It’s not a crime to role play. And in Connecticut Family Court, it’s a decided advantage.
This is a case where the father of three children, including a teenage girl, role plays online as a teenage girl who has sex with her father.
Be assured, none of this is cause for alarm in Connecticut Family Court.
The role-playing, wealthy father got custody of his three children.
Divorce Connecticut Style
Geoff Herzog and his wife, Robin, of Stamford CT., sought a no-fault divorce. In November 2015, Robin filed for divorce against Geoff. Custody of their three children was bitterly contested.
Geoff had a number of attorneys. Attorney Nickola Cunha represented Robin.
During 1,945 days of litigation, Geoff spent far more money than his spouse. He reportedly bragged he spent more than one million dollars to ensure he purchased custody of his children.
Their divorce case involved 240 docket entries, followed by 70 post-judgement entries. There were numerous judges – a privilege afforded to well-heeled litigants – to ensure the man with the money gets the forum he requires.
This case saw Judges Colin, Tindill, Heller, Truglia, Hartley-Moore, Strada, Fusco, McLaughlin and finally Gould preside.
Judge Mark Gould was the golden judge who ensured that Herzog won custody.
When you see some of the proceedings you will have to wonder what Judge Gould was thinking.
Geoff Was Linda
Early on, it was discovered that Geoff Herzog had an alter ego. Online, he was Linda 24, a 16-year-old girl who sought sexual encounters.
He was on chat forums as Linda, who Geoff said, was 5’5″, with long blonde hair, blue eyes, with a great body and 34-inch chest and who works at a “video store.”.
Herzog computer findings report
Herzog later changed his online name from Linda to Sara.
December 3, 2015
At a deposition, Geoff was asked about Linda 24.
Q. How long have you participated in chat rooms where you role-play as Linda 24?
A. I don’t remember the exact time I started, but it would have been around 2009 or 2010 maybe.
Q. Who is Linda 24?
A. A character.
Q. Who created Linda 24?
A. I did.
Q. Why do you role-play as Linda 24?
A. It’s a creative outlet.
Q. What are the screen names have you used in chat rooms?
A. Sara P. That was the only other.
***
Q. When was the last time you went into a chat room as Linda 24?
A. I can’t remember. But probably maybe a year or two ago.
Q. You know you are under oath, right?
A. I can’t remember. It was a long time ago. Just to be clear, I recently changed the name I use.
Q. To what?
A. To Sara P.
Q. When was the last time you went into a chat room as Sara P?
A. Sometime in October.
Q. Why did you change your name from Linda to Sara P?
A. Because I was being harassed online.
Q. You were — Linda 24 was being harassed online?
A. Yes.
Q. By who?
A. Other people.
Q. How many other people?
A. I mean, just people were bothering me, so I changed my name.
Q. Bothering you in what way?
A. They were messaging me, people I didn’t want to talk to.
***
Q. When you were role-playing as Linda 24, was Linda 24 ever a character under the age of 24?
A. Yes.
Q. Under the age of 20?
A. I think so. But, again, my chat — the chats, I don’t retain the memory of every one thing I’ve chatted.
***
Q. And how old was Linda 24 in those chats, sir?
A. … I think it was — I think — I can’t remember exactly, a teenager.
Q. A teenaged girl?
A. … I’m not sure I remember typing that.
Q. Have you ever met any of the people you role-played with in a chat room?
A. No.
Q. Have you ever provided any personal information to anyone you’ve met in a chat room?
A. No.
Q. Have you ever provided an e-mail to anyone you’ve met in a chat room?
A. No. I mean, if I had, they have been made up e-mails but not real e-mails.
Q. They would have been made up e-mails?
A. Yes.
***
Q. And do you agree that Linda 24 sometimes plays the role of a teenaged girl?
A. I’m not sure that I can remember exactly. But sometimes she might have been involved in being a 19-year-old or younger, yes. But none of this involves children. It is all adults.
Q. Well, a teenager is not an adult, sir, is it?
A. I am an adult. The person I am chatting with is an adult.
Q. Linda 24 is role-playing as a child.
A. No, Linda 24 is an adult.
Q. Linda 24 in the chat rooms is pretending she is a teenaged girl, yes or no, sir?
A. Not all the time.
August 19, 2016
At a hearing, Judge Thomas Colin expressed concern about Herzog’s chatroom activity, relating to sexual relations between a father and daughter. This was disturbing since Herzog has a daughter, who said her father used to hop in bed with her while he was naked, something that made her uncomfortable.
Judge Colin awarded temporary custody to Robin and gave visitation rights to Herzog, provided all electronic devices in his house were password protected, a supervising third party was present, and that Geoff “shall not partake in any chat room or internet discussions during parenting time.”
In the transcript of the hearing, Judge Colin said, “Now, I would note that, I am concerned about the nature of Mr. Herzog’s chatroom discussions in this case. And particularly the evidence I heard about the discussion related to sexual conduct between a father and a child, I found that extremely concerning.
“That doesn’t mean that I have concluded Mr. Herzog is guilty of anything. To the contrary, the record should be clear that I have made no such finding that he is guilty of anything. But that testimony is concerning. And I heard Attorney Plancher describe Mr. Herzog’s explanation for why one would engage in that type of behavior. And it could be completely innocent fantasy. It could not be. I just don’t know.
“But putting aside all the allegations and sexual abuse, which have not been proven, if nothing else, those discussions — a reasonably prudent mother, similarly situated would have to be concerned by reading those chatroom discussions. I don’t think any objective observer could think otherwise.”
The judge also noted: “Mr. Herzog is accused of role playing an incestuous relationship, not of the act of incest itself. As a result, there is no accusation of a crime or act of moral turpitude.”
What a relief.
A father goes online and pretends he is a teen girl who wants to have sex with her father, while, at the same time, he has a teen girl in the house. But nothing to see here. It doesn’t mean he is guilty of anything.
January 18, 2017
While the judge was mildly concerned, Attorney Cunha was deeply concerned.
She emailed Georgia McKenzie, who was the children’s nanny, and the designated supervisor present at visitations with role-playing daddy Herzog.
Attorney Cunha said she was concerned about whether she was supervising the visits correctly; especially with respect to the use of electronic devices. She wanted to make sure McKenzie understood why the supervised visitation was in place, because: “Mr. Herzog has engaged in serious questionable conduct which includes social media as a young girl, engaging in graphic sexual fantasy chat in the nature of a young girl (Mr. Herzog’s character) having relations with her father.”
April 21, 2018
A disclosure was made by two of the children that daddy-role-play Herzog touched the private parts of one of the children during his supervised parenting time. It was not clear when he touched the girl whether he was in the role of adult daddy or little teen Linda.
April 23, 2018.
Attorney Cunha was concerned that the DCF investigation into daddy-role-play not be compromised. She sent an email to attorney Mark Feller of CT. Department of Children and Families complaining that actions of personnel at the children’s school relating to sexual assault allegations against minors was in violation of the law. The email concludes, “I will not sit back and allow these children to be mentally and physically abused any further at the hands of their father.”
April 26, 2018
Cunha wrote to Jennifer Cerezo and Kari Gutierrez, administrators at the school attended by the youngest daughter.
The email concludes that “my client [Robin] has recently made reports to the Police and [DCF] specifically concerning allegations relating to this child and an alleged injury to the child directly related to her interactions with her father.”
The best way to stop this pesky complaining and shut down an investigation was to transfer custody to the father and cut the mother right out of the equation.
May 4, 2018
The one smart thing Herzog did was to get a new judge. One that would be sympathetic to daddy-role-play’s needs.
It was so arranged that Connecticut Family Court Judge Mark T. Gould took over the case and he, dutifully, awarded sole legal custody of the three children to role-playing-papa, Geoff Herzog.
Robin gets the children every other weekend and one night per week. The rest of the time they are with Geoff/Linda/Sara.
The children were mortified when they learned the court ordered them out of their mother’s safe home to the home of the man who thinks of himself as a teen girl who wants to have sex with her father.
It was scene out of the movie Psycho.
March 6, 2019
Shocked at the transferal of custody from a loving mother, whom the children wanted to live with, to an abusive father, who they despised and were fearful of, Cunha wrote to Gary Stanek, a therapist appointed by the court, and others involved in the case, accusing them of “corruption and manipulation.” She said she would file a complaint against them.
She wrote, “Each and every one of you are very dismissive of the true facts and choose to turn your heads to the horrific psychological abuse and the factually supported physical and sexual abuse that Mr. Herzog has subjected his children and wife to.”
What she did not take into consideration [or perhaps she did] was that Herzog was paying these therapists and if they wanted to keep on being paid, they had better declare that he was the better parent.
July 19, 2019
After winning custody and getting his divorce, role-paying Daddy Herzog filed a lawsuit against Attorney Cunha accusing her of making libelous statements against him. His complaint alleged Cunha accused him of “scandalous and illegal actions” in emails she wrote.
He lost the libel suit but brought attention to the allegations Cunha made, which Frank Report was pleased to reveal.
It is in fact thanks to Role-Playing-Daddy’s lawsuit that we found out about his peccadilloes. It makes one wonder if his money purchased the children. It is something we have seen again and again in Connecticut Family Court.
But what about the children? They are with their father.
Still, at any given moment, one does not know who he is. Sometimes, he is daddy looking for a chance to hop in bed naked with his teen daughter. Perhaps sometimes he is his own teen daughter, in his mind, and, who knows, maybe his teen daughter is, in his mind, his daddy.
He may be all confused, just looking to express his inner sexuality – something he is encouraged to do, for he has the money to pay for it, and it’s all in the day’s work in Connecticut Family Court.
[…] Jan. 30, 2022, I wrote a story about Geoff Herzog, of Stamford CT, who got custody of his children despite the fact that they wanted to live with […]
This site has turned into “character assassination for hire.com” yuck.
I raised my nephew from birth to 8 years old, when he was 7 his father (my brother) shot himself in the head in an act of domestic violence against his girlfriend at the time. When my nephew turned 8, his father, a drug addict at the time, who lived yet refused therapy to re -learn how to read write etc. went to court, backed my mother and won full custody. There was never a drug test, a supervised visit, therapy required- he wasn’t even required to take the guns out of the house. He was taken from our loving home where he was the center of our world and thrust into a world of chaos with a man who wasn’t even able to help him with his homework or care for him. The judge refused to even consider that this child was raised by us, that he didn’t know his dad or that his dad was dangerous – currently a defendant in a criminal assault with a deadly weapon case with 3 priors and couldn’t even speak, read or write and was and still is, in an active drug addiction and that my nephew did not want to go, not for 5 minutes let alone the rest of his life. The whole hearing took 10 minutes, cost me 11k and stole my sanity for a long time, I don’t know that I will ever recover. thank you for exposing this, family courts tear families apart and inflict long term damage to children.
This comment really resonated with me. Please know he won’t forget those early years and I hope you can be reunited one day soon.
Frank!
I’m calling you out, you sniveling coward! If you don’t reply to my message and talk this out, let it be demonstrated to everybody on here that you’re not a real man and you’re nothing but a beta-male pussy!
Why do you claim to love free speech so much, but continue to ban Patriot God?!
You will honestly give more free speech to Keith Raniere who would screw your ass over again in a heartbeat, rather than Patriot God! In other words, a Jewish psychopath’s paper-American’s “free speech” is more important that a patriot?! You’re a sick man!
Why are you trying to charge Patriot God money to speak?!
Why do you claim you’re not posting him because his speech is “off-topic” but continue to post many other people’s off-topic comments?!
If you don’t thoroughly answer this, let it be shown what kind of a man you truly are (if it hasn’t already been demonstrated enough)!
No running your mouth about “mental institutions” or “meds” either! Deal straight and nut up or shut up!
I’m calling you out on everything you claim to be, a man, a patriot, your integrity, your everything! Right in front of everybody!
So go ahead and either deal straight and make a fool out of yourself like you do constantly! But know you’re not a real man if you call yourself a patriot and don’t answer about something this essential to a true patriot!
The question is why would a judge choose to favor this father over the healthy mother who raised them? Even if you believe the sexual incestuous role play isn’t an issue, why are the children not heard? Why would 50-50 custody not be the result when there are no claims by the state against the mother?
Children need to be heard. Our family court is abusing its power and destroying childhoods by demanding separation of mothers and children. It’s child abuse by judges, psychologists, and custody evaluators with no basis in medicine nor supported by law.
Judicial discretion is taken to be that judges can do whatever they want. No law applies. The abuse of power by our government is killing our people.
Frank, you like to speak truth to power?
Speak truth to Nancy Pelosi!
It involves a San Francisco flophouse used as a drug den known as “The Pit”
The Pit is owned by Paul Pelosi’s girl friend.
Nancy Pelosi’s Son Becomes Subject of a Sixth FBI Investigation
by BLUEAPPLES | ZeroHedge
Nancy Pelosi’s Son Becomes Subject of a Sixth FBI Investigation
by BLUEAPPLES | ZeroHedge
Although she’s most recently announced her intent to run for re-election of the congressional seat that she holds as Speak of the House, perhaps Nancy Pelosi has a 2024 presidential run on her mind.
While there’s no indication of that directly from her camp, there may be reason to presume she is given that her son Paul is doing his best Hunter Biden impersonation. Already amidst controversy, Paul Pelosi Jr. became the subject of a sixth FBI investigation following news that he was previously involved in five different companies suspect of fraud and associated with convicted criminals.
The sixth of these investigations places the speaker’s son at the core of a fraud investigation against Rodrigo Santos, the former President of the San Francisco Building Inspection Commission who now holds the role of a city permit expediter. Santos and another commission official named Bernard Curran were indicted in November in a case that has been rumored to include Paul Pelosi. Details emerging from the FBI fraud probe of Santos and Curran include details regarding a client of theirs involved in the alleged bribery scheme who many suspect to be Paul Pelosi Jr himself.
Details about Santos’ scheme have emerged from the United States Department of Justice in a press release that gives context to the investigation that Pelosi became ensnared by. This indictment follows an earlier criminal complaint filed against Santos on May 11, 2020. Then, the San Francisco public official was alleged to have committed bank fraud as the principal and co-founder of Urrutia Structual Engineers, Inc. Santos was initially appointed to the San Francisco Building Inspection Committee in 2000 by then-mayor Willie Brown before being promoted to the office of its president by Brown’s successor, current California Governor and Pelosi family member Gavin Newsome.
The scope of the 2020 indictment against Santos was broadened in July 2021 before the subsequent November case brough against he and Curran to include ten additional charges of bank fraud during a period between November 2012 and March 2019. Additional charges in the latest indictment against him include two counts of aggravated identity theft, and one count of falsifying records in a federal investigation with the intent to obstruct justice. The DoJ announcement conveys that Santos’ is the subject of an on-going investigation while his current case is being prosecuted by the Special Prosecution Section of the US Attorney’s Office.
While Pelosi has not been mentioned by name as a conspirator in the previous indictments made by the federal government, FBI records of the five-year investigation they conducted on Santos disclose that Pelosi was interviewed as the federal government built its case. At the core of the bribery scheme uncovered by the FBI is a property owned by Pelosi Jr.’s girlfriend and a non-profit organization alleged to have been a vehicle that used “donations” as ad hoc bribes to Santos in exchange for city building permits.
The property in question is infamously referred to as “The Pit” by residents of San Francisco. For years, the flop house has been allowed to operate despite numerous violations. The FBI investigation alleges that a those violations were removed as part of the bribery scheme that has brought charges against Santos. Prosecutors claim that Santos used a local rugby club and hockey association for their non-profit status in order to receive payments through them which led to the removal of building violations. Pelosi’s connections to The Pit go back years to a period that federal prosecutors claim was rife with fraud. In the past, building inspectors in the city have also revealed that Pelosi himself asked them to “take care” of violations at the nefarious Utah St. property. Those revelations present a potential connection between Pelosi and “Client 9” in mentioned in federal charges against Santos.
Client 9 was referred to as “an individual working on behalf of the owners of the property” which is located at 1312 Utah Street. Leaked documents from my own sources show that Pelosi filed the necessary paperwork to submit building permit applications on behalf of the owners of an adjacent property at 1314 Utah Street back in 2017 during the same period in which Santos is alleged to have committed the fraud that charges made against him by the Department of Justice are based upon.
Details about Santos’ scheme have emerged from the United States Department of Justice in a press release that gives context to the investigation that Pelosi became ensnared by. This indictment follows an earlier criminal complaint filed against Santos on May 11, 2020. Then, the San Francisco public official was alleged to have committed bank fraud as the principal and co-founder of Urrutia Structual Engineers, Inc. Santos was initially appointed to the San Francisco Building Inspection Committee in 2000 by then-mayor Willie Brown before being promoted to the office of its president by Brown’s successor, current California Governor and Pelosi family member Gavin Newsome.
The scope of the 2020 indictment against Santos was broadened in July 2021 before the subsequent November case brough against he and Curran to include ten additional charges of bank fraud during a period between November 2012 and March 2019. Additional charges in the latest indictment against him include two counts of aggravated identity theft, and one count of falsifying records in a federal investigation with the intent to obstruct justice. The DoJ announcement conveys that Santos’ is the subject of an on-going investigation while his current case is being prosecuted by the Special Prosecution Section of the US Attorney’s Office.
While Pelosi has not been mentioned by name as a conspirator in the previous indictments made by the federal government, FBI records of the five-year investigation they conducted on Santos disclose that Pelosi was interviewed as the federal government built its case. At the core of the bribery scheme uncovered by the FBI is a property owned by Pelosi Jr.’s girlfriend and a non-profit organization alleged to have been a vehicle that used “donations” as ad hoc bribes to Santos in exchange for city building permits.
The property in question is infamously referred to as “The Pit” by residents of San Francisco. For years, the flop house has been allowed to operate despite numerous violations. The FBI investigation alleges that a those violations were removed as part of the bribery scheme that has brought charges against Santos. Prosecutors claim that Santos used a local rugby club and hockey association for their non-profit status in order to receive payments through them which led to the removal of building violations. Pelosi’s connections to The Pit go back years to a period that federal prosecutors claim was rife with fraud. In the past, building inspectors in the city have also revealed that Pelosi himself asked them to “take care” of violations at the nefarious Utah St. property. Those revelations present a potential connection between Pelosi and “Client 9” in mentioned in federal charges against Santos.
Client 9 was referred to as “an individual working on behalf of the owners of the property” which is located at 1312 Utah Street. Leaked documents from my own sources show that Pelosi filed the necessary paperwork to submit building permit applications on behalf of the owners of an adjacent property at 1314 Utah Street back in 2017 during the same period in which Santos is alleged to have committed the fraud that charges made against him by the Department of Justice are based upon.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/nancy-pelosis-son-becomes-subject-of-a-sixth-fbi-investigation/#:~:text=The%20scope%20of%20the,federal%20charges%20against%20Santos.
Separation of parents from children is domestic terrorism. If you go into family court with a lawyer that dares to speak, they will get disbarred. Violation of first amendment.
Family courts use “judicial discretion” to break family bonds. It’s against state and federal policy. God help us and God bless you, Frank Parlato.
Thank you for doing God’s work and standing up for our children and parental bonds.
Our children need you, Frank Parlato.
God is watching and working through you to save our children. Thank you.
Alyssa D: God can’t do everything, that is why he made guns. Folks in Connecticut are just sheeple. A real society protects its children…lock and load.
What proof do you have that role playing is acted upon? So he likes to whiz off pretending he is a naked 16 year old girl being enjoyed by her daddy – while he has his own teen daughter at home.
Nothing unnatural about that. Just a creative outlet for him
You are kidding, right? Rolse playing or not.. it is wrong..
Next, he’ll put on a dress and demand access to little girl’s washrooms.
Connecticut family court adheres to the psychology of Freud who advocated for fathers to have sex with their children, boys and girls. It is rooted in Khazarian Jews, the freaks from the Caucuses who adopted the Jewish religion as it gave them ‘chosen’ status. Freud was a Jew, supported by Jews to provide a basis in psychology for pedophilia. Family Court of Connecticut is a rabbinical court based on the edicts of the Talmud. Raping children is a Jewish delicacy. Judge Gould is a Jew. Judge Heller is a Jew. Judge Colin is a Jew. Connecticut is the pedophile capital of the U.S. A perfect place for sexual deviancy involving minors. The judges, cops, child protective services are all pedophile or protecting pedophiles. In Connecticut, screams of children are silenced by the government itself.
This is all cultural imperialism. In many countries, the father initiated the daughter into the wondrous world of sex.
Really? Please do name some of those many countries. Surely, you have some data to back that statement.
You’ve never heard of the “Vanguardium”? It was really tiny kingdom of sorts (not really a country) that used to be located in the Clifton Park area in the state of New York. The NDNY granted it a sovereign right to rule for a while when a special tithe (called “bryburry”) was paid to some of its governors for almost two decades by two pseudo-JAPs whose last name sounded like Brawneffman when pronounced.
Surely not merely a kingdom – it must have been an Empire, no less. You know, with colonies in Mexico and Canada and hopes of expanding. Must have been grand… as in delusions of grandeur. Given the above statements on sexual indoctrination, guess it’s a good thing the little deluded emperor never fathered any girl children, at least that we know of. Then again, perhaps he asked the minors he deflowered to call him “Daddy”. Maybe Pea is onto something.
You said many countries.. now you talk about a small sect in clifton park? its a bunch of sick people.. is what it is.. need to all be in jail..
Nicki, You’ve been on the worst D-Lists ever assembled.
Celebrity, KR…
Pea Onyu
January 30, 2022 at 2:44 am
This is all cultural imperialism. In many countries, the father initiated the daughter into the wondrous world of sex.
Pea, was that true in your childhood?
Role playing does not mean he wants to have sex with his daughter.
He was a fool to sue Attorney Cunha and bring this out in the open. What a dunce.
Gould was also on Gros case for a year plus
Judge Gould [redacted] Sat on Groh’s case to induce the psychotic break of girls Evie and Sophia, and did what GAL Mary Brigham instructed him to do.