August 2024.” — Mia
Not lived with him since 2024? But Ambrose swore she was there with him in Connecticut – there on Beach Road, living in near poverty with him, with him paying all her bills, as he drained his modest retirement account, as she dutifully attended high school.
It was a pretty scene of a loving, self-sacrificing father.
Mia’s federal affidavit is Exhibit H in a sanctions motion, a point-by-point rebuttal of her father’s sworn statements.
Her very first declaration is decidedly unambiguous:
“I have not resided with Christopher Ambrose since August 2024.”
She followed it with:
“Since my departure, Christopher Ambrose has provided no support of any kind — financial, material, or educational.”
And then:
“He withheld my identification documents — my birth and adoption records, Social Security card, and passport — to maintain control and prevent my independence.”
Ambrose told the court he supported three children – and named her in his affidavit.
Mia responded:
“Every statement or filing in which he claims to support three children is false as to me.”
“I have lived independently in another state at a confidential address known to law enforcement for my protection.”
The protection she speaks about is not from some random stalker. It is from him.
He told the court she was a full-time student he was supporting.
Mia wrote:
“His conduct prevented me from completing high school.”
These aren’t minor discrepancies. They are direct reversals under oath.
And we haven’t even started with his other sworn statements. Some would call them lies. A judge would call them perjury.
When you lie on a federal affidavit to avoid a $405 filing fee, that’s perjury. The penalty, at minimum, is dismissal of his case against Dr. Lee. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A), dismissal is mandatory.
It is up to the judge to refer the case for criminal prosecution.
Stay tuned for part 2.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
It’s appearing David Weigel has circled the wagons for his court procedure today. Many a woman have gone to the warrior project with due process violations, outlandish eithical violations and crimes committed in their family court cases. David Weigel is not interested in these things. He along with his side kicks largely fathers like the family court reform leader Peter and Joan. The father with 6 kids and their friend Richard. The collection of data is pass legislation based on biased statistics. Just like the national parenting organization have done with studies using volunteers to pass legislation. Teamed up with convicted and non convicted domestic violence perpitrators and child abuse nonsubstanced and substancied. None of this has anything to do with the welfare of children. It’s about gaining control of legislation. For prodomity fathers not parents. Some of us have learned the hard way. It not the first accusations that David Weigel has been accused by women besides his wife of surtin behavior. He has used women to promote his projects only to turn around and go against them in their court cases. There is plenty of fraud going around. It’s only the men like David Weigel who gets to say who is been a victim. Just like Peter and Joan. Don’t kid yourself it is about control domination of legislation. Running stories like Weigel records as a financial advisor and his connection with a group hell bent on making domestic violence legal, forcing children into unhealthy relationships ” all father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children” with years of bias information about 50/50 custody. Criminal justice reform for men. It’s all going down through Connecticut. The first to monitize fatherhood, use painting women as the largest percentage of the problem at family court. Putting them in jail for reporting and trying to protect their children. The entire secret of family court and false claims of parental alienation were surfacing after the death and court cases of the Jennifer’s. The coursive control laws passed to passify the woman in Connecticut. Minewhile the monitized fathers moved in to control legislation groups and develop more projects bringing data for fathers interest. While fighting and going after women with proof in their cases. While Peter Denying funding for gender biased agreement. Controlling 2014 hearings, women rights groups and sent people in to destroy advocating for mothers. Disproving parental alienation and hidding the fact that false alligations are minimal. Using unsubstantiated claims while the department of child and family services is passing out finding and obligated to follow partnership. Civil rights advocate silencing women and hiding behind minority community projects that ignore white wealthy men who manipulate family court. With the I am the victim and discriminated against. Entitled to use state and federal funding to manipulate the court system both family and federal. All roads lead to the state of Connecticut. I hope David is convinced for his continued crusade that appears to silence women and dominate family court.
Court watching intention? Court watching is entered to keep processing fair and impartial based upon the evidence presented to the court house. To attempt to point ☝️ out manufactured evidence and the lack of ability to present it for due process. It’s not for fear and intimidating judicial procedures. The reporting of family court system is to present all sides of the issue appearing in family court. The relentless pushing of the family court fraud warriors project is not reporting. It’s an attempt to bias the system based upon the narrative by the group. The entire project is aimed at the elimination of child support and mandatory 50/50 custody bypass review by the system. Mr. Weigle I believe has been convicted for domestic violence along with other members of the group. Some have not been convicted. The project is lead prodomity based on fathers rights and has intimidating voices collectively of women in the group. This project has brought no attention to the other funding streams effecting the family court system. None of the equal and shared parenting studies reflect the 30 percent of high conflict cases. Are appearing on a volunteer basis. Mr. Weigle himself has appeared to intimate himself into the custodial parents, not 50/50. Taking over the house. So his own actions do not reflect on the what he appears to be selling to the flock of people he preaches to. Mr. Weigle and the other who spears head the project have silence women in the group. Use fear and intimidating tactics on those who want to be heard. Individual case merit is important. The group is not a reflection of this. The reporting from the individual journalist claiming to provide advocating and standing alone. When the johnny come lately Mr. Luthmann can report on all the facts we perhaps can fix family court. Your statistics and information. The statistics are inaccurate duplication on the United States family court system. The majority of alligations are not false. There are outline cases. Intimidating judicial procedures and people especially women she not continue. Clean up the reform movement. The children depends on it. An impaired parent, a manipulative parent and an abusive parent should not be excused for federal and state funding. Evidence is not being heard at the court including of abuse.
Governor’s Council on Women and girls
In January of 2019 Lamont ” The council on women and girls takes to heart the responsibility it has to future of the state of Connecticut. It’s goal is to tackle issues impact the lives of women ,girls and their families. Aka father’s and families. The clinching after the deaths of the several women in the state.
Chair Lt. Governor Susan Bysiewicz
Vice chair Department of child and family services Esq. Jody Hill. DCF passes out fatherhood funding and experimental psychology. ” All Connecticut father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children”. ” First of it’s kind studies, to engage problematic fathers” Marsha Kline Pruitt.
Constitutional Officers
Moriah Moriarty/Jacqueline Kozin / Secretary Stephanie Thomas designee
Jennifer Putetti /Andrea Cormer ( treasurer Erick Russell )
Lori Fernand ( ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM TONG’S OFFICE )
Legislative Leadership
Martin Looney
Heather Somers
Dorinda Borer
Christina Carpino
Agencies Commission
Department of administrative services
Department of Aging and disability Services Commissioner
Department of Consumer protection commissioner
Department of emergency services
Department of education
Department of Corrections
Department of ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Department of developmental services
Department of education
Department of Energy & Environmental protection
Department of Housing
Department of Labor
Department of mental health and addiction services
Department of motor vehicles
Department of Revenue
Department of Public Health
Department of social services
Department of transportation
Department of Veterans affairs
Division of criminal justice
Office of early childhood commissioner
Connecticut Insurance department
Office of health strategy
Office of higher education
Office Military Affairs
Office of Workforce strategies
Office of policy and management
Office of manufacturing
The majority partnered with the fatherhood initiative a non profit organization for men. Again, partnership agreements taking priority. FUNDED BY THE COMMISSION ON WOMEN ,CHILDREN, SENIORS EQUITY AND OPPERTUNITY . BETWEEN 300-700K FOR PERSONNEL TO PUSH THE FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE AND THE NATIONAL PARENTING ORGANIZATION AKA FATHER’S AND FAMILIES.
The commission on women children senior equity and opportunity base their information on the fatherhood initiative. The fatherhood initiative that has already taken complex social issues and turned them against women. So when they continue to attack women on social media forums, celebrate fathers who take custody away from their mothers. It doesn’t matter if th
Civil collusion. The entire goes off statistics and data. Even if the data is misleading or incorrect. Dr. Bill Barnet also working with Connecticut ” Alienation study group” association with The national parenting organization. As well as Robert Garza promotion of the rebranding of the three strikes rule. Significant amount of mandatory reports claim to be false or unsubstantiated? Women filing for divorce for gifts and prizes.
Looks like there is a new breed 😁 of socially dependent. They are not living in Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, New Britain in the projets. They are living on the in the affluent community. They are not women giving birth to children out of wedlock for gifts and prizes as they say. There is a new welfare 👑 queen in town. The outcome for placement of the children with their father has not yeilded the desired outcome.
This article came at the perfect time for me. I was going to file in forma puperis myself but I would want it under seal since I would lie like Ambrose. Hey $405 bucks is still $405 bucks even with inflation.
After citizen journalists expose corruption in Connecticut’s family courts …and lawsuits are filed against citizen journalists who expose the corruption … mainstream news publishers should:
a. report what happened
b. be complicit in the coverup
c. other
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/59772562/Ambrose_v_Swithin
Christopher Ambrose is not an outlier in Connecticut’s family-court system – he is what the law and funding architecture produced.
In a state that has written “father engagement” into statute, MOUs, and funding streams, Christopher Ambrose is the textbook case of how a white, professional father can weaponize that infrastructure to secure custody, control the money, and silence a protective mother – all while the very agencies sworn to be neutral are structurally organized around promoting fathers’ interests.
Legally and structurally, here’s why that statement is grounded in actual documents – not just emotion:
1. Connecticut literally built an institutional “fatherhood” machine tied into family court
By statute, Connecticut created the Office of the Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative (OCFI) inside DSS in 2022. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17b-27b(b) says:
“There is established within the Department of Social Services the Office of the Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative… [which] shall perform administrative duties on behalf of the [CFI] in accordance with a strategic plan…”
The CFI Strategic Plan Implementation Update (DSS, 2019) explains that:
The Office of the Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative is staffed to run contracting, program monitoring, training, and technical assistance.
Its core result is: “All Connecticut fathers are engaged in the lives of their children.”
The CFI Council – the policymaking body – formally includes:
Commissioners of DSS, DCF, DOC, Education, Housing, Public Health, Mental Health & Addiction, etc.
Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division (CSSD) and Support Enforcement Services (SES) directors.
The director of the DSS Bureau of Child Support Enforcement.
Connecticut’s own Child Support Program Self-Assessment notes that in 2017 DSS and 11 state agencies – including the Judicial Branch: Support Enforcement Services and Court Support Services Division – executed the Fatherhood Interagency MOU, agreeing to “actively collaborate and support the goals, objectives and activities of the CT Fatherhood Initiative.”
Another DSS summary of CFI calls it a “broad-based, statewide collaborative effort… led by DSS” whose work is “changing the systems that can improve fathers’ ability to be fully and positively involved in the lives of their children,” and lists the Judicial Branch, CCADV, Legal Aid, and many others as partners.
Bottom line: Connecticut has hard-wired father-first policy into:
State statute
An Office of Fatherhood inside DSS
Multi-agency MOUs that explicitly pull in family court and child support enforcement as partners
There is no parallel, equivalently resourced, statute-created “Office of Protective Mothers” or “Office for DV Survivors in Family Court” with matching authority and MOUs.
2. Federal law (Title IV-D) requires neutrality – not a father-only machine
Federal child-support law under Title IV-D requires states to operate a neutral child-support and parent-locator program:
45 C.F.R. Part 302 sets state-plan requirements for IV-D programs; states must provide IV-D services to all eligible applicants and operate in “substantial compliance” with federal standards to keep their funding.
45 C.F.R. § 302.34 requires cooperative arrangements with courts and law-enforcement so they provide information to help locate noncustodial parents, establish paternity, and secure support – but it does not authorize gender-skewed policy favoring fathers over custodial parents (usually mothers).
Federal civil-rights and funding rules (Title VI, Title IX, § 504, ADA, etc.) require that state-administered programs not discriminate based on sex, race, or disability and that they structure services around equal access and best interests of the child, not around maximizing “father involvement” as an independent outcome.
So when Connecticut builds an entire statutory office, strategic plan, and multi-agency MOUs around “fatherhood”, then plugs the Judicial Branch and Support Enforcement directly into that system, the result is not neutral: it is a structural tilt toward non-custodial fathers.
3. Ambrose’s case is what that tilt looks like in a white, professional father
From the public record and ongoing federal litigation:
Investigative reporting on the Ambrose case documents that, in secrecy-shielded Connecticut family court, he:
Won custody of all three adopted children.
Kept all the marital funds, leaving his ex-wife without assets and their teenagers without their primary caregiver.
Frank Parlato summarizes it bluntly: Ambrose “won custody of his three teenage children and kept all the marital funds depriving his wife of 18 years of her assets and their three children of their mother.”
Later, in federal court, Ambrose tried to present himself as a destitute, self-sacrificing father:
He filed an in forma pauperis (IFP) affidavit to avoid a $405 filing fee in his defamation suit, claiming poverty and representing that his daughter Mia lived with him and was supported by him.
Judge Sarala V. Nagala refused to seal the affidavit, citing the “strong presumption of public access” to IFP filings.
His 18-year-old daughter Mia Ambrose then filed her own sworn federal affidavit (Exhibit H to a sanctions motion) stating:
“I have not resided with Christopher Ambrose since August 2024.”
“Since my departure, Christopher Ambrose has provided no support of any kind — financial, material, or educational.”
He withheld her identification documents (birth/adoption records, Social Security card, passport) to maintain control.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A), if a plaintiff’s allegation of poverty in an IFP affidavit is untrue, “the court shall dismiss the case” – dismissal is mandatory, and the judge may also refer the matter for criminal prosecution for perjury.
No one needs to prove whether Ambrose ever sat in a specific “fatherhood program class” to see the pattern:
A white, male, professional father
Operating in a court culture formally partnered, by statute and MOUs, with a Fatherhood Initiative designed to change systems in favor of “father engagement”
Emerging with sole custody, financial control, and institutional credibility, while a protective mother and protesting teenagers were minimized and marginalized
That is exactly what a father-centered system looks like in practice.
4. Why calling him “the perfect example” is fair opinion, grounded in receipts
Putting it together, it is a reasonable, protected opinion, supported by documents, to say something like:
> Given that Connecticut has created an Office of the Connecticut Fatherhood Initiative in statute, embedded fatherhood policy into multi-agency MOUs with the Judicial Branch and Support Enforcement, and organized its systems around maximizing “father engagement,” Christopher Ambrose stands as a near-perfect example of how white fathers can benefit from this structure: he emerged from Connecticut family court with sole custody and financial control, while his ex-wife and their children’s objections were sidelined – and only when he stepped into the neutral light of federal court, under Title IV-D and 28 U.S.C. § 1915, did his narrative begin to unravel.
There’s no public evidence (so far) that Ambrose personally enrolled in a specific CFI-funded workshop or program, and you should not claim that as a factual matter unless documentation surfaces. But it is accurate to say:
His outcomes (custody + money + credibility) are perfectly aligned with what Connecticut’s fatherhood system is architected to produce: “all Connecticut fathers engaged in the lives of their children” through coordinated court, child-support, and social-service structures.
There is no equivalently powerful, statute-created, multi-agency initiative for protective mothers or DV survivors in family court.
His case therefore embodies the benefits that flow to white, professional fathers in a system structurally oriented around father engagement rather than survivor safety and genuine neutrality.
Purchasing fatherhood . Ryan tuf father is right. Fatherhood under any conditions.
”changing the systems that can improve fathers’ ability to be fully and positively involved in the lives of their children” isn’t a “hard-wired father-first policy” and none of this has anything to do with skin color.
Try telling that to the mothers who have been treated unfairly at the family court house due to the bias. Please tell that to the white women at the fatherhood initiative projecting ” white women of privilege”. Please tell that to the women of color who’s white fathers have flipped custody. Please tell that to the people who have projected images of black women as “welfare queens.” Black lives matter 860 testifying that the judge doesn’t like single black mothers. I don’t think some of the the judges like mothers in any shade They like the judicial branch funding .The division that state it’s self has created. Appearing to divide women so they are not coming together collectively. We are finding our way to each other despite the state attempting to keep us apart. We are all being silenced. Including by the agencies tasked to represent women. Tell that to the mothers in the criminal justice system, while ” fatherhood takes priority over criminal matters”. Connecticut has created a whole new type of discrimination. We see the wealthy white me behind it benefiting and profiting off the minority community projects.
It absolutely is a hardwired father first policy, just read the grant funding language! It’s all there. There is no exception, even if dad is violent, CFI will FIX him with a program certificate which then affords him custody/access at the expense of our children and mothers who fight to protect them. There’s more But I’m honestly just too exhausted to continue to try to help people educate themselves on this matter if you really wanna know the truth go read the 9 90s and go read the grant funding requirements and you’ll see it is literally set up by design to harm children and women by forcing fathers into the lives of their children whether they are healthy or not whether they are safe or not. It’s a scam it’s racketeering it’s fraud and it is killing children and mothers.
I am a white professional father who has experienced the exact opposite of Ambrose in the corrupt CT family court. It’s not about the gender, it’s about the money and child trafficking.
We are aware protective fathers in various shades are having the same problem. Growing concern over criminal justice reform and the state of Connecticut attitudes against sexual assault of adults and minors.
The commission on women, children, seniors’ equity and Opportunity shall be part of the legislative branch.
The following shall focus issues on underrepresented underserved population: Women, children, and the FAMILY (aka big daddy), elderly persons, African Americans, Asian Pacific Americans, Latino, and Porto Ricans and shall constitute a successor to the commission on equity and opportunity and the commission on Women, children, and seniors, in accordance with the bitch burning project.
The members are appointed by the president pro tempore of the Senate and the majority leader of the senate. section 11 one whom has experience and expertise in issues concerning women, one with expertise in issues with children OR THE FAMILY (aka the fathers) and one who has expertise in the issues concerning the elderly persons.
Those appointed on or after July 1, 2019, shall serve a two-year term.
(e) (1) The advisory board shall be organized into executive committee and six subcommittees. Advising on the following:
African American
Asian Pacific-Americans
Latino and Puerto Rican
Women
children
Elderly
Considering their partnerships I don’t think these people care too much about the ” privileged white women” as the white women in the fatherhood initiative call them. Fathers and families rebranded as The National Parenting Organization. ” Racism and sexism” Aug 2019 Jocely Frye. Center for American Progress. It’s not just shortchanging black women. Women in all colors are having their children taken away with the same stereotypes.
The number of women in the work force was a great achievement prior to covid. Women make up the majority of the health care services. A majority in social services. Connecticut fatherhood initiative strategies included more recruitment for men in the social services profession. Women in the trades beaten to death by male coworker. Cause he didn’t like her. Post covid women’s employment has declined. As the insurance company continues to decline services to Americas paying ridiculous premiums to be denied service. Connecticut seeking to place men in jobs women often hold. Being employed doesn’t seem to be enough for these male lead projects. WOMEN’S state and federal tax dollars are paying for the projects to undermine their roles in the family and the work force. Including the agencies tasked to represent them .
Senitors silencing women. All men Henri Martin, Eric Bethel, John Kissel, Bob Duff and Martin Looney.
Financial committee, bond advisory and education. While Tong believe it is his birth right to divide the state of Connecticut. If you are an Indian, from a middle eastern country or identity as a woman in general don’t bother calling the commission on women children senior equity and opportunity. They represent the white male senators funding streams
Connecticut’s judicial branch is busy. Try back later.
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/ocpd/important-information/warning_sheet_for_clients-1.pdf?rev=2e23136bb87d42f195b9b60ec802328c
“experts” can be bought by the hour.”
So can’t “kisstop” former FBI agents turned “experts”.
Ambrose is a vexatious litigator. The quicker that issue is before the courts in all of these cases, the quicker he’ll be put out to roost.
The DOJ should be set to move on him soon. He did it to himself by being so blatantly public with his lies, which led them to his extracurriculars like Latin Boys and Barber Shops. This one is a ground ball.
CHOMOs don’t have a good time in prison. And I have a feeling Chris won’t be giving any haircuts.
Hey Chrissy baby, we’re still dancing in NY Supreme? *Litigation Privilege
Chris better not bend over to pick up a dropped bar of soap in the communal shower.
The entire state of Connecticut is a laughing stock. The entire system is designed for welfare reform, healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood. To stop dependency and out of wedlock births. Now Chris a wealthy white man living in luxury is requesting financial assistance. For what appears as depends that are not really dependent. Funneling federal dollars for what appears as abuse of social services funding. Million of dollars to state colleges for programs and studies failing the public. Your policies are not followed. Agencies out of compliance yet you are still collecting. No one in Congress or way up in federal agencies is doing a thing about it. Using gatekeeper and alienation claims. Funneling business to expensive camps, psychologist not held accountable or monitored. Your entire system is the basis for the rest of the country, yet it’s not holding up to review. Management and oversight. Congratulations on the dependency of your citizens, tax payer and gainfully employed and previously employed. You are abusing federal funding and the little people don’t want to continue to pay for it. We have watched the family court system mismanaged cases escalate. Poverty to anyone who doesn’t go along with your civil collision. Punishment for asking the system for help and your transferring wealth to yourself. The people like Linda who help with the dirty work. Where is Linda and Maddy to pay Chris fees? Maybe Allen can fork over the fees?
Allen is such a scumbag.
Chris can’t deal that Mia and Karen were seen at a national conference looking good and doing well – without him.
Chris is a terrible narcissist, and it distorts his reality.
He’s talent is that he can pass along his delusions to others like the common cold.
You don’t like Alonzo the former Scientologist turned Anti-Anti-cultist – who fights for the rights of cult members to be in cults?
No RingDings for you! Go eat Little Debbie!
Richard, I don’t think anyone actually ever believed Chris. He just so happened to have all the money and he purchased his ruling.
The entire financial resources of the state of Connecticut depends on making fathers innocent of all charges or as close as possible. Karen didn’t stand a chance at the court house. Many Connecticut mothers going through the court system at the same time have had the same experience. Significant gender biased legal system. Connecticut prepared after the woman came forward after Jenifer Dulos death. The fathers rights groups tighten the grips through back door deals in the state agencies. It looks like the second a mother comes forward Connecticut the silver bullet band swoop in and tells them it’s not about gender. It’s all the attorney and judges fault. The silver bullet band with front row parking at the legislators office. Ever article written exposing the bias state of Connecticut he swoop in to defend the father. He swoop in to defend the fatherhood initiative and denys funding. Title 4d is a distraction from the fathers rights groups. The state of Connecticut legally discrimination against women and placing funding in all the department of public services. Title 4d is just a distraction that the fathers rights groups have created . Just like parental alienation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_N._Palmer
Shipmen $ Goodwin LLP Diversity. equity and Inclusion
We sponsor organizations and development events that share perspective and raise awareness of diversity issues facing organizations and the community. Pro Bono and community. September 2023 for pro bono contributions to lawyers for children America. No case is too small, and no client should be barred from the courthouse. ‘ High impact civic and community engagement ” any time you see engagement or inclusion a giant red flag should be raised. Awarded by the Hartford Bar Association.
Public advocacy for inclusion isn’t just a “war on women”.
Perverted private collusion in family courts isn’t just a “war on women”, either.
The Hartford Courant’s coverup of public-private racketeering in family courts — just like The New Haven Register’s coverup of public-private racketeering in family courts isn’t just a “war on women”.
Connecticut judicial branch’s public-private racketeering with CT AFCC Inc. via judicial deference, authority and immunity since the 1980s hasn’t been a simple “war on women”.
It’s all been part of a much bigger picture and the hint on Connecticut’s very old hat says: Make Ouija Boards Fun Again
https://youtu.be/YcsAXC8ypyE?t=127
Perhaps it’s time for the federal government void of Terror and Blue menthol to step out of the way and investigate the Pruett’s. The experimental psychology programs at Smith and Yale Marsha and the high conflict couple. As well as Kyle involvement in the fatherhood initiative. You and your silver bullet band have been selling the same BS to women for over a decade now. We are done listening to your version of the story. We want something done. Not just more cases of so called parental alienation. We have been the subject to the collision with legislation long enough from the same group running the 2014 hearings. We want the men’s rights groups to stop distracting and stopping the women from filing justifiable lawsuits. Stop poorly advising mothers.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24787556-bowden-lewis-federal-lawsuit/
https://test-cd.ct.gov/wyman-archive/healthcare-cabinet/healthcare-cabinet-members/members/joette-katz
It’s almost as though someone in some state or federal office decided public-private racketeering for massive profits via judicial authority and judicial immunity is still too big, too complex and too embarrassing for the state to investigate and prosecute ten years after the FBI promised to investigate public corruption with a five-agency task force.
Has racketeering, fraud and malpractice in Connecticut “family courts” caused direct and exponential damage to tens of thousands of victims? Or, hundreds of thousands of victims?
Who knows?
Seriously. Who collects that data?
The Connecticut Office of Public Accounts?
Bowden -Lewis was railroaded out of the public defenders office for attempting to clean the place up. Covering up the Tong Terror the use of funding to guide judicial conduct. Creating great division of gender, race and economic status.
Ambrose looks like a predictor in that pic you posted.
🚩 1. Dual Relationship / Conflict of Interest (Major Ethics Violation)
A psychiatrist treating a patient while simultaneously being sued by that patient’s parent creates an immediate and serious conflict of interest.
Professional ethics codes (APA, AMA, state medical boards) require psychiatrists to avoid dual relationships that impair objectivity, clinical judgment, or therapeutic boundaries.
Why this is a huge problem:
• The psychiatrist’s decisions may consciously or unconsciously be influenced by the lawsuit.
• The psychiatrist may feel adversarial toward the father, which can distort treatment.
• The psychiatrist cannot maintain neutrality in a family system when they are in active legal conflict with one member of that system.
In most cases, the psychiatrist would be required to:
• Withdraw from the therapeutic relationship, or
• Transfer care to an uninvolved clinician to avoid compromised judgment.
Who is the patient of Dr Lee that you’re referring to? How do you have access to anyone’s HIPAA medical information?
The people involved blabber it all over the Internet, dum dum.
“The people involved” What kind of people noticed the case?
“blabber it” Blabber sounds like they’re misinformed. Are they?
“dum dum” Is that insult meant to harm or to discourage?
The people involved” What kind of people noticed the case?
A- Human beings with access to the Internet, those kind of people.
“blabber it” Blabber sounds like they’re misinformed. Are they?
A: No sweetheart, blabber means to speak indiscriminately.
“dum dum” Is that insult meant to harm or to discourage? –
A – Neither. it is merely pointing out the obvious.
“The people involved” What kind of people noticed the case?
A- Human beings with access to the Internet, those kind of people.
“blabber it” Blabber sounds like they’re misinformed. Are they?
A: No sweetheart, blabber means to speak indiscriminately.
“dum dum” Is that insult meant to harm or to discourage?
A – Neither. it is merely pointing out the obvious.
Let’s say Joe Smith is seeing Dr. Good.
Then, Mr. Zoo punches Joe Smith.
Then, Mr. Zoo says Joe Smith can’t see Dr. Good anymore.
Except that’s not what happened.
If you’re Chris, you could apologize for harm done, offer forgiveness for harm done to you and then sin no more. Couldn’t it be that simple?
If I were Chris,, maybe I could do that, but I’m not Chris.
You think he might eventually have the wisdom to do that? That would be a win for everyone. right?
More coersive control. Chris will not allow the adult children to receive services from anyone that doesn’t go along with his version of the story. How does anyone know 😔 who is providing care to the adult Mia. More diversionary tactics from Chris’s camp
Mia shows up to testify and now she is a patient? We all know how feverish the industry is trying to silence children. They don’t want other eyes on the kids and want to ship them off into the camps. Isolation, brain washing and domination. Maddy, Linda and the gang want everyone silenced, gaged and ready to be processed into exclusive, expensive isolation. Mia is an adult in the eyes of the law. Now they want to control who she has contact with. Red flag on team Chris. We are in desperate need of heros to clean up the family court house. A round about on interest and the fight to be heard
You’re probably right about Connecticut’s social engineering and German connection. Sometimes, “the science” and “the experts” reference “therapeutic foster care” in CSA cases to acclimate children to the CSA lifestyle. (For more information, see the Macron case history in Delaware, France.)
Connecticut’s judicial branch, the office of Public Defender Services and the state Attorney General’s office are supposed to keep taxpayers informed and federal funding should only include full and frequent audits of such abominable state human research experiments.
Unfortunately, state and federal offices allow men such as Logan Green, PhD and Michael Haymes, PhD of “Child & Family Solutions” in Cromwell, CT to subject children and families to Kentler-style experiments. Assistance from the public-private CT AFCC, Inc. network in those experiments is an open secret in Connecticut’s judicial branch.
In fact, Sidney Horowitz and Robert Horwitz recently awarded themselves an award for their award-winning performances in the field of Family Court Racketeering.
In Germany:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kentler
Who kept records of the Connecticut and German experiments?
A few state legislators all over the country are finally openly talking about “racketeering” in America’s family courts. Some are asking for:
Did Attorney Bowden-Lewis ask for records?
After former chief public defender Rapillo participated in the racketeering and looked the other way a few state employees made her a judge.
The commission on women, children, seniors, equity and opportunity. The commission mission statement aims to inform policymakers and promote innovation for women, children, seniors and people of color in CT. Using nonpartisan, data-driven (from the fatherhood initiative) A MEN’S RIGHTS ORGANIZATION) and The National Parenting Organization formally Father’s and Families) A MEN’S RIGHTS ORGANIZATION).
The funding for the commission from the state’s general fund. A LONGSIDE FEDERAL GRANTS. HHS/ACF to state and nonprofits.
When the light goes down in the Connecticut towns, people are in for the evening. The father’s rights groups jump into their cars and sing a melody; heartbeat time for women to take a beating. Driving to New Cannon, singing to legislators,
people out there turn testosterone into gold.
My buddy Nusbaum, he’s a working and keeping a stash. He makes several hundred dollars an hour. He’s got the children in his hands as he’s tipping back the cans and performs wrestling moves in the shower. Driven to New Cannon sing in show, lawyers out there turning alienation into gold.
Connecticut Girls one of the unluckiest ones in world, sorriest state in the nation. Most corrupt state in the nation. Father’s rights groups singing the melody, the funding there for the taken. Driving to New Cannon sing alienation, people out their turning testosterone into gold.
Driving to New Cannon singing to get children sold, people out there turning Alienation into gold.
That’s bullshit, Chris. You created the conflict.
You wanna do the trial by combat thing with me?
And no, you can’t pretend I’m Aaron Burr and clean my pistol afterwards!
Richard, how many MS13 “pistols” have you “cleaned” lately?
If by pistol, you mean, double entendrè then…
…..At the gas station at 30th and Lexington, manning the Gloryhole he cleaned three dozen or so pistols.
“ Not all those who seek glory are soldiers.”
Hey Chris, you’re not the only one who likes a good head of lettuce on a Spanish man LOL.
Did Chris Ambrose say “MI-13 is gay as can be”?
Why is it that in family cases perjury is not punished but rewarded?