Juda Engelmayer
Frank Parlato’s latest exposé may be the most important read of the summer for anyone alarmed by the way media narratives are driving criminal prosecutions. His new piece – “The Lawsuit That Sparked a Federal Sex Trafficking Case Against the Alexander Brothers”—offers a critical reexamination of how it all began.
Because this case doesn’t start with an indictment. It starts with a civil lawsuit—filed by a woman whose credibility is now collapsing under the weight of her own messages.
Texts she sent after the alleged incident—flirtatious, friendly, entirely voluntary—paint a radically different picture than the one the government has spent months promoting. These texts were hidden from the public, ignored by prosecutors, and excluded from the narrative that led to a federal sex trafficking indictment.
The house of cards is wobbling.
And it’s not an isolated case—it’s part of a pattern.
Consider Harvey Weinstein’s Los Angeles trial: a key prosecution witness, Pascal Vicedomini, is now accused of perjury. He testified under oath, placing himself away from the accuser at the time of the alleged assault, but court filings, travel and phone records suggest the opposite: that he was with her. Despite this, the judge barred Weinstein’s team from presenting the evidence to the jury. Now, Italy’s High Court has allowed Weinstein’s perjury complaint against Vicedomini to proceed. And – Candace Owens will be running her final piece with Harvey post-trial next week.
That’s not justice – that’s selective storytelling.
And it’s happening again.
The Alexander brothers’ prosecution appears engineered to destroy reputations in the court of public opinion long before facts could be tested in a courtroom. Those facts are now emerging: hidden messages, collapsing timelines, and political motivations that undermine the entire foundation of the case.
And more revelations are coming.
In the OneTaste case—another media-driven prosecution wrapped in trafficking rhetoric and government theatrics—new motions will soon be filed. We’ve already exposed troubling FBI misconduct, fabricated evidence, and internal contradictions that show the government was pushing a story it knew didn’t match the facts.
Remember: Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz were convicted of a single count of Conspiracy to Force Labor, not through violence or financial threats, but because the jury accepted that wanting to be “liked and accepted” amounted to coercion. The “victims” were adults who wanted to be liked, accepted and welcomed by a group they wanted to leave and left voluntarily, but prosecutors successfully labeled emotional complexity as criminal conduct. How does that bode for every religion, fraternity, club and community group?
This summer has been loud—but underneath the noise, the ground is shifting.
Once-airtight prosecutions are springing leaks. The public is beginning to ask harder questions, and cases like the Alexander brothers’, once presumed clear cut, are starting to unravel—one message, one motion, one court filing at a time.
P.S. As we examine the Alexander brothers’ prosecution—and the broader collapse of due process in media-fueled misconduct cases—we must also take stock of the troubling saga of Frank Rose, former Principal Deputy Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration under President Biden.
Frank wasn’t accused by a colleague, a subordinate, or even someone he could confront. He was targeted by an anonymous, uncorroborated allegation—timed with surgical precision to derail his efforts to restore J. Robert Oppenheimer’s legacy and challenge entrenched interests in the national security establishment.
In Frank’s case, the hallmarks are all too familiar:
- A vague, weaponized accusation with no opportunity for defense
- Media leaks crafted to assassinate character
- Institutional silence from the very agencies he served with distinction
Frank has gone public with claims of a coordinated effort to oust him—not because of misconduct, but because he disrupted the status quo. His story, like the Alexanders’, reveals how institutions protect themselves, not people.
Together, these cases demand a cultural reckoning—not about whether justice matters, but about how accusation has become a weapon more potent than proof.
And how easily the system breaks when few people ask to see the evidence.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
[…] Frank Report and other outlets covering this saga have explicitly raised the question of “weaponization of […]
Kate Whitemsn – a promiscuous delusional tramp who plays the victim after her pathetic attempts of securing interest from a man were met with silence, dismissal and blatant disinterest.
She’s an embarrassment to all females and should be charged with fraud because there is no way her story holds up- and the damages she claims have disappeared based on her own texts and slut shots.
This was easy to follow, even for someone new like me.
You mean “even for someone stupid” like you
I really needed this today. Thank you for writing it.
I would not have written it if I had known that.
Posts like this are why I keep coming back. It’s rare to find content that’s simple, practical, and not full of fluff.
I was hoping you’d go away and not come back.
You have a real gift for explaining things.
Yeah I know that. Why are you wasting my time telling me things I already know,
Your content never disappoints. Keep up the great work!
If you think it is great I will have to reassess it. It might be only mediocre.
Very useful tips! I’m excited to implement them soon.
I doubt very much you will be able to implement any one of them.
In just about all the cases highlighted here that involve federal prosecutorial misconduct and false prosecutions involve Jews being targeted. It is clear that as America is politically, socially, and economically collapsing, Jews are being targeted for malicious prosecution much like in Europe throughout the diaspora. America is no longer a nation ruled by law and due process. It is no longer a nation safe for Jews, or anyone else for that matter. America now is exactly what Spain, Germany, and Poland were; once friendly civilized nations turned mad and targeted Jews. It is time that American Jews realize they don’t only face dangers from antisemitic college mobs and their woke professors, but also from the judiciary and prosecutors who likely were indoctrinated in college and law school by antisemite professors. It’s time for American Jews to leave and go to Israel.
I legally recorded the former GAL in my divorce case saying her Jewish neighbors are mean to her and that she tells her non Jewish neighbors not to sell their homes to Jews otherwise she would be “surrounded” (by Jews). She also said, and I have it recorded, that one of her Jewish neighbors called her an antisemite (which I clearly believe she is) to which she dropped the F bomb on. This GAL is an attorney and entrusted to determine the best interests of children.
You are right, America is no longer safe for Jews. This sort of filth would have never been tolerated in the last, but it’s woke now,
GALs determine the best interest of their own wallet That tidbit only detracts from the friend you reference Is she a family court attorney? Even worse
Hey Frank, why did you place that black cover on the backsides of the two women? Don’t your readers have a right to see and inspect pictures depicting her ‘soft’ p*ssy that feels like velvet and which is very nice and wet?
Please, this poor woman, Kate Whiteman, hasn’t she been through enough? All she ever wanted was a velvet pussy and $35 million. When she could not have either she did the only thing that was natural for her to do – destroy some lives.
I wonder how many men (and women) have experienced her self described soft velvet p*ssy? I venture to guess it’s a pretty high number.
Frank, you’ve seen the pics in the raw. From your unobstructed vantage point, does her p*ssy look like it’s as soft as velvet (as she asserts) or does it look worn and thorny as a result of a plethora of guests and visitors of said crevice?