Guest View
By Jamie Morgan
OneTaste was run by women a sort of feminine education, teaching people feelings and the feminine. Force was not a part of OneTaste. Attention was the OneTaste syllabus, not force. The women were there to open up their sexuality and find their power.
You come, you do some classes, you leave, you hang out with people, you don’t hang out with people. You go to see your family.
OneTaste was an intense experience. It was a place to learn and to push yourself. People had intense experiences.
You opted in, you could do what you want and you could leave whenever you want. Some people had trouble with the intensity of their experiences afterwards, even if they were positive experiences or breakthroughs.
Some people found it easier to hate OneTaste and move on with their lives.
Just to be in OneTaste, you had to have a certain level of confidence, because it’s not just sitting at home watching TV. It’s an active lifestyle. People found relationships in OneTaste and dated. Some people got married in OneTaste.
It was about desire, what does this person want?
What course would fit them? What would serve them?
It was a very open community where everyone was exploring sex and desire. There was a lot of sex. It was sex-positive.
It was strictly over 18. All of the events, all of the courses, all of the games night, community nights. And the houses where people would move in together and practice, were all strictly not for children.
Children were specifically excluded.
Alcohol was excluded. They were all sober events.
There was no alcohol at the courses or the events, because that’s a bad thing to add into an already volatile mix. Marijuana was not permitted. No drugs or alcohol.
People would meet up and hang out outside of the official courses and have friendships and people would drink. Probably more weed in California and pints of beer in England.
There were boundaries and care taken to ensure that it was a safe environment. There’s a traffic light system of green, yellow, red on what sort of emotional state you are in, and red means stop.
Was there surveillance? Surveilled secretly and surreptitiously by OneTaste as they have been accused in the indictment?
Everyone had private Facebook, private Instagrams, text messages. No one was reading anyone’s phones. There were no CCTV cameras in the houses.
Everyone had their own bedrooms with locks on the door so they could not be interrupted if they were having sex.
The destruction of the community, of what it was Bloomberg article was terrible. Strange allegations and things melded together and taken out of context, twisted.
People buying each other courses and people sleeping with each other for courses.
There was a woman in London who was dating one of the guys, and she paid for them both to do the relationship course. She paid for him and her to do the course, because they were in a relationship and they wanted to do the relationship course together to improve their relationship. But then you see that framed as like, was he sleeping with her to get her money to do the courses and make money for OneTaste , and it’s all twisted darkly just for views.
The FBI following Bloomberg went looking for five years and they came up with the two women planned to do a crime. Over 12 years. Forced labor conspiracy.
Most people in the One Taste community lived in their own houses.
And then the staff, some of them lived in their own houses, some of them lived together.
And as soon as the events finished at 9 or 10 PM, you just went home, you go to bed, and then you could get up for morning practice. Most of the events were in the evening or at the weekend.
People were running the business, but then there was time to go to the gym or take a nap at home or have sex. People were not run ragged and lacking sleep and gaunt and malnourished.
Most of the houses had food programs where one person would cook and everyone would chip in money and make these big meals.
A lot of people put on weight because the food was good and there was lots of it. They were going to events and having fun, eating out.
The two women – Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz – were the worst conspirators that ever lived. They couldn’t figure out how to do anything right. Everything, all the forced labor they failed at.
Instead it was it seems largely youthful adventures and fun and friendships. They just didn’t know how to conspire right.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Looks like I have a fan
Who are the hot chicks:
At the top and at the bottom?
If Nicole is so innocent – if she’s not a cult leader hiding in plain site like they all do, if she’s has not coercively controlled the participants, if she does not have minions brainwashed and devoting every moment to freeing their leader, then stand trial.
Stand trial and let’s hear what you have to say.
This isn’t a Carlos Watson case- he stood trial and all due process was violated.
In the one taste case the prosecution already admitted the journal was an error and they won’t be using it.
So let’s sit back and hear the truth- what else does the government have on Nicole?
Let’s hear from Nocole. I would like a Dr Seuss glossary of one taste terms published for the public to see. I think they are a cult/ a high end cult with polished, influential, bright people working their game and making millions.
Aries would have gotten nowhere if we had prosecutors with integrity.
We can arrest the FBI and prosecutors who at best failed sue diligence and forced this case forward when there was no crime. Not even close to a crime.
Prosecutors have been permitted to defame and ruin the reputations of two innocent women when they cannot provide the dates the crimes occurred, cannot name the victims, and cannot describe the alleged labor that unidentified persons allegedly were pressured to complete.
It’s an embarrassment to our criminal Justice system.
We are not short on criminal conduct here in the US; it’s just that our greatest criminals- the most unethical and psychopathic are those running our judicial system.
When our judicial leaders, when our prosecutors, our judges, and our FBI have been infiltrated with unethical, evil, psychopaths and have operated with impunity for decades, innocent Americans like Nicole and Rachel will continue to be persecuted.
Had our system been just, Aries’s nonsense claims would have been ignored and scoffed at- not welcomed and used as a catalyst to manufacture false evidence and deceive grand juries.
Braindead take. Ayries was not a witness in the case. The jury returned a conviction. If you don’t like it, tough
FBI McGinnis has to be held accountable if Aries is. Without McGinnis they’d be no second version of her journal.
Without the second version of the journal they’d be no charge of forced labor.
She’s an unethical, perjurer, who agreed to manufacture evidence so she could play the victim and receive some of the sympathy that Bloomberg’s self-serving Ellen Huet recklessly and baselessly conjured to promote her own career. No fact checking; just pure lies and spin resulting in the destruction of One Taste, the dismantling of a community, and the false indictment of two talented, capable women.
Ellen Huet should not be able to profit from the foundation she layed in the house of sand that has burned through taxpayer dollars for case where there was zero wrong doing.