New Haven, CT: Paul A. Boyne, 62, of Springfield, Virginia, faces 18 felony cyberstalking charges for alleged online threats targeting three Connecticut judges.
After spending 90 days in a Fairfax County, Virginia jail, Connecticut extradited Boyne on October 19.
Boyne appeared in New Haven Superior Court on October 20, where Justice Eugene R. Calistro issued protective orders prohibiting him from contacting the three judges. With a bond of $750,000, Boyne remains in custody, awaiting his next court date on November 1.
Boyne, who fought extradition from Virginia, said he feared prosecution in Connecticut.
“If I go to Connecticut, you’ll never see me again,” Boyne said. “They’re going to throw me in a hole in the basement of the oldest prison in Connecticut. And the trial might be sometime in the next ten years. And they won’t let me out, and they’re just going to punish me, because it’s a whole bunch of Jews running the entire thing.”
The charges against Boyne stem from a multi-year investigation by Connecticut State Police alleging he operated the contentious blog “The Family Court Circus” from his Virginia home. From late 2017 until Boyne’s arrest in July 2023, the blog, which is currently offline, regularly posted derogatory and sometimes threatening language aimed at exposing the injustices of Connecticut family court.
The charges are based on sworn complaints by three Connecticut Superior Court judges, including Judge Jane Grossman.
Boyne detailed in an article entitled “Judge Grotesque” how someone might shoot Grossman through the windows of her home by hiding in the woods behind her house.
Responding to these allegations, Judge Grossman told investigators that Boyne’s website “changed the way she thinks about work and home.”
Connecticut charged Boyne with violating sections 53a-181 c 4 and 53a-181 [f] of the Connecticut Penal Code. These sections are typically misdemeanors, but can be elevated to felonies if they involve racist, anti-Semitic, or other prejudicial language.
In a statement to Frank Report (FR), Boyne said, “They charged me because, obviously, Judge Jane Grossman doesn’t like reading about herself on the blog.”
For the state to convict Boyne of felony stalking, the prosecution must prove that he knowingly engaged in conduct that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their physical safety or the safety of a loved one. Furthermore, to establish a felony, the prosecution must prove that Boyne did so with no purpose other than harassing, terrorizing, or alarming individuals based on race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
According to Boyne, the charges are under new hate crime statutes introduced by the Connecticut legislature in 2021.
He told FR, “They’re part of the Connecticut hate speech packages, which is authored by the Jews.”
Despite the severity of the charges, Connecticut authorities have not claimed Boyne’s writings resulted in actual violence against the targeted judges.
Boyne said, “They’re all whining and complaining that the blog says terrible things, and they all say the blog threatens to kill them all.”
The Boyne case comes in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Counterman v. Colorado, which clarified the definition of a “true threat” and set a precedent that could potentially influence the outcome of Boyne’s trial.
Boyne’s animosity towards the Connecticut family court system reportedly originated from a contentious divorce battle with his ex-wife, Heather P. Boyne, in 2007.
A former Naval officer, forensic expert on nuclear submarines, and an electrical engineer, Boyne lost custody of his four children after a 16-year marriage when Judge Gerard Adelman granted his wife sole custody, allowing Boyne visitation at his wife’s sole discretion.
Effectively terminating his parental rights, Judge Adelman would order Boyne pay more in alimony and child support than he earned.
Adelman invoked a provision in Conneciitcut law that allows a family court judge to arbitrarily calculate what a party might earn and base support payments on that.
Boyne was unemployed at the time of his divorce. In the three years prior, his annual income averaged $41,000. Adelman decided Boyne could potentially earn $100,000 – and set both child support and alimony based on that figure, which was two and half times his three year earnings average annual income.
The judge also ordered Boyne to transfer the bank accounts he had worked for and saved for his children’s education to their mother – with him having no more input into his children’s education.
As part of the divorce settlement, Adelman ordered Boyne to secure a bond to guarantee payment of the alimony and child support, and a $500,000 life insurance policy with Heather named the beneficiary.
These obligations, which Boyne could not meet, cost more than 100 percent of his average annual income. The bond alone cost $41,000, on top of his alimony and child support.
His wife alienated his four children and moved to New York, leaving Boyne financially and emotionally devastated. Boyne has not seen his children in over a decade. He moved to Virginia to live with his elderly parents.
Paul Boyne with his daughter before CT family court terminated his parental rights.
Boyne maintains that his online activities merely express critical commentary against “the most evil court in the land and the monsters who control it.”
He called the Connecticut Family Court, “A Jewish enterprise designed to destroy the rights of a sovereign people.”
After his divorce, Boyne spent 11 years fighting the custody and support orders unsuccessfully.
Then he began the Family Court Circus in November 2017.
Boyne said, “It’s a totally Jewish game. They’re punishing me for [exposing] my experience in family court, where every judge that ever hammered me and kept me away from my kids was a Jew.”
He reserved harsh words for Adelman, referring to him as “Adelshit” and “the Dark Lord.”
He posted statements such as:
“Judge Gerard Adelman gets a .50 cal to the head.”
“Adelman proves beyond a reasonable doubt, Jews of Connecticut hijack courts, rule from the Talmud, victimize children in worship of their money god. He begs a patriot’s .50 cal to the head.”
Adelman told investigators, “I have serious concerns about this blog as it repeatedly calls for someone to kill me. Almost every entry speaks about a .50 caliber bullet to my head.”
Two former judges, Thomas Moukawsher and Eric Coleman, are believed to have filed complaints against Boyne.
One Family Court Circus post targeted Coleman:
“Only the Second Amendment remains for the sovereign people to protect the children. There lies the constitutional case for the assassination of Judge Eric Colemen. A .50 cal to the head, a .308 sniper shot from the grassy knoll through two panes of window glass, complete and rapid discharge of a high capacity magazine in a dark alley. Burn the courthouse to the ground, bring body bags.”
Coleman told investigators:
“I do not know what the author of the article or the administrator of the website is capable of… and who among that audience may be inspired to act on the suggestion to harm or kill me.”
Another post targeted now-retired Judge Thomas Moukawsher, his picture superimposed in a crosshair.
It is JUST CAUSE when Mouk gets a .50 cal to the head.”
A photo of Judge Moukawsher has the caption, “Given the domestic terrorism, several bullets needed.”
Boyne said he never made contact with any of the judges. He likened his internet postings to a bulletin board on his front lawn. No one is forced to drive by his home – neither does he force any judge to visit his website and feel threatened.
“There is some serious concern about these charges among people who actually can count to First Amendment,” Boyne said.
New Haven State’s Attorney John P. Doyle, Jr. is prosecuting the case. Unlike in family court, where a judge has full authority, Doyle will have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Boyne’s writings are not protected speech before an unanimous jury of between six and 12 Connecticut residents to win a conviction.
During jury selection, Boyne will likely seek to exclude Jewish jurors, while Doyle will likely try to keep parents who have experienced family court off the panel.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
AG Tong would now investigate Connecticut AFCC, Inc.
AG Tong was on the state judiciary committee. Unfortunately, he probably knows what Connecticut AFCC, Inc. did to families in the state’s family courts — and he probably knows a lot more than just that.
What a tangled web some wove.
“From the River to the Sea” threatens the entire State of Israel and all living there.
https://www.pressreader.com/usa/hartford-courant/20231118/281496461018871
In light of Paul Boyne’s case, who sees a palate cleanser?
Who sees an instigator?
“… To be convicted of felony stalking, he must be proven to have ‘knowingly’ engaged in conduct that would cause a ‘reasonable’ person to fear for his physical safety or the safety of a loved one … with no legitimate purpose other than harassing, terrorizing or alarming on the basis of ‘race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.’ …”
“Most of the millions who perished at the hands of Stalin, Mao Tse-tung, Pol Pot and the other communist dictators died because the party’s leaders believed they belonged to a dangerous or subversive social class or political grouping.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rubinstein
https://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/anthony-j-zingales-1529140
I hope Kirschbaum Law Group gives Attorney Zingales the case.
I also hope the 40 years of Connecticut AFCC, Inc.’s Kids for Cash racketeering is thoroughly investigated and sent to the “rarely used – – very rarely used” grand juries.
Everyone who knows how Connecticut family courts operate knows the purposely adversarial management of dangerous child custody cases for profit has endangered public safety since the 1970s.
Most everyone who reads the news about Connecticut has heard about the Dulos case and can probably think of hundreds of ways the Dulos case should have been managed to protect that family — and everyone else who was eventually dragged into that nightmare.
Was the evaluator in the Dulos case who decided Mr. Dulos wasn’t a danger ever held accountable for his bogus diagnosis? Of course not. If he ever is, that would be a first.
Have Connecticut family courts continued to endanger public safety since the Dulos case?
How many parents, children, state and local police officers have lost their lives as a direct result of Connecticut’s for-profit purposely adversarial “family courts”? What office has bothered to count the victims?
Connecticut’s must have noticed something which prompted the overhaul of the family court processes with the new Pathways process.
If the new Pathways process is finally an admission that there’s been a problem with the way state family courts have operated in the past, when will all the victims of family courts since the 1970s receive compensation for all the harm done?
The new Pathways process limits opportunities for attorneys and vendors to exploit children and families. Limits placed on horrific for-profit purposely adversarial practices will serve to prevent future harm. So, who’s going to do what about the harm that’s already been done to children and families?
ARTICLE I, SECTION 9, CLAUSE 2 says:
“The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”
Why is Paul Boyne still in jail? Why isn’t the Kirschbaum Law firm holding press conferences about the crimes and corruption Paul Boyne investigated and exposed?
Attorney Zingales practices family law, criminal defense and habeas corpus law. He knows about the problems with for-profit “family law” practices. He knows about crimes committed in family courts. He knows about ARTICLE I, SECTION 9, CLAUSE 2.
Did the Kirschbaum Law firm give him the case?
How many lawyers at the Kirschbaum Law Firm think: To protect the most people in the state with public safety, the safest approach to the Boyne case is to allow Paul to share with the public what he knows about the for-profit purposely adversarial management of dangerous child custody cases which have endangered public safety since the 1970s.
Will the Kirschbaum Law firm allow Paul to tell the world why he wrote what he wrote?
https://thedesk.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2023-11-15-Slade-Sohmer-probable-cause-report.pdf
https://medium.com/@melatakiros/dear-us-law-firms-77ec63e838af
The court docket shows he has a pre trial hearing today.
The next date scheduled is 12/20/23 … and nothing’s in headline news? 🤔
https://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/parm1.aspx
“… the importance of the speech to the public interest wasn’t considered …”
https://insideinvestigator.org/supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-in-reporter-shield-law-case/
Does the Public Defender representing Paul Boyne know how and why The Public Defender’s Office started offering the mandatory GAL/AMC training instead of the CSSD offices?
For-profit public-private purposely adversarial Connecticut AFCC, Inc. networks of the same judges, attorneys, GALs and evaluators etc. had been monopolizing the worst, most dangerous child custody cases for years. They passed billable hours to and from each other for profit with judicial authority and judicial immunity. Those are federal crimes.
Someone somewhere decided to transfer the GAL/AMC training from the judicial branch Court Support Services Division (CSSD) offices to the Public Defender’s Office. Stephen Grant and Joseph DiTunno had set up the CT AFCC, Inc. public-private networks out of CSSD offices decades ago. HHS grants were managed out of those CSSD offices.
Who in the Public Defender’s office or the AG office should prompt a federal investigation into the crimes committed in Paul’s “family court” case? Who will research Pauls’s complaint regarding Kingberg Family Services? Did Klingberg Center provide “therapy” and visitation without a licensed therapist using HHS funds? What about Sidney Horowitz providing his “services” without a state contract? And what about former judge Lynda Munro authorizing twice the state rate to pay Dr. Horowitz for his services?
The State AG office should care as much as the Public Defender’s office about the gross lack of accountability for the crimes committed in Paul’s case which fueled his frustration.
The Public Defender’s office and the state AG office must consider the need for freedom of speech as much as the need for justice and accountability for the harm done to Paul. If Paul tried to help victims of Connecticut family courts with what looks like the most vile kind of attention-seeking — will it work?
If the Public Defender and AG offices continue to ignore the Kids for Cash racketeering in Connecticut family courts — if they allow those federal crimes to go unnoticed and to continue without oversight and accountability — that would be far more vile than Paul’s extremely vile blog.
If the Public Defender and AG offices allow the CT AFCC, Inc. network’s federal crimes to have been committed and continue without oversight and accountability: That will result in far more harm than the harm the three judges claim.
https://portal.ct.gov/OCPD/GAL-AMC-Announcements/2022-GALAMC-Training/GAL–AMC-Training-Registration
If The Kirschbaum Law Group is letting Attorney Zingales represent Paul Boyne:
The Kirschbaum Law Group and Attorney Zingales could easily make history in Connecticut — and save the world while they’re at it. ♥️
“.. released from Orange County Jail on $5,000 bond and has entered a plea of not guilty.”
https://nypost.com/2023/11/07/news/connecticut-man-arrested-for-filming-boy-in-disney-resort-bathroom/
Have any Hartford Courant reporters asked Paul Boyne about his motivations?
Isn’t “the motive” what most reporters ask and report for stories like that? Wouldn’t most readers of The Hartford Courant want to know why Paul wrote what he wrote?
It looks like Paul wanted his blog to draw attention to the injustice of Ted Taupier’s arrest and the continued blatant Kids for Cash racketeering in Connecticut family courts. Can The Hartford Courant reporter report that?
Why were there no charges against Paul until three judges complained?
Which three judges complained?
Meanwhile, how many actual victims of that judge — and the other two judges — have actually been harmed by the actual blatant for-profit racketeering in Connecticut family courts?
https://www.pressreader.com/usa/hartford-courant/20231021/281556590502552
Oh Ok so I guess when someone is arrested for burglary the newspaper should interview the burglar and ask for the reasoning behind why they did it? After all, maybe they broke in and stole stuff just to prove a point that the house was not secure enough.
Get real.
And either you didn’t read about any of the crimes the vendors committed in Paul’s case or you’re somehow part of the problem.
“… The letter goes on to make 14 specific requests for information from 23andMe, with a November 13 response deadline. The requests include the number of people affected by the breach, including Connecticut residents; the types of information compromised and whether it was exposed online; whether the company will officially notify affected Connecticut residents of the breach; a timeline of the data breach; any current or developing “plan, policies, and/or procedures” to prevent a future breach; and more. …”
“whether the company will officially notify affected Connecticut residents of the breach”?
23andMe hasn’t already officially notified affected Connecticut residents of the breach?
False dichotomy
After Paul Boyne went through the right channels to notify the state of Connecticut about the crimes committed in his case, state and federal employees ignored his complaints.
Did Paul start his controversial blog to share information with the public about the corruption in family courts to prompt state and federal investigations?
Did his extreme approach work?
While we wait to find out how Connecticut will manage his case, here’s another approach:
“… Submit a Hotline Complaint
OIG Hotline Operations accepts tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ programs. Every report we receive is important, however, not every submission results in an investigation. Due to the high volume of complaints we receive, it is not possible to contact every complainant. However, Hotline tips are incredibly valuable, and we appreciate your efforts to help us stamp out fraud, waste, and abuse. ..”
https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/
The New Haven AG Office must ask Paul Boyne about his experiences as a victim of “family court” racketeering in Connecticut.
registered complaint regarding the Klingberg Clinic “supervised visits” — which were provided via HHS funds.
Paul noticed the “therapist” at the Klingberg Clinic wasn’t licensed to provide the “therapy” she was said to deliver in the Boyne v Boyne case.
Is the “K-Assist”case is the SAME kind of case? “… Vanessa Roberts Avery, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, and William Tong, Connecticut Attorney General, today announced that KELLY STUTZMAN (“Stutzman”), and her business, K-ASSIST, LLC (“K-Assist”), entered into a civil settlement agreement with the federal and state governments and paid more than $234,000 to resolve allegations that they violated the federal and state False Claims Acts. …”
Emphasis added:
“… The Government alleged in its civil investigation that Stutzman and K-Assist submitted fraudulent claims to Medicaid for psychotherapy services.
Stutzman and K-Assist falsely represented that a licensed provider had rendered the services when, in fact, an unlicensed individual rendered the services.
To resolve the allegations under the federal and state False Claims Acts, Stutzman and K-Assist agreed to pay $234,064.89 in order to reimburse the Medicaid program for conduct occurring from February 1, 2018 through August 1, 2019. …”
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/connecticut-behavioral-health-clinician-group-pays-234k-settle-false-claims-allegations
For Paul — and for all without political connections in Connecticut — how long will life be all about “not what you know, but who you know”?
If Paul Boyne hasn’t tried that approach yet, would Connecticut courts allow him to file the allegations against The Klingberg Clinic under the federal and state False Claims Acts?
AG Offices must note:
What will and what won’t
AG Tong’s offices note?
Boyne isn’t as scary as Arthur. Boyne was hypothetically thinking on a social media platform, while Arthur seems to have more experience in actual murder
The bond amount is $750,000.
November 1. Hopefully there are folks attending the hearing. Paul Boyne has tons of information on family court and Connecticut curruption. We need reporters to do their job.
Where is the information about the hearing?
85 churches seized, 222 illegally re-registered in Ukraine since Constantinople’s unification council
https://orthochristian.com/121965.html
“… The population of Gaza depends on groundwater as the only source for drinking, agricultural use, and domestic supply. The nearest stream is Wadi Ghazza to the south, sourced from Abu Middein along the coastline. It bears a small amount of water during the winter and virtually no water during the summer.
Most of its water supply is diverted into Israel. …” 🤔
Writing is critical for social change and no injustice will be hidden as long as writers are free to write.
Look at this first amendment case in CT
https://www.courant.com/2023/10/30/a-ct-man-got-a-court-to-silence-his-social-media-star-wife-she-says-it-will-cost-her-millions/
… Hillary Sanchez explained what is at stake during an August hearing in Superior Court, at which Nate Sanchez succeeded, over his wife’s objections, in obtaining the restraining order that blocks her from talking about him or their marriage on social media.
“I have, in my hand, and you can review it … a two-million-dollar contract with a national syndicated talk show and a reality show that has been executed,” Hillary Sanchez told the court. “I got approached by the production company. I signed this deal. Our social media posts have reached over 22.5 billion views. We are social media people.”
“People are interested in us,” she said. “I’m 48. He’s 22. We were married. They are interested in how the demographics of this marriage happen, what is going on, was I his sugar mamma, was he a sugar baby. There are all types of questions in the public.
The limited legal filings in the case so far indicate that the Connecticut Supreme Court was unaware of what is behind the online interest in the Sanchez marriage when Chief Justice Richard Robinson agreed on Oct. 18 to take the case …
… Several lawyers have said the case presents a serious First Amendment question. …”
Would this toolBag be in prison if the FrankReport hadn’t posted his musings…..
I doubt it….🤣
… the death toll among Palestinians has passed 8,000 — mostly women and minors. It’s a toll without precedent in decades of Israeli-Palestinian violence, and it is expected to climb even more rapidly as Israel presses its ground offensive. Over 1,400 people have died on the Israeli side, mainly civilians killed during the initial Hamas onslaught. …
Is “the initial Hamas onslaught” to be known as a logical reason to start World War III?
Who knew about the planning of the attack and when did they know about it?
Which unelected bureaucrats organized and funded “Hamas”?
… Associated Press
October 30, 2023 | 8:00 AM
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians remain in the north and would no longer be able to escape if the north-south highway is blocked. Around 117,000 displaced people are staying in hospitals in northern Gaza, alongside thousands of patients and staff, hoping they will be safe from strikes, according to U.N. figures. …
The same thing happens in “family courts”.
It’s been going on thousands of years……
They deserve one another
… There is plenty of evidence to prove that the newly formed British Government, under Churchill, was ordered to take this unjust action against all prominent and influential people in Britain who had voiced their opinion that “International Jewry” had promoted the war between Britain and Germany.
Just before the wholesale arrests were made, Mrs Nicholson, the wife of Admiral Nicholson, another very distinguished British Naval Officer, had been arrested as a result of a “Smear” campaign. She had stated publicly she thought the plot to involve Britain in war with Germany was the work of the International Jewish Bankers.
Four charges were actually ‘framed’ against Mrs. Nicholson. She was tried by a judge and jury. She was acquitted on all counts. This action on the part of the judge and jury did not suit those who were detex\mined to persecute people who objected to the International Bankers in Britain, France, and America running the affairs of the nation, so as to inveigle them into another Global War. So the antiquated Regulation 18 -B was used to put them out of the way. The Phony War became a fighting war. The British and German Empires weakened, as those who started the wars strengthened their positions. …
https://archive.org/details/foia_Carr_William_Guy-Pawns_in_Game-HQ-1/page/n176/mode/1up?view=theater
Pick a fight your bound to get a black eye…..
Hate begets hate. ….
An eye for an eye and we’ll go blind…
In land the blind the one eye man is king…..
Has anyone reviewed any of the grant requests by these GALs ? They must achieve what their goals are according to their grants. I just wonder if this is even a thing? I’m confused, are CT citizens under mafia rules as well?
What is a gal grant request? Please explain. Thanks
We are under the control of a state government driven by federal funding. Gender apartheid. Legislation favoring father’s rights over mothers. Over the best interest of children. We are subject to a judicial system run by state political leaders who have a financial investment through pay increase, benefits and retirement. More recruitment more funds. Balancing the budget. We are subject to groups balancing the legal system through funding attached to legislation. Evidence and following eithics doesn’t matter. Blanket immunity. The attorneys placing and keeping judges on the bench. Legislation, senitors and heads of committees acting according to finding. Silencing whistle blowers with incarceration, inability to financially care for ones self and even death. Inhumane conditions if you don’t get or stay married for the financial best interest of the country.
… Secretary Blinken’s stepfather was a close confidant and lawyer for Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, Robert Maxwell, who mysteriously fell to his death off theLady Ghislaine in 1991. Pisar is reportedly one of the last people to have spoken to Maxwell before his death, according to The New York Times:
From 1994 to 2001, Secretary Blinken served on the National Security Council staff. Leah Pisar, his stepsister, also served on the National Security Council staff during the Clinton administration. She also worked for the State Department, the U.S. Embassy in Paris, France, and was a communications director for President Clinton. …
“OSA Renamed Vera and Donald Blinken Open Society Archives … OSA is the official archive of the Open Society Foundations …”
https://www.ceu.edu/article/2015-11-05/osa-renamed-vera-and-donald-blinken-open-society-archives
“… This Frontline documentary was scheduled to be broadcast on PBS stations across the United States on May 14, 2019, but it was pulled at the last minute. The BBC, the co-producer, aired it in Britain.
We feel that Americans, whose tax dollars fund PBS, also have the right to see it in a timely fashion. Since the US gives Israel over $10 million per day, it is particularly important for American citizens to be fully informed about Israel’s actions.
Frontline is the top in-depth news broadcast in the US: In an average week, more than 4.6 million people watch it. After numerous people complained about the cancellation, Frontline issued a statement saying it will broadcast the documentary sometime in the coming moths. It is not currently on its schedule. …”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hx5EgoVpmZav/
“Furthermore, to establish a felony, the prosecution must prove that Boyne did so with no purpose other than harassing, terrorizing, or alarming individuals based on race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.”
I’m not an attorney so maybe someone could clarify… BOYNE’s writing was purposeful. It was done to expose actions of corruption family court rulings and decisions that violate due process and constitutional protections. He had a purpose – it wasn’t solely to harass individuals. It was to call the public’s attention to their actions and expose what they get away with in the secrecy of family court— a place where phones are checked to prevent recordings. Why do secret?
What’s there to hide that people can’t record? Is it to secure more money to the state to order transcripts? Or is it to control the narrative? Because it’s been proven that the courts doctor the transcripts as needed.
That’s why CT court stenographers no longer have licenses so there’s no accountability when they edit the transcripts based on criminal cover ups.
CT is a vile place.
CT court stenographers no longer have licenses? 🤔
That’s a whole other scam/ they demand cash payments for transcripts yet are paid by the state to transcribe! Go figure 26k later in transcripts
Taxpayers pay stenographers to transcribe digital audio? Can’t AI do that, yet?
Why not have software transcribe, then anyone can check for errors, right?
While Boyne blamed Jewish judges, he applied the term “Jewish” liberally- to anyone who participated in the family court cabal- those who acted against fundamental rights and severed parental bonds with children.
He used racist terms against virtually every race. This made reading difficult, and detracted from his articles, but the legal points made by Boyne were valid.
This is why people rad his blog.
In terms of a jury and eliminating Jewish people, Boyne has been equally offensive to gays, African Americans, Hispanics, Latinos, Chinese etc.
No one escaped inflammatory language.
But Chris Ambrose gets to call his adopted children beaners and the judges and dcf are cool with that.
I think the main way to determine if Boyne is a threat is to physically weigh and measure him. If he is a short, scrawny guy, let him go. Everyone at the FR knows people of small stature are 100% harmless.
“ Judge Adelman would order Boyne pay more in alimony and child support than he earned.”
Oh please. It’s plain as day that Boyne was lying about his income. And it looks like he’d rather hide in his parent’s basement and stay unemployed than actually provide any support for his four children (probably just to spite his ex wife). The man is evil.
Have you ever met him?
Have you ever met me?
huh?
Adelman put Boyne in contempt immediately with his fictitious ruling that he has the potential to earn a certain wage. Maybe Adelman should leave the bench and go earn x2.5 his wages back practicing law. why else is he a judge. He probably couldn’t cut it! gross man never practiced. She just had bad Malloy annoint her from good connections through her marriage to get a judgeship! almost lost this past time around if she did not delivery the $$$ to her friends!
“Adelman put Boyne in contempt immediately with his fictitious ruling that he has the potential to earn a certain wage.”
Gerard Adelman and Sidney Horowitz have been friends for decades.
Paul filed a complaint against Mr. Horowitz. Mr. Adelman probably did his friend a favor.
He will never get an impartial jury. They have him in New Haven- the armpit of corruption and collusion.
They’ll set it all up. They’ll control the jury pool. Bo doubt.
Boyne knows their game and tactics. He called them out on their corruption.
It’s unfortunate he felt the need to push the legal limits of the first amendment but understand he’s seen our constitutional and God given rights obliterated by family court.
Praying for a jury of 12 who can keep their minds open.
His intent was not to harass but to expose corruption and the violation of parent and child rights.
He identified how cops are being used to enforce civil orders which also violates parent and child rights.
The public needs to be concerned. The government corruption in CT is indicative of the unchecked powers of our federal government.
They’re stealing our children, stealing our money, destroying our families and blaming victims.
The 2021 law was designed with Paul Boyne as the target.
The state creates laws to take down one man and protect the family court cartel.
Which 2021 law?
Senate bill 989 21-56 I believe
It probably wasn’t targeting complaints about corruption in the Connecticut family courts as much as it was part of the general crackdown on free speech in the past few years.
The original bill: “… race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of such other person” … meant you would no longer be allowed to question Anheuser-Busch Companies LLC’s promotion of men dressed as women.
Remember that commotion? You better remember and you better remember from now on or suffer the consequences. That’s now the law in Connecticut, “The Constitution State”. 😜
https://legiscan.com/CT/text/SB00989/id/2321591
… “This isn’t 1984, but 2023 — I should never have been arrested or investigated simply for the thoughts I held in my own mind,” Vaughan-Spruce said, alluding to George Orwell’s dystopian novel. “Silent prayer is never criminal,” she said …
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/255453/woman-arrested-for-silent-prayer-at-uk-abortion-clinics-gets-police-apology
His blog looks like a product of a frustrated man who is afraid to mention the actual criminal groups running the criminal networks in family courts.
That group — whoever they are — are a protected class in Connecticut. They ran the racketeering in his family court case and thousands of other cases. Maybe tens of thousands. We have no idea because no one dares to investigate or discuss in public what those private international criminal groups have done in Connecticut state government.
https://archive.org/details/MackeyAGEncylopediaOfFreemasonryVols121914_201705/Mackey%20A%20G%20-%20The%20Symbolism%20Of%20Freemasonry%20-%201882/page/7/mode/2up
Jewish people don’t think the same thoughts. They don’t share the same goals.
Meanwhile, Freemasonry’s stated goal is to be an international religious enterprise. It references Jewish culture, history and tradition — just as it references Christian and Muslim culture history and tradition in its process of destroying all three world religions.
Freemasonry (not Judaism) was “designed to destroy the rights of a sovereign people” to create their “New World Order” so they can control the entire world. That’s not a secret.
Destroying families in for-profit, purposely adversarial “family courts” with no oversight and no accountability clearly serves their agenda to weaken all sovereign nations.
Freemasons swear oaths to cover for each other’s crimes. It looks like that’s the problem in the Boyne case. Sidney Horowitz and Gerard Adelman are old friends. They have many friends and acquaintances in New Haven, where the Boyne case is being processed.
The New Haven AG office probably knows who started Connecticut AFCC, Inc., who organized it and who ran it since 1982. They probably know what Sidney Horowitz did in the Boone case. It will be a shame if they allow the scapegoat in of Jewish people to cover for the crimes of Sidney Horowitz and Gerard Adelman.
Are We the People allowed to know who involved in the Boyne case is a Freemason and who isn’t?
How many Freemasons and other private criminal groups are totally fine with not admitting their crimes at the expense of those who follow and practice the actual Jewish religion?
How many Jews, Christians and Muslims throughout history have been sacrificed as scapegoats to cover for the crimes of Freemasons and other international criminal groups?
Freemasons divide people and start conflicts on purpose. “Family courts” do that, too.
They started the Mormons to divide Christians. They started the KKK to divide America by color. Who thinks inner cities are such nightmares by chance? Who produces and markets multi-million dollar “gangsta rap”? Who ships in the drugs and who coordinates it?
Freemasons started The Red Shirts to divide Democrats from Republicans. Their Hegelian dialectic and secret handshakes moved us like cattle on their global chessboard. We go along to get along and march lockstep toward WWIII. WWIII is violent already.
Paul didn’t go along to get along.
It will be interesting to hear what he has to say. When will he be allowed to speak freely?
I see, “Julia Donovan” has finally outted “herself” as the ugly anti-semite she is.
Oh? Do you care enough to explain your comment?
Dear Anonymous,
The small groups of people keeping secrets, starting wars, destroying families and dividing the people of this world to conquer us are probably more fascist than Semitic.
Are you feeling the squeeze, yet?
Patriot God, ummm, I mean Paul Boyle is a piece of shit.
Legally, he should walk under Counterman v. Colorado.
Morally, his anti-Semitism is unforgivable.
Practically, I have my doubts he’ll ever walk out of Connecticut prison. I think the plan is already in action that he’s carried out.
He cannot be charged for being racist. This is Protected Speech.
I believe it is the “bullet to the head” stuff that is being considered threatening/illegal.
Not really where the line is.
It looks like from now on, there will be no line.
“… Parliament has been formally prorogued by a king for the first time in more than 70 years, … The last time Parliament was prorogued by a king was by the late Queen’s father in 1951.
Elected members, led by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle filed out of the Commons after their attendance in the upper chamber was requested by Black Rod Sarah Clarke, a senior Lords officer tasked with overseeing the proceedings. …”
Oh, hey. Didn’t the same thing just happen in America? Weird. Right?
Remember that time when America was left without a Speaker of the House for three weeks? That lack of a House Speaker paralyzed America at a crucial time in world history.
So, the British “Privy Council” had a say in what just happened in The United Kingdom.
Aaand … Lord Mark Malloch Brown is on the Privy Council … aaand … Lord Mark Malloch Brown knows a lot about elections.
The speech therapists were right — if The British Privy Council still allows us to write those kinds of things.
For those who have never heard of Lord Mark Malloch Brown: he’s the guy in charge of Africa, now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Malloch_Brown
A man driven to madness by family court. The divorce appears unfair. I wonder what the children had to say about Boyne? Sad. Many of Connecticut family court cases are sad.
… Commenting on the targeting of Abu Artema’s family, Neta Golan, a co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) and Return Solidarity, said: “In the weeks leading up to the attack, Ahmed had used his voice to call for global protests to stop Israel’s genocide and criminal bombing campaign of the Gaza Strip.
“It was Ahmed’s words in 2018 that inspired thousands of Gazans to march unarmed towards the fence besieging the Gaza ghetto, to demand their right to return to the lands from which they’d been expelled. …
“My Children Are Too Young to Know War So Well … In the past, when Israel attacked Gaza, my little son Abdul Rahman would run into my arms screaming in terror when he heard bombs falling. I always tried to make the cruel reality easier on him by saying, “Look, son, these bombs are far away and fall in the sea not near us, so whenever you hear them again, I want you to jump high in the air, laugh, and shout ‘Hey!’” I do believe that if we cannot change the harsh reality, we can instead secure our minds as a means of facing it. …”
“… The Israeli occupation forces killed Ahmed’s family because Israel feared the power of his words. …”
… Jewish Voice for Peace and their allies who shut down the main terminal of Grand Central Station during rush hour Friday in one of New York’s largest acts of civil disobedience in 20 years to demand a ceasefire in Gaza. The multiracial, intergenerational movement says about 400 people were arrested, including rabbis, famous actors and elected officials from the New York State Assembly and Senate and the City Council. …
More like children protected from a madman by family court.
That would be a simple version. Easy for most readers to understand. Right?
Why try to sway them in that direction?
Here’s one tiny bit of information about the more complicated version of what happened:
“… In April 2013, the Connecticut Commission on Judicial Ethics issued an informal opinion stating that it would be a violation of judicial canon for court officers and their staff to serve on the board of directors of nonprofit organizations that provide services to court-involved clients who appear before them and receive the majority of their funding from contracts with the Judicial Branch. …”
Do you happen to know about any of that?
Emphasis added for those who don’t have time to read:
“… In April 2013, the Connecticut Commission on Judicial Ethics issued an informal opinion stating that it would be a violation of judicial canon for court officers and their staff to serve on the board of directors of nonprofit organizations that provide services to court-involved clients who appear before them and receive the majority of their funding from contracts with the Judicial Branch.
The Connecticut Secretary of State’s office has confirmed that at least one such business was not properly registered and may face sanctions.
Paul Boyne, a Connecticut father of four, says the CJE’s ruling comes too late for his children, who he says have not been allowed to visit him in years.
Boyne says that since his divorce case opened in 2007, the custody case has remained open due to the fact that the judges who currently serve as corporate directors for the vendor refuse to establish a custody or visitation schedule.
These same judges have ordered his family to patronize various vendor affiliated services from Dr. Sidney Horowitz, who does not have a State contract to provide therapeutic services on behalf of the Judicial Branch.
Court transcripts show that in July 2012, Judge Holly Abery Wetstone recused herself from hearing the Boyne matter, then authorized payments from the Judicial Branch to an unnamed vendor, despite the fact that there were no motions for fees pending before her to rule on at that time.
Judicial Branch billing records are kept separately from the court case filed in the Court’s administrative offices, and parties who wish to see the invoices submitted by professionals appointed to their cases are required to request them under the State’s open records laws.
The heavily redacted records Boyne obtained from the Judicial Branch show that Horowitz had billed over $4,200 to the state on the Boyne case, however, Boyne and his ex-wife’s attorney confirm that Horowitz did not provide them with copies, nor did the Judicial Branch seek their approval for the charges Horowitz submitted.
Boyne says that Horowitz failed to provide all the services and reports outlined in the court order, then recused himself from his appointment to the Boyne case in May 2012.
Yet in fall 2012, Judge Lynda B. Munro and Judicial Branch Manager Mary Kay West administratively authorized payments to Horowitz at more than twice the state rate, even though no court order on record had approved the payments. …”
Note:
A longer version could include the fact that Representative Steve Stafstrom and former family court judge Lynda Munro both work for a law firm called “Pullman & Comley”.
*** Do whistleblowers know what role(s) — if any — Lynda Munro and Steve Stafstrom played in getting Mr. O’Neil onto the bench for the Ambrose case?
*** Who allowed Patrick Carroll III to hang around in the Chief Court Administrator’s Office after he was replaced?
Does the DOJ consider that racket “Kids for Cash” or “Cash for Kids”?
“.. Ciavarella disposed thousands of children to extended stays in youth centers for offenses as trivial as mocking an assistant principal on Myspace or trespassing in a vacant building. …”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal
Did Connecticut “family court” administrators apologize to those three teenagers in the Ambrose case after Connecticut DCF allowed the officers to threaten those teens with horrible crimes (in for-profit facilities) because they were living with their cousin instead of their adoptive father?
Kids for Cash as a direct result of absolute lawlessness.
Some call it “Ordo an Chao”.
https://youtu.be/tRrG_KMMvNY?si=bga9AG6qtADCAQcD
“Ordo ab Chao”
I still don’t see how any of that affected the outcome of Paul’s divorce case. He is a hateful evil mentally sick person who should not be involved in raising children.
Any of what?