Her name was Anthia Gillick. She went by Brooke Sheffer when she was in OneTaste.
Assistant US Attorney Kaitlin Farrell, the prudish prosecutor from Brooklyn, was going to elicit some truthful testimony. She did so – but not by design.
A whole book could be written about this one testimony – Brooke Sheffer AKA Anthia Gillick. We will have to do it in a series. This is part 1 of the Brooke Sheffer series.
The testimony began with Gillick/Sheffer identifying the defendants – Nicole Daedone, the owner and CEO of OneTaste – “wearing the tan wrap.” Rachel Cherwitz, head of sales – “wearing the off-white blazer.”
Under questioning from prosecutor Farrell, Gillick said she first joined OneTaste in 2013 as a student. She transitioned into a OneTaste New York, LLC franchise owner within a year. Her tenure spanned two and a half years, concluding in the summer of 2015. She entered the organization at 25. She left when she was 27.
She lived in community housing, as many did.

OM Not Quite a Secret
Gillick said the main practice was orgasmic meditation. Not a secret. It’s not some hidden thing. Just a thing they did. A thing with a name. A thing they talked about openly.
Prosecution: And if you could just briefly explain what OMing was.
Witness: It is a 15-minute partnered pussy stroking practice, was the way that they described it, but almost only of the female genitalia.
OneTaste Taught About Sex – and Its Students Tried It
Gillick described OneTaste’s services – BDSM demonstrations, “ritual piercing,” and “magic school.” Gillick confirmed that OneTaste offered the services in paid classes and retreats.
Gillick’s family had wealth and paid her expenses. She grew up in rural Colorado, got a bachelor’s degree, moved to San Francisco and worked at a restaurant.
Gillick Wanted to Be in the Circus
Prosecution: And what did you do after completing undergraduate?
Witness: I moved to San Francisco to start a business in aerial silks or circus arts.
Prosecution: And what are aerial silks?
Witness: If you’ve ever seen Pink, the sheets that hang from the ceilings was my main apparatus, and so that was aerial silks, and I taught that.
Prosecution: Sorry, what do you do on the sheets?
Witness: Circus tricks, performances.
Prosecution: When did you first learn about OneTaste?
Witness: Pretty soon after — so I was living in various neighborhoods in San Francisco, and then I moved down to the South of Market District, and pretty soon after I moved, I was walking down the street and there was a guy clipping his toenails on a bench who came running after me and he was …a student at OneTaste, and he asked me to coffee.
Prosecution: And what happened after that?
Witness: We went to coffee … He just basically said he was living in a commune in San Francisco which are very common. So I was not very interested. And then we kept running into each other. And eventually, he kept asking me to his event… called Turn On, and the name kind of freaked me out, so I kept saying no. And then, eventually, he invited me to a lecture that Nicole Daedone was doing on just — it was informational on orgasmic meditation.
Prosecution: And did you attend that?
Witness: Yeah. And I agreed to attend that after going to another coffee with him, where I grilled him for 45 minutes.
Analysis of What I Think I Just Heard
Let me get this straight: a girl from Colorado comes to San Francisco to start a circus act. She meets a toenail-trimming guy on the sidewalk who keeps asking her to a thing called “Turn On,” which sounds like a 1970s porno club, and she says no. Then he says, “It’s actually a talk on orgasmic meditation,” and that wins her over?
And now the feds want you to believe she was coerced?

Anthea Gillick, Colorado native, aerialist, and part-time restaurant hostess, was recruited not through violence or threat—but by toenails.
A man grooming himself on a public bench offered enlightenment. She resisted. Then returned. Resistance became curiosity. Curiosity led to coffee. And the lecture that followed? A gateway not to a cult but to a question: what if pleasure had a method?
She was chasing a dream—circus arts. When she finally agreed to attend the OneTaste lecture, it wasn’t under duress—it was after a 45-minute cross-examination over coffee. That’s not victimhood. That’s agency.

Let me reduce it further: Colorado kid. Moves to San Francisco. Wants to hang from ceilings doing ribbon tricks. Working two jobs, mooching from mom and dad. That’s how this whole federal circus starts.
Stunned By Daedone

Gillick goes to see Daedone and is amazed and explains it all in one impressive run-on sentence.
Witness: Yeah, I’d never met anyone who, like, knew themselves so well and was so, like, aware of their flaws and willing to just, like, own them and just, like – it was like she had mapped her entire psyche, basically, and was able to just talk about it and it just seemed very powerful and I really wanted to – like, I was struggling with my aerial silks business, it was not going very well, and I really wanted to become a powerful businessman and I sort of thought if it woman could sell orgasm, I could sell circus, she could teach me to sell circus. But I was not interested in the practice at all.
Prosecution: So, after attending that first event, what did you do?
Witness: I kind of ran out the door. They were trying to persuade me to take a How to OM class, and I wanted no part of it….
Prosecution: So did you sign up for an additional class that night?
Witness: I did not.
Gillick left the event without enrolling in a class . She leaves the building on her own—but eventually returned, voluntarily.

Rural Colorado to Clitoral Enlightenment: Brooke’s Big Move
She wanted to learn how to pitch her dreams like Nicole pitched hers. That’s not cult thinking. That’s life thinking. You find someone who has what you need and follow them for a while. Gillick said no when she wanted to. That’s what matters.
What the hell kind of courtroom is this?
The true manipulation here is not Daedone’s. It’s the prosecution’s distortion of motive and autonomy.
A place where inspiration is mistaken for indoctrination. Where choosing to attend a seminar and walking out on your own is called coercion. Where ambition is reframed as exploitation—because the topic wasn’t stocks or supplements, but sex.
And it only gets worse. Way worse. Cringeworthy worse. Stupid prosecutor worse.
Stay tuned for Gillick-Sheffer part 2.
Spoiler alert. Gillick wasn’t shackled to a massage table.
And now a word from our sponsor.

What customers have to say

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.





Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Our government has seen to it that public education will create generations who have no idea of their constitutional rights and no idea how to protect themselves in s court of law. The brainwashing is not within OneTaste, but has been a brainwashing of the American public by curriculum that teaches lies and rewards conformity and submission.
The testimony from this past week handed the defense a hung jury.
If this case ends in conviction then we know the alliance of the prosecutors and the judges has become so great than even the jury can’t level the playing field to restore Justice.
It’ll be a hung jury.
I miss Senor Raniere so much!! I loved him more than anything else on this Earth!!! He was my one and only Vanguard. We gave him our three daughters to dump his loads into. Laure, Nicki, Danielle and those other sluts HATED my little princesses.
Shout out RC with the offwhite Blizzy
I guess nobody’s responsible for their actions anymore….
This case is without merit!!!
The Keith Raniere NXIVM and
Sean Puffy Combs cases both involve coercion, blackmail, and threats of physical violence…
Blackmail threats of physical violence and coercion are…
….NOT involved in the One Tase case whatsoever!!!
The trial is a forest and she never have gotten past a grand jury!!!
📈 Rating (Audience impact – within its lane):
8/10 — Frank nails his niche.
That’s what ChatGPT has to say about Frank’s article!!!
Frank i agree, this AI drivel is not going to be approved in future.
Anthea is hot but intricately stupid
I love DOS! I LOVE KEITH!! I LOVE ALL THINGS NVIVM!! VANGUARD WILL REIGN AGAIN!
I have come back around to loving Mr. Raniere! I was mad because he fucked my daughters instead of me, but I understand now. He was just teaching them the birds and the bees. He was really in love with me.
Fuck all the slut Fernandez sisters! Keith and ME were in love! Those skanks got in our way. Keith and I were meant to be togerher!!
I was a FIRST LINE SEX SLAVE TO KEITH!
MONKEY. YOU FUCKING WHORE!! YOU WERE NOT EVEN PART OF DOS! YOU FUCKING SLUT!!!! I HATE YOU WITH A PASSION!
Mi papa is right! Frank needs to cover the Keith Raniere matter!
Keith fucked me and my two sisters for years. In addition to all the other harem sluts like Allison Mack, Lauren Salzman and Nicki Clyne.
Keith is God…
Mr. Parlato, you must cover the Raniere case. Vanguard is innocent!
All four of our children were in ESP. Many will say, “But your kids dropped out of high school. They never went to college. They worked for free for the Salzmans. They never got jobs or made friends. They never made money or got any practical work experience. They caught STD’s from Keith. They became suicidal. They had abortions. They lost their childhoods.”
I say, but they have a heightened sense of self-awareness.
Frank, you fucking faggot! You had my savior Vanguard imprisoned. May you burn in hell.
Dear Friends, it’s been a while since our last update—thank you for your patience, and we apologize for the radio silence.
In the meantime, we just wanted to say hello test out a new email tool, and let you know that we’ll be unveiling a new development at a live demo event at our new space this weekend, June 7th.
This is the most bonkers federal case I’ve ever seen. Raniere had some wild stories for sure but they at least supported the prosecution’s arguments. Who is running this show?
I’m betting this will be the most complicated jury charge instructions, the prosecution is contorted into a circus shape even trying to suggest some kind of criminality in their witnesses testimony.
Not that complicated. It’s one count of forced labor. Judge will go over the elements of the crime. And jury will find that none have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt
It’s not though. It’s one count of conspiracy to force labour.