Frank Parlato
Spotting the Lies
Lies are not difficult to detect. For example, Ayries Blanck claimed she wrote a journal in 2015 documenting the suffering she endured at OneTaste just after it happened.
But she did not write the journal in 2015. She wrote it years later, when she knew there was an FBI investigation into OneTaste. She wrote it to make money.
I will offer $25,000 if either of the Blanck sisters, federal prosecutors, FBI Special Agent Elliot McGinnis, or the Blancks’ civil lawyers can show that Ayries Blanck’s journal is not fake.
Of course, if they fail, they must pay me $25,000.
Contact me for the terms of this offer: 305-783-7083 or frankparlato@gmail.com.
The Absurdity of the Case
Let me tell you about this criminal case where Blanck’s journal undoubtedly figures. In a sane world, a fake journal would figure nowhere, especially not in a criminal prosecution. But this is a federal prosecution where allegations can be untethered to truth and evidence can be fake or stolen.
The federal prosecution of Nicole Daedone, co-founder of OneTaste, and Rachel Cherwitz, her former head of sales, is a joke.
The US Attorney for the EDNY alleges a 12-year conspiracy existed between Daedone and Cherwitz – starting one year before they even met. That is a rookie mistake by prosecutors who don’t know the file. Nobody in the prosecutor’s office knows this file. They have relied on an FBI agent with a highly inappropriate relationship with the Blanck sisters, and an unusually serious aversion to the truth.
The prosecutors will have to confront his errors soon enough.
A Weak Case Deflated
- Initially, the prosecutors probably didn’t think the case would boil down to a one-count forced labor conspiracy. I believe they thought they had many victims and co-conspirators. They didn’t. Their case hinges on Ayries Blanck and a few others equally willing to lie.
I am not aware of any case in the EDNY where the FBI started investigating six years ago – in 2018 – where they hoped to end up with a one-count indictment on conspiracy without any substantive charge. That is, they charged a 12 year failed scheme to commit forced labor. The US Attorney did not charge the women with the actual substantive crime of forced labor.
I believe the prosecutors intended this case to be NXIVM 2.0. Then the case started to deflate. Ayries Blanck was perhaps the main reason the case deflated.
Judge Gujarati’s Role and Challenges
Maybe it does not matter if a case is as thin as a 98 pound weakling – and 80 pounds of it is compacted fecal matter.
In the EDNY, the judges are more than usually accommodating to prosecutors.
Nine times out of 10, ties go toward the prosecution. Most judges are former prosecutors, and if they were not, they at least know that they must live in the same building as the prosecutors. They must see them every day. The judges are collegial, and sometimes deferential to the prosecution throughout the federal system. In Brooklyn, they don’t even pretend.
One of the worst things that can happen to a new judge like Diane Gujarati is to attempt to buck the system by coming out with rulings contrary to cases the prosecution put a lot of effort into. They can make her otherwise easy, comfortable life, hell. Plus, Gujarati was a prosecutor herself.
The FBI’s Questionable Tactics
When confronted with a justice issue, the misuse of a stolen attorney-client privilege document that a too-sly FBI special agent took and used, Judge Gujarati punted. She understood what was going on, but declined to look in the direction of justice and whether some blame should attach to an FBI agent up to his nostrils in misconduct.
What OneTaste experienced with this FBI agent shocks the conscience of people familiar with due process. At the hearing, Judge Gujarati went out of her way to ignore the misconduct, prop up the FBI, or at least not give the stolen privilege argument any judicial notice.
That may be because the US Attorney’s Office and the FBI came in a show of force – 11 representatives in total (though conspicuously absent was the FBI agent in question, Elliot McGinnis).
It may be contextual. Dealing with stolen documents and hiding their existence from the defense may be common at the EDNY. Telling potential witnesses like Ayries Blanck to delete evidence or her sister to hide evidence – like the fake journal – may be a standard operating procedure here.
I am not saying the prosecutors are in bed with McGinnis in taking stolen privileged documents and hiding them from the defense or conspiring with grifter sisters in the obstruction of justice.
But I have to think that any prosecutor with a few years’ experience would not want to try this case, because there’s no theory to the case. And the defendants have enough money, competent lawyers, and confidence to go before a jury.
The Prosecution’s “Coercive Control” Argument
One of the disadvantages the prosecution has is they have only a one-count conspiracy charge. It’s hard to back up from that when you’re opening play is the two of clubs.
To show how weak their forced labor conspiracy case is, they want to call junk science blatherer, Dr. Chitra Raghavan, as a coercive control expert. Is there a card lower than the two of clubs?
“Coercive control” where all the world is forced to do everything – and weakness is the anthem, rather than strength – is at best/worst feeling forced to do something with the inability to exit. You can have a boss who’s a table pounder and yeller. He makes you stay till 10:00 pm, but if you’re free to go, it’s not coercive control. But if there’s something that keeps you there that may not be on the level, then you may have something.
No one was forced to stay at OneTaste. Everyone was free to go and the discontented did. Why Ayries Blanck beat up her rich boyfriend, then she beat up his new girlfriend, then quit.
If the prosecutors want to go down that road, it’s going to be hard, because they’d have to come up with credible witnesses (not Ayries Blanck) that could show they had a rational feeling (that a Brooklyn jury would understand) that they could not leave. This must be backed by documentary evidence in the communications between Cherwitz and Daedone, which shows their business plan was based on coercive control.
It’s not a good theory.
There were no people chained in a galley rowing a ship. So the prosecutors need brain control, as in, more or less zombies.
If it was coercive control, how were they not able to decide the time they wanted to leave OneTaste?
That’s the key. Who decided when they were going to leave? If it was in the hands and mind of the individual OneTaste student or employee, there’s no coercive control. It may have gotten unpleasant for them. Unpleasant is not a crime, if you can leave.
People left when they wanted. Some got refunds, some just quit. Some were pissed and cried to the media. Some quietly went away.
But the ratio of unhappy campers to satisfied customers and employees at OneTaste is very low. There were a few malcontents. Who does not have malcontents? From my investigation, these malcontents are a motley crew of liars and opportunists. I only hope the government is not exerting coercive control in getting them to testify and the ultimate embarrassing impeachment.
A Whole Controversy Based on One Hurt Feeling
This whole controversy started because Ayries Blanck got her feelings hurt. Her rich boyfriend left and went with somebody else.
“You took my boyfriend, therefore you are illegal.”
Maybe Ayries wants to believe that it wasn’t her fault that her rich boyfriend left. Maybe she wasn’t a good love interest to Ravi.
But Ayries blamed OneTaste for taking her rich boyfriend, and she responded with violence and left. Then she tried to allege her insatiable sexual appetite with other men (which may have caused their split) was not her own doing, but coercive control. The devil made me do it.
Fuckaday
The Spark That Ignited the Investigation
There are no consequences for FBI Special Agent Elliot McGinnis. Is he going to get fired over telling Ayries Blanck to delete her emails with evidence that she was the nymphomaniacal aggressor-predator of many men, so she could claim coercive control?
Will he get fired because he told her sister to secrete Ayries’ journals to him, to hide them so the defense wouldn’t find out that the journals are fake? (This came out in a civil case in open court.)
Will he get fired because he hid a stolen attorney-client privileged document? No.
FBI Special Agent McGinnis obtained a hacked document in January 2021, whether it was privileged or not, and did not reveal it to the defense in discovery. I think when the trial is held, the FBI will assign McGinnis to an urgent top secret assignment in Ghana, and he will not be available to testify.
The Ayries Blanck Saga Continues
By the way, Ayries’ whole journal is a lie. But I especially enjoy disputing her saying she was 98 pounds when she left OneTaste, as she wrote in her fake journal.
She forgot that a former OneTaste student – a man she took sexual advantage of while at OneTaste – took pictures of her at the time she left. (I have covered his face with an emoji to protect him since he is a victim of Blanck.)
The pictures of Ayries were taken on January 5, 2015 – five days after she said she left OneTaste.
Here are these pictures side by side with her fake journal entries of January 17, 2005.
“Every morning I count my ribs as I get dressed.”
“I weigh myself religiously hoping I have gained weight. I left weighing 98lbs.”
“As I stand in front of the full length mirror I barely recognize the woman I have become. My hollowed out cheeks, deep circles under my eyes.”
(I am not sure what cheeks she refers to, but her face cheeks do not look hollowed out.)
“My bony ribs stick out even when I don’t lift my arms above my head.”
(I think she looks rather corn-fed.)
“The smile that at one time reached my eyes is no longer there.”
“The innocence and young girl filled with sparkle and magic is no longer there.”
“Only deadness. Flat and endless.”
“At times I feel the wasting in my body is only a reflection of the disintegration of my will to live.
(But not her will to lie.)
The Journal That Never Existed
Ayries’ journal is fiction. It is not even good fiction. It was not written in 2015. Why, the dummy even put in her journal entry of Feb 22, 2015, that she was reading a book not published until 2019.
Whoops.
In a subsequent post, I will explain how I know Blanck’s journal is fake, using all the info publicly out there.
America’s Cult of Blind Faith in Prosecutors
When I say the prosecution of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz is bullshit, many don’t hear a word I say.
I am interested in the legal rights of people wrongly accused, and I try to be a credible chronicler.
But I have learned that much of America is in a cult I like to call “Subserviently Trusting Unwarranted Power In the DOJ” or better known by its acronym, STUPID.
These American cultists do not want to hear that power corrupts even unelected officials. It spoils their supper.
Congress is corrupt and the president is an idiot, but at least we have honest prosecutors to defend us. S.T.U.P.I.D.
Justice or Smokescreen?
Maybe somebody on the jury will not be stupid. Bullshit has a detectable odor. It can be sniffed all the way from the prosecutors’ table to the jury box. McGinnis’s case is falling to pieces.
Purple Prose
Purple ProseBefore we conclude, I want to say Blanck’s fake journal is a wonderful example of purple prose. And since the entire journal is fiction, I thought I’d add a few lines culled from the Bulwar Lyton Purple Prose contest, and adapt them slightly to Blanck’s journal in case she wants to revise it again.
Now some people think it is awfully cruel to pick on little Ayries. But she went out with malice and lies to destroy others. She is in my opinion a criminal and deserves to be exposed, whether she uses the name Ayries Blanck or her latest alias Ares Milligan.
***
***
Aubrey had a body that reached out and slapped my Ravi’s face like a five-pound ham-hock tossed from a speeding truck.
***
Ravi dumped me and married Aubrey. At least it was a creative way to be dumped, I mused to myself as I looked at the new location of my name on the updated seating chart for Ravi’s wedding reception—the singles’ table.
***
If broken hearts were made of simple syrup, and shattered dreams were made from white rum, and agony and despair came from ¾ ounce of lime juice, freshly squeezed, and three mint leaves respectively, then I just served up a mojito cocktail straight from the ninth circle of hell when I told FBI Special Agent McGinnis that OneTaste made me do it.
Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist, media strategist, publisher, and legal consultant.
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Coercive control is the latest weapon of choice because it’s a subjective measure and can be spun be an artful prosecutor – and convincing victims.
The government takes particular sadistic pleasure in finding women guilty of coercive control because it was designed to protect women from coercively controlling abusive spouses- often via financial dominance/coercive control by taking all financial resources and leaning them beholden and powerless to fight back within the courts.
As a fuck you for this “victory” they’re making women the perpetrators of coercive control and these two successful, dominant, indecent women are just the ones to use this tactic on.
It’s a dangerous weapon in the courts no matter how ridiculous it may appear to be.
They’ll be able to prove coercive control by Nicole. It’s easy to prove because there’s no measurable criteria. And they’ll be plenty who will testify to Nicole’s ways- she’s assertive, pushy, and doesn’t take no for an answer. They will make that coercive control.
The feds are dirty and the prosecutors are the worst. Even with a jury- the jury selection and directions given by the judge are designed to deny Justice.
I don’t think prosecutors would humiliate themselves unless they have a slam dunk case. Is there a case where the prosecution actually “lost”???
McGinnis will be on special assignment for certain!
How can Aries possibly be called as a witness with these blatant lies uncovered? Seriously, are the prosecutors planning on actually calling her?
S.T.U.P.I.D. – I realized this of myself after the damage was done by the courts I trusted on blind faith/how I was raised.
Thanks for educating the public about the realities of our judicial system. Hope it wisens all of us up to the dangers of a punitive, vindictive system, where truth is of little value.
So, the fat chick who schedules 30 days of sex, was coerced into gaving sex? Ummmm. I don’t think so.
This fat, Twinkie smuggling dingbat is trying to get a check. Should be charged with extirtion.
Sounds like you think you could get away with raping her. Has this worked in the past for you?
J would not rape Ayries. She is not my type.
Twinkie has probably eaten too many Twinkies because they are so delicious, but unfortunately the cake eating has affected her figure, and she has a few extra pounds on her ribs. Twinkie can’t say that she could count her ribs because she was so emaciated. It is more likely that Twinkie always counted the fried ribs on her plate, which she may have always enjoyed eating.
Not the Daily Vitamins XD
We don’t hear what you have to say because you were paid by One Taste. You have no idea what is to come. The Feds only need one charge. Hell, the combs case is only 3 charges. That’s not unusual. Keep up the paid propaganda!!!
Getting paid makes some cents
So why do you do it?
Three thought crimes or actual crimes?
more like Thot crime
That ho over there
Your point (about Frank being paid) is not relevant.
Truth is, many of these ‘witnesses’ are money grubbers looking for a civil-suit payout. If that doesn’t destroy their credibility —- then their CRAZY and ILLOGICAL stories will certainly finish the job.
Ayries Blank and Mark Gottlieb (and every other witness in this case) have said so many things that defy common sense that they’ll all be absolutely destroyed on the witness stand.
Under cross examination, these witnesses will have their unholy motives laid bare for the world to see. It will be more of a crucifixion (figuratively speaking) than a cross examination. lol.
In fact… If the prosecutors actually have the BALLS to go to trial (with these clowns as witnesses) then I’d be shocked beyond belief.
Why? Because they’d be sabotaging their own careers by losing such a HIGH PROFILE case.
What future law firm is gonna hire ex-prosecutors who show such bad judgment in a HIGH PROFILE case?
Going to trial (with these witnesses) would be akin to putting Stephen Glass or Bozo-the-Clown on the witness stand.
Jurors will not sympathize with ‘weirdo’ witnesses who spin such bullshit stories that defy common sense.
IMO, these witnesses need mental help more than anything else.
Frank is on the right side of this case.
Special Agent Elliot McGinnis is the type of shoneen scum that England rightfully did their best to starve out of their own backyard. These lazy drunks have been responsible for countless police misconduct incidents in the USA for over a century and continue to serve only as a stain to an otherwise magnificent and honorable service.
Any time a travesty of justice is occurring it’s always a safe bet that an Irishman is to blame.
Nicole Daedone might be an intimidating Sicilian that towers over the masses like some ancient Roman Centurion, but there’s no proof that she ever committed any crime.
As for the potato longing McGinnis? There’s enough evidence to prove how bad Irish cops like him have haunted the United States far longer than anyone can remember.
*Typo: Ayries Blanck (not Blank). 🙂
I believe that it is possible to identify people by their full names if there is a legitimate interest in doing so. Especially when it is a matter of exposing doubts, contradictions or lies in civil or criminal proceedings that call into question the legality of the proceedings. The purpose of journalism is to inform the public about the work of the public prosecutor’s office and the courts, and to be a source of information for the public.
P-Diddy Party List Names:
1. Jay-Z
As both a friend and fellow music mogul, Jay-Z has been a regular guest at many of Diddy’s events, including the famous “White Party.”
2. Beyoncé
As Jay-Z’s wife and a superstar in her own right, Beyoncé has attended several of Diddy’s parties, particularly high-profile events like his New Year’s Eve celebrations.
3. Jennifer Lopez
Jennifer Lopez, who dated Diddy in the early 2000s, has frequently been seen at his parties even after their breakup. Their connection kept her on the guest list for years.
4. Kanye West
Kanye another heavyweight in the music industry, has been spotted at multiple Diddy-hosted events, including music industry celebrations and fashion-related parties.
5. Kim Kardashian
Kim has attended Diddy’s famous parties, including his annual birthday bashes and New Year’s Eve extravaganzas.
6. Naomi Campbell
The supermodel and longtime friend of Diddy is often present at his glamorous events, especially his exclusive yacht parties in St. Barts.
7. Mary J. Blige
As a close friend and collaborator with Diddy, Mary J. Blige has been a regular fixture at his parties over the years.
8. Leonardo DiCaprio
Leonardo, known for being a part of the Hollywood elite, has attended Diddy’s parties, particularly during high-profile events like Coachella and Cannes.
9. Usher
Usher, who has been close to Diddy since the start of his career, is a frequent attendee at his events, including his notorious birthday parties.
10. Rihanna
The superstar singer has attended several Diddy-hosted parties, particularly in New York and Los Angeles, where both have deep social connections.
11. Mariah Carey
Mariah, another longtime friend and collaborator, has been spotted at many of Diddy’s glamorous events, including New Year’s Eve and fashion industry parties.
12. Pharrell Williams
Pharrell has been a frequent attendee at Diddy’s parties, and the two have collaborated musically, solidifying their bond both professionally and socially.
13. Paris Hilton
Paris Hilton, a socialite known for being a fixture at high-profile events, has attended many of Diddy’s famous gatherings, including his iconic “White Party.”
14. Justin Bieber
Justin has attended Diddy’s parties, especially after becoming a global superstar. Diddy has acted as a mentor to Bieber in the past.
15. 50 Cent
Although they’ve had their share of public feuds, 50 Cent has attended some of Diddy’s most famous parties over the years, particularly during their early friendship.
16. Kendall and Kylie Jenner
The younger members of the Kardashian-Jenner clan have been spotted at Diddy’s extravagant parties, reflecting their place in Hollywood’s social elite.
17. Lil’ Kim
Lil’ Kim, another artist who was closely associated with Bad Boy Records and Diddy, has been a regular guest at his parties.
18. Drake
Drake has attended several of Diddy’s events, including high-profile music industry gatherings and celebrations.
19. Snoop Dogg
Snoop Dogg has been a regular presence at Diddy’s parties, from Hollywood events to hip-hop industry celebrations.
20. Alicia Keys
The singer-songwriter has been spotted at many of Diddy’s elite gatherings, including his famous pre-Grammy parties.
21. Serena Williams
The tennis superstar has attended Diddy’s lavish events, from industry parties to celebrity yacht gatherings.
22. David Beckham
As a close friend of Diddy, David Beckham has been a guest at numerous Diddy parties, particularly in Los Angeles and during major sporting events.
23. Victoria Beckham
Victoria Beckham, a fashion icon and wife of David Beckham, is often seen attending Diddy’s fashion-forward and exclusive events.
24. Will Smith
Will Smith has been spotted at multiple parties hosted by Diddy, particularly during high-profile Hollywood gatherings and award season events.
25. Jada Pinkett Smith
Along with her husband, Jada Pinkett Smith has attended Diddy’s parties, especially events surrounding Hollywood or social justice causes.
An example of good form would be avoiding towel contact with the
anus during the towel stroke
Hey that is correct!
Awesome artwork!
It will definitely make the judge more sympathetic to OneTaste when the prosecutors show it. They will be found not-guilty for sure!
Ayries is a fat pig
She’s a skinny bean pole compared to the lard ass Richard “Butt Boy” Luthmann. Even OneTaste wouldn’t take his money… that’s how creepy his vibe is.
Richard, are you gonna take that?
First, Theo trash talking you, now Ayries?
Hey Frank, GAL Lisa Kouzoujian in Stamford is caught on tape saying she encouraged her non-Jewish neighbors in Stamford not to sell their homes to Jews. She is also on tape telling a father that the supervisor for supervised visits will “help out” and “redirect” during supervised visit of an autistic child, and during same visit while the supervisor was watching the autistic kid and the father was playing with the other kid, the autistic kid ran off. Kouzoujian and opposing counsel in front of the judge acted like nobody told the father that the supervisor was there to “help out” and acted surprised that the supervisor did what the GAL told him to. The GAL had a duty to disclose she told the father the supervisor was there to “help out” and instead let the judge yell and blame the father.
Also this same GAL while observing the father having dinner with his kids at a diner got upset and refused to pay $4 for extra gravy she ordered. She ended up leaving the diner and in a loud voice several times announced she wasn’t leaving a tip, all the while she was there making $400 an hour for watching the dad have dinner with his kids.
How come you used Ayries’ name. That is illegal. She is supposed to be anonymous.
Anonymous is posting about Anonymous who is posting that Frank Report should be identifying Ayries Blanck as Anonymous
Yeah she’s a victim you’re not legally allowed to publish her name. You may have ruined the whole prosecution by revealing her name. A.B. does not deserve this.
I hope she sues you for publishing her name.
Survey says False!
Onetaste: the company that taught courses on how to navigate the clit in 15 minute partnered stroking sessions called Orgasmic Meditation, and where employees like Ares Milligan turned out to be violent compulsive liars.
Areeze Multigunn