Timothy Vale
By Peter Szymonik
Constitutional and Civil Rights Activist
It was most interesting hearing the commentary at the Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2025.
We admire Sen. Winfield’s leadership as a non-attorney; however, the closed and insular nature of the judicial review and reappointment process in this state is a significant concern. Additionally, the fact that the public is given less than three days’ notice of these hearings is a serious issue.
The fact that nearly all hearing time is co-opted by attorneys and bar associations, who operate in and profit from the operational dysfunction and “good ole boys and girls club” is a serious problem.
It’s no surprise that these horrific and sociopathic “family” court judges are treated with kid’s gloves and handed softball questions when they are being questioned by divorce attorneys who had or have cases before them. (One could only imagine if they could be questioned by the parents and children whose lives they destroyed).
Rep. Tom O’Dea did us great service by illustrating that despite all the complaints made against the judges who appeared before the Judiciary Committee ‘all’ of them were dismissed. Every complaint, no matter how egregious, is ignored and dismissed by those who are supposed to hold our judges accountable for gross misconduct and violations of our rights and laws.
Not a single complaint upheld, or complaint acted on by the Judicial Review Committee.
Because judges in this state can simply do no wrong.
Rep. Melissa Osborne, a divorce attorney who seems intent on rolling the clock back to 1975, let it slip that she moderates a private Facebook page of CT divorce attorneys. Where they apparently discuss pending legislation. What possible agenda can they have? Apart from prolonging cases and promoting conflict to increase their revenues.
I invite her to invite me to this group and respectfully ask her to disclose if other legislators are part of her private Facebook page, and if any judges participate in this page. In addition to “therapists”, “Guardian ad Litems” or any other state “family” court vendors and actors.
Regarding her comments about alimony, a relic of the distant past, she may find this site helpful: Connecticut Alimony Guide – Alimony Laws, Amounts, and Duration
Rep. Matt Blumenthal repeated the disgusting Divorce Industry narrative and falsehood that “someone has to lose in a divorce.” No representative, they do not. Not if our state came out of the Dark Ages and made shared and equal parenting a standard, which 34 other states have done to one degree or another. With positive results. But there is no money to be made if there is no conflict to encourage and promote.
Connecticut ranks DEAD LAST in family court reform, and parental rights.
Grade F. NPO Child Support and Shared Parenting Report Card | Tableau Public
Sen. Mae Flexer repeated the unsubstantiated myth that “1/3 of all divorce cases involve DV.” No Senator, they do not. The actual problem is the extension of DV to areas where it does not belong. And continuing to believe that our broken and corrupt “family” courts are the proper venue for criminal claims, when they are not. Because they are not courts of evidence or law, solely equity. Follow the flow of federal dollars.
Sen. John Kissel, after praising his buddy Judge Barry Armata, one of the most notorious and despicable actors in the state “family” court system, raised the concept that our poor judges need raises to do their jobs, and that we need more than 180 judges, is beyond laughable.
Connecticut already has some of the highest paid judges in the country, averaging well over $200,000+/year between salaries and benefits. Operating some of the most operationally dysfunctional court systems in the country.
They don’t need more money and we don’t need more judges. What we need is more judges to protect our fundamental and federally recognized parental rights. What we need is judges who run their courtrooms effectively and to the benefit of the PUBLIC, the state, and most importantly – the parents, children and families who appear before them.
NOT to line the pockets of a very few well-connected divorce attorneys, and state “family” court vendors and actors (i.e. so-called ‘evaluators, ‘therapists’, ‘Guardian ad Litems’, ‘Supervised Visitation Centers’, etc. etc.)
Pray tell, what incentives are we providing “family” court judges and divorce attorneys to resolve cases quickly and effectively? As opposed to the PROFIT motive that drives divorce attorneys and “family” court judges to encourage and promote conflict, false claims of abuse, and unnecessary prolong cases and clog our court dockets?
Didn’t anyone notice and hasn’t anyone questioned how it’s possible that, over the past decade, the Divorce Industry in this country has ballooned from $20 Billion dollars to over $65 Billion dollars in revenues…. while the number of divorces has gone down?
Chief State Court Administrator Elizabeth Bozzuto, a jurist who stated in open court that she “didn’t believe due process was that important” as she had me placed in shackles and a holding cell for not paying a millionaire attorney in my case fast enough or to her liking, showed the Judiciary Committee her crocodile tears and false concern that 80% of parents in her “family” courts are Pro Se and ‘without proper legal
representation’.
Because to her, parents are the enemy and the problem. Parents in her “family” courts are all invalid, incapable and gee, just so darn emotional. They’re all in such dire need of her “family” court’s and the state’s “services.”
If only parents could remain calm, as her sociopathic “family” court judges played social experiments with their kid’s and family’s lives.
If only parents just accepted having their children taken from them for no reason or cause, their lives shattered, and their bank accounts, retirement funds and children’s college funds liquidated. Forced to lose their jobs and even be made homeless – all under the threat of being jailed – to line the pockets of millionaire divorce attorneys – everything would be so great! How dare parents complain about her “family” courts? How dare they?
Rep. Craig Fishbein illustrated how much of a problem this is when it comes to extreme cases that require immediate responses. Rep. Fishbein cited a shock example of a heroin using father shacking up in the basement of his home with his girlfriend while his wife and children lived upstairs. And how awful it was that the mother had to wait months for a motion for exclusive use of the home, even heard by the “family” court.
Two observations Rep. Fishbein. First, you’re absolutely correct. Using heroin is a crime and requires a criminal investigation and criminal complaint. The mother shouldn’t be running to you and the civil “family” court. She should call the police so they can arrest and jail her husband and/or to issue a restraining order against the father.
Second, the extreme scenario you cited is not a norm. A far more common scenario is using a false claim of abuse against a parent to justify having the “family” court criminalize and destroy their lives. Divorce Industry 101. The reason this state is known for horrific cases like the Dulos case, where the divorce attorneys viciously pitted two parents against each other, and Judge Heller played ping-pong with their children and finances.
(It’s worth noting that when Judge Heller came before the Judiciary Committee last year for her reappointment hearing, not a single member of the Judiciary Committee asked her a single question about her mishandling of the Dulos case. Not. One. Question.
When evaluating judges, is it any wonder how attorneys who appear before them and bar associations will rate them? At the hearing, we also had Attorney Ed Gavin, the head of the CT BAR Criminal Lawyers Association, praising Judge Corrine Klatt.
Why would the head of the criminal lawyer’s association be at the hearing singing the praises of a notorious “family” court judge? Perhaps because the Judiciary Committee was presented with evidence that Judge Klatt suppressed evidence of fraud and perjury, violated due process, violated state and federal law, and sanctioned a parent for exercising a First Amendment right. Perhaps the good judge needed a criminal defense
attorney?
If we want honest and impartial reviews, look here – and solicit feedback from the consumers of the public court system’s systems, the PEOPLE of this state.
The Robing Room: CT State Judges
There is perhaps no more important legislative function for a state legislator than to be present and engaged in than the reappointment of our state judges. Judges who enjoy eight-year terms and preside over critical cases that lead the direction of our state in terms of our rights and laws.
34 judges up for reappointment.
Approximately $190,000 per judge per year for salaries. $6,460,000. Approximately $200,000 per year per judge for support staff and services. $6,800,000.
$13,260,000 per year x eight (8) years = $106,080,000.
38 members of the Judiciary Committee.
15 attorney members.
23 non-attorney members.
Number of committee members who attended the January 22 and 24 judicial reappointment hearings: 11
Number of attorney-legislators who attended: 8
Number of attorney-legislators who attended, who are connected and operate in our “family” courts: 4
Number of non-attorney members who attended: 3
Number of days’ notice provided to the public of the reappointment hearings and opportunity to testify: 3
Total number of minutes set aside for public testimony: 24 minutes for 8 members of the public.
Questions asked of the parents who waited years for the opportunity to testify regarding judicial misconduct and violations of rights and laws by judges in their cases: 1
Candid opposition to Armata here.
More pointed Armata opposition here.
Even more Armata opposition here.
Klatt and Murphy opposition from Peter Szymonik here.
Imagine the outrage if this were the level of engagement and opportunity for public input we had on the federal level and regarding nominees for the SCOTUS.
In the not-so-distant past, judges were selected by a panel of six sitting judges and six members of the PUBLIC.
In the not-so-distant past, the Judiciary encouraged non-attorneys and members of the PUBLIC to become judges.
Connecticut is one of the only states, if not the ONLY state, that doesn’t elect our judges.
Instead, we rely on a completely closed and incestuous process where PUBLIC input is trivialized, if not laughed at by those who have co-opted the process to enrich themselves at the expense of the children, parents and families of our state.
The poorly named Constitution State.
UPDATE: Jan 28, 2025
The State of Connecticut Judiciary Committee has FAILED the children, parents and families of this state. Once again.
Once again, the attorney-packed Judiciary Committee simply RUBBER STAMPED horrific “family” court judges back to the bench despite clear evidence and testimony presented before the committee that these rogue judges:
• Completely ignore fundamental rights
• Completely ignore due process of law
• Completely ignore state and federal law
• Completely ignore the federally protected rights of custodial parents
• Allow a very small number of well-connected divorce attorneys to PREY ON and
PROFIT from destroying children and families,
• And in a manner which causes the state to defraud the federal government and its
programs
These rogue judges should have been fully accountable, and should NEVER have been allowed to remain judges by the Judiciary Committee.
Instead, our state taxpayers and families will face another EIGHT YEARS of these nightmare judges at a cost of $1,600,000+ EACH.
If any Democratic member of the committee is dismayed, disgusted or horrified that President Trump is not being held accountable for his violations of law, and yet voted for these nightmare judges, and looked the other way regarding the same violations of rights and law on the part of our state “family” court judges, then respectfully, they are part of the problem we face in this state and country regarding disregard for the “Rule of Law” and hold no moral high ground of any kind.
Every Republican member should be aware that we are bringing this issue to the attention of the White House, and the initial meetings have already been held.
These state legislators all had the opportunity to do the right and just thing – and did not. Shame on all of them.
Shame.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
In 2011 Gary Barker pitched the fatherhood project to the United Nations. Equimundo a global non profit focused on redefining masculinity. For economic and social affairs. The lead Dad. The dad company. Now Paul Sullivan from New Canaan Connecticut a writer for the New York times has started a successful business. Connecting the lead fathers. A 503 non profit lead mom’s are unwelcoming. Gary Barker celebrated in Washington. Yet, there is no funding for fatherhood in Connecticut?
Anthony Gay. Social work supervisor for CT DCF. Fatherhood engagement. Arrested and incarcerated in the 90s. Advocacy for men getting out of jail, ignoring the increase in incarceration of women. Diagnosed with Bipolar disorder and PTSD. Maternal gatekeeping. Explains his relationship with his son as ” He is Linus and I am his blanket” which would be called enmeshment in the family court house if it were a woman making that statement. ” I received a phone call the other day on behalf of a man from California.” I wonder if the DCF supervisor ever takes phone calls on behalf of women? Connecticut child and family services has had a number of significant problems. It’s passing out the funding for fatherhood research. Anthony Gay represents one of many bias individuals running the states problematic court system. Both criminal and family. Pushing for more men biasing the social services in Connecticut. All public record. Connecticut despite federal funding from Richard Blumenthal is experiencing a significant traffing problem. A large push to arrest protective parents for custodial interference. Connecticut senator trying to change the sex offender registry and handling of cases. Child support is a mess and a small portion of the problem in CT. The leader and the head of the snake. Where are our tax dollars being spent? Fatherhood research is almost exclusively paid for with federal tax dollars. How much money is funding equal and shared parenting 503c nonprofit? 503c parental alienation nonprofit? As Connecticut doesn’t want to fund victims services? Now dumping money into fatherhood flames.
7/23 The Hill from the briefing Room. One quarter of adults are estranged from their parents. A social shift and change from previous norms. 26 % are estranged from their fathers. 6% are estranged from their mothers. Choosing healthy relationships and a path to healing. ***** There are no longitudinal studies at this time*****. It’s been a long time goal for the United States to strengthen families. With the assumption that it will lead to a stronger American. Years of harming children with forced engagement. The condition and mental stability of America is worse as a result. Forced relationship with unhealthy parents are a major contributing factor. All these social programs and experimental psychology programs have cost billions. Are a major contributing factor to the financial demise of Americans fighting in the family court house. While this and many other point to the child support and arrest of parents. The real underlying question is the condition that America children and the parents are being left. Which Peter Syzmonick has greatly distracted from. While both men and women reporting problems with the children support and collection. The best interest of American children is being ignored. The fatherhood crisis is people like Peter Syzmonick who refuse to get help. Going on to more marriages and bringing more children into the world. Using new partners and presentation of what is the desired outcome of what American is looking for. 2 parents in the household. Discarding the mothers of the children. Under constitutional rights and entitlements. Using financial assistance to gain leverage over the mother in several cases. Is fatherhood inclusion really the problem? Most parents would love nothing more than the ability to raise children who can function and are happy in society. Can this be achieved when years of family court custody battles, especially over money? Children deserve healthy parents and should be allowed to move on and heal when it’s not present. Parental alienation has and forced reunification therapy has done little to help create a healthy society. Marriage is unhealthy as ever.
Overview of the report for healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood. Deficit reduction act 2006-2010. #150 million to each state for the program to support 2 parent households and to support the father’s roles. The report highlights the government actions harming women and children. Health and human services awarding the grants. If Trump is looking to get rid of fraud waist and ABUSE he should take a good run through the health and human services. Unfortunately Elon thinks it’s good to have multiple baby mommas. One is going broke trying to see her kids in Texas court. Bobby Kennedy second wife was a train wreck and killed herself. I don’t think he’s gonna be objective.
government accountability office Jan 13, 2025 TANF block grant funding and fatherhood. The lack of oversight. Connecticut surplus of money selling children for fatherhood. A 73 percent expenditure for fatherhood in 2022 to $126,604,254. 2022 64 billion dollars in unobligated balance of TANf public assistance money. Connecticut sitting on a surplus of cash. Taking away children from the minority community several living in poverty. Taking children away from mothers especially DV victims who may need public assistance. This is why Peter Syzmonick and the fatherhood initiative are targeting white women. Women from higher income brackets. While the judiciary committee hides behind equity and inclusion. Connecticut senators and Attorney General fight to keep Kash and Pam from investing it. The men’s rights groups blaming it all on child support. Who is trafficking children at the family court house? State of Connecticut and the welfare reform act.
34 percent the largest piece of the pie for tanf block grant funding is listed as “other”. This is up to the state to figure out what to do with. As the state pushing 2 parent households. Fatherhood engagement. The push in health and human services and the ignorance and hidding DV. Under reporting of crimes and taking away from the money allocated for victims services. While the leader of family court reform pushes for 50/50 and discrediting claims of abuse and legal definition of abuse such as Jennifer law. While Gary Winfield promote letting men out of jail. Mini Gonzalez was promoting parental alienation the city Streets of a community of poverty mostly has to have citizens patrol themselves. Cause crime especially violence is out of control. Crime goes unpunished and statistics are played with. God help us all. This is the leader of welfare reform, responsible fatherhood and healthy marriage?
CT has the highest Tanf block grant funding. Spending on Moe. According to the welfare act in 2025 is supposed to alicate funding to at risk children in poverty being removed for abuse and neglect but doesn’t want to fund victims services. Children have been abused, traffic and missing in the states care. Where are our federal and state taxes going? DCF and the Connecticut family court system are a mess. Who needs to be held accountable for what is happening in Connecticut?
Civil rights. With Peter Syzmonick and Gary Winfield. The number of women incarcerated has increased sevenfold. 43 % of Africa America women are victims of domestic violence. 47% of the children in foster care are black. 43% are white. While these gentleman are proclaiming the innocents of men and the unfair incarceration. There is much focus on incarceration of women for custodial interference. All of these platforms are political and follow healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood. The majority of the child support arrange as the chair of the judiciary committee has no questions. ” It makes sense” to change the sex offener registry. For who? Majority white men. Women are marching on DCF. Peter is telling everyone it’s wealthy white women. The fatherhood initiative is blaming privileged white woman. All the focus is on fatherhood inclusion and blaming women for the problem. Parental alienation and fatherhood studies. Connecticut started it all. Blumenthal on the ground floor. He’s young son in politics and putting his head in the sand. While Connecticut passes legislation for more funding. I don’t believe Peter Syzmonick is working for parents. He’s promoting exactly what the politicians want. Does anyone wonder 🤔 why the family court system is allowed to operate in the manner it does? The overturning of abortion rights. The flipping of custody. Everyone is ignoring what is going on at the courthouse. Limited prosecution and a large number of public defenders. All following the welfare reform and informing abuse. This is deep rooted in the government. These gentleman are taking full advantage of it.
According to court transcripts the leader court reform and parental alienation advocate was involved in a domestic violence incident with his then fiance. ( 2014) . According to court records. The former fiance fled her own home. According to court documents Peter moved his new girlfriend ( second wife) into the house claiming she abandoned it. She owned by herself out right. Forced her to live in one room until she evicted them. The domestic violence incident was discribed as pushing her through a door way and onto the bed. Yelling and screaming at her. How many women have had difficulties with Peter Syzmonick?
One of the biggest problems we have today is men like Edward E. Bartlett. Health and human services. Collision to end domestic violence. He’s a mysognist who encourages these types of men to engage in behavior and then say they don’t exist. Women are the problem. Edward E Bartlett is part of the federalist society. With men like this involved in government affairs it’s not wonder 🤔 States are hidding crime statistics. These types men in the government are a profound part of the deep seeded war against women. Probably one of the main reasons equal rights amendment hasn’t been archived. The suppression of women in the United States is real. One conversation with Peter Syzmonick outside of public view is telling. If anyone of the women expecting to be treated ” fairly” by a man who would couresively take over a woman’s property and bring his newest conquest in the house isn’t trying to reform the court. He wants to dominate it . Human rights to dignity and living free of abuse is not feminist. Special shoot out to Karen Riordan. Peter Syzmonick thinks you should be custody sharing. So either doesn’t believe you, or he thinks it ok for your children to be abused. He and his alienation industry friends are a big part of why you are in this mess. All you female victims should be taking a closer look at who you are aligning yourself with. First sign of disobedience and you will find your self on the detractor list. Is the problem domestic violence or the mysognist approach in government and the people they send out to the public?
Mr. Bartlett, while you are attacking funding through save for Violence against women, how about you take a good look into the even larger financial waist to support a gender of parent. The fatherhood initiative. Your masochistic approach to family and hatred of women. It’s not feminine that is the problem. It’s men like you who want to oppress women and force them in to marriage with abusive men. Cruel and inhumane treatment using children as means to control them. People like you are the reason American is in the state it’s in.
The entire court cases outlined Peter Syzmonick controlling and abusive behavior. Including surveillance cameras and holding a woman hostage to a room. Multi agencies were involved and the children expressed fear of the father. Along with the woman involved. All liars according to Peter. Apparently Joan thinks they are alienated. Joan wrote several articles on the Masterangelo case. ” The crime of parental alienation” the children climbed up a tree to avoid their anger father. According to court documents. They would not disclose why they didn’t want to go to the therapist. Children are often stressed over the lack of control of their lives. Fast forwarding one of the Masterangelo triples faces sexual assault charges of 5 children. Many children contemplate suicide rather than be forced into an abusive household. Joan and her alienation industry friends claim it is alienation. In all these cases the men refuse to get help and the mothers are projected as the problem. Who is fighting false claims. Where there is smoke there is fire 🔥. Fatherhood flames. 🔥. This is why children are growing up with cognitive and emotional problems.
Definitely time to reevaluate all that have been part of the corrupt system. Not saying all are corrupt, however the taxpayer pockets are now closed. We want them working for us, not for their own personal gains. Thanks for posting this important information.
A majority of the family court and legislation is based on America policy. Divorce is not the reason for fatherless in the United States. Many children are born to unwed mothers. Initially co habitation and often the relationship ends. According to studies father’s engage in a half hour of caregiver activities a day. The American theories are that the problem of America children is the absence of fathers. The truth is motherless household fair no better. The step mother is a sarigate care giver. Because men often co habitate. The so called ” alienation is” has used the mental health correlation of single parent households. 50/50 is a push from the government to attempt to solve the problem. There is no consideration for abuse in the American politics of the welfare reform and responsible fatherhood. Syzmonick and Joan klot Zanard are appealing to the push for marriage and responsible fatherhood. There is a correlation between fatherless households and incarceration and no effort to study of the father of these children were incarcerated setting bad examples. Using mental health issues and attaching them to mothers. Much Bible thumping is involved in these government affairs. Women are chastized for filing for divorce or remaining unwed. While abusive fathers negligent fathers and pedophiles are swept under the rug. Connecticut is the leader and the head of the snake. Passing legislation and assistance to other states to promote male dominance in the family circle. The number of abortions and the projection of the labor force. All the information is available for anyone to look at. It’s the belief that America is only to prosper in two parent households. Women in the United States are being controlled by this. It’s not just Barry Armota. Best interest has been decided by the government and very little consideration is given to the actual best interest of children. These court system are controlled by the government and making the United States more prosperous.Believing material brake up to be the problem, not the condition of the household prior to divorce. All the assistance is going to father’s to solve the problem. School shooter households were dysfunctional but blaming it on fatherlessness. Possibly precipitated by an abusive or abandonment. The continued stigma placed on children raised in single father households. Coupled with the large donation to state colleges to keep the focus on blaming the mothers for the problems in the United States. Ignoring the mistreatment of women and children. The American institute of families and the custody flipping of children for social projects. The leading expert in “parental alienation” knows all about it. Through her degree in government and is working the psychological angles and Syzmonick is working the legislation.
It’s time for reparations sweetness…. since woman have destroyed the family unit…
A Simple Summary
Nearly 20 million children live without a father in the home in the U.S.. The U.S. stands over 3 times the world average of
7% of children raised by one parent.
Of all U.S. births, 41% are born out of wedlock. For women under 30, out of wedlock births increase to 53%.
Over 90% of all other fatherless children are the product of divorce.
Statistics Tell the Tale
• Children living without a father in the home has more than doubled from 11% in 1968 to approximately 24% in 2022.
• 30% of single and absent fathers are never married.
• 50% of single fathers and 30% of absent fathers are divorced.
• As of 2022…
– 20.1% White/Caucasian children lived with a single mother only.
– 31.2% Hispanic children lived with a single mother only.
– 57.6% Black children lived with a single mother only.
• Of the 10 U.S. states with the highest fatherless – single mother households – 8 or 80% are in Bible-belt states.
• The 6 most fatherless state/th district is the District of Columbia – the U.S. capital.
Consequences are Catastrophic!
The CURSE of fatherlessness is almost beyond imagination and has nearly destroyed the functional foundation of an
entire nation. According to the CDC, DOJ, DHHS and the Census Bureau, children who live apart from their fathers
account for…
• 63% of teen suicides
• 70% of juvenile incarcerations
• 71% of high school dropouts
• 85% of youths in prison
• 85% of children with behavioral disorders
• 86% of rapists
• 90% of homeless and runaway children
• 90% of children living in poverty
• 100% of gang members
“If it were classified as a disease, fatherlessness would be an epidemic worthy of attention as a national emergency.”
A good pre-nup solves a lot of problems, pre-marriage counseling is worth every penny. Stay of dating websites, meet someone in church, stay the hell away from eastern europeans, and any asians with the nickname boom-boom.
Pre-nup will not solve child custody cases. People no longer attend church. The ones who do are usually the sinors who believe they are saints. Parenting classes should be mandatory with a marriage license. Not during divorce process. Pre – nups are not holding up at the court house.
Dr. Fibrinous Arazona state fatherhood Lab. A 10 year bias self reported study for 50/50 child custody funded through grants. Elevating dad improve public safety? The states are lying about the crime statistics. Non child support cliff model. Men’s rights groups buying the family court judicial system. Levine Colly Boston. Fatherhood research grants for 50/50 custody. Biased research from 503c non profit men’s rights groups. Aggressively promoted through CGS government solutions contract. Criminal justice reform. False crime statistics to promote fatherhood initiative agenda. Rich white men running the court house and experimental psychology programs in the colleges. * Recruiting more men in social work programs* Dominate, manipulate, and use federal funding for the father’s rights projects.
It’s time for reparations sweetness…. since woman have destroyed the family unit…
A Simple Summary
Nearly 20 million children live without a father in the home in the U.S.. The U.S. stands over 3 times the world average of
7% of children raised by one parent.
Of all U.S. births, 41% are born out of wedlock. For women under 30, out of wedlock births increase to 53%.
Over 90% of all other fatherless children are the product of divorce.
Statistics Tell the Tale
• Children living without a father in the home has more than doubled from 11% in 1968 to approximately 24% in 2022.
• 30% of single and absent fathers are never married.
• 50% of single fathers and 30% of absent fathers are divorced.
• As of 2022…
– 20.1% White/Caucasian children lived with a single mother only.
– 31.2% Hispanic children lived with a single mother only.
– 57.6% Black children lived with a single mother only.
• Of the 10 U.S. states with the highest fatherless – single mother households – 8 or 80% are in Bible-belt states.
• The 6 most fatherless state/th district is the District of Columbia – the U.S. capital.
Consequences are Catastrophic!
The CURSE of fatherlessness is almost beyond imagination and has nearly destroyed the functional foundation of an
entire nation. According to the CDC, DOJ, DHHS and the Census Bureau, children who live apart from their fathers
account for…
• 63% of teen suicides
• 70% of juvenile incarcerations
• 71% of high school dropouts
• 85% of youths in prison
• 85% of children with behavioral disorders
• 86% of rapists
• 90% of homeless and runaway children
• 90% of children living in poverty
• 100% of gang members
“If it were classified as a disease, fatherlessness would be an epidemic worthy of attention as a national emergency.”
Fraud and material misrepresentation. Representation must be factual claims. Not hypothetical theory. The claims was false and shown to be false. The plaintiff relied on the information. False statistics and not breaking down the information. # the state of Connecticut and the fatherhood initiative. Intention to influence the plaintiff. Encourage the planiff ( the accuser) to take action. How many family law attorney and alienation industry experts encourage the use of parental alienation in domestic violence claims. How much advertising is the fatherhood initiative and media coverage inflicting family court system battles? How many are suffering losses? How many cases before family services ( partnered with the initiative) find for abuse and recommendation is for reunification? What statistics have been collected for 50/50 legislation has been collected outside father’s rights organizations? Who is upset about the legal definition of DV in Jennifer law, but won’t define parental alienation?
The daddy batter, alienation industry and custody flipping. 50/50 will not stop the custody cases. ” Unable to control the child” when the court system refuses to control the abusive parent. Judges ordering children to be tossed out of the house seeking safe harbor. Temp custody orders mooted before appeals conclusion. Refusal to transfer child requires showing of willingness. S c v JC 227 conn appeals 326. Running the alienation racket in Connecticut. Alienation industry experts on line. The baby whisper. Father’s are the disciplinarian. Using the family court system to engage in couresive control of the children. When good mothers are painted as malicious alienator to gain the upper hand at the court house. Holding children hostage and encouraging neglect and abuse of a child to assist a custody flip. # pushing for arrest of custodial interference. “Go to the police department” documented arrest is not good enough. ” All father’s to be engaged in the lives of their children” . With federal funding. Child abuse statistics. # alienation industry fraud and material misrepresentation in a family law case. ” Prioritizing fatherhood over criminal matters”. # fatherhood funding weaponizing the family court system and creating bias. Poor judicial discission. Creating more havoc in Connecticut families.
It’s time for reparations sweetness…. since woman have destroyed the family unit…
A Simple Summary
Nearly 20 million children live without a father in the home in the U.S.. The U.S. stands over 3 times the world average of
7% of children raised by one parent.
Of all U.S. births, 41% are born out of wedlock. For women under 30, out of wedlock births increase to 53%.
Over 90% of all other fatherless children are the product of divorce.
Statistics Tell the Tale
• Children living without a father in the home has more than doubled from 11% in 1968 to approximately 24% in 2022.
• 30% of single and absent fathers are never married.
• 50% of single fathers and 30% of absent fathers are divorced.
• As of 2022…
– 20.1% White/Caucasian children lived with a single mother only.
– 31.2% Hispanic children lived with a single mother only.
– 57.6% Black children lived with a single mother only.
• Of the 10 U.S. states with the highest fatherless – single mother households – 8 or 80% are in Bible-belt states.
• The 6 most fatherless state/th district is the District of Columbia – the U.S. capital.
Consequences are Catastrophic!
The CURSE of fatherlessness is almost beyond imagination and has nearly destroyed the functional foundation of an
entire nation. According to the CDC, DOJ, DHHS and the Census Bureau, children who live apart from their fathers
account for…
• 63% of teen suicides
• 70% of juvenile incarcerations
• 71% of high school dropouts
• 85% of youths in prison
• 85% of children with behavioral disorders
• 86% of rapists
• 90% of homeless and runaway children
• 90% of children living in poverty
• 100% of gang members
“If it were classified as a disease, fatherlessness would be an epidemic worthy of attention as a national emergency.”
Light side Pro tempo Martin Looney. Million of dollars for head start through the fatherhood initiative. The first ever housing project paid for through head start. The McKinney housing for men only. There is your men’s only shelter. The women get temporary assistance. But they give men a permit place to go.
finally a shift in the tide …woman have been milking it for quite some time now, dads turn!
Dads turn to milk the system? That’s good for the kids
at least we will spend it on the kids and not a boob job and tummy tuck.
It’s time for reparations sweetness…. since woman have destroyed the family unit…
A Simple Summary
Nearly 20 million children live without a father in the home in the U.S.. The U.S. stands over 3 times the world average of
7% of children raised by one parent.
Of all U.S. births, 41% are born out of wedlock. For women under 30, out of wedlock births increase to 53%.
Over 90% of all other fatherless children are the product of divorce.
Statistics Tell the Tale
• Children living without a father in the home has more than doubled from 11% in 1968 to approximately 24% in 2022.
• 30% of single and absent fathers are never married.
• 50% of single fathers and 30% of absent fathers are divorced.
• As of 2022…
– 20.1% White/Caucasian children lived with a single mother only.
– 31.2% Hispanic children lived with a single mother only.
– 57.6% Black children lived with a single mother only.
• Of the 10 U.S. states with the highest fatherless – single mother households – 8 or 80% are in Bible-belt states.
• The 6 most fatherless state/th district is the District of Columbia – the U.S. capital.
Consequences are Catastrophic!
The CURSE of fatherlessness is almost beyond imagination and has nearly destroyed the functional foundation of an
entire nation. According to the CDC, DOJ, DHHS and the Census Bureau, children who live apart from their fathers
account for…
• 63% of teen suicides
• 70% of juvenile incarcerations
• 71% of high school dropouts
• 85% of youths in prison
• 85% of children with behavioral disorders
• 86% of rapists
• 90% of homeless and runaway children
• 90% of children living in poverty
• 100% of gang members
“If it were classified as a disease, fatherlessness would be an epidemic worthy of attention as a national emergency.”
Who is performing this research? Preservation or controlling a gender. The majority of fatherless households still have father’s engaged in context of divorce. The largest contribution to so called fatherless households is birth out of wedlock. Co habitation fails. Little to no research on the father’s conduct leading to the breakups. All the research is biased and placing the blame on women for failed relationships. The biggest national health emergency is the failure to address the bad behavior in society among men. According to studies father’s often engage with their children about 30 minutes a day. Several social pressures to take care of children and bring in income for the household. The policy in the United States blames single family household for the problems in the country. Relentlessly abusive behavior of individuals and sugar coating the lack of morals of men in society today. The devaluing women as a significant backbone of the country. Most services and resources have been allocated to specifically men. A large campaign of degradation of the character of women has been under attack by the misogynistic view of men in power. Especially monitized white men. Hidding behind and exploting the minority community. Through equity and diversity. Men who feel they have the right to define manipulate and control women. Blaming them for societal issues and forcing inhumane conditions in cases to live under the control of superiority complexes. Failing to take responsibility for themselves. Failing to admit fault and tossing all the blame on the opposite sex. Perhaps the condition women are being forced to live under has taken the niceness right out of them. Fighting the notion that women were born to serve men. For the economic stability of the country. The morales respect and control of women in the US are profound contributing to the determination of marriage and family. You have had decades to work on the healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood of the country. Look where it is today and you are still blaming women.
Women in the United States don’t need to apologize. Becoming a bitch is all that these women have been left to defend themselves. Because men decided to blame women for all the countries problems. Women are getting divorced and not getting married because they are tired of the national campaign to blame them and failure to address abusive mysogisic men who want to control them. Hold children random at the court house. For payback. Women no longer want to get married and are not having children. You wonder why? Cause your social programs are not working.
2018 OFA $75 million in grants for head start for responsible fatherhood. Buying the States. Almost 30 million to Florida for fatherhood flame 🔥. Buying custody in the US.
Excellent!!! long overdue of righting the ship. False DV, false abuse, false child abuse industry bubble is bursting. You and your trash attorneys (silver bullet-er coaches) abused it and ruined it for the real cases. I just hope they destroy family court and its slimebags. Start a totally new program that hols everyone accountable with consequences equivalent to both sides of the aisle.
The majority of child abuse and DV claims are not false. The narrative being pushed out that women are making false claims is an objective often pushed by abusive men. Catered to by the alienation industry. The judicial branch doesn’t follow evidence based models. They are pushing the welfare reform policy. The same group pushing the alienation claims also stand behind female domestic batters. That have been proven in family court. My attorney hid the evidence. And ignored the evidence that was presented. This is the model the family court is following.
keep telling yourself the imflated lie..
Time magazine article from March 2024. When Southern segragist sent black women up North on a one way buss ticket. Welfare queens 👑. Singeling out black women. Up north they put all women on the bus.
This is not just happening in Connecticut- New Jersey is another state, horrific violations of law. I think Family Court should be dismantled. It is a lawless court.
It’s not just white women of privilege. The judges are not just discriminating against black women. They blanketly don’t care about abuse or addiction. They return children in all colors to at the very least questionable daddies in all shades.
They do whatever it takes to make the most money.
Through the fatherhood initiative.
Gary Winfield failed advocacy for minority women. It’s not secret that the welfare reform has and continue to dominant the Connecticut family court house. Of course these black women are labeled welfare queens 👑. Gary Winfield rubber stamps egfectiontaly the wonder breads daddys of the state. Winfield knows where is bread is buttered. Pay your child support Peter. Set a better example for your daughters. What is the example Gary Winfield is setting for the minority community? Senitor Winfield you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time. What you do in the dark eventually comes to light. Your community will know who and what you are soon enough. Peter you are a man of many things but integrity and respect is not one of them.
Did Peter leave you broken hearted? Why the hostility void of facts or evidence of wrong doing?
In 2014 hearings were held in the Hartford state capital. Many stories were told. Including the mothers of abused children. After 2014 the claims of parental alienation increase. The unregulated practice of reunification therapy was ordered or forced on family court cases. Prodomity women. Despite presenting evidence mine was one of those cases. Evidence was suppressed and I was dragged through the court. The majority of Peters platform is to dismiss the complaints of women and children. In conversation with Peter he continues to claim that the fatherhood initiative is unfunded and not to take away custody. Despite several women attempting to present the evidence and funding , he continues to ignore it. When children are resistant to visit a father the red carpet is rolled out. Despite the gender bias in state contract the problem is presented as domestic violence funding. The equal and shared parenting has done a great deal to present this as a majority father’s rights issue. Statistics are posted and presented that are not broken down and used to gain leverage for one gender. The people in the group and the judges know who they are. So does the judiciary committee., go out of their way to stop people from exercising their first amendment rights. You are often bullied and called stupid of you don’t agree with them. I’m fairly certain that most women involved in the family court system have no romantic feelings for these people who engage in this behavior. It is pretty scary that someone would blame a judge for the actions of a litigant. Fotis Dolus and his crew were angry because the judge did the right thing. Stopped him from squandering financial resources and restranted Fotis trying to eliminate Jennifer with the ” crazy lable”. If you want someone to blame take a look at the GaL and custody evaluator. I landed at the court house around the time Jennifer did. If the fatherhood initiative and the shared parenting crew push women as the problem several of us would have had different experiences. Neither my child or myself were able to protect ourselves. Peter would have been perfectly happy to have me tossed in jail. For a relationship gone wrong I wasn’t responsible for. Both the fatherhood initiative and the parental alienation crew could care less about these types of cases. The equal and shared parenting crew has done some interesting things to push for 50/50 legislation. That takes place outside the court house.
Fake profile pages. Contacting DV victims and telling them they were not abused.
A white man CEO of the nonprofit organization the national fatherhood initiative is making $708, 892 annually. The average salary in the fatherhood initiative appearing to be white mostly $80 thousand to $104 thousand. Mr. Doug Edwards real dad’s are forever a judicial branch employee reporting to have a plummeting salary of under $30 thousand. Reporting to be up to $50 thousand in prior years. GHS government solutions come and employees prodomity white people pushing the fatherhood initiative aggressively. Minewhile minority women are loosing their children to crack addicts and domestic batters. Can someone please explain to me how this is helping the minority community?
Wade Horn another white man. Health and human services advertising. The McManus family foundation. $ 157 million dollars for the abstance program through the fatherhood initiative foundation. It’s not just a judge who doesn’t like single black mothers. The McManus government relations services. $3,230,000. For lobbist in 2024. All rich white men buying the family court system. Wade Horn probably doesn’t like the frank report. He probably doesn’t like the stories of parental alienation being exposed. It’s not child support that is designer trafficking. Senitor Gary Winfield has no questions for the minority women in his community.
Gary Winfield Co – chairs legislators judicial committee proposes a bill to modify the sex offener registry. 7 days ago the Enfield police department arrested Derek Gauthier for crossing state lines and sexually assaulting a minor. The same man was arrested in connection to molesting children in 1997. The majority of sex offender on the list in Connecticut are white. It’s worth letting people slip through the cracks? Some how the experimental psychology programs think these people are low risk after 5 years. Connecticut the low crime state. Using custody of children to reduce the recidivism rates.
you are an idiot for that statement, clueless dip.
You are hidding something. The funding for the collection of child support is not the money maker. A very wealthy group of prodeminatly white men are making an lot of money off the promotion of the importance of one gender. Clueless or exposing the family court business and foundation of operations for exactly what it is. Experimental psychology. We have a court system gatekeeping children away from their mothers. Mothers going to the court house in every color. Cause a non profit organization is partnered with the judicial branch. The court of equity. Government stakeholders for the economic growth and development of the state. All running through DCF, the judicial branch and the department of health and human services. What white fathers not in poverty have been ordered to a fatherhood program to address addiction, poor parenting skills and learning to be a better co parent? The benefits of the project are for all non costodial fathers in any color. Who exactly is in charge and making all the money off these government backed programs? The judicial branch is obligated to follow. Rich white men controlling the family court system.
How much money is Doug Edwards receiving from the national fatherhood initiative for his speaking engagements? A volunteer?
Another words how much money are the wonder bread committee giving to place a minority tent of equity and or inclusion over the fatherhood project? It’s rich white women causing the problem at the family court house.
The entire family court system is a set up of alienation ambulance chasing family law industry. The fatherhood initiative is greatly reasonable for this problem
2017 21 compelling motherless statics and the wonder bread daddy project. 30 percent of costodial fathers receive some form of support including welfare. 29 % of fatherless households are Africa America 20% are Hyspenic 14 % are Caucasian. 24% of fatherless households live below poverty. 18 percent of single father are between 15-29 years of age. 20 percent failed to graduate from high school. 7% were college graduates. . Problem with single father households that are not recognized by the fatherhood initiative and welfare reform act. Difficulty bonding with anyone but the father. Fear, anxiety and separation anxiety , 2 fold grief process, increase rate of isolation, INCREASE RISK Of ABUSE. Psychological issues. What studies have been done since then? All the federal funding and projects are surrounding fatherhood. The experimental psychology and court order surround reunification, rather than treat the reality children are living under. Heal the child instead of the demands of the parents.
misandrist at its best speaking. Have you burned your bra yet? oh by the way if you are superior or more entitled why do you need support ? or alimony? There are plenty of brick laying/oil drilling in the Pacific jobs open since your are so superior/equal to the inferior male species
The welfare reform and responsible fatherhood is Rosey the rivetor meets Daddy Daycare. A majority of women seeking alimony is because they are taking the children to appointments. Missing work and pay to get the service the children need because of experiencing and or witnessing abuse. These Teflon Dons and Teflon Donnas often use financial resources as a weapon to subdued or overcome the other parent in the family court cases. As an individual who has a career and balancing motherhood. You don’t get to define me. I’m a mother first and an employee second. Many of these Daddy reformist refuse to take time off and neglect the children issues me . Man and women are different. Each case is different. I’ll keep wearing my bra and the values I hold. You don’t get to determine them. Women and men don’t have to do things equally. Each case deserves to be judge fairly and best interest standards should not be determined by a multi million dollar rich white men father’s rights organization.
The international brotherhood of teamsters. Collaborative union dues to gain upper hand in divorce proceeding. Fatherhood initiative recruiting more men for experimental psychology programs. Many women can’t work because the daddy is dragging them back and forth to court. How many of these men’s rights groups are coaching these alienation cases?. Ladies, document everything. These daddies are passing around the play book. Sympathetic judges are very aware of the money running the court house. Fraud upon the court system for more federal funding. Fatherhood inclusion or your children will be the subject of a custody flip. The department of labor red carpet roll out. Union benefits for child legal services. # misuse of the funds to financially ambush divorcing spouse. # pushing parental alienation cases?. Maternal gatekeeper. # gatekeeping funding for the state under the immunity to follow the partnership.# the dirty dozen friend of the alienation industry. Who is teaching the ” appointees ” how to manipulate the court house? 2014 hearings.# pushing legislation to dominate the court house. Who is training the child welfare attorneys? #who is involved in the children law center? # taking minority children from black single and privileged white woman to addicts and domestic batters. Cancel the funding and stop the wealthy white men buying the family court house!
least questionable parent, they couldn’t care less what gender you are just as long as the dollars are flowing. But if you want to compare apples woman are favored in family court. hands down
Is this in general where the case are decided amicably? Cause mothers are a lot more likely to loose custody when they report the truth to the court house. Again presenting statistics void of being broken down is unseles in finding out what is wrong at the court house. 85% of suicide in the US are men. So it’s not shocking they are 10x more likely than women to commit suicide during divorce. Most custody cases are settled amicably. So is divorce really the reason for fatherless households in the US? Incarceration deployment and death statics are not factored in. All coming from the national fatherhood initiative. An organization now is running the family court houses not just in America. Wade Horn turned into the million dollar man.
good ol’ cesspool family corrupticourt going on with its business.
The Trump administration needs to send the DOJ at once to take over the family courts in CT. There is no judicial oversight to abuse and constitutional violations by the so called judges. There is also a child trafficking RICO racket going on there, particularly in Stamford.
Time to hold these criminals accountable.
Trump is desperately needed to hold these lifetime court criminals accountable.
SOS to the Trump administration from parents in Connecticut. Using federal funding for inflammation of family court system battles. Profit seeking model.
Dear Mr. Vale, The he lastest information on the family court system State 25 to 50 percent of custody cases involve domestic abuse . Domestic violence is more than a black eye. The scope of domestic violence includes the recognition of financial abuse and couresive behavior. Which is a good reason not to support 50/50 legislation. Unfortunately substance abuse is a significant problem in society today. Please refer to research from fathers for change on the issue of substance abusers. As well as the need for further studies on abusive fathers. With all do respect, under the equity and inclusion funding the majority of studies are done on Black and Hispanic fathers. The majority of white fathers complaining do not receive responsible fatherhood training. The female DV perpetrator are not getting services. The police are not equipped to deal with DV issues. DV education is imperative to help fix the family court system. According to some studies 68 percent of children of domestic batters children want contact. 32 percent are resistant. Having the Those 32 percent will continue to have to be addressed in family court. Having the domestic violence victims arrested is not the answer.The information can be found at Yale father’s for change. One of the big problems with voting judges are the Abusive parents often rally to get a judge using best interest standards to cases off the bench.There are big problems at the court house. Republicans should be aware of some of the waistful funding to the state of Connecticut. Legislation with funding for inclusion programs that discriminate. Bullying the state of Connecticut into 50/50 legislation and not liking Jennifer’s law is not in the best interest of the public.
Since you’re an expert and give stats with no reference, (“some studies” is insufficient) can you provide your name? Or give the sources from which your great wisdom has been gained? No doubt you’re a scorned woman.
Carla Smith Stover 2013 a new approach to working with fathers who are DV perps
Child abuse and neglect Feb 2021 Catherine Thomas Walsh. Domestic batter father’s effect on their children.
No doubt you are an abuser. You can keep coming for me. But eventually the truth will come out.
Me Vale is a school counselor. Connected to legislative aid working for community outreach. ( The state initiative) . I wonder 🤔 if he thinks children reporting abuse and DV at school?
Peter did you go onto write all the negative reviews?
You’re obsession with Peter is disturbing.
Peter’s obsession running the family court and making the legislation is healthy?
There is no Timothy Vale under the family court look up. Peter Syzmonick under another pen name. Making big accusations against a judge. To push 50/50 legislation. This is just his style.
There are plenty of accusations against ct judges. Even the judiciary committee knows family courts are a disaster- particularly Stamford.
Shame on them for demanding due process be followed! Did you listen and look at the documents submitted by Peter? It has nothing to do with 50/50 custody.
Your obsession with him and your adamant stance that 50/50 custody is sinister, cloud your ability to take in any information brought forth by Peter.
Peter has placed a cloud. He’s working on a different project than fixing family court.
Any one see Richard Blumenthal and William Tong attacking the Republicans. The director of the FBI and US attorney general. Anyone wondering what Connecticut is hidding?
Pedo child trafficking ring. Larceny by attorneys and judges widespread in both family and private courts.
Those who participate are protected because the personal profits of those all the way up to Tong are complicit.
Since when does the public get to speak? It’s usually Peter. Mea Flexer is accurate. The number of domestic violence cases are correct. Due process rights are violated. Evidencary hearings need to be held. How much of the modernization project is the problem? The police are I’ll equipped to handle domestic violence. DCF is passing out the funding for the modernization project. We got problems in Connecticut. Judge Heller did her job. She is not responsible for the actions of Fotis Dolus when he didn’t get his way. The ” family court professionals” need to be held accountable not the judge!
The family court “experts” upon whom judges rely are corrupt but judges are in on the racketeering scams. Judges know they are to rely upon medical evidence only- physicians. Not psychologists who are not qualified to make psychiatric assessments. The judges also allow a sole “evaluator” to render a single opinion which is then used to flip custody.
The judges violate due process daily and isolate children from their parent without any finding of unfitness. This is child abuse.
The family courts go around dcf and make fraudulent determinations to prolong litigation and isolate children for years from healthy parents whom they love.
Heller is in on this with many others.
The public is invited to speak, but if you watched in its entirety you would know that the judiciary committee gave the public only three days notice – proving they don’t want to hear from parents and taxpayers at all. They then rushed the vote outside of protocols. But keep blaming Peter if it makes you feel safer.
If you have a family court battle to fight, hire Richard Luthmann as an adviser. He’s the most brilliant legal mind that has ever walked the planet. You are sure to win with him on your side!
Richard Luthmann is nothing compared to the great Gary Cohen!