Juda Engelmayer
Where is the outrage? Where are the media watchdogs who claim to stand for truth and accountability?
A surprise letter was filed by the U.S. Government under seal late Wednesday night in the case of OneTaste. A heavily-redacted version was subsequently filed on Friday.
The Prosecutors on the case of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz V USA have now admitted what we have been telling you for years — after months of deception — that Ayries Blanck lied about her so-called “journals,” which were nothing more than fabricated documents written for a Netflix production. This admission, detailed in Celia Cohen’s March 13 letter to Judge Gujarati, confirms what the defense has been saying all along: Blanck committed federal crimes by falsifying evidence and lying to federal agents, and yet, the prosecution relied on these fraudulent materials to bring charges against the defendants.
Now, faced with this damning revelation, the government has hurriedly filed a response under seal, hiding from public scrutiny rather than owning up to its failure. Why? Because they cannot justify their reliance on fake evidence. Because they do not want to explain why FBI Agent Elliot McGinnis held onto Blanck’s hard drive for over two months before logging it as evidence, violating FBI protocols and raising serious concerns about evidence tampering.
As Jennifer Bonjean’s March 14 letter lays out in detail, McGinnis not only delayed logging the hard drive but attempted to access it before any official forensic analysis—a blatant breach of FBI procedure. He was in direct contact with Blanck throughout this time, and it is increasingly clear that he orchestrated efforts to obstruct the defense’s ability to uncover the truth. The government’s refusal to call him as a witness only underscores his central role in this misconduct.
Had the defense not relentlessly exposed these lies, Blanck’s perjured testimony and Netflix-scripted journals would have been presented as fact at trial, potentially leading to wrongful convictions. The media should be asking:
Why did the government allow a known liar to shape its case?
Why has the prosecution refused to drop the charges after admitting their evidence was fraudulent?
Why is the government refusing to investigate Blanck for fabricating evidence and lying to federal agents?
Why is the government hiding behind sealed filings instead of being transparent about their failure?
This is not just incompetence—it is prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecution would have presented false evidence in court, and the only reason they didn’t is because the defense fought to expose the truth.
This case isn’t about justice—it’s about covering up government ineptitude.
The media should be demanding answers. The public should be outraged. Instead, the government hides behind sealed filings, hoping no one will notice the catastrophic failure of their case.
The time for silence is over. The media should demand that the U.S. Government unseal their folly. The case must be dismissed, and those responsible must be held accountable.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz have hired Harvey Weinstein’s main PR dude.
They aren’t messing around with a D-leaguer like Richard “Buttboi” Luthmann.
These ladies know how to spend their money on the A-league.
Frank is Bone-n-Jeans hot in person?
I don’t know…. when do prosecutors or lawyers ever admit to being wrong or turning a blind eye to crimes.
I don’t think that the defense has a reason to celebrate yet.
The defense motion could be a trap for their arrogant clients.
I think about it … if you’re either of those two defendants Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz … you’re probably feeling like your lawyers just hit a grand slam.
The two defendants Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz are probably celebrating because the court has some obligation to follow the Rule of Law.
The two defendants Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz are probably celebrating when they should be nervous.
Probably the exact opposite will happen in the case … the two defendants Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz will show up to court feeling pretty good about themselves….. and that’s when their lawyers will sell their clients out.
This March 13, 2025 motion has to be some sort of trap.
Lawyers never admit to being wrong or turning a blind eye to crimes.
This is probably the stupidest take I’ve read on any of these articles. Try to follow along.
A very real possibility. But I still think the defense had more on the prosecution in this case than the prosecution has on the defense.
For once the defense is powerful and financially sound enough to fight back. Most of us in the position of being falsely accused would have been dead and buried/pleaded out by now simply for lack of resources. I applaud these women and the media who are fierce and ethical; who dig deep and expose the abuse of power and pervasive corruption that takes the lives of innocent Americans.
Where’s the Netflix lawsuit? Coming Soon?
McGinnis is their man. He’s made a career of corruption – If anyone pursues McGinnis he can flip on god know how many people to save himself. McGinnis isn’t working alone.
Thankful to Frank Parlato and others who will not allow prosecutorial misconduct to go unchallenged. This case needs to be dismissed immediately. There is no case. There never was a case.
Allowing this fraud to continue and the protection of McGinnis will only confirm prosecutorial misconduct.
Dismiss the case, walk away and don’t give further cause to investigate.