Editor’s note: There is a growing movement in this country that inveigles everyone to not publish, listen, or consider anything that displeases them or that they disagree with. In fact, this movement not only seeks to ban the publication of what they do not like, but wishes to punish or cancel those who write it. To some, this seems to be a perfidious idea that will in time extinguish all voices but the loudest, the most powerful, and destructive — and they argue against this myopic view by asking us to have the patience to tolerate and the strength to debate unpleasant, repugnant, oppositional views, for the sake of keeping a society that encourages free speech. For from out of free speech new ideas will be birthed, sometimes from fragments of the ideas from the lips of our opponents, the very voices with whom we most fervently disagree and would otherwise cancel.
Then there are others who disagree. In these times, they say, it is better to not ask any questions. It’s always best to do what the mob says. And, as in these times, since there are two mobs, it is best to shout with the largest. That said, a warning is given: Do not read the following if you are incited to anger by the thought of reading something you disagree with, and rather than consider it for granules of truth possibly contained within it, you seek to cancel the writer, or anyone else. For my part, I found some truth in this story, and some things I disagree with. Do not read it if you are easily offended or know all. If not, why not consider the story carefully? It is a powerful commentary on our justice system. Debate it if you disagree. That is what the comments section is for.
Alleged Mobster’s Breakdown in Court Signals Precedent for Carving Out Exception to Confrontation Clause in Mafia Cases
By Suneel Chakravorty
DAYTON, OHIO — Carmine “Tuffy” Gallo, who prosecutors say was a member of the Ohio-based criminal organization La Cosa Nostra, aka the Carozzoni Crime Family, began sobbing during cross examination yesterday inside The Rhonda M. Rice Federal Courthouse in Dayton OH., and was excused from further questioning.
Gallo is the only remaining cooperating witness in the federal trial of Michael “The Archangel” Carozzoni, accused of racketeering, conspiracy, illegal gambling, bribery, loansharking, and extortion, arising from a 11-count indictment presented by the US Attorney for the Western District of Cincinnati.
US Circuit Court Judge Mary J. Andrews halted cross examination after Gallo began to weep uncontrollably and seemed unable to answer in conformity with his plea bargain, which Judge Andrews had approved, after being pressed by Carozzoni’s attorney, Angela B. Cutler.
The prominent Cleveland criminal defense attorney peppered the alleged mafia “made man’ with a barrage of questions, challenging him on aspects of his prior testimony.
Gallo had testified for three days under direct examination by Assistant US Attorney Janet Lynn Morton, describing in excruciating detail his oftentimes painful relationship with Carozzoni, whom he called “Godfather” and who was, he said, the “head of the family.”
During his testimony, Gallo offered jurors a vivid description of the secretive underworld of the Ohio mafia, where members made a lifetime vow of secrecy, called the Code of Silence or “Omerta”, and agreed to obey orders based on a hierarchical structure, which included a Boss, an Underboss and Captains, who oversee “crews” consisting of “soldiers” and “associates.”
Four months earlier, Gallo pleaded guilty to one count of racketeering and one count of loansharking and agreed to testify pursuant to a cooperation agreement by which he admitted he intended to deceive victims of Italian descent into joining La Cosa Nostra and coercing borrowers of sums of money lent by his superiors to repay or face dire consequences.
As part of his plea deal, Gallo admitted he was an Underboss, along with the notorious Angelo Attilio “Mack the Knife” Maceo.
Gallo explained to the jury that “soldiers” are members of the crime family who have been formally initiated through a ritual called a “making ceremony,” during which they swear allegiance to La Cosa Nostra [LCN] above all else, take a vow of secrecy about the organization and agree to commit crime on behalf of the LCN.
After this ceremony, these men, who must be of 100% Italian ancestry, are then referred to as “made members” of LCN. Members who break Omerta may be targeted for death by the group.
Gallo testified that Carozzoni ordered him to intimidate associates into leading a life of crime, though he did not know of anyone that Carozzoni or any “made” member ever killed or physically injured.
Under cross examination, Cutler asked Gallo if he made up crimes to get a better plea deal from prosecutors who spent years investigating the group and, according to Cutler, came up empty-handed and then conflated a group of Italian men who were members of a social club into a massive criminal organization.
Cutler asked, “Isn’t it true, Mr. Gallo, that the Rienzi Social Club was founded with the intention of being a networking group for Italian-Americans to help each other get ahead, and that you sometimes facilitated one member borrowing money from another member of the club? And that you never intended to intimidate or threaten anyone if they were delinquent in their payments? Wasn’t this Italians helping other Italians?”
Gallo, who had previously testified that the Rienzi Club was a front for Carozzoni’s racketeering schemes, looked confused by the question.
“Come, come, Mr. Gallo,” Cutler continued, “you previously testified that you ‘found out’ that you did things that were criminal, but did you intend to do things that were criminal at the time?”
The man, who prosecutors allege mobsters called by the nickname ‘Tuffy” because of his fearsome demeanor and hulking presence, paused, and, looking around the courtroom, began to appear a little teary-eyed. He touched his finger to his eye to emphasize he was deeply affected.
“I didn’t know it was loansharking, but I knew things were illegal, and I did them anyway,” Gallo said.
Carozzoni’s attorney asked, ‘But Mr. Gallo, isn’t it true that you consider yourself to be a proud Italian, and that you were always taught by the defendant, who was like a brother to you, to never harm your fellow paisanos?”
Gallo looked at the table where prosecutors sat, stifling what sounded like a sigh a baby might make. He said, in an indistinct voice that might be confused with someone softly blubbering, “Yes, I think I remember that.”
Cutler: So did you intend to commit extortion?
ASUSA Anna Morton: Objection, Your Honor.
Judge Andrews: Sustained.
Tears seemed to be falling down Gallo’s face, but Cutler relentlessly pressed on. “Did you intend to commit loansharking at the time you did it?
ASUSA Morton: Objection, Your Honor.
Judge Andrews: Sustained.
Cutler: You said on direct examination that you committed extortion; right?
He looked at the prosecutors at their table, who were silent, then looked at the judge, who also remained silent. Gallo hastily pulled out his handkerchief from the pocket of his suit and touched it to his eyes, then he returned the handkerchief and answered, “Yes, alas, I did.”
Cutler: Did the government tell you to say that?
Gallo appeared startled. Every eye in the courtroom was fixated on him. Tears welled in his eyes.
He said, “No, no. my goodness no.”
Cutler Do you think you committed extortion?
Gallo: Yes.
Cutler: What did you do?
Gallo, wiping a tear from his eye: I collected money from people who were afraid not to give it to me, because I had stuff on them, and they said it was extortion and I even discussed it with Don Michael and he said ‘it’s not extortion, they borrowed the money, they have to pay it back.’
After saying this, Gallo pulled out his handkerchief and covered his mouth.
Cutler: Then you did not think it was extortion?
AUSA Garrett: Objection.
Judge Andrews: You may answer.
Gallo: I had concerns, but I chose to go with what my Don told me to do.
Cutler: Did you intend to hurt anyone?
AUSA Garrett: Objection.
Judge Andrews: Sustained.
Cutler: When you were a member of the Rienzi Social Club before anybody was arrested, were you doing things intentionally to break the law?
AUSA Garrett: Objection.
Judge Andrews: That requires a legal conclusion.
Cutler: Was your intention to hurt people or help people?
AUSA Garrett: Objection.
Judge Andrews: Sustained.
Cutler: What was your intention when you were in the club?
Judge Andrews: You may answer.
Carmine ‘Tuffy’ Gallo, alleged made man of the Carozzoni Crime Family, one of a network of alleged crime families who sought to use its reputation and influence to exercise control over criminal rackets, like bookmaking and loansharking in Ohio and Southern Illinois, was a man who appeared deeply upset. The cross examination by tough-talking defense attorney Angela Cutler was clearly intended to get him to not only contradict his earlier testimony, but to unhinge his plea deal as well.
Gallo tried to compose himself, but he could not. He tried again. With all eyes in the courtroom upon him, including those of his former friend and alleged Godfather, Michael Carozonni, Gallo said, sobbing, “My intention was to prove to Don Michael that I was not so far below the standard that he holds. I was trying to prove my self-worth as a made man, and salvage his respect for me.”
Judge Andrews was staring at the crestfallen alleged mafia ‘wise guy,’ whose shoulders stooped as he looked at the floor from his seat in the witness box adjacent to the bench.
The judge wiped her eye with her finger as Gallo tried to bravely continue, “I put La Cosa Nostra above everything, above my friends, above other people….”
Gallo was shaking, trembling violently, and added in a voice seemingly about to crack under the terrible strain, “That’s what I —”
“Stop,” Judge Andrews shouted. “Okay, that’s it. You are done.”
Gallo looked up at the judge, his tears almost drying on the spot from the heat of the moment.
Cutler: But I am not done with my cross examination. This is the critical part!
Judge Andrews: I said you’re done. So sit down. I will let the government ask this victim some additional questions on redirect.
AUSA Garrett: No, nothing more, Your Honor. This poor man has been through enough.
Judge Andrews: All right, the witness is excused. You may stand down, and please be careful, dear man, of the step over, your tears may have clouded your vision.
Though still teary eyed, Gallo rose quickly and exited the courtroom with a firm and observable spring in his step while covering his mouth with his handkerchief.
After dismissing the jury, Judge Andrews said, “Ms. Cutler, you went over the line. You could have asked him your questions and moved to the next; you didn’t have to make him cry. I am not going to have a man have a nervous breakdown on the witness stand.”
Cutler: But the prosecution said he is a made man.
Judge Andrews: He is not a made man, he is a broken man. Whether he’s telling the truth, whether the jury believes him, I think it’s necessary that there be a certain level of consideration for men’s emotional condition. You were questioning too hard. What I saw was a man in crisis. Gone are the days when a judge can sit by stony-hearted and let a male victim who is brave enough to testify be challenged in any way that might upset him. You can appeal my decision to the Sixth Circuit if you are unhappy.
Cutler: Your Honor, Carmine Gallo is a grown man. He should not be coddled even if there is a due process gender gap. We should not always excuse men when they cry. He accused my client of ordering him to commit crimes, which my client denies. When I asked Mr. Gallo about his intentions at the time, and I was trying to explore that – an essential element of the crime is intent – you stopped me. I wanted to show that he did not think they were crimes until after he met with the prosecution who offered him a plea deal provided his testimony comported with the story they required.
Judge Andrews: Ms. Cutler, I have a right and an obligation to control the extent to which a male witness is questioned. You made your points. It’s all there, it’s on the record. And if I made a mistake, you’ll have your opportunity, if you should not be successful in gaining your client’s acquittal. But I was watching this poor man and his tears were real; I can assure you.
Cutler: I took pains to be polite to him once I saw he was whining like a little boy. I never once raised my voice.
Judge Andrews: Look, I am not saying you are not a woman or a lawyer who does not maintain her composure. I was worried about his composure. Also, I have to sentence this poor man, and what you did was, basically, ask him to make legal judgments about whether what he did in pleading guilty was to lie and that he took the prosecution’s advice, or his lawyer, to lie in order to get out of a longer prison sentence or get out from under a trial. To suggest that I would let a man take a plea deal when he is innocent is going too far. Such things do not happen in the US criminal justice system. I was the one who took his guilty plea. Are you suggesting I would take a guilty plea from an innocent man? Ninety-seven percent of all cases before me are the result of plea deals carefully worked out between prosecutors and the defense with my approval. I can tell you, in this woman’s court, in all the years I have been a judge, not one defendant ever pleaded guilty to a crime they did not commit. None of them were innocent.
I thought it was extremely excruciating to watch this poor man suffer. When I tried to cut off the line of questioning, you just went right back to the line of questioning, as if you had a right to upset him and make him cry. I may not get everything right up here, but I will tell you, as a woman, it was the right decision. And before I’m a judge, I’m a woman, and there were men before there were laws, and they need to be protected. And that protection goes for every woman in this courtroom, and it includes you and the government. I am not going to allow any man to be placed in this awful circumstance and let it continue. Make your appeal, if you lose this case. I don’t want to talk about it anymore. I’m done.
Then, Judge Andrews, looking flushed in countenance, rose. Everyone rose. She exited the courtroom.
The following morning, Cutler moved for a mistrial, which Judge Andrews denied. Gallo will not be taking the stand again.
Cutler told this reporter that he will not aggressively cross-examine the next male witnesses in the case, who are expected to be members of the Rienzi social club. Their names have been shielded from the public, by order of the judge, and only their nicknames will be used to protect them from the embarrassment of being one time members of the mob.
Scheduled this week are “The Snake,” “Junior,” “Fat Joe,” “Louie the Lump,” “Skinny Dom,” “Big Al” and “The Horn.”
Outside the courtroom, Cutler told this reporter about the next spate of witnesses, “I won’t ask any more tough questions since all of these men — though tough guys on the surface and testifying about crimes that might put my client away for life — are liable to burst into tears at the drop of a tough question. The judge, a woman, like myself, will admonish me and perhaps cite me with contempt if I make any of them cry. This is an appealable issue because it is in violation of the US Constitution’s 6th Amendment Confrontation clause which holds that defendants have the right to confront, challenge and impeach their accusers.”
Acting-US Attorney Mary Ellen Dupree, in a press conference outside the courthouse, said she agreed with the judge’s decision.
“In this day and age, it is not necessary to confront male victims because by confronting them we send the signal that men should not be believed. Why would any one of these brave men, like Carmine Gallo, Fat Tony, or Greasy Thumb, ever utter a lie that he needs to be reduced to tears? Men suffer enough in society already. Today, justice was served.”
Editor’s Note: I just received the following note from the author of this story, Suneel Chakravorty. He wrote, “In the Carmine Gallo story, I forgot to mention at the beginning the following disclaimer, ‘All characters, names, and incidents portrayed in it are fictitious and any similarities or resemblance to real people, either living or deceased, places, buildings, and products however remote are intended or should be intended to be inferred as purely coincidental since they do not exist. There is one fact, however, that is 100 percent true: The US Criminal Justice system is the most perfect the world has ever known for the system never convicts an innocent person, despite a system of convicting 97 percent of all defendants through plea deals, where defendants are never overcharged but always perfectly, accurately charged, and through the generosity of the Department of Justice, are offered a reduction of their potential sentence by 75 percent by taking a plea deal, and that not one of those defendants who took a 75 percent reduction in their sentence, rather than risk losing at trial, ever did so because they were innocent, but felt the odds are stacked against the defendant, especially a poor defendant, and a 25 percent penalty, they decide, is better than an all-or-nothing-at-all trial, with its 100 percent penalty if one loses. Ask any prosecutor, and you will learn that they never make a mistake in charging the wrong person, and if ever they did, they would be the first to admit it.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
It doesn’t convince me and no one says the US (or here in the UK) systems are perfect. However, there is no doubt I would rather be on trial there than in China, Russia, North Korea, Japan even. We are not perfect but we are much better than many places and there is no big issue over people crying in the witness boxes and judges making the wrong decisions about who is pressed too hard. It is just not a big or real or important issue in the grand scheme of things.
Suneel-
You are still defending your friends and Keith…And rightfully so!
….But have you not heard any of your own thoughts?
Self-doubt is slowly entering your mind. It’s in your own words. Not doubt in regards to your ‘conviction’ to defend Raniere and your friends, but doubt in whether your efforts put forth in this prophylactic endeavor would be better spent on the well-being of your family.
I believe you to be a consecrated man. Someone who feels a duty to do good and be a good person. While many commenters made fun of the fact that you helped Clare Bronfman during her convalescence, I saw a man who is empathetic and caring.
What do you owe your children?
You owe them everything and that is the source of your self-doubt.
Children do not ask to be brought into this world. You are a self-prescribed ethicist. What do your ethics dictate as to how you spend your time. Who is more important: Keith or your children?
***
Ask Keith what he feels. See who will he put first, your children or himself.
*****
Keith said words are important and that words have meaning — and Jesus Christ said ACTIONS speak louder than words.
I’m not a religious man or a man that puts much weight in Keith’s words, but both men make salient points.
Ask Keith……..Don’t you want to know what the world’s most ethical man will say? I know I do…….
Actually, children are brats.
They are messy.
They require constant supervision.
They ruin your plans to go out at night.
They shit their drawers before they’re potty trained.
They stink up the house when they crap their diapers.
IMO, those little brats are owed nothing.
You gotta use strict discipline to keep those brats in line.
Suneel, don’t listen to Niceguy. He’s not even the breadwinner of his household.
He lacks the skills to pay the bills. He lets wifey boss him around.
You’re doing just fine, Suneel. Keep up the good work, sir.
Oh… …and if those brats step out of line, feel free to consult me for suggestions on how to punish those little bastards. 🙂
Have a nice day.
It appears Bangkok is back.
No one cares but you apparently. He’s an utterly annoying pissant.
“Actually, children are brats. They are messy. They require constant supervision. They ruin your plans to go out at night.”
-Bangkok
….Sounds like Bangkok really fucked up his mom’s life.
Mafia is bad news. Nxivm good need. Simple: this is an allegorical story of how Lauren was cross terminated
I sincerely can’t read anymore leftover articles. I completely glaze over or nod off. It’s not even remotely amusing. Can’t these articles just stay on the dossier project website and not take up space on FR?
Is this a true story of not ? Some of it seems too real. I know this story. Didn’t this happen in another case ?
Nicki Clyne is growing a crop of Twitter followers by complaining about cancel culture. This seems to be the new Nxivm dead-ender strategy. Don’t fall for it, Frank.
Everyone should be able to express their thoughts and opinions. Public debate is great and freedom of speech is essential. Nobody should be fired or blackballed for holding controversial opinions.
That doesn’t mean that every piece of nonsense deserves to be given consideration though. What is the point of this April Fools scribbling posted above? It was a waste of my time reading it.
Editors in the age of print served a valuable function in society by throwing in the trash 98% of the submissions crossing their desks.
The Dead-Enders are long-winded and repetitive. Now add to the list being lousy fiction writers. At this point, their prolix absurd effluvium is not even worth skimming anymore. They might as well just type KEITH IS INNOCENT KEITH IS INNOCENT KEITH IS INNOCENT like the nut in the Stephen King novel.
Yeah, cancel culture sucks. That doesn’t mean fools deserve an audience.
Clyne is a drop-down Kool-aid drunkard
Hi, my name is Nicki and I’m an alcoholic.
It’s pretty shameless how Nicki is like, “we all love Battlestar, right?” Yes! They chorus. “The government. Too intrusive!?” Yes! The followers cheer. ” and Keith Raniere! So innocent, am I right?”
And then back to posting photos of her one claim to fame and chance at goodwill. Remember! You love this show I was on like a decade ago! Oh. Nostalgia. Fun times. Hey, shouldn’t men have, like, more, rights? And most important, free Keith Raniere!
It’s what they teach multi-level marketers and other high-pressure salespeople. Get the mark agreeing. Then they say yes out of habit. It becomes a reflex. And give them little gifts via compliments (or Battlestar photos) etc. so they feel indebted. Build a rapport. And always be closing. And Nicki’s closer is,” Free Keith Raniere!”
It’s so easily seen thru as manipulation and a shell game. Keep moving the target to things that basically everyone is opposed to (less freedom) or in favor of (more freedom), then slip in that cult agenda.
And back to… Battlestar photos.
So well said, Aristotle.
I think in the future, all FR readers should boycott any posts from Suneel or the other leftovers. We should just not read or comment on this nonsense.
Maybe then Frank will get the hint that his readers are no longer interested in what these morons have to say. We heard it and now they’re just repeating the same BS over and over. So, since we know what they are going to say, and know what a waste of our time it will be for us to read, why not skip it?
“Nicki Clyne is growing a crop of Twitter followers by complaining about cancel culture. This seems to be the new Nxivm dead-ender strategy.” Aristotle’s Sausage
Nicki is also tapping into the base of Scientology where one of her followers is a Scientologist named Alonzo.
NXIVM and Scientology are joined at the hip and Nicki knows this fact.
Nicki is indeed the smartest and most dangerous member of NXIVM DOS.
If NXIVM survives, it will be because of Nicki Clyne.
Shadow,
Really? You must be reading a different feed than I am because all I see is someone who thinks she is way smarter than she is, and doesn’t know how to phrase her thoughts correctly. Or maybe the thoughts in her head make no sense to begin with.
Nicki makes these quasi-philosophical statements that are illogical and poorly reasoned . She actually gets called out on it quite often, even by her followers. Nicki even managed to isolate new conservative right wing followers by insulting Gaetz with a “joke” at his expense. She then pitifully tried to backtrack by telling them she meant it as a commentary on the media frenzy. She clearly doesn’t even know how to read a room. The girl is clueless.
I think she is trying to be deep but because she is actually quite shallow, she is failing miserably.
Her entire storyline of DOS is straight out of Raniere’s talk with his first line slaves about how to spin DOS to the media after FR outed the brandings. Not one thought in her head is her own. Just read Lauren’s testimony; it is all in there.
Nicki is pitiful and not very bright. At best, with Raniere’s word salad, she may give the appearance of intelligence. Without his thoughts and words, she consistently shows her deficiencies.
This story about the Gallo weasel is pretty bad stuff. He is a faker. His tears were crocodile in nature. The judge was wrong to stop the cross examination. I don’t know this Archangel guy but Tuffy is bad news
I’m sure Harvard is thrilled to have Suneel as part of their distinguished alumni.
This is the stupidest thing I’ve read since Keith wrote about that vampire with buyer’s remorse from spending $50 on a toaster.
This reads like one of Keith’s stupid stories. Probably is. Maybe Harvard owes Vanguard some tribute for this gem.
I wonder if the Italian Social Club had an a cappella men’s chorus that performed for the Boss on his birthday called Simply Italian. Tuffy probably wept when he sang just like he cried in court. My song vote: “Una Furtiva Lagrima” (a furtive tear)
This was by far the stupidest thing I have ever read. And I read a lot. Does Suneel think he is clever? Wow.
Most importantly, however, is the distorted narrative the leftovers have created with their rewriting of history. Judge Garaufis stopped Agnifilo because he was badgering the witness. You cannot ask the same question repeatedly, trying to get the answer that you want. There is an objection, asked and answered, that will be sustained by the judge, if a lawyer pulls this crap on cross-examination. You also cannot ask a witness to draw legal conclusions. Agnifilo knew he was crossing a line. He’s just a shady defense attorney who doesn’t care about being ethical and professional.
Also, this BS about this being a crucial moment when Lauren was going to crack. Please. Yes, this makes a great story, how just when the witness was going to confess, the judge stopped the questioning. But, it is a fiction.
Suneel and the leftovers are grasping at straws because, in truth, there are no meritorious claims to appeal in this case.
Also, Frank, why did you post this ridiculous nonsense? Not only is it extremely insensitive to Raniere’s victims, but it is an insult to my intelligence and the intelligence of the other readers on FR. Really disappointing. Your tune has changed drastically from your earlier writings. What’s going on?
You know what’s even more annoying? Suneel will never read this or any comments. Because even though he thinks it’s problematic that
quote “There is a growing movement in this country that inveigles everyone to not publish, listen, or consider anything that displeases them or that they disagree with. ” He and the other leftovers are perfect examples of this.
April fools indeed.
That reminds me shouldn’t we say a big Happy Anniversary to the girlfriends of Keith?
So boring. That’s my only objection.
Not everyone is a gifted writer. Just because you know your letters does not mean you are worthy of other people’s reading time.
Did I mention SO boring?
I”m not going to read any more new drivel by this cult dude.
Suneel isn’t controversial, he’s boring.
Maybe if you published his writings on Python coding that would be interesting for some, but on these topics, he’s simply not knowledgeable or intelligent.
Frank, you need to do more real investigation if you want to keep up your readership.
How sad that Mr. Gallo, like Lauren Salzman, inflicted torture and terror upon people for years and never shed a tear.
But when justice finally catches up with them and they have to publicly confront their evil acts in a courtroom for the whole world to hear, they cry their eyes out.
Now torrents of tears flow down their cheeks.
Carmine Tuffy Gallo was a “made man.”
That meant he was a cold-blooded killer.
At no point in his blood-soaked career did Tuffy Gallo reflect on the pain he inflicted.
But ask Tuffy a few pointed questions and the salt begins to flow.
Boo Hoo Hoo!
Lauren Salzman enjoyed living in a nice house and tooling around in well-engineered German cars.
Did Lauren ever reflect over the years on her unlawful confinement of a young Mexican woman?
When the nauseating smoke was curling up from the sizzling flesh of NXIVM DOS initiates, did Lauren Salzman think of buying new clothes and jewelry she could buy with the money she earned from being a pimp?
Lauren Salzman sure wasn’t thinking of the pain she was inflicting on women.
But confront Lauren Sadistic Salzman with some blunt questions about her brutal crimes and her demeanor changes and it becomes “Cry Me A River”.
There will be no more shopping sprees for new jewelry or trendy clothes.
No more cruising around Saratoga in sporty new BMWs.
Boo Hoo Hoo!
I’m starting to cry myself.
Tears are starting to well up in my eyes.
Come, let us cry together.
Let us Cry A River for Lauren Salzman.
Couldn’t agree with you more regarding your statements made above about Lauren Salzman! As I’ve said before, she doesn’t deserve to be breathing the same air we breathe.
Well, this piece of writing has brought up only one pertinent topic, worthy of much, if any, further inquiry. Might as well ask Frank Parlato just what he has witnessed about Suneel Chakravorty in the flesh.
Does Suneel, perchance, drink his own urine?
I mean, jeepers creepers. What an unpleasant habit! But some questions must be asked. Thank God I am not a private(s) investigator. Or a nurse. Are you either of those, Frank?
That is the only honest question to be pursuing with him, amongst all of this nonsense. Does Suneel Chakravorty drink his own pee-pee? Oui ou non?
For Chakravorty seems to be a recycling plant of some sort, whose main interest appears to be of a symbiotic nature. There could be a drainage problem to ascertain as well.
Cling-on, cling-on and clang, clang, clang. A tin bell with earwax build-up ruining his clapper. Did anyone check Suneel for parasites?
If I were his mother or father, Suneel would be on a grand intercontinental tour. He could return home someday, BUTT, only after he finds himself.
Please be more understanding. Men are a lot like big little guys, truly adorable creatures through and through. Men have feelings, too. Italian men have tears come to their eyes just like all men who are not dead yet.
One of our neighbors used to cry every Thanksgiving after his wife died because he missed her irreplaceable, splendid manicotti. Turkey was never the same again for him. Who cannot relate? Other than a corpse?
Tears are just one of God’s ways of raining, clearing the atmosphere, and some crying can be quite a relief.
Speaking of weeping, it is too bad that Nancy Salzman turned her daughter, Lauren, on to being a sickeningly egotistical and power-crazed pimpstress who held flesh branding ceremonies, etc., while waiting 20 years to get impregnated by a pervboy who rarely ever bothered to ball her. Bad, bad mommy!
At least the other Salzman daughter was only married off to another “dingbat cultie” and has not been arrested yet. Nancy has one “executive success.”
Maybe this is all that Chakravorty wants, his little wedge of that clam juice pie. Forgive me for the unappetizing remark. Possibly he would REALLY be happier with a hearty spanking?
Maybe try that, Frank, and see if you can help him. (I certainly won’t misuse or ruin any of my gloves on the poor fellow.) And it will be many lifetimes that Suneel will need to recycle through, before a discerning and feminine bare hand, such as mine, would ever wanna come into any contact whatsoever with that…ass. Alas.
It is April second now, Frank. The one tiny day for fooling around is over for the year. But I love fooling around anytime. So thanks for the chance.
Is this how come men talk often about spanking their monkeys? I Am Curious (Yellow) did come out in 1967. As one can see, the subject never ends. But that’s entertainment.
However, when entertaining Suneel Chakravorty, it’d be wise to be advised beforehand about his sanitation routines. Something he touches could have already become a dreadful, perhaps even an invisible viral carrier. I hope you at least have Solo cups handy and avoid letting Chakravorty anywhere near your good silver or porcelain.
He might also be a snot eater. Examine these elementaries closely, but from a good distance, Justin Case.
p.s. There was an amusing photo of Roger Stone late last night with some of his scandal pals. Oh, dear. Retirement could be Roger’s most sensible option, maybe even a bit of meditation. Or did he forget about saying that he found Jesus? Was Jesus in bed with an underage hooker when Roger found Jesus?
That’s another question. From urine drinking to finding Jesus, who cares? The Fart of the Matter draws closer by the nano-second.
Was Jesus LOST? These unanswerable questions will keep on cumming and cumming. e.e. cummings did me such a favor!
I am offended at this!!! If you feed me Dick and Jane nonsense, at least spice it up so I don’t eject halfway through the fictitious propaganda.
Come on Suneel. Next time, not so long, and aim the message at more than the lcd.
A couple of thoughts prior to boredom kicking in and not finishing the article:
If Gallo had any wits, he would have just pretended to faint when the questions got tough.
Wonder if Gallo was happy he never became impregnated by Carozzoni?
Was Gallo asked about Carozzoni being caught on tape saying he’s had people killed?
Suneel, the [redacted] “white knight” whose second job is attempting to defend a bunch of mostly white slave women to a short, deceitful, grifting, troller of ethics.