Allison Mack came to Keith Raniere as a successful actress in a starring role in a TV show. Under his tutelage she became a slave of Keith Raniere and now quite possibly a convict.
Uncategorized

Will Allison Mack get real or [Bronfman-funded] fake job?

Recently, Allison Mack requested that U.S. District Court Nicholas G. Garaufis loosen some of her bail conditions so she could leave her parents’ home where she is currently under house arrest.

Radar Online quoted a source who expressed dismay over the request that Allison may leave home to go to work, school and church.

“Going to church, really? It’s ridiculous!” the insider exclaimed. “The only God she believes in is Keith Raniere. And who is going to give her a job?”

The fact that the prosecution consented to her request suggests the court will grant it.  But who will give an accused sex slaver a job?

Bronfman money could easily set up a job for her. With the right friends to help her, plus Bronfman money – she can come and go as she pleases. The hours and type of work could be tailored to suit her desires to get out of her parent’s home and enjoy some freedom. If she wants to go to the beach – her job that day could be to take photos of the ocean. If she wants to meet with friends – she could be assigned to interview them at their home.

A job made to order to meet the needs of the elusive and deceptive actress – funded by Sara Bronfman-Igtet’s money – can eradicate home arrest.  The job won’t be directly NXIVM. The money for payment can be arranged through trusts and administered by attorneys.  Someone can be paid to be her employer.

Whether this is bad, good or neutral is up to the court to decide. But don’t expect Allison to get a legitimate job. She is not going to work at Macy’s or Bank of America.  She is not likely to get a real acting job.

Bronfman money is likely already paying for her New York City criminal defense attorneys.

This raises a question: Does Allison have the freedom to cut a deal with the feds?  If she were to become un-brainwashed tomorrow – and wanted to save herself – would there be a conflict with her lawyers? Would they have to withdraw if she insists on taking a plea deal that meant testifying against Raniere?

It is almost certain Raniere would prefer to stand trial with Allison as a co-defendant rather than go to trial without her. She will likely be a sympathetic character. She is an actress who can cry at will. She can be convincing.  If she goes to trial and testifies – [takes the fall] – that branding and collateral was her idea – [as she did in the New York Times Magazine article by Vanessa Grigoriadis] and testifies that Keith was but a passive actor in DOS – only vaguely aware – having no direct control over women’s collateral or coercive sex acts – and if the jury believes her – Keith’s chances may be better than most think.

On the other hand, if Allison becomes a witness for the prosecution – and testifies that Keith set up the whole DOS plan  – and how she herself – having given Raniere terrible collateral – and having been sleep-deprived and kept malnourished, on a brain-deprived 800 calorie diet for years – was but a coerced pawn herself – Raniere is sunk.

More than the Jane Does, Allison Mack is the direct tie to Raniere and DOS coercion and sex trafficking.

For the sex trafficking aspect of this case [not considering financial crimes], Allison could bury Raniere and possibly save herself.

But will she help herself or sacrifice herself for him?

Frank Report will attempt to monitor what job Allison is doing and whether her job is legitimate or staged to give her some freedom from house arrest while keeping her further indebted to the Bronfman-Raniere crime organization.

A lot depends on Allison Mack.

See you at church.

 





About the author

Reporter

31 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply

  • Do you think maybe it’s her parents trying to get her socialized with “regular” people (hence, the appeal for church)? Maybe on the advice of a psychologist to deprogram her? She could at least volunteer.

  • Hey Sara – Make me Allison’s employer! I’ll do it for minimum wage, I’d love for the chance to boss her around for a change, tell her what to do, give her menial jobs like scrubbing toilets and cleaning halfway houses for abused women. No contact with them allowed though.

  • Shadowstate1958,

    “Why did Allison’s collateral to Raniere include a confessional letter Allison wrote to Children and Family Services?”

    Some DOS slaves “confessed” to crimes that they didn’t actually commit because they couldn’t think of anything else to give as collateral. Just giving nude photos or videos wasn’t enough. As much as you evidently want to believe that Allison abused her nephews, in all likelihood – it’s just not true. “What if I haven’t done anything wicked?” Frank himself has written articles about how DOS slaves made up crimes they didn’t actually commit.

    This was all part of KEITH’S sick game. You never seem to recognize that. You place all the blame on Allison.

    Love,

    Allison’s Mom?

    • Making a false confession is a crime called “Obstruction of Justice.”
      And if the authorities remove the children from a home based on Allison’s false confession even temporarily, it can have a traumatic impact on those children.
      The false confession in and of itself is a form of abuse.

      As an Aunt Allison has a duty to protect her nephews from bad scenarios, not to make up stories that could end up hurting the children.

      Frankly I believe that any good aunt or uncle would refuse to make up horrible stories about children and if a potential lover demanded that false stories be fabricated about children, the aunt or uncle would kick that potential lover to the curb ASAP.

      With Respect Shadow State 1958

  • This is ridiculous if this comes to pass. Are we to believe she has been sat at home applying for jobs on the internet? It’s really worrying she could be out and communicating with Bronfmans. There’s no control over who she communicates with once she is let loose. How can it be this easy to eradicate your house arrest? Fingers crossed it does not happen.

  • Frank has said that Keith stands a better chance than we might think —– due to being tried together with Allison.

    Frank said that Allison can gain sympathy from the jury by crying at will and being a sweet looking actress. He said that Allison can be the “fall girl” by simply saying that everything was all her idea and that Keith had nothing to do with those decisions regarding blackmail collateral.

    I call bullshit on Frank Parlato.

    The prosecution has ALREADY shown emails written by Keith which admit that he told a senior slave that he would only agree to tell her more details (about the DOS slave group) once she recruited a slave who gave her a “collateralized life vow” (this is Keith directly instructing a slave to get “extortion collateral” to make another person a “life” slave).

    Allison cannot make this email disappear nor can his attorneys prevent the jury from seeing it. That’s game over right there. That’s Keith’s own words.

    It doesn’t matter if 50 other NXIVM women say otherwise, because Keith’s own words are instructing a slave to get a collateralized life vow (blackmail material to seal a lifelong slave relationship) before he would agree to tell her more secrets about how DOS operates.

    That same email also has Keith admitting that he’s the *grandmaster* of all first line master slaves, and that they all report to him. That’s game over. That’s his own words saying that he is the head of the DOS sex slave group.

    What else does that email say?

    Keith also tells this same slave that although DOS wasn’t created for purely sexual purposes, he still has the power to make any slaves sexual in nature if he chooses (he also says that some slaves *may* be asked to do sexual duties for him).

    This directly shows that he’s pulling the strings and that all slaves are subject to *his* choice on whether they become sexual with him or not. Again, this is another admission that he is the head of DOS. If he weren’t the head of DOS, he could not order slaves to perform sexually for him under any circumstances. It’s game over.

    Allison’s testimony can’t change Keith’s admission no matter how hard she cries. Frank is a freakin’ moron for even suggesting that Keith has a chance at acquittal.

    That same email also has the famous “fuck toy” request — where Keith is directly telling this same slave to recruit another slave to be his permanent fuck toy. How do you think the jury is going to view those words? Any women on the jury will be repulsed that he views women as worthless objects.

    If his attorney tries to claim that’s just a boyfriend “fantasizing” with his girlfriend about how to rejuvenate their sex life (by using lofty words like “slave”) —– the prosecution will point out that Keith didn’t even trust this supposed “girlfriend” with any info about DOS until she recruited another *slave* and received a collateralized life vow from that person (a blackmail backed life vow).

    How can this be his “girlfriend” if he’s refusing to trust her (with info about how DOS works) until she gets a collateralized life vow from somebody else? That’s the grandmaster telling a slave what to do. It’s game over.

    What else?

    Keith also personally accepted the collateral of Allison. That’s game over. The fact that he accepted and possessed Allison’s blackmail material shows that he participated in the collateral scheme. He can’t pretend it’s all fantasy either —– because Allison pledged her own real estate properties and also the lives of her future children to Keith — if she ever disobeyed him. If it were fantasy, such ownership transfers would not be required, nor accepted.

    What Else?

    Keith also told a senior slave that many women were wanting to get *his monogram* branded on them. In other words, Keith’s admitting that he’s aware that it’s his own personal monogram being branded on women (and not some secret sorority symbol). He can’t distance himself from those words no matter how many talk shows his attorney does.

    Finally, let’s not forget that Allison will *never* be seen as sympathetic or sweet to the jury —- because her own emails show how depraved and sick she is.

    The jury will see her sick and twisted pledges to Keith via email.

    Normal and caring mothers don’t pledge the lives of their unborn babies to a sex slave master. Only depraved and sick people do that. The jury will see these emails and Allison’s crying cannot overcome her own sick and twisted words.

    Let’s not forget about the dozens of prosecution witnesses who will testify how sick and depraved Allison behaved towards them.

    Let’s not forget that the prosecution has only shown us like 1 or 2 emails so far, which means they probably have hundreds of other emails written by Keith and Allison showing how sick and twisted and guilty they are. The jury will see all of this.

    Going on a talk show and claiming that you’re looking forward to cross examining witnesses can’t erase his own client’s email messages.

    Frank is full of crap for saying that Keith has a chance if a “fall girl” decides to take the fall for him. Keith and Allison are doomed no matter what. Their own words have done them in. You can’t take back your actual words. They should have never used email.

  • I wouldn’t be surprised to see Allison guest starring on a TV show–think of the publicity a fledgling show could get if Allison were given a character to play. Never underestimate the greed of producers–if they think Allison can bring in an audience, she will get hired.

  • shadowstate1958 is a secretly a gayman everyone a fucking cocksucker

    Oh FrankReport reporters you watch your step or ill kick your asses get me mates

  • Not only could Allison get a job with Bronfman money but she could also get a job with Salinas money from Mexico.
    Southern California is very close to Mexico.
    Some people say it’s part of Mexico.
    And the Salinas family now runs NXIVM Mexico.
    Moreover the Salinas family has at least 60 billion dollars.
    They make the Bronfmans look like paupers.

    As for church what denomination does Allison belong to?
    How about the Church of Satan?
    In January Allison posted a picture on Twitter of Marina Abramovic, the Spirit cooking witch.
    Abramovic poses with live snakes and the skulls of sacrificed goats in her art work
    Marina Abramović’s art focuses on “confronting pain, blood, and physical limits of the body.”
    Curious choice for such a devout church going girl as Allison Mack.
    And Marina Abramovic lives in Hudson ,New York only an hour South of Clifton Park on the wy to Brooklyn.
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZqOuQmXcAAducE.jpg

      • Never tell me to shut the f up.
        That only tells me that you are a NXIVM troll and a thug.
        If anything that will only make me talk more.
        And I am not your “buddy.”

        Allison Mack is a Satan worshiping pervert who molested an 8 year old girl.
        Neighbor: Allison Mack befriended 8-year-old girl – and seemed to be grooming her- said to have fondled her
        https://frankreport.com/2018/07/01/neighbor-allison-mack-befriended-8-year-old-girl-and-seemed-to-be-grooming-her-said-to-have-fondled-her/

          • Scott Johnson,

            “Said to have fondled” and “fondled” are two very different statements.

            Absolutely agree. Why are you being harassed and censored on this site instead of shadowstate1958, who does nothing but spew Allison-related hatred 24/7 in the comments, much of which is either factually incorrect or grossly exaggerated, and all of which shows his bizarre sexual obsession with a woman half his age?

            Love,

            Allison’s Mom?

        • Hey shadow shut the fuck up. If Allie gets a job at the local 7-11 you would in that store non stop until the cops arrested you for loitering and harassment.

          • Why would the local 7-11 hire a woman like Allison Mack indicted for stealing credit card information?

            FYI, I don’t shop at the local 7-11, aka the local “Stop and Rob.”
            It’s run by an Indian guy who sells food way too spicy for me.

          • You would be anywhere your precious Allie worked Shadowperv…7-11 Burger King. Hell if she cleaned crappers at a shelter for woman you would have a sex change to get in there.

        • shadowstate1958 writes:

          “Allison Mack is a Satan worshiping pervert who molested an 8 year old girl.”

          There is no *actual evidence* that Allison Mack molested an 8-year-old, as you well know. Unsubstantiated interviews with random people Frank happened to encounter in her neighborhood hardly constitute evidence.

          Also, posting one picture from Abramovic does not make her a “Satanist.” Abramovic is known as a performance artist, not a Satanist. You love Wikipedia – why don’t you read her Wikipedia page? There are no references to Satanism, other than ones related to Alex Jones or other idiots and conspiracy-mongers.

          Love,

          Allison’s Mom?

          • Why did Allison’s collateral to Raniere include a confessional letter Allison wrote to Children and Family Services?
            In this letter Allison Mack conesses to molesting her two nephews, boys of pre-school age
            Had those letters reached authorities, Allison’s nephews could have been placed in foster homes, a traumatic experience for children.
            The FBI has this confessional letter.
            If this letter is false, what kind of nut job is Allison that she would make a false confession that would hurt her nephews?

          • Abramovic is a avowed Luciferian.. Doubt your daughter is, but please stop defending evil. You are getting into CNN-MSNBC conspiracy mongering that you left wing idiots dig up.

        • Response to Allison’s Mom

          Read this interview transcript and then tell me if this witness is correct how Allison Mack is normal.

          Transcript of interview with neighbor who claims Allison Mack molested 8 year old girl
          July 3, 2018
          Without disclosing his identity, the Knox Woods neighbor who said he saw Allison Mack molest an 8 year old girl knowingly did a taped and filmed interview with me, on-the-record, and was not compensated, in any way, for doing so.

          Once again, I’ll remind you that we do not know Allison’s side of the story.

          For those who blast me for daring to publish this results of the interview, kindly keep in mind that Allison Mack gave Keith Raniere “collateral” that included a letter claiming her nephew was sexually molested.

          So please – all you screamers – calm down a bit – and let us simply listen to what the neighbor said:

          Here is a partial transcript of his on-the-record comments:

          Frank: Allison was trying to interview an 8 or 9 year old girl who was trying to be a gymnast?

          Neighbor: Yes. She even told me I should get into doing a blog. That’s what she was doing with the girl – a video blog.

          F: Allison?

          N: Yeah.

          F: And she wanted to video tape this girl?

          N: Yeah. She was video taping the girl…. The girl was doing these little gymnast things.

          F: Did you think it was suspicious at all?

          N: It was creepy. Very creepy.

          F: That is very creepy because you know Keith Raniere had a predilection for little girls.

          N: I saw her feel the 8 year old up.

          F: Whoa!… Could you say that again? You saw her feel the 8 year girl old up?

          N: Yes.

          F: Where were you?

          N: We were up off of Independence. She was up on —-. and they were sitting there and I was walking [with his dog] and we were coming back and I was wondering what she was doing. I did not know who she was at the time. I did not know who she was until November and then I was like, ‘Oh that’s who that girl is.’ But they were sitting there and I just said “Hi” and … I went up to to be nice to them . We started talking and she was trying to quick-end the conversation so she could get back to what she was doing.

          F: With this 8 year old?

          N: Yeah, And at one point she was next to the 8 year old and she turned around and went like that up the girl’s chest.

          F: Allison?

          N: Allison did that, yeah.

          F: Maybe she’s a perv too.

          N: Yeah, she is obviously.

          F: Could you have been mistaken? Could it have been a push or friendly playful thing?

          N: It didn’t look like that

          F: Why didn’t you call the police?

          [He explained how he had a bad experience once before on an unrelated matter involving adults when he called the police to report a crime and the police were not friendly and almost tried to turn it around on him. I certainly could not argue too hard against this, since this is especially true for whistle-blowers against NXIVM.- they are the ones who get into trouble.]

          https://frankreport.com/2018/07/03/transcript-from-neighbor-who-claims-allison-mack-molested-8-year-old-girl/

          • Shadowstate1958,

            I’ve read this transcript before. It proves absolutely nothing. Guess what? I could say that shadowstate1958 (substitute your real name) molested a small child just because I was bored one day. “Oh yeah, I totally saw [shadowstate1958] molest an 8-year-old.” Then I can post this on a website for everyone to see. “Shadowstate1958 Molests Children in Chicago!” That can be my headline. See how easy that is?

            It doesn’t make it true. It doesn’t prove anything.

            Also, what is described in this transcription, if true, which there is *zero* reason to believe that it is, does not describe “molestation” in any meaningful sense. “She turned around and went like that up the girl’s chest.” What does that mean? What does “went like that up the girl’s chest” mean? It doesn’t mean anything. An 8-year-old doesn’t have breasts.

            On top of that, female pedophiles are extremely rare. And on top of that, Allison does not have a history of pedophilia. Keith Raniere, on the other hand, does. Why do you insist on projecting Keith’s sins onto Allison? Keith is/was the mastermind behind all of the NXIVM evil, not Allison.

            Your constant need to vilify Allison, while rarely, if ever, mentioning Keith, shows you for what you really are – a misogynist who simultaneously gratifies himself with thoughts of Allison’s naughty behavior. You clearly derive some sort of satisfaction, and I’m not going to go into any detail about it lest I grow physically ill, from imagining Allison as the worst sort of deviant sexual predator. She is only this in *your* own mind, because *you* enjoy thinking about it.

            Everyone can see it…not just me. I am certainly not the first person to point it out.

            Others have said that you attempted to “court” Allison via social media and she rejected you. I honestly have no idea if this is true or not, but if true, it would at least make *some* sense out of your relentless negative focus on her.

            What if she turns out not to be the monster you think she is? What will you do then? I think you’ll find some other woman to hate.

            Love,

            Allison’s Mom?

          • Response to Allison’s Mom?

            #1 Allison associated with Keith Raniere, a man with a reputation of molesting girls
            That association alone leads people, including the police, that she might be grooming girls for Raniere.

            #2 Most adults don’t make up stories about child molestation because of the seriousness of the charges. Most people don’t want to be involved in child molestation cases even as a witness or innocent bystander.

            #3 Touching a child’s genitals or private parts, even if undeveloped or prepubescent, is still molestation if done for prurient purposes.
            Only the parents or medical professionals should be allowed to touch children and even then only for the limited purpose of providing medical care or cleaning the child.

            # 4 Your claim:
            On top of that, female pedophiles are extremely rare.
            The Reality:
            The Rise of Female Child Molesters
            https://blogs.psychcentral.com/psychoanalysis-now/2017/06/the-rise-of-female-child-molesters/

            Allison does not have a history of pedophilia. Keith Raniere, on the other hand, does. Why do you insist on projecting Keith’s sins onto Allison?

            Yet another category is passive women who sexually abuse a child
            while under the influence of a male pedophile. Such women are not pedophiles themselves but are influenced to act that way by a dominant male figure in their lives. Often that figure is someone close to them, such as a boyfriend.

            (My comment: Even if Allison molested a child under Raniere’s influence, she is just as guilty as Raniere They are co-conspirators.)

            With respect Shadow State 1958

          • Response to Allison’s Mom’s asinine statement:

            ——————————————————————————————————————
            Your quote:
            Your constant need to vilify Allison, while rarely, if ever, mentioning Keith, shows you for what you really are – a misogynist who simultaneously gratifies himself with thoughts of Allison’s naughty behavior. You clearly derive some sort of satisfaction, and I’m not going to go into any detail about it lest I grow physically ill, from imagining Allison as the worst sort of deviant sexual predator. She is only this in *your* own mind, because *you* enjoy thinking about it.

            Everyone can see it…not just me. I am certainly not the first person to point it out.

            Others have said that you attempted to “court” Allison via social media and she rejected you. I honestly have no idea if this is true or not, but if true, it would at least make *some* sense out of your relentless negative focus on her.

            ——————————————————————————————————-
            The US government is persecuting Allison and describing her as a racketeer, fraudster, sex slaver, torturer and slave master.

            Allison is the monster who tortures women while talking about “female empowerment and then blackmailing women into serving as sex slaves.

            Allison is the true misogynist and hypocrite.

            As for courting your daughter I have never been to Albany or Vancouver.
            After Allison’s long sexual history with Keith Raniere, no one wants to court Allison Mack unless they want to play Herpes Roulette.

            I hope you don’t need smelling salts for your delicate constitution but that is the ugly truth about Allison Mack.

            With Respect, Shadow State 1958

%d bloggers like this: