Christopher Ambrose calls himself a victim, but he is a man who broke his children’s hearts. He’s the guy writing the script, directing the actors, and stealing the scenery while crying that he’s broke. In this guest view, we see him for what he is: a man who seized children through a system designed to protect them, and who now tries to silence his critics with federal litigation. This isn’t an episode of fiction like the ones he used to write for TV. Ambrose has turned institutions of law into instruments of cruelty. The money tricks, the broken kids, the fake poverty act. You read it, and you’ll know exactly what kind of man Ambrose is.
Margaret Sullivan is our guest author and she is commenting about Frank Report’s story and adding some keen insigts of her own.
Claiming Poverty From a $2.2M Beach House: The Ambrose Affidavit Story

By Margaret Sullivan
This article lays bare what so many of us have been screaming for years: Christopher Ambrose is not just dishonest — he is dangerous. The fact that this man, who has already devastated his children’s lives and financially destroyed their mother, can now stand before a federal judge claiming poverty while hiding behind misrepresentations and legal technicalities is a grotesque insult to the very concept of justice.
Let’s be clear: this isn’t a “he said, she said.” This is a man who manipulated the family court system to gain custody of three children who were terrified of him, only to now turn around and claim that he is a victim — of public scrutiny, of a psychiatrist’s professional opinion, of his own financial ruin. But who created this financial ruin? Ambrose himself.
He transferred marital assets into secret Fidelity accounts.
He withheld financial records from his own divorce proceedings. He took control of his ex-wife’s inheritance. He made his children’s mother — their only stable parent — homeless

Ambrose lives in a $2 million plus home he rents. He pays $3750 per month, but told the court he pays $2400. He pretends he is impoverished.And now, to save himself $405, he tells a federal judge that he’s destitute? As if the rest of us are blind to the staggering hypocrisy. He didn’t want the public to see his financial affidavit — and now we know why. What he tried to hide speaks volumes.
Let’s not overlook the most sickening irony: Ambrose weaponized the family court against his own children and now he’s weaponizing the federal courts to silence Dr. Bandy Lee — a woman who dared to use her professional expertise to assess his behaviors and protect others. Her conclusion? A 32 out of 40 on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist.

Is this lawsuit agsint Dr. Lee truly about defamation — or is it a desperate attempt by a man finally cornered by truth to silence those shedding light on his abuses?

And where is the judicial accountability? How many lies does Ambrose have to tell under oath before someone in power steps in? Where is the perjury investigation? Where is the referral for fraud under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A)? If any other citizen lied to a federal judge to gain financial relief, they would face real consequences. Why not him?

Christopher Ambrose isn’t a victim. He’s the system’s ugliest product
Frank Parlato’s article is more than journalism — it’s public service. Because Connecticut’s family court system has become a safe haven for abusers with money, influence, or a convincing sob story. And this man checks every box.
What Ambrose is doing — and has done — should horrify anyone who cares about children, about truth, about the integrity of our courts. And while the judge rightly denied his motion to seal his affidavit, that’s just the beginning.
Exposing his lies is not enough. There must be consequences.
We must demand a system where perjury is not optional. Where family court cannot be weaponized against protective parents. Where children’s voices are not silenced to serve the vanity and vengeance of an unstable man playing victim.
To all who’ve been following the Ambrose saga — to survivors, to advocates, to mothers and children failed by the courts: don’t look away. Let this case fuel our fire. The truth is out. Now it’s time for justice to catch up.
#FamilyCourtCorruption #JusticeForRiordan #ProtectTheChildren #AmbroseLies #ExposeTheSystem #DrBandyLeeWasRight #PerjuryIsACrime #AmbroseAccountability






Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] Ambrose, the disgraced TV writer turned “litigation queen,” is now suing renowned psychiatrist Dr. Bandy Lee, journalist Frank Parlato, and advocate Tina Swithin for […]
Luthmann seeing Ambrose’s name in print must give Richard flashbacks to his prison rape.
Hope you are getting good treatment for your PTSD!
Sending lots of love your way!
Well let’s see if he can scratch up enough money to sue Margaret Sullivan. I’m sure he’s working on it right now. Of course with the close relationship he has with the court system they’ll probably pay for it!
Did he not sue Paul Boyne because of the discovery phase?
The Hartford Courant is most definitely “fake news”.
Great piece!
A little bird told me Ambrose’s parents were rich.
He was getting his money from his parents.
The money he inherited may fall out side of probate
Hopefully his ex will hire a forensic accountant!
Thank you Margaret Sullivan! I hope you write longer articles in the future!
Q: What kind of society creates attorneys’ families with estates in probate?
A: The kind of society limiting discovery in government corruption cases.
Q: What kind of government makes violent discourse inevitable?
A: The kind of government that makes peaceful discourse impossible.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/prosecutor-jackazs-gag-motion
Ambrose is pure evil he’s lied since high school about his identity can look at himself in the mirror no friends no connections using kids to give him a shred of credibility The lies can easily be proven false but his evidence is prior court orders based on manufactured stories- and paid opinions of court appointed people Ambrose solely paid Federal court will blow the case open he’s too arrogant to see it coming
With love for mankind and hatred of sins,
there is no salvation outside the church.
Did Bandy Lee ever have the opportunity to evaluate Ambrose or was this scale completed based on Riordan’s subjective complaints?
“In his report, Dr. Freedman makes numerous references to his negative impressions about the behavior and attitudes of the mother,” wrote Judge Trial Referee Constance L. Epstein. “Mr. Freedman, however, has never met, interviewed, or even attempted to talk to mother, and quite clearly has chosen to adopt only father’s descriptions of mother’s actions and parental abilities.
Consequently, and unfortunately, Mr. Freedman relies on father’s accounts of mother to imply that mother may be the cause of some of the obstacles to father’s ability to parent, a conclusion with which the court does not agree.”
https://insideinvestigator.org/best-interest-of-the-child-one-mothers-fight-against-a-claim-of-parental-alienation/
Bruce Freedman: CT AFCC Inc. treasurer
Gerard Adelman: CT AFCC Inc. director
Robert Horwitz: CT AFCC Inc. secretary
How many times has the court house fraudsters used PTSD symptoms to diagnose borderline personality disorder? I wonder how much therapy it will take to heal the damage caused by the family court system to the children? They ran from what they reported as danger only to be threatened by police department. How much damage has been done to mothers like Karen Riordan from a system that profit off the denial of abusive behavior? How much damage to the children? I would like to know in the history of Connecticut family court system if there has been a case where therapist like Mr. Freeman have ever diagnosed the children and parents like Karen Riordan with PTSD or CPTSD? I’ve been accused of being intense and argumentative. I’ve fought with therapist who continue to say that people are being kept in trauma. Perhaps if the court system would stop forcing people in to living in traumatic conditions we could all move on. Get out of trauma. It’s not just about Karen and her beautiful children. It’s about all the parents like Karen Riordan and children that will be entering family court for years to come. Labeling me what ever you want. We are all going to continue to live in trauma until someone does something about family court.
Sandusky brought you out, I feel that you should seek help. When I was a tri state whore. I made a million on my back before age 23. Cheap thrills and dirty deeds!
63. Developing an Innate Sense of Drama and Conflict
Chris Ambrose loves me.
The Ambrose case is about $$$. Look at the players, psychobabblist Caverly, child snatcher GAL Hurowitz, lecherous dad attorney Aldrich, the case management by the so called judges tells all, docket entries by judge name:
Rodriguez 52
Grossman 76
Truglia 32
Adelman 230
Moukawsher 52
Tindill 92
Griffin 19
A simple no fault administrative divorce running over six years, destroying childhoods to generate lawyer feed, orchestrated by the worst judges known to man. Judge Adelman ordered the $400/hr GAL Hurowitz to attend every minute of every hearing to reward the players with family funds … no purpose in law, merely judicial revenue generation authority, the sole function of family court, destroy families, empty the bank. Of course Adelman and Ambrose share a common deviant affection.
Adelman is the devil.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16043586/
The state has little concern with such matters . Judges are placed on benches by political pieces of crap. The state will continue to traffic children and hide it away from the public. Just ask the Megan and Karen.
… and which individuals in state and federal offices protected Gerard Adelman, Robert Horwitz, Sidney Horowitz, Bruce Freedman et al. since the 1970s?
In all pending judicial proceedings regarding corruption in Connecticut “family courts”, attorneys should subpoena Ms. Katz and Mr. Rubin to answer on record:
”At any time in your work in the state of Connecticut, have you been aware of which state and or federal office(s) collected and stored research data for the involuntary research subjects in state family court cases and in Department of Children and Family cases?
That question must be asked and answered because:
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
Note to good Arizona lawmakers who don’t already know: HHS/AFCC Inc. research started in Connecticut, California and Minnesota family courts in the 1970s.
Good ideas are everywhere, too.
Find and discuss the cause. For example:
What kind of people benefit from trauma and harm “family courts” cause?
https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcast/videos
Who turned American “family courts” into instruments of cruelty?
What was the motivating factor? To destroy as many families as possible?
When were family courts designed to be purposely adversarial and for profit?
Where was the racketeering organized? California, Minnesota Connecticut?
Why haven’t federal law enforcement offices prosecuted the racketeering?
How have criminals used “family courts” as instruments of cruelty for so long?
“… To: Jim Greiner
From: Melissa Gayton
RE: Jessica Pearson & Nancy Thoennes, A preliminary portrait of client reactions to three court mediation programs, Conflict Resolution Quarterly 21 (1984).
Date: September 30, 2018 …
… Title: A preliminary portrait of client reactions to three court mediation programs …
… Sample: N=528, Los Angeles n=256, Connecticut n=163, Minnesota n=109 …
… Location: Los Angeles Conciliation Court, Family Relations Division of the Connecticut Superior Court, Domestic Relations Division of the Hennepin County (Minnesota) Family Court
Sample: N=528, Los Angeles n=256, Connecticut n=163, Minnesota n=109
Timeline: 15 weeks (undated) …
… Target group: Divorcing couples who contest child custody and visitation …
… Partners: Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, Jane Hunsinger, Project Officer, Association of Family Conciliation Courts …
… IV. Results and Policy Lessons
The authors examined the time spent on each case as well as causes of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. None of these results were analyzed for statistical significance, so we do not report them here.
V. Quality of the Study
The study did not make clear why they picked the courts that they did or if they had certain requirements of disputants besides the fact that they were seeking child custody or visitation rights in a public mediation court. It is also unclear how cases included in the study were selected, and therefore it cannot be determined whether the selection was truly random. Even if the cases sampled were sampled randomly, there was no randomization between treatment (mediation) and control groups (traditional divorce proceedings). Therefore, it is not possible to determine whether mediation leads to significantly improved outcomes. Additionally, while the authors purported to compare differences across regions, none of these differences nor any other results of the study were analyzed for statistical significance. Finally, the study did not include the results from the last survey, so it is impossible to determine the longer-lasting impact of the mediation as compared to regular adversarial-style settings. …”
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/crq.39019840304
Mediation is a service for people with minimal problems. Chris and Karen did not have minimal problems. People with problems have no choice but to go to the courthouse for help. The courthouse is not a place for help. The service who can provide help are locked out of the courtroom. Instead you are either directed to the family services run by Joseph Ditunno AFCC. The evaluation were made by Marsha Kline Pruett promoting the AFCC. ” The high conflict couple”. Marsha Kline Pruett has received hundreds of thousands of dollars for experimental psychology programs. The experimental judicial system that has placed countless children in questionable conditions. Who is in charge of this system that has lead to the emotional break down of the individuals who can simply had no choice but to go there for help? The other options are the gals. Who has been allowing the gals to engage in conduct adviserial to the best interest of children? Who has allowed the psychologist to get away practicing experimental psychology that is adviserial to the well being of the children?
Many a rumors swirl through the court reform community. Connecticut has been the “leader” of many social programs that appear to be of great benefit to the state not the human beings living in it. From the hoods of Hartford to the large homes of Stanford, one thing is for sure. The family court is driving the people into disparages.
The state of Connecticut has made out like a bandit. While the men’s rights group spread the rumors of title 4D being the problem. Here is what these parents need to know. The welfare system was intended to help Americans. Many were minority mothers and teenagers giving birth unmarried and unable to meet the needs of raising children. In the last few decades the world has made a major shift. The majority of single parents remain women, but has made drastic increase in single daddies.
Despite raising alarm bells in the court house Mr. Ambrose was given custody of three minor children. Which follows the guidelines of what women in the state of Connecticut are complaining about. Here is what you journalist may be missing . In your endless crusade against the payment of child support.
According to a google search in the never ending quest to protect children from living under the court ordered condition that are not best interest.
” While Connecticut does not keep unspent TANF funds , a large portion is spent( responsible fatherhood) on programs and administration cost rather than direct cash assistance.”
How Connecticut used TANF $266 million annually, the state is SPENDING A VERY LOW PERCENTAGE ON CASH ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES. Just 6% in 2021 in contrast to national average of 23%. Leading to questions of the appointed judges by elected officials very concerned of the ” budget gaps”. The state of Connecticut ranks 48 in the country for percentage of TANF funds spent.
Mr. Ambrose feel under the umbrella of the MOU for fatherhood dominating the state of Connecticut legal system since 2007. $450 million dollars when you include state matching funds goes towards a wide range of other programs and administration cost. All under the Daddy umbrella.
The family court judges bet on the wrong horse. While you Wonder bread daddies have been yelling about child support and using parental alienation. Some of us Crazy bitches have been doing our home work.
xoxo The protective Momma who caught the family court bitch burning brigade bring fraud upon the court for statistics, funding and cost savings to the state. Fast cash for the family law industry.
P.S. A shot out to the silver bullet band, your nose is growing by the minute.
P.S.S. MOTHERS WAKE UP !!!!!! These “warriors” are leading you like lambs to the slaughterhouse!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Clean up the politicians and clean up family court # Blumenthal, Tong, Lamont, Murphy, Kissel, Looney, Winfield just to name a few.
No reform will come to CT unless the feds step in or the judiciary committee in the legislature will no longer be dominated by family lawyers and their relatives.
Lamont and Tong are well informed about the child trafficking that runs through family court and the gross violations of the constitution and violations of due process
Yes they are. It’s a joke how upset they are about deportation. They could careless. There has to be money involved.
How about an update on the Ambrose Children? At least one must be over the age of 18 years by now. What does/do the adult child/children think at this point?
they probably want to live good, happy, healthy lives
without anyone expecting them
to field random questions
from anonymous strangers
in public forums
Do they have a gage order? Cause Mia doesn’t live with him anymore.
Ambrose looks like one very creepy dude.
Christopher Ambrose is a pedo, in my opinion based on filed court documents I have seen. Until and unless he explains the presence on his computer of:
latinoboysblog.com
and
latinbois.com
the presumption in my mind is that he is a kiddie diddler.
Come clean Christopher!
That definitely explains why judge O’Neil gave Ambrose the kids.
Perhaps the judges before O’Neil was just following through on the oath of his assignment. Chris quickly drained Karen’s assets with the assistance of Ed Nausbalm. A quick hundred thousand for phone calls and emails. The judges perhaps look at the financial affidavit and decided Chris was able to financially support the kids. All other related matters were tossed out the window with the fatherhood gatekeeper barrier to fatherhood. The hypothetical theater of parental alienation. How much of the state ability to express funding needs and outcomes? The entire system is based on welfare which appears to be guided by financial resources. Chris is now claiming he is broke. While Karen is joined the 61 percent of women slaving for a paycheck in the state.Living above poverty because she claims one. Yet the state of Connecticut is not stepping up to advocate for them. The entire financial structure is based on the opposite gender of a parent. Connecticut is home to some of the wealthiest men in the country. The judicial branch is catering to them.
Mr. O’Neil’s white collar criminal defense experience was what did it.
(BTW, if anyone knows who replaced the family expert with the white collar crime expert, please let readers here know.)
While Mr. O’Neil’s flak for racketeering in the case did minimize evidence of crimes against children, Ms. Grossman, the GAL and others already ignored those crimes beginning at the beginning of the case.
Indeed it does
The Gal Jocelyn Hurwitz and custody evaluator Jessica Biren Caverly buried it all. They had all the evidence and never brought it before the court. All the attorneys knew and silenced the mother and silenced the three teens who are still being abused by Ambrose
If you want to “save” Karen and the women in the black bikini , it would require you to stop promoting the warrior project. These guys have taken money from women, treated them like crap and at some point going to have to answer to the FBI. You cant keep bringing in parents and taking money for complete bullshit .
The dark ops private investigator most likely planted those when Karen stole Chris’ laptops and gave them to the self-described black ops PI Manuel Gomez. Duh.
Not quite Jealous Ambrose bc black ops PI is a hot Hispanic, who is wealthy, fearless, and has the highest clearance credentials allowing him to carry weapons in the majority of foreign countries This is Chris Ambrose attempting to discredit those who expose him Maniel Gomez has the evidence and will demonstrate the truth Discovery will bring it all out Ambrose 😂😂😂
Try laying off the steroids.
Why would Chris be jealous of Manny Gomez? Was Karen Riordan Manny’s intimate partner like she was with Frank? For an old lady she sure gets around.
Guess what else Dumbass?
None of those websites hosted child porn.
fucking moron shit for brains.
None of which websites? And how would you know? 🧐
How would I know? Um, by copying and pasting in a URL that was/is listed here at the Frank Report and seeing what’s on the website in question. That’s how.
You are too stupid to know how to do such a basic thing?
Shit for brains.
Dick, you Jew bastard! How DARE you criticise Ambrose? He is PURE WHITE Aryan with a clean bloodline. Unlike YOU, you fucking dickface!
Don’t insult Jewish people by wrongly associating Luthman with them.
Fuck you, Dick, you fucking asshole
I love Keitth and Allisonn.
Richard, want to enter a pie-eating contest with me? I can eat 58 pies in one sitting…
Rich-
Has it been confirmed about both websites?
I knew about one, but not the other. He’s a pedo.
Good luck getting a judge to look at the evidence in family court. They don’t want to address pedophiles or anything of the sort. They will say it was the sexless marriage. There is always an excuse for that type of stuff.
Of course not.
Chris Ambrose is an albino asswipe.