Frank Parlato
Dr. Richard A. Gardner helped clear the way for profit incentives in custody litigation. He was a psychiatrist who invented “parental alienation syndrome.”
He said children who reported abuse were usually liars coached by their mothers.
He said, “The mothers of these children are often fanatic… obsessed with hatred of their husbands… paranoid… They see in their husbands many objectionable characteristics that actually exist within themselves.”
Gardner wrote that sexual activity between adults and children was “part of the natural repertoire of human sexual activity,” and he framed pedophilia as a procreative benefit because abuse “charges up” the child sexually, making the child “highly sexualized” and more likely to “crave” sexual experiences that increase reproduction.
Family courts couldn’t officially endorse Gardner’s views on pedophilia, but they adopted his framework: the assumption that children lie and mothers alienate.
The algorithm is simple:
If a child reports fear, assume coaching.
If a mother reports abuse, assume vindictiveness.
If the father is accused, assume alienation.
Then prescribe the treatment: flip custody.
Cut off the protective parent.
Order the reunification programs.
Mandate therapy and the evaluations.
With PAS, the court doesn’t need to distinguish a credible abuse case from an alienation case, a confused case, or a fabrication. All get processed the same way.
Remove the Mother and Cash in
Gardner prescribed what the courts must do:
“The children must be removed from the mother’s home and placed in the home of the father.”
Lawyers liked it because it made every case a billable circus. Therapists liked it too.
Gardner explicitly endorsed coercive, court-powered therapy:
“Therapists must be comfortable with taking a somewhat dictatorial position.”
“The therapy relates more to manipulating and structuring situations than providing insight.”
“When parental alienation is present, the approach must involve people manipulation by court order.”
A Booming Business Is Sprung
Gardner helped created a billion-dollar system of evaluators, GALs, therapists, and reunification programs feeding off litigation.
It is profitable because a predator will pay to keep access to a child, and a protective parent will pay to stop it. A falsely accused parent and a false accuser will do the same.
What About the Judge?
Family-court judges live in a strange corner of the judiciary. They are often selected for reasons unrelated to expertise. They hold the broadest power but often have the least skill. In many states, family-court judges depend on reappointment or party endorsement. The people who decide that—lawyers, party committees, donors—are the same people who appear before them.
Gardner relied on GALs to enforce PAS:
“I have generally found collaboration with guardians ad litem to be very useful.”
“A guardian ad litem unfamiliar with parental alienation may prove a definite impediment.”
The Best Interests of the Child: The Nicest Lie Ever Told in Court
The phrase “the best interests of the child” sounds noble. But in family court, it means the judge, the GAL, and the court-appointed therapist can overrule the parents, the evidence, and even the child, because they say so.
If PAS is used to flip custody, it is justified under the ”best interests” of the child.
Yes. There are real alienators. Some parents do poison a child against the other parent. The trouble comes when the court stops asking what is real. The problem is how the courts use it to avoid the hard work of finding the truth.
In other courts, the jury, not the judge, has the last word.
A jury won’t start from Gardner’s claim that children lie.
A jury won’t endorse forced reunification camps.
A jury won’t jail a mother because she won’t “comply” with an abuser.
A jury won’t call a child’s fear “alienation” without looking at the facts.
A jury means a public trial, which is precisely why family courts resist it. Twelve citizens will not destroy a family lightly.
If a jury was going to make the final decision, lawyers couldn’t threaten clients with the whim of one judge. Cases would be resolved rather than turning into six-figure wars.
If juries were allowed, cases would end sooner, cost less, create less abuse, and strip away the incentive to weaponize accusations.
The Trouble With It
Privacy protects the court, not the child. Discretion becomes unchecked power. “Best interests” becomes anything the judge wants it to be.
Until there are juries, stay away from this criminal enterprise called family court.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Real Abuse Exists — But So Does MisuseThere is no question that PA/psychological abuse is real and damaging. Many parents — men and women — have lived through isolation, manipulation, and control that never left visible bruises.
But family court is also a system where:
For fathers, the concern isn’t just theoretical. Family court already operates with limited procedural protections:
The lesson for parents is not that psychological abuse should be ignored — but that broad, subjective laws applied in family court can produce unintended and irreversible harm.
Many parents would support laws that:
But embedding broad definitions into family court — without clear safeguards — risks turning an already adversarial system into one where accusations alone decide outcomes.
For over 22 million victims of parental alienation in the US family courts alone; for them to have such similar clear, cut symptoms and similar case outcomes is evidence alone of a systemic, catastrophic root cause based on facts that stem from extreme “profit for trauma” systems
They utilize the dysfunctional behavior of the alienating parent to fuel and foster such psychological and prolonged dysfunction for the children and the targeted parent
https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2712&context=faculty_publications
The evidence proving that family courts treat mother and child abuse allegations badly (as alienation) has been thoroughly documented by Prof. Meier of George Washington University, in a 10 year study of cases.
At the start of the trial Westchester Supreme Court Judge Francesca Connolly allowed my husband to read a statement he wrote blaming me for the years of litigation and court costs. How is that even legal??
He had been the number 3 man in the largest media company in the world. He was compensated millions per year, most of which he hid from us in tax deferred stock options.
He saddled me with a million dollars in real estate debt while we were married. Essentially turning our partnership into indentured servitude for me. I never would have qualified for that mortgage on my own and certainly not when Judge Connolly was done with me.
I married him when he was penniless and sheltered him when he was homeless, yet when he made good he did not share equally with me. He hoarded in secret.
He was not only financially abusive but emotionally, sexually and physically too.
When he found out I was going to divorce him, finally, he disclosed that he had amassed $30,000,000 during our marriage and that if I stayed I and the children would be rich.
–I knew if he said he had $30 mil it was likely twice that.
He gave me papers to sign, which I signed knowing they were probably stock transfers. I made copies that I later gave to my lawyer.
That lawyet said there would be a paper trail.
I never inagined the lawyers would conspire against me and the kids. Financial papers disappeared and/or were not presented at court. There was discovery that showed stock assets my husband claimed had zero value. My lawyer at the time said they were worth tens of millions. But the trial lawyer did not present that analysis at trial!
The lawyers knew what they were doing. They made millions on the divorce. Connolly did not understand what was happening.
She took both houses away from me, one that had no debt and one that had an $800,000 mortgage.
She “gave me” use of one house and forced the other sold. She had me give my husband half of that sale on top of the approx $60,000,000 he had by trial that he did not disclose to her. (In fact he told her he didn’t have a house to live in or means…huge lies.)
Anyone familiar with corporate executive tax shelters would have understood his tactics.
A judge whose husband worked as a prison guard was completely out of her depth.
He dealt with the judge as if she were a mentally slow child. That was the winning approach.
The lawyers made more than the kids and I.
She could have just looked at the size of the file without reading anything but the lawyers’ names to know why the litigation was so lengthy and expensive. But she accepted his story that I was to blame.
She allowed him to defame my motives for divorcing him and my report of the abuse because he appealed to her prejudices.
Later I read her priest son’s blog and saw it was full of hate for moslems, gay people etc.
Think reasonable professionals will be in charge at court? Think again. Religious bias, unsophisticated bias, cronyism will prevail.
I am now dying of cancer. If I become a ghost I will haunt all those arrogant illegal biased bullies that the NY court allowed to crush me and my kids for nearly 10 years.
He always ruined things for me, and his marital attempts to ruin our children were consistent with his abusiveness.
Confortably rich women risk their wealth trying to protect their children.
Rich men have everything to gain by calling them liars.
The only ones who rig the game are those who profit by it.
FAMILY COURT IS A VENDING MACHINE — AND IF THAT DOESN’T SCARE YOU, NOTHING WILL
Most people think Family Court is about justice, fairness, and protecting kids.
It’s not.
It’s a vending machine — and YOU are the product.
Here’s how it really works:
Step 1 — Insert Parents
Two human beings walk in.
Two people desperate to protect their children.
Two wallets.
One machine.
Step 2 — Push a Button
• False allegation
• Emergency hearing
• Ex parte order
• “Reunification therapy”
• Supervised visitation
• Psychological eval
• GAL appointment
• Attorney ad litem
• Amicus fee
• Drug test
• Another drug test
• Parenting class
• Re-evaluation
• Re-litigation
• Re-traumatization
Each button = money.
Each button = another reason to keep the machine running.
Step 3 — The Machine Dispenses the Same Product Every Time
Not justice.
Not safety.
Not due process.
It dispenses:
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Conflict
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Financial ruin
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Parent/child separation
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Trauma
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Years of litigation
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Zero accountability
The machine never breaks.
Because the machine is designed to feed itself.
But Here’s the Part Nobody Wants to Admit…
Family Court doesn’t need to “work.”
It only needs to stay plugged in.
This “machine” has:
• No strict scrutiny
• No constitutional standard
• No evidentiary burden
• No oversight
• No criminal due process
• No accountability
• No external review
It just has parents, kids, and a system addicted to revenue.
If this doesn’t terrify you — you’re not paying attention.
We tore apart the vending machines that stole quarters from us as kids.
But the one stealing our families, our rights, and our children?
We’re told to obey it.
Enough.
Family Court reform isn’t optional —
It’s survival.
Semper Fi
Family Court Survivor Rob
Rob V
TEMPORARY ORDERS: THE HIDDEN DEATH SENTENCE OF FAMILY COURT – and the dirty secret is this: it’s all about money, not justice.
Let’s get very real for a second
THEY CALL THEM “TEMPORARY”
…but every parent who’s been through this system knows the truth:
Temporary Orders decide the whole case.
Before evidence.
Before trial.
Before you even get a real chance to defend yourself.
One signature.
One hearing.
One judge.
And your entire life is permanently rearranged.
No jury.
No due process.
No strict scrutiny.
No “clear and convincing” standard — just loose, sloppy, unreviewable “best interest” guesses.
And suddenly:
• Your child is ripped from you
• You’re labeled “non-custodial”
• You’re forced into supervised visitation
• You’re ordered to pay more than your mortgage
• You’re buried under mandatory services, fees, and evaluations
• And the final trial that could fix it is 12–36 months away (if ever)
Temporary Orders are not temporary. They are the verdict.
WHY? BECAUSE “TEMPORARY” = REVENUE STREAM
Here’s the ugly math of family court:
Child support orders bring in federal Title IV-D money.
Supervised visitation brings in private profit.
Psych evals, parenting classes, mediation, drug tests, monitoring — all profit centers.
Attorney fees skyrocket the moment “Temporary Orders” are issued.
Once they brand one parent “possessory” and one “managing,”
they’ve created a payer and a payee — and suddenly everyone else gets paid.
It’s not justice.
It’s not protection.
It’s not keeping families safe.
It’s a machine, and Temporary Orders are the coin slot.
THE CONSTITUTION DISAPPEARS ON DAY ONE
Where else in America can the government:
• seize your child
• restrict your movement
• force you into services
• bankrupt you
• and put you under state control
…without evidence, without strict scrutiny, and without the clear and convincing standard required for any other fundamental right?
Answer:
Only in Family Court.
Every other court follows the Constitution.
Family Court follows its own revenue model.
HERE IS THE PART THEY FEAR YOU SAYING OUT LOUD
Temporary Orders are how the system:
• manufactures conflict
• manufactures imbalance
• manufactures dependency
• manufactures fees
• manufactures federal reimbursement
• manufactures years of litigation
Temporary Orders don’t stabilize cases —
they create the chaos the court profits from.
PARENTS AREN’T LOSING BECAUSE THEY’RE “BAD” — THEY’RE LOSING BECAUSE IT’S A BUSINESS MODEL
Judges know this.
Attorneys know this.
Guardians ad litem know this.
Supervisors, evaluators, and mediators know this.
The only people who don’t know?
The parents walking into court for the first time.
THE TRUTH: TEMPORARY ORDERS ARE A SENTENCE, NOT A STEP
And until we demand:
• Clear and convincing evidence
• Strict scrutiny for parental rights
• Real due process
• Abolition of Title IV-D incentives
• Ending fraudulent “temporary” schemes that become permanent
…the machine will continue devouring families for profit.
Share this if you’re tired of a system where “temporary” means FOREVER.
Parents deserve justice — not a financial death sentence disguised as Temporary Orders.
Semper Fi
Family Court Survivor
Rob V
This is on point and shows the playbook used to buy custody and steal children abd life savings
There is far more at play then you are talking about. Reforming the court house must include protection first for the children then the parents. The court house is a maze. People are trapped like rats and seem to have to buy their way out. If the reporting of abuse is statistically low. Then alligations of parental alienation are the largest falsehoods at the court. Parental alienation brings in the cash cow the big elephant into the procedure.
Incorrect, False allegations of abuse is the cash cow “SILVER BULLET” practice of divorce. Utilized primarily by woman and that in turn brings about severe alienating tactics and behaviors by the custodial “parent’ for financial and custody gains. Parental alienation is real and it is abused by assholes. When you criminalize false allegations at the same level of the claim you will eventually see a correction and parental alienation claims also decline.
THE MOST DANGEROUS THING HAPPENING IN FAMILY COURT — AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT
Judge-Ordered Psychological Evaluations & Supervised Visitation Without a Trial = Practicing Medicine Without a License
Family court judges across America are now doing something so reckless, so unconstitutional, and so medically dangerous that if any doctor tried it, they would lose their license, be sued for malpractice, and could face criminal charges.
Yet in family court?
They do it casually. Silently. With zero oversight.
And children pay the price.
Let’s get into it. “see Below”
1. NO TRIAL. NO EVIDENCE. NO FINDINGS.
Judges are issuing forced psychological evaluations and supervised visitation with:
• No testimony
• No evidentiary hearing
• No cross-examination
• No factual findings
• No clear and convincing standard
• No due process whatsoever
One allegation — often unproven — becomes an instant sentence.
This is NOT law.
This is not justice.
This is medical experimentation without consent.
2. A Judge Is Not a Doctor — But They’re Ordering Medical Treatment
Here’s the bombshell:
When a judge orders:
• A psychological evaluation
• Therapy
• Parenting classes
• Drug testing
• Reunification therapy
• Supervised visitation
They are prescribing medical and mental-health interventions.
But judges:
• Are not licensed doctors
• Are not licensed psychologists
• Are not trained in diagnostics
• Are not trained in medicine, psychiatry, or trauma
Imagine a judge saying:
“Your child will undergo heart surgery. Because I said so.”
WITHOUT a trial.
WITHOUT evidence.
WITHOUT a doctor’s medical recommendation.
That’s exactly what’s happening — but with your mental health.
3. THIS IS LITERALLY THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF PRACTICING MEDICINE WITHOUT A LICENSE
Every state — EVERY SINGLE ONE — has statutes that make it a crime to:
• Diagnose mental illness
• Order treatment
• Mandate medical procedures
without a medical license.
But family court judges do this DAILY.
They hide it under the word “orders.”
4. What Happens When a Judge’s “Medical Order” Is WRONG?
Lives get destroyed:
– Misdiagnosis
Fake mental-health “concerns” become permanent court records.
– Financial Abuse
Parents are forced to pay thousands for unnecessary evaluations.
– Emotional Trauma
Supervised visitation breaks the parent-child bond.
Sometimes permanently.
– Weaponized Allegations
False claims suddenly “require” psychological testing — even if disproven.
– Forced Therapy
You’re compelled to participate in “treatment” with no clinical need.
– Stigmatization
A label placed by a biased evaluator can follow you for life.
This isn’t just unethical.
It’s medical coercion under the color of law.
5. Judges Are Violating:
• 14th Amendment Due Process Clause
• 5th Amendment liberty protections
• 1st Amendment right to parent
• 9th Amendment retained rights
• Strict Scrutiny requirements
• Clear and convincing evidence standards (required before removing a child)
• Medical licensing laws
• Federal civil rights laws (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
And they do it with ZERO accountability.
6. The Impact on Children Is DEVASTATING
Supervised visitation — without cause — is psychological warfare on a child.
Studies show it causes:
• Anxiety
• Attachment injury
• Fear of abandonment
• Long-term trauma
• Relationship breakdowns
Removing a parent without evidence is one of the most harmful actions a court can take.
Yet they do it before a trial.
Before facts.
Before truth.
7. THE VIRAL TRUTH THEY DON’T WANT TO SAY OUT LOUD
When a judge orders a psychological evaluation without a trial,
they are practicing medicine without a license.
When a judge orders supervised visitation without due process,
they are committing state-sanctioned abuse.
Family court has become a shadow medical system —
run by untrained judges, unregulated evaluators, and unaccountable power.
This is not justice.
This is not safety.
This is a constitutional emergency.
8. The Call to Action
Share this.
Expose this.
Shine a light on the system that operates in the dark.
Because NO parent should lose their child
to a judge’s medical fantasy
without a trial, evidence, or due process.
Family court reform begins with the truth —
and the truth is finally coming out.
Semper Fi
Family Court Survivor
Rob V
These bogus psychologists are known to the courts and protected by the courts. In Connecticut it had been Linda Smith that gave the “sealed” custody heals that trashed a parent and kidnapped children for the abuser
She then faded a bit after being caught so many times, but her protege is Jessica Biren Caverly –
She us protected by all the judges- most notably adelmsn and Grossman who have relied on her trash reports absent a medical license- pure works of opinion based on the desires of the parent paying her bill and that of the GAL
There is zero credibility to the garbage she produces but the courts accept it and put in no contact orders with the loving parent and deliver kids to the shower where they’ll be silenced abd all money will be taken from the targeted parent leaving them unable to effectively combat the trafficking that stole their children
Caverly also writes reports for DCF cases where custody is taken from innocent or struggling parents and they put these kids – some as old as middle school – into homes with new families- separated from siblings and all they’ve known. These desperate parents even ask for visitation after the adoption occurs and Caverly suggests it’s not a good idea and DCF and the courts separate and traffic these children because it’s a lucrative model where states are financially rewarded each time a child is adopted out
Thank you Frank Parlato to your dedicated coverage on the abuse to our children and families
Where is department of health? Passing funding out to experimental psychology programs. They are not vetting psychologist . They are not vetting reunification camps. They are not doing their job. Why? Because the state is responsible for the fraud accusing in the court house . When the appointment is handed out the blanket of immunity is given. Incompetent and unquilfied rule the day. When you can’t tell the difference between real and fake abuse. Or when you lie like a rug on the stand to get more business. False alligations are not the norm in the court system. There are isolated incidents and the appointment of individuals in imparative to the welfare of children. While some folks are running around wanting the arrest of survivor and no actual investigation into their professionals. The court system is not designed for the children or parents it serves. It’s designed to drive a person insane. Broken emotionally and financially. Who is at the wheel of the bud bound for disaster?
FAMILY COURT REFORM IS CATCHING FIRE!!!!
Two warriors.
Two states.
One mission: expose the largest unregulated system in America — the Family Court Industrial Complex.
MATT GRANT — The Missouri Attorney Taking on the Giant
While most attorneys stay quiet to protect their careers, Matt Grant stepped into the ring with a full-scale RICO lawsuit targeting the family court infrastructure itself.
Not a judge.
Not one attorney.
The entire machine.
He’s naming the corruption that everyone else whispers about:
• Title IV-D financial incentives
• Collusive networks
• Guardian-ad-litem abuse
• Court-appointed professional racketeering
• Due process violations baked into the system
He’s not doing it for clout.
He’s doing it because families are being destroyed — deliberately.
If you care about reform, this is a man to stand behind.
ARNOLD YAN — North Texas’ Relentless Force
Texas is known for fights… but Arnold Yan’s battle against a rigged family court system is becoming the blueprint for what courage looks like.
While judges hide behind immunity and attorneys hide behind privilege, Yan exposes:
• Judicial retaliation
• False narratives
• Weaponized ex parte conduct
• Title 4-D pressure
• The culture of intimidation toward parents and reform advocates
He’s fought tooth and nail — not with money, but with truth, documentation, and refusal to bow down.
Texas needs more Arnolds.
America needs more Arnolds.
THE MOVEMENT IS HERE
The system relies on silence.
These men are breaking it.
Family Court reform is no longer scattered voices —
it’s becoming a Nationwide Organized Pushback against:
• Corruption
• Profit incentives
• Judicial abuse of discretion
• Forced separation of children
• State-sanctioned trauma
This is no longer a “family issue.”
This is a civil rights movement.
CALL TO ACTION
If you believe in:
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Accountability
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Transparency
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Due process
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Ending state-sponsored family separation
https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t51/1/16/2714.png Real reform that protects children, not court budgets
Then stand with those fighting the frontline battles.
Support their cases.
Share their work.
Amplify their voices.
Reform doesn’t happen by accident — it happens when we make noise so loud they can’t ignore us anymore.
Semper Fi
Family Court Survivor
Rob V
those who use children for financial gain- custody, alienation and so on need to be put on death row.
Excellent article Frank. Thank you for your continued coverage of the family court crisis that is destroying the lives of children and innocent parents
Article is accurate and exposes the truth of what is commonplace in family courts throughout this country. Our rights as parents are violated daily- zero oversight and no accountability The patterns are identical in case after case where the targeted parent enters the family court of strangers and is painted as mentally unstable and incompetent with no medical evidence whatsoever.
Gals are the brokers and ring leaders and custody evaluators are not medical doctors nor is anything forensic or scientifically based- it’s an opinion report after meeting with the family and children for maybe an hour each – tops- full legal and physical custody is then given to the monies parent and one parent- usually the mother- will never see her children again and will he tortured and traumatized for years by illegal and inhumane family court orders- the children are subject to trauma and abuse as without cause a healthy parent is erased from their lives – usually with “temporary orders of no contact” with no evidence, no dcf findings, and no police or dcf claims of abuse or wrongdoing
Welcome to family courts where criminal actors run the scam and the state turns away gif it’s far too lucrative to protect our children custody for sale –
Anyone know who met with/ worked with/ instructed Richard Gardner in Germany? Alfred Kinsey had a few acquaintances there, too.
The first so called reunification camp was opened in the early 2000s. Camp common ground in Vermont which was initially unsuccessful. A group of professionals got together and opened family Bridges and turning point.
The theories of maternal gatekeeper in the context of fatherhood research first emerged in the 90s. Conceptualized by Allens and Hawkins in 1999 expanding on it. These theories arose alongside father involvement. In 2000 that examined the relationship between Maternal Gatekeeping and father involvement. The Fatherhood initiative was founded in 1994 to promote fatherhood involvement. Alen Hawkins is a researcher and advocate for “responsible fatherhood”. improving parental involvement Hawkins worked for the National Fatherhood Initiative and the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Hawkin’s is a professor at Brigham Young University.
Wade Horn was the first president of the fatherhood initiative a 503c non -profit organization. In 2001 to 2007 Wade Horn served as the Assistant secretary for child and family services. CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES IS IN CHARGE OF PROVIDING FUNDING TO FATHERHOOD LABS.
Dr. Wade Horn is the Deloitte Consulting LLP’s responsible for public sector practice LEADING HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES marketplace and is the key advisor to HHS clients. Wade Horn an influential Bush Administration appointee who overseen Head start, ABSTINCE SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS, Stepping down in 2007 in a cloud of questions about his spending. An annual budget of $47 million in 2007. ” He earned kudos for his personal style, even from groups often at odds with the Bush administration’s policies. Education Week April 10, 2007.
Dr Sara Allen coined the term maternal Gate Keeper, the wife of Sean Allen Sr. who founded the EQUITY ENRICHMENT Alliance and chair of the NATIONAL PARENTING ORGANIZATION AND FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE ADVISORY BOARD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OUT OF THE CITY OF HARTFORD CONNECTICUT. In partnership with the Commission on WOMEN, CHILDREN, SENIORS EQUITY AND INCLUSION silencing and ignoring women and children in the state. TASKED WITH WEIGHING IN ON LEGISLATION FOR THE GROUPS THEY REPRESENT.
Connecticut is the first state to pass fatherhood legislation, and the entire state of Connecticut Judicial Branch is partnership with THE FATHERHOOD INITATIVE.
Connecticut is home to the largest parental alienation resource group and referral network PASI. Joan Kloth Zanard, Working with Dr. Bill Barnet, Robert Garza and several attorneys. Americans for equal and shared parenting.
” Go to criminal court” Connecticut is the leader in criminal justice reform. 95 percent increase incarceration rate of women in the United States over the last few decades. Prioritizing fatherhood over criminal matters in the strategic planning for fatherhood. The equity enrichment alliance does not directly contribute to political candidates, however the “Equity Alliance Fund” a separate 501c 4 organization like the non- profit alienation group and the family court fraud warrior project with associates tied to these groups does donate to POLITICAL CANIDATES WHO ADVOCATE FOR POLICIES THAT BENEFIT UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES WHICH THE FATHERHOOD INITIATE CLAIMS TO REPRESENT.
Sarah M. Allen and Alen Hawkins Brigham Young University 1999
Maternal Gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that Inhibits Greater Father Involvement in family work.
Maternal gatekeeping is conceptualized within the framework of social construction of gender and has three dimensions.
(It’s now illegal to identify as a mother in family court)
Mothers’ reluctance to relinquish responsibility
External validation of a mothers’ identity
Different conception of family roles.
622 DUAL EARNER MOTHERS 21 percent were classified as gatekeepers
The counsel on family relations the journal on Marriage and families the leading research in the family field. In Connecticut the head of family services is married to the head of the fatherhood initiative at UConn. Placing negative images of mothers in the United States. Welfare Queens, white women of privilege and attempting to correlate school shootings to single mother households. Using anthropology, demographics, economics, history, psychology, sociology, human development and family sciences to profile women as the cause of family problems.
The prevailing explanations for unequal distribution of family work are grounds in theories of family power and focus four major conceptual approaches:
Relative resources aka second wives and grandparents
time available
economic dependency
Gender Ideology
Jan 2025 EVAWI
The percentage of false allegations in the United Staes are low. Between 2 % and 10% of all reported cases. 5.9% at universities. UConn had the heighted reports of sexual assaults in 2016.
****The rate is under 10% of child sexual abuse originating from adults in the context of custody disputes. ***********
IMPORTANT DISTINCTION FOUND TO BE FALSE, NOT UNSUBTANCED CLAIMS OR CRIMES NOT REPORTED.
MISCONCEPTION: DESPITE MEDIA COVERAGE OF FALSE HIGH – PROFILE ALLIGATIONS, THESE CASES ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OVERALL RATE.
In 2014 hearings the “parental alienations ” claims were pushed by the equal and shared parenting community and alienation industry expert. Since then, several women have reported being treated unjustly at the family courthouse. Their children removed and or forced into reunification therapy. Forced to live under poor conditions trying to co parent with the fathers of their children. As well as children’s reports of abuse ignored at the fatherhood imitative funding convince as well as the alienation industry. Women have been “sold” on the concept of parental alienation left in the background of the family court fight for fairness and the right to parent their children. Many quest to be free of abuse and financially abusive court litigation. Poor fact-finding procedures from the family relations office. The lack of evidence hears overridden by appointments of court ” professional” following a fatherhood model. Despite merit, best interest standards. Appearing to be based on statewide agreement bringing funding to non- profit organizations and hiding behind a mask. Governed by health and human services industry know the facts of a case. Based on unbroken down statistics oversimplification of complex social issues.
Frank along with others have been pioneers in reporting on the complex and abusive process of custody disputes. Giving voices to women and children throughout the state of Connecticut and the country. He has brought to the surface the ongoing failures and dirty secretes. Is the lawsuit he is facing retaliation for foiling the plan backed by government founding to dominate family law practices, social services and the entire mental health system profiting greatly off the family courthouse? Perhaps it’s unclear who is married to who but the funding stream and history stand.
What is real is custody is for sale at the courthouse. The federally funded history behind it and the key players.
Uconn kids equal and shared parenting spans over 20 departments and 5 labs$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. The new reshaping of parenting to force shared parenting under any conditions. ” One of a kind studies to engage problematic fathers” Yale. Civil conspiracy is when two or more people or organizations legally or illegally get together. ?# the fatherhood initiative, family services, child support enforcement. Department of child and family services. National parenting organization, the equity alliance, the commission on women children senior equity and inclusion. The public defenders office, equal and shared parenting organizations, judiciary committee co chair and other members. All partners in the mou. Several discriminatory agreements using maternal gatekeeper, parental alienation and mounchouen by proxy. Using integrated practices and unquilfied mental health professionals? Prioritize fatherhood over criminal matters. Solistation of men for social workers , financial resources for family court procedures. Access and visitation grants. Over 400 women in Connecticut complaining about the court system. Bar association members, appointed judges by the governor who created overcoming system barriers for access. Discrimination in the criminal justice reform. The department of education, weaponized legislation, gender biased organization employed by the judicial branch, in the children’s legal organization. How many women have had their children taken away, threatened, arrested and almost arrested for custodial interference? How many women have been treated unfairly from the court professionals for HHS funding, crime statistics ” to fix bias in the family court” and ensure fatherhood inclusion because a group of organizations got together to profile women as the problem in the United States? Using volunteer special project to force legislation with federal and state tax dollars. How much money are the 501 nonprofits using for political contributions?
Co chair of judiciary. Equity and inclusion. Wants to take people off the registry. Wants the men out of jail, but the woman can can be sexually assaulted and shipped out of state away from their families. Equity and inclusion my ass. Misogyny, mask and violation of women in all shades. Blumenthal, Murphy, Lamont, Looney, Tong and the democratic party turning testosterone in to gold.
5 million dollar to the state of Connecticut yearly to promote the gatekeeper theories.
In 1998 Father’s and families was founded. In 2013 the name was changed to the national parenting organization. Pushing 50/50 custody and domination of family court The state of Connecticut is ground zero for flipping the entire state resources to assist fathers and paint any mother a malicious mommy and parental alienation. The entire state of Connecticut has been bought by wealthy men. The organization for women in the state are all bound by agreement and providing no advocacy. The welfare reform, healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood is a front. Abused through out the United States of America to legalize abuse , take over custody of the children. It’s no wonder the war is on. Legalize junk science of parental alienation and funnel children to Alienation camps. Million of dollars in federal funding to Uconn and experimental psychology programs. Uconn kids a volunteer study to push shared custody in divorce despite abuse. These are NOT high conflict cases where abuse is in question. Federal tax dollars to enable discrimination in family court cases. ” Father’s and families” the largest minus Mommy project in the United States. Unbroken down statistics from the fatherhood initiative. Blaming mothers for all of the problems in the United States. Best interest standards are often based on these government funded programs. Women across the United States can thank Connecticut for a lot of the problems we face in family court and criminal justice system.
“Skankat versus the Commonwealth! What a load! Just some yellow-haired, yellow-belly skank wasting everybody’s goddamn time in the big house of lies! That’s all it is: a sideshow
Governor Ned Lamont created the office of equity and opportunity, to give the opportunity to over come systematic barriers and promote inclusion. Fatherhood inclusion.
The silver bullet band. Red pill pusher. Just like another short haired woman who published a report on the weapon of parental alienation? How many side steps will you and your gang of bullies to hide bias funding streams? Let’s see you run down the the legislators office and complain about the discrimination against mothers in family court and women in the criminal justice system. It’s not going to happen. You would prefer that when a mother or woman fight for the rights of themselves and their children they get tossed in jail. Custodial inference. We see you, we see what you are doing. We are going to continue to educate the public on what is happening. Thank you Frank for not being a coward. American deserves to know the truth. This is a legal system that is being hyjacked and manipulated.
How long has Maggie been spying on domestic violence victims? How long has she helping you and attempting to drive a wedge between the woman advocating? Since Uconn wrote the brief?
There once a man who before family court reform who was taken to court by a former employer. For taking files and employees. He’s back at it busting up organization that helps women.
Happy Thanksgiving, Frank Report!! I love you all! My new neo-Nazi life is WONDERFUL!!
Civil conspiracy. The long history of the network to transfer custody. Thank you Frank for not being intimidated into silence. Those of us who have danced with the devil at the court house appreciate all of your hard work and effort to educate the public. There is a long list of the industry and years of manipulation of legislation. Monitized special interest groups have taken over the shaping of family court. Not in the Best interest of children, not for families. It’s about the promotion of shattering the credibility of victims of various forms of abuse. To legalize abuse and poor parenting practices and blame them on the other parent. The court induced Stockholm syndrome under the ” reunification” falsehoods. The largest amount of experimental psychology was passed out in 2025 under the fatherhood initiative. President Trump stopped the funding to stop false information on social media. False statistics and information is spread out to the public. All under the umbrella that a parent prodomitly father’s are the largest percentage of ” alienated” parents. The misuse of government funding to assist Americans with the complex social issues of families. The government creating healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood was never meant to be used as a weapon against mothers and protective fathers at the family court house. The fatherhood initiative was never meant to provide a funding stream to bash mothers and stigmatizing children from single parent households. Mostly mothers. The federal funding was not meant to create or fix biases. The money was meant to asst fathers in healthy engagement. It was not meant to obsolve abuse, addiction and financially punish parents when relationship doesn’t work out. It was not meant to prioritize engagement over criminal behavior. It was never meant to silence advocating and telling the truth at the family court house. In the United States of America federal tax dollars are being used for experimental psychology programs. The subject are voluntary and don’t appear to accurately demonstrate the population in need at the family court system. American public has no where else to go to seek assistance in legally disintangling themselves from parenters. Children are being used as leverage and property. These are human beings subject to a system filled with crocks, ignorance and significant amount of money running through HHS. Family court is the gateway to hell on earth. Greed, lies and big non profit organization rules the roost. From $50 to about $240 dollars an hour you can learn how to dance with the devil .
Correction for $50 to $240 dollars an hour you can learn to start the parental alienation dance at the court house. Distracting the court system from everything else. Buying your way out of responsibility.