CT Judge Thomas Moukawsher took the unusual step of disbarring attorney Nickola Cunha.
He did it without the usual due process adhered to in CT and every other state. He disbarred her on the spot.
He was a judge, prosecutor, and panel. In this triple role, he took her license away.
Most, perhaps all other states, do not give a judge the unilateral power to disbar an attorney on the spot. It is an awful precedent.
If a judge can disbar an attorney practicing before them for conduct in his court, the attorney may be chilled into a too-submissive role, which is inimical to zealous advocacy.
There should be an independent judge or panel to hear the alleged offense of an attorney before disbarment can occur.
But this judge decided she had it coming.
Cunha was a thorn in the side of all CT Family Court judges. She complained about the arbitrary and capricious nature of judges for years. She complained about bad results occurring in family court.
The CT Family Court is notorious for attorneys misusing Parental Alienation. Dr. Richard Gardner devised Parental Alienation to protect his clients, pedophile fathers. Gardner believed all societies practiced father-child incest. He believed this incest is best for the survival of the species.
His parental alienation is a godsend to attorneys, even if they do not share his pedophilic beliefs. Parental alienation allows attorneys to pick who gets custody of the children.
If one parent accuses the other of child abuse, the attorneys decide.
They can tell the court if the abuse is actual or if the accuser is guilty of parental alienation.
To maintain control, a guardian ad litem [GAL], who is a family law attorney, represents the children. In consultation with the parents’ attorneys, the GAL decides who gets custody.
Since the GALs are family law attorneys, they switch on different cases. For example, sometimes, a GAL is on one case and works with attorneys who are GALs on other cases they work on together.
So they are GALs on each other’s cases.
They are a collegial group, known for getting along. The mother’s attorney, the father’s attorney, and the children’s attorney [GAL] decide together.
All the family law attorneys played ball with this lucrative arrangement, but Cunha. She caused trouble. She hated how stay-at-home mothers kept losing their children.
The fathers have money. And are usually affluent. For a family to afford to live in CT on one income, the father must make good money.
Cunha said the mothers were victims of misapplication of parental alienation.
In case after case, the other attorney and the GAL agreed to find parental alienation by the mother. That makes the most money. But not Cunha. She wanted to fight it on the merits. She would challenge the other attorney. She would challenge the GAL.
She would challenge the hired therapists and custody evaluators. The custody evaluators’ living depends on referrals from the GALs and attorneys.
The Ambrose case reached a boiling point, because Cunha was convinced the father abused his children. But he controlled the money.
The GAL, who has her own family to feed, sided with the father. She decided to tell the court that the abuse of the children was not real. She said it was parental alienation by the mother.
This sale of custody would have gone unnoticed. Like it always does. They remove one mother from her children’s lives, and she goes away penniless, unable to fight.
But this mother got Cunha, and she fought. She kept fighting. Cunha went unpaid for months, at a time and received only a fraction of her billings.
She took it to heart that the kids were suffering.
The court took the Ambrose kids from the mother and forced them to live with their abusive father. Frank Report got into this toxic fray.
Cunha kept fighting, and the judges kept finding in favor of the abusive dad.
Then one day, Cunha made a mistake. She mentioned that she thought the conspirators were all Jewish. This got her disbarred.
It would have been OK if she had said they were all profit-driven lawyers. Had she said they were all white, it might have been OK. Had she said the worst lawyers were all women, it would have been OK.
But she brought in religion – and a historically oppressed religion. She did not condemn the religion. She made an observation. She said she thought the bad lawyers and the judge in the Ambrose case had a commonality – they were all Jewish.
And that one wicked old Gardner devotee, Judge Adelman, favored them.
But she mentioned they were Jewish – and she claimed they favored one another – and could not prove it. That was a huge mistake.
She did not say Jews were bad. She did not say all Jewish lawyers and therapists conspire to do bad things. She said everyone who conspired to hurt the Ambrose children were Jewish.
And she thought Adelman favored them.
It was a moment of misery for the children. For now, CT Family Court Judge Moukawher had justification for hanging Cunha.
[For the record, I have no idea if the players are Jewish or not. I do not care either. I do not want to know. I want to judge these lawyers and therapists by their actions. So I agree Cunha made a mistake, and they took advantage of it to hurt the Ambrose children.]
Judge Moukawsher used Cunha’s mistake as grounds to disbar her. As a result, the Ambrose children continue to suffer in isolation away from their mother.
Cunha made this comment to the Frank Report.
By Nickola Cunha
I was unraveling, emotionally and physically.
My client in the Ambrose case was being coercively abused. I was being coercively abused and suffering from a medical condition that caused severe anemia.
In addition to the Ambrose case, I became a target.
Judge Gerard Adelman and Judge Jane Grossman made sure they tarnished me among other judges. The full story will be told when I’m strong enough.
The comment that suggests I said something about the fact that I had just learned that morning that all the professionals in the Ambrose case are Jewish is inaccurate.
I said something to the effect that it was recently brought to my attention that the commonality concern of Judge Adelman favoring all Jewish professionals was a real issue.
(That is not my statement verbatim. The court transcript seems to have omissions).
As to the question, does a judge have a responsibility to act when there is obvious concern of an attorney unraveling? Yes, they have an obligation to act.
However, Judge Adelman was pushing for me to unravel so he was not going to report that he succeeded in pushing me over the edge.
At the end of the day, everyone has opinions. Unless you take the time to read the transcripts and review the evidence (that is the transcripts and evidence that hasn’t been sealed), I ask for the courtesy of not being spoken poorly about.
I’m far from perfect. I’m sure I made mistakes. The Ambrose case was a nine month trial, with scattered scheduling and no actual ability to litigate with voluminous irregularities.
I’m not sure there is an attorney that could make it through that kind of trial without making some mistakes.
The bottom line is, regardless of what you think of me or my client, we are both entitled to the same protections afforded to everyone else through our Constitutions and law.
In the Ambrose case, it was a “free for all”.
Neither the defendant Karen, the three minor children, nor I were afforded even the ability to offer evidence to be considered in support of the allegations against the father.
Frankly, the evidence that came in through the plaintiff’s case should have resulted in many different outcomes, if the law was applied.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
“My client in the Ambrose case was being coercively abused. I was being coercively abused and suffering from a medical condition that caused severe anemia.”
Who was coercively abusing the two of you? Hateful bigot Paul Boyne? I think he should be locked up for what he does to these women going through divorce.
I am generally opposed to locking up people for speech.
I don’t think he should be locked up for speech I think he should be locked up for terrifying and manipulating these women Taking over their cases and destroying them.
Anti-semitism is not a symptom of anemia.
There is no medical correlation between anemia and being anti-Semitic.
BIG difference between anti-Semitic and anti-corruption.
Nickola Cunha isn’t anti-Semitic, anti-religion or anti-good-ol-boy networks. She’s anti-corruption.
If there were more anti-corruption attorneys in Connecticut, none of this would have happened and concepts such as anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and anti-Muslim wouldn’t be a thing.
What happened is outrageous
The judges of CT court are now trying to bury the fact that they summarily disbarred Nickola Cunha.
Judge Moukhowsher and pals know his actions violate state and federal law.
AG Tong knows this as well. EVERYONE in the CT legislature and judiciary know Moukhowsher’s actions were, and continue to be illegal– Nickola Cunha was denied due process; no hearing for her. Banished mid-trial, with commentary of Moukhowsher and Leanne Larson, “Friend of the Court”, splattered all over the Ambrose case– Cunha nor her client were given the opportunity to challenge a single word. Justice? And what about the three children who have been denied their mother for over two years? To hell with them… this is about silencing every advocate and ally they ever had.
And now… Judges are actually denying the summary disbarment of Nickola Cunha. They are pretending it never occurred. Just like Moukhowsher fabricated an “In Re” case for Cunha, now they are fabricating another reality, where Cunha was not summarily disbarred. And NO ONE had better SUGGEST Cunha was summarily disbarred… or that will gain the wrath of CT family court judges– and further retaliation.
What is helpful in such a cover up, is that the ABA PUBLISHED the article titled, “This state allows a judge to summarily disbar lawyers; it recently happened in a divorce case” by Debra Cassens Weiss published Jan 31, 2022.
More to come…
What can we do to help, Frank?
You can comment on your experiences and what you have observed in family court. People find it hard to believe.
Nickola Cunha was sent to the Regional Family Trial Docket- the same place Sandra MacVicar was sent when Gal Jocelyn Hurwitz stole her two girls, concealed abuse by the father, released confidential information to schools without authority, perjured herself, and had the judge direct the mother NOT to make any report to dcf or the police- the judge said it had to go to the gal first.
It’s such a sick game. A decade later- even after journalist Keith Harmon Snow investigated Jocelyn Hurwitz and published about Hurwitz and Adelman among others- In The Worst Interest of the Child: Trafficking Children through Family Court— both Hurwitz and Adelman did the exact same play with the Ambrose kids- at 15, 15 and 12 they are silenced by the court.
Adelman first agreed to give them their own counsel – who would express what they wanted and why- instead of the bs “best interest” for the pockets of the attorneys.
Someone step up and get these children access to their mother and the life that was taken by this delusional and sick excuse for a father.
No healthy man would inflict such pain upon their own children.
They will resent him for all he’s done, but Ambrose doesn’t care. Malignant narcissists only care about destroying anyone who knows who they are. The wife made the fatal error of asking for a divorce.
Never tell the malignant narcissist anything- warming to all!
You speak of Bangkok. He was quick to seize upon anything that would improve his mind or his appearance. Bangkok had innate breeding. Though he needs a more attractive toupee.
Bangko’s poise and charm of manner captivated many readers. He has warmth,vitality. He has authentic magnetism. Women admired him. Men envied him. I never liked him.
When it comes to the MFC’s (Mafia Family Courts, such as AZ, CT, MO, MN, MT, TX, NC, FL, Canada and many more) there is no law. The MFC’s are run by ex parte communications with the sitting judge and all actions are done by what ever rules need to be applied by said MFC and the Actors involved. All of this unequivocally is done without any regard to the well being of the children and the target parent (usually a caring mother). It is all done for the pure purpose of pumping as much dollars as possible into each Actors pockets.
It would be real interesting to put together a Federal Task Force made up of U.S. Marshals and FBI Agents to swoop down on all the Actors involved in the CT case. Instant and immediate confiscation of all computers, office files and all bank information for all the actors involved and even taking into custody the Actors and confiscating their cell phones as well. Then the task force analyzes all the files, bank records, phone calls, etc and comes up with Federal charges for all of them. I’m sure the IRS would be very interested in the data as well as the DOJ.
All we keep doing with all this MFC mess, in every state, is keep kicking the tires and keep finding out none of the tires are flat, repeatedly and repeatedly. In the meantime we have hundreds of children’s lives being totally ruined, in many cases for the rest of their lifetime, even if they manage to come out of the situation alive at the age of 18.
It is all the largest criminal and inhumane group of Actors in the U.S., even larger than the real Mafia. It reminds me of the slave trade. These custody children are just objects like Bitcoins being used to illegally fill all the Actors pockets for as long as they can drag it out. Just HORRIFIC!
Another great report Frank!! Just so people have an idea of who I am as they read my comments. I spent 20 years as a U.S. Marine with some very interesting and sensitive assignments and traveling to 3rd world countries and seeing corruption at the highest levels and now I have witnessed the same or worse here in the Connecticut Family Court system. My wife is Geoff Herzog’s ex and we have been together for nearly 5 years and I have witnessed some of the most insane behavior that cannot even be explained. Jill Planchar, mentioned in this report, was the GAL in their case, saw me a couple of times during separate court dates, but 2 minutes or so prior to me taking the stand in the last court date I saw her, she decided to introduce herself to me. Amazingly enough, Geoff Herzog’s Attorney, Leslie Jennings-Lax asked her first question to me and it was, “Has Jill Planchar introduced herself to you?” The GAL had never spoken to me before but on that day it was just a coincidence that she introduced herself to me. Strange right?
Attorney Jennings-Lax’s next question had to do with a interaction I had with Geoff Herzog prior to this court date starting… I sat down next to him and said, “You know only men who are pussies bully women and children, right?” I then got up and walked over to a Marshall and starting speaking to her about how many Marines they had on their force in Bridgeport. Geoff Herzog ran by me and shoved and ran faster out of the court than he had probably ran in his life. The Marshall said she would handle it so I let it go – it wasn’t as if he hurt me…Lol. So on to question 2 from Jennings-Lax. It went something like this, She asked if I had had a conversation with her client prior to court starting that day. I said I had and then said something to the affect that “forgive me for the word I am about to use” and then I said, I told him that men to bully women and children are pussies.” As I remember, Judge Gould even laughed at him.
Next point in this insane case: I also have a letter from one of my previous employers stating that Jeff Herzog (they were unaware that he Spelled his name Geoff). I will attach the full letter at a later time. Geoff Herzog called the company at 8:30am on May 4, 2018 to accuse me of planning to kidnap the kids. What the fool did not know was that I had ridden my Harley to work that day and it would be difficult to stuff 3 children in my side bags. The interesting thing is that his first call was at around 815am on May 4, 2018, the day custody was switched from Robin to him, the orders had not even been finalized. Attorney Cunha at the time and Robin were both unaware of the transfer, however funny enough Geoff Herzog knew. Nothing to see here, right?
Next point: Once Geoff Herzog and his vile parents (Stan & Vivian Herzog) paid $1.5M to have the children taken away from Robin, they also made sure she was kicked out of the home where she lived with the children. Robin and I had been moving her things out of the house and into my house over a week or so prior to the date the court said she had to be out of the house. We had moved most of her things out of the house but there were a few things left that she needed to get before the 2:00pm deadline on August 19, 2018. I was in Baltimore that weekend for a business meeting I was required to attend for work. There are photos of Geoff Herzog, Stan Herzog (his father) on the front porch and Andrew Carney out in the driveway apparently on the lookout for me showing up. I called Robin and she was absolutely stressing out and in tears because Geoff Herzog screaming at her and blocking the door and being the complete punk he is. Robin was in tears and absolutely afraid as the guy (Geoff Herzog), who role platys being a teenage girl trying to find someone role playing the father to have incest rape with him, screamed at her around 12:30pm during the time she had one 1/2 hours before the deadline. Thank you Pedro Mauchi Barreno for walking over and helping Robin get out of the house and leave safely. Again, Geoff Herzog is a punk who only attacks women and children and even with the three of them backed down when a lone neighbor came over and confronted them.
Next point: I also had Nickola Cunha as my attorney during my divorce and we found out that Geoff Herzog was collaborating with my ex-wife (proof was that he had copies of two of my alimony checks to her). Not only that, the home had been awarded to me in the divorce and my ex was directed to sign a quit claim deed by Jan 3, 2021 or I would have to sell the house. Geoff Herzog had told Robin during their marriage that if she divorced him, he would take the children and leave her in the streets. I guess Geoff Herzog thought that convincing my ex to not sign the Quit Claim Deed would leave us in the streets. He certainly underestimated me and Robin as we live in a better place than the previous nice home we lived in which has caused him to act out in an even stranger way.
Next point: I have known Nickola Cunha for nearly 5 years and have never heard her say anything negative professionally or in a personal setting about any religion, color, creed or lifestyle. It appears Judge Moukawsher and others who followed “Dr.” Richard Gardner’s beliefs just had to find a reason to attack Nickola and get her out of their way. Isn’t it interesting how you cannot hide the truth forever.
By the way, I am obviously not a writer, but I do document very well, very well. Gary Stanek was the Co-Parenting Counselor in this case and as I said, I document very well. Thank you again Frank – Ken
Moukawsher’s disbarment is unconstitutional. The power to assassinate a lawyer on the spot comes from a court rule created in 1890 by then CJ Andrews, who could not count to 14th Amendment. The sovereign people of Connecticut never empowered the court to instantly obliterate a zealous advocate by whim of a retard in a black robe, such is tyranny, for which the clowns in the legislature turn a blind eye. The American remedy to tyranny is marked in the blood of history. Moukawsher is a King’s judge, loyal to the crown, a traitor, domestic enemy, terrorist to the American people.
What can be done to get anyone in CT to act? The children continue to be denied their mother.
The mother continued to be denied legal counsel and denied all martial money.
The court record of the case is now filled with conclusions and defamatory statements about Cunha which reflects negatively for the mother.
Cunha lost all means to support herself, and publicly shamed and marred by comments of Mouk and Larson.
The press took it and ran with it. CT press never comments on family court cases, but they were all over Cunha and her client to protect the criminals.
What can be done to get justice?
A sovereign people denied redress rights, hold Secondary Rights, the country was founded by firepower, which is now needed to preserve it, simple political aspect of life, but no one has the guts to do what is required to protect the children of Connecticut. The society will eventually perish, savage rule of tyranny will triumph, there will be no children’s laughter, smiles, or hugs to comfort the old … Connecticut is doomed, just what the twisted left wants, what Governor LaMont is paid to deliver. Liberty is lost.
Proper law enforcement would help, but they’re overwhelmed because the name of some group’s game somewhere for the past few decades has been: To destroy America from within.
Family courts … public schools … universities… prosecutors offices … men dressed as women reading to children … men dressed as women pole dancing with children … men dressed as women in control of Health and Human Services for the entire nation. America is The Weimar Republic, now.
Proper investigations of the crimes in family courts are the only way to stop crimes and the criminals. It would help if the public demands it, but mainstream media outlets don’t inform the public about what’s been happening in family courts. The general public has no idea how much harm family courts do to the entire state, not just the children and parents.
It seems running for office and voting for the best candidates this year will help until law enforcement offices do what they need to do.
Leanne Larson- “friend” of the court- claimed Cunha asked for 16 continuances. No idea if that’s accurate but surely that would lead a judge to consider there was a problem.
Cunha also has some skin picking condition that’s obvious when you see her on video during the hearings.
She looked completely scattered and emotionally a reck- the average observer could see it. Why didn’t the judge express concern and intervene?
Is Mr. Adelman a Freemason?
Is Norm Pattis a Freemason?
Those who keep secrets among themselves shouldn’t be anywhere near any court of law.
What is wrong with Connecticut citizens that they allow so many crimes?
Jennifer Dulos never had a chance.
https://archive.org/details/Records_Of_Freemasonry_In_The_State_Of_Connecticut_Vol_I/page/19/mode/1up?view=theater
Jennifer Dulos was a victim of the same system of racketeering, which is why there still has been no meaningful action in her trial.
The report by the court appointed psychologist is no doubt as fraudulent as Jessica Biren Caverly’s reports.
They are designed to give “cause”for the judge to change custody.
If Dulos kept the kids, the game would be over- as it should have been. The attorneys didn’t want that so they set out, as with the Ambrose case and many others, to destroy the reputation of the stay at home mother who raised them- without any issue or complaint until family court.
It’s a big club and you and I ain’t in it …Carlin
What a softball interview Frank. No mention that she regrets what she lied about to the court saying she had a list of cases to prove her Jewish conspiracy. No mention that after she was disbarred she stole from one of her clients and refuses to turn over her case files. No mention of how she openly mocked the judge in court on the day he asked her to come back with a lawyer to defend her lies.
I have been following this from the beginning and you don’t hold her accountable to anything she did.
Nobody was out to get her. Read the transcripts Frank. They gave her chance after chance to admit she was wrong and she never did.
She does not believe she is wrong. Therefore she’s not admitting anything. She was unprepared and scattered. However, the word conspiracy came from Judge Moukhowsher–take your own advice and read the transcript.
She refuses to turn over case files because those clients have forbade her from turning them over. I guess the media decided not to include that factoid. Her clients– though most have been stripped of all children and money– are humans with rights. They have written to STOP their personal files from being handed over to court appointed cronies.
If monies were taken, allow Cunha her day in court. I assure you she has not blindly robbed clients like the GAL’s in these cases. Hurwitz got over $200,000 and Janis Laliberte, Sue Coussineau, Robert Horwitz, Jill Planchard, and many other attorneys have united to drain family bank accounts and deliver the children to the sole custody of the monied parent.
In terms of being mocked, Nickola Cunha has been mocked by Judge Adelman, Nancy Alrich, Jocelyn Hurwitz, Judge Grossman, and Jessica Biren-Caverly – ruthlessly- since taking on the case in Sept. 2020. Read the transcripts– if the court will ever release them–
Judge Adelman called Cunha a “cry-baby”. Caverly mocked how Cunha articulates the word ending “ing” as “in'”– and this was welcomed in the court of Judge Adelman, with clique of Aldrich, Hurwitz and Ambrose sneering and snickering.
Slander abounds these transcripts. The perjury by Aldrich, Ambrose and Hurwitz is pervasive. Of course in CT family court, as GAL Jocelyn Hurwitz reminded Cunha many times, there is the “hearsay rule”– which is the legal permission the CT legislature has given GALs to LIE!! The CT legislature created this to assist in the racketeering that absolutely runs through family courts throughout our country– not just CT– though CT is known to be among the worst.
Cunha is absolutely at fault for being unprepared, inarticulate on this particular day of such importance, reckless and scattered, however, she deserves a hearing. She deserves due process. She has the facts on her side. Think there’s no evidence of abuse in DCF records? Think again. They have been systematically concealed. It’s all there– which is why Ambrose is preventing the kids from contact with the mother and all of the family and lifelong friends whom they trust. He’s suing the godmother who the kids love– because she knows the truth and has the evidence. Looking forward to a public trial on that lawsuit!
I think it’s clear your ignorant of the basic facts. Cunha is so messed up she is the one claiming that she is mentally I’ll and trying to find money to get a psychological exam. She is the one trying to keep from having a day in court. What does nobody want to acccept that if there is rot in CT courts Cunha oz abolsurlt part of it.
The doctrine of destroying families in Connecticut family court is the ideology imposed by Judge Elliott Solomon, who proudly proclaimed that he TRAINED all the family judges in his image. Nothing to do with law, rights, humanity, family court holds the mark of the beast.
The docket shows the mother has been stonewalled in getting a fee waiver since May 1, 2022.
The judges do not want the transcripts available to the public and are delaying and denying this mother to prevent her from pursuing an appeal
Trial court judges are protecting themselves to prevent the truth from being exposed. Typical CT family court.
Maybe she should get a job?
Those criminals stole all of her children and all of her money and that’s your comment?
What a miserable thing to say.
She is the one who has been acting like a criminal.
How has she been “acting like a criminal”?
Ask any parent or guardian who’s been through family court hell, what happened after they asked a family court judge to protect their children from identified sexual predators.
Most will tell you: the family court judge(s), lawyer(s) and court practitioner(s) punished them for trying to protect their children from sexual abuse.
Sexualization of children in America and all over the world is a political agenda.
Anyone who can’t see that isn’t paying attention.
“Ask any parent or guardian who’s been through family court hell, what happened after they asked a family court judge to protect their children from identified sexual predators.”
There is no identified sexual predator in this case whatsoever. The abuse allegations in this case were thoroughly investigated by police and two major medical institutions—a whole host of experts. They were found to be unsubstantiated.
There is evidence the mother was putting pressure on the children to lie—that is criminal.
The mother disregarded every court order.
The mother purposefully destroyed evidence.
The mother told the children what kind of porn the dad supposedly likes to look at — that is not criminal but it sure as fuck is immoral and inappropriate and damaging to those kids.
The mother put the children’s private information and photos all over the Internet. she did not need to do that To prove her point against dad. She could have redacted their names and blurred their faces.
She does not care about their welfare she only cares about herself.
The mother put pressure on her lawyer to say it was a Jewish conspiracy against her… At least that’s what the lawyer told the court.
The mother in this case totally deserve the outcome she got. It is all based on her own shitty, immoral and criminal behavior.
Whoever wrote:
“There is no identified sexual predator in this case whatsoever. The abuse allegations in this case were thoroughly investigated by police and two major medical institutions—a whole host of experts. They were found to be unsubstantiated.“
… shouldn’t write such thoughtless comments. Or lie.
After hospital providers substantiated sexual abuse, the child should have been returned to the protective parent, not the perpetrator. Isolating a sexually abused child from the protective parent is cruel and criminal. Placing the child according to the identified perpetrator’s choice is cruel and criminal.
Any “reunification” the court forces on sexually abused children should be on the childrens’ terms, not identified perpetrators’ terms. Experts know children stop disclosing sexual abuse if they’re forced to engage directly or indirectly with perpetrators. Some children take years to feel safe enough to disclose what they experienced.
When family court judges place children directly with sexual predators or within the sexual predator’s reach, those children usually stop disclosing sexual abuse. The worst fathers who want to use family courts to take children from good mothers use the same plan:
They molest their children, knowing the mothers will try to protect their children. The fathers then say the mothers are “alienating”. The family courts then “flip” custody to the fathers who abused the children. The mothers can’t understand why the courts aren’t protecting children from perpetrators. Mothers who can’t protect their children from sexual deviants normally do look stressed and crazy when their children are taken away from them and given to the perpetrators. Everyone then notices how stressed and crazy the mothers act. Hospitals and DCF usually substantiate actual sexual abuse. Then, perverted family court judges give the sexually abused children to perpetrators because of perverts and their perverted theories.
Sexual assault cases are for criminal courts, not perverted family court judges.
If you haven’t already, look up: “Dr. Richard Gardner” “parental alienation syndrome” “fathers molesting children is normal” “mothers who object to fathers molesting children are crazy”.
Chris (?) continued …
“There is evidence the mother was putting pressure on the children to lie” Wrong.
“The mother disregarded every court order.” ALL sane people would have done the same.
“The mother purposefully destroyed evidence.” Wrong.
“The mother told the children what kind of porn the dad supposedly likes to look at — that is not criminal but it sure as #%@ is immoral and inappropriate and damaging to those kids.” It’s appropriate to teach children the difference between right and wrong.
“The mother put the children’s private information and photos all over the Internet. she did not need to do that To prove her point against dad. She could have redacted their names and blurred their faces.” Emergencies call for emergency measures.
“She does not care about their welfare she only cares about herself.” Wrong.
“The mother put pressure on her lawyer to say it was a Jewish conspiracy against her… At least that’s what the lawyer told the court.” Wrong.
“The mother in this case totally deserve the outcome she got. It is all based on her own %#*%#*, immoral and criminal behavior.” What an evil thing to write.
Horrible stuff. What bad vibes.