Editor’s note: There are those who believe Monte Blue is a troll and others who believe she is a true follower of Keith Alan Raniere. Regardless, the opinions of Monte Blu are strictly her own. They do not represent the opinions of the editors of Frank Report. For newer readers, Monte Blue has been contributing articles that purportedly support Raniere for several years. This is the first one we have received in quite a few months.
By Monte Blu
Mr. Parlato, you are the most slanted and biased journalist in the history of time. You are not even a journalist but a demented hater, a crazy that has hindered the cause of advancing human civilization. In the end you will be exposed as a beast who thwarted the growth of humankind.
I will revisit some thoughts I previously published. I do not give you permission to change a thing I have written. Either publish as-is, or don’t publish.
First I will discuss your mania of accusing Keith Raniere of condoning rape.
In Jness, Keith taught that woman might achieve first orgasm while being raped. He did not suggest rape is good. He was trying to teach something that hadn’t been thought of.
Women don’t want to be raped by someone unattractive.
This is a provocative statement. But what is repulsive is being raped by someone unappealing. Many women fantasize about rape by someone attractive. That is all Keith is saying. He did not say women want rape. He pointed out women think differently if an attractive man does the same thing as an ugly man: which is to use physical dominance to have sex.
For the ugly man it is rape. For the attractive man, it starts as rape and becomes consensual. He did not say however that men should rape women.
He also said it’s OK if women have orgasm when raped. He asked a question: “What does it mean if a woman is raped and learns to have orgasm?” He explained the importance of orgasm for health and well being.
When is tradeoff of good and evil fair exchange? Suppose a blind woman is raped and got her eyesight back?
All he does is teach relativity, make us think. He is NOT condoning rape. He is saying there can be instances where rape CAN be lesser evil because of what it heals. .
We read of women withdrawing consent retroactively. Some of the mutant former women of the VOW did this. Nicole did. She wanted to be tied down. I know. She wanted to to have oral sex and not know who did it. Then she withdrew consent and the rabble called it sex trafficking.
The reverse is true. You have a frigid woman. If rape warms her to enjoy sex under a true master, isn’t it logical to ask, how much pain did she really get from rape, versus how much pleasure she gets the rest of her life from orgasms?
She can give consent retroactively.
That is all he did he gave women freedom.
He posed questions: Can a frigid, timid woman become empowered by rape by a superior man, a man she could never get as a husband?
A great man who conducts sexual mentoring sessions, done for the woman’s own good, is like a doctor forcing a patient to take medicine that will save her life. The secret teaching is that he could ask her. She might say yes. He could try to persuade her. She might say yes. But if nothing works, the doctor must force her to take it.
Vanguard is the doctor of Universal Energy. His Seed is capable of birthing an avatar child. His life was foreshadowed in your own mythical Bible where Mary, the mother of Jesus, was raped by God. She was lifted up to the most highest when God raped her.
The immaculate conception of Jesus in the fable of the Bible is rape. Mary did not consent. She was betrothed to Joseph. God came to her instead. Are you saying Joseph is a cuckold, your favorite word to denounce men who were pleased to stand aside and offer wives to Vanguard out of love and for their healing?
If the mythical story of the rape of Mary is worthy of veneration, the real story of the GREAT SPIRIT OF THE UNIVERSE, taking flesh in the form of OUR VANGUARD who teaches many empowered women is also venerable.
Was it rape when the Romans took the Sabine women and carried them across the threshold of Rome and by raping them founded the Eternal City? Was it rape when the Jewish Patriarch took a 12 year old girl to his tent and ‘knew her’?
Zeus raped Antiope, Europa, Hera and Leda. Odin raped Rindr.
What starts as rape becomes betrothal. This is why Muslims sanction “temporary marriage.” This is what is meant by conjugal rights
This is why Keith called those women he “knew” as his wives.
Rape is condoned under certain circumstances and rapes becomes marriage. This is all Keith was trying to teach.
He was not teaching men to rape women. He said the average man is not qualified to rape. That is reserved for Gods.
Keith did not teach what held for him held for all.
He was helping them.
He said inferior man should be punished for rape. He said taking women away from inferior men is not rape. It is natural law since the caveman.
I know you all will scream and holler about this teaching, but you know Keith is right. He is not only my Vanguard, he is your Vanguard, only having eyes you cannot see.
He belongs to the world but is not of the world. All women belong to him.
Our Vanguard, Keith Alan Raniere, delivered his promise. One of his most noble women, the Blessed Mariana, gave birth to the Supreme Avatar, Rishi Keimarian Siddhi Samadhi Raniere on August 17, 2017 at 9:02 AM EST.
This moment marked the end of the Kali Yuga and the dawn of Satya Yuga.
Keith’s appeal will be filed and will be successful. He will be released.
A child is born and living in Mexico who will grow up to be our world’s new Savior, ruling side by side with his immortal father.
Good days are coming to Earth.
Great Balls of Fire ! … Keith could benefit from prison rape, at least to test his “theories”.
So then this guest post applies to Keith as well, that he may find some actual healing benefits in prison when he gets held down and raped, well good for him then he can test his own rape theories.
Let us turn Keith’s words back to him:
These are quotes from the post. I am not bound by the rule that our dear Buddy Frank is, the rule that I can’t tweek the post to make my point:
Keith doesn’t want to be raped by someone unattractive.
This is a provocative statement. But what is repulsive is being raped by someone unappealing. Keith fantasizes about rape by someone attractive. That is all Keith is saying. He did not say he wants rape.
For the ugly inmate raping him it is rape. For the attractive inmate raping him it starts as rape and becomes consensual. He did not say however that men in prison SHOULD rape him.
He also said it’s OK if he has an orgasm when raped. He asked a question: “What does it mean if I am raped and have an orgasm?”
Keith: When is tradeoff of good and evil fair exchange? Suppose I’m raped and get my 20/20 eyesight back?
All Keith does is teach relativity, make us think. He is NOT condoning rape. He is saying there can be instances where rape CAN be lesser evil because of what it heals for him.
Keith says “you have me a man who has trouble maintaining an errection. If rape warms me to enjoy sex under a true master, isn’t it logical to ask, how much pain did I really get from rape? I can give consent retroactively.”
That is all Keith did he gave women freedom and now in prison he can benefit in finding this freedom for himself.
Keith posed questions: Can a frigid, timid man in prison become empowered by rape by a superior man in prison? A prisoner who would never notice him on the outside?
Keith: A great manly inmate who conducts sexual mentoring sessions in my cell for my own good, is like a doctor forcing me to take medicine that will save my life. The secret teaching is that he could ask me and I might say yes. He could try to persuade me, I might say yes. But if nothing works, the doctor must force me to take it.
Keith: Rape is condoned under certain circumstances and rapes can become marriage, maybe for me in prison.
Keith: And if the ugly inmate rapes me and I’m wishing he were more attractive? Well better luck next time because I am not a victim. There are no victims. It’s all good.
Well said.
Thanks
Dan 11:36 “… And the king shall do likewise, and shall exalt himself, and exalt himself above all gods; and he is also reckless against the God of gods, and will be fortunate until anger is fulfilled… ”
This isn’t how someone real talks even within the cult. The cult people bring him up with reverence but not in this way. Not even Nicki Clyne. So it’s a troll. Take it for what it’s worth. Not sure trolls like this should be given a forum. But it’s not my blog.
I don’t think anyone not using their real name or a fake name connected to a social media account should be given a forum. Even if the name links to Clare.com. But it’s not my blog.
@Scott Johnson
You abject sonofabitch. Anonymity should be a right protected on the internet. Google has already dismantled much of it. I suggest you go back to pitching boxes of brownie mix to Texas housewives and leave the real thinking to your betters.
Anonymity is protected on the internet, goofball. I have never said you should always use your real name. LOL
“Anonymity is protected on the internet” What the hell are you talking about?
It most certainly is NOT protected. Anonymous posting to sites is the exception not the rule.
A lot of sites allow anonymous posting. All you need is a fake name and a social media account. In fact, except in extreme cases, the courts have defended the right to post anonymously, just as they did back in the Revolutionary days. You don’t have a CLUE. LOL
There are some signs that English may not be the writer’s first language. I could imagine a Mexican from a heavily Catholic background writing something like this; they still might be a troll, but I just wouldn’t necessarily rule it out on that account.
So if Keith gets raped by a good looking prisoner then it’s not rape. Got it fellas? Good.
It starts out as rape, but then turns into consensual sex. Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I’ve seen women go for some butt-ugly dudes, they must have been well-endowed. Raniere will probably get “explored” by lots of them kind of Bubbas.
—Are you saying Joseph is a cuckold, your favorite word to denounce men who were pleased to stand aside and offer wives to Vanguard out of love and for their healing?—
So is the rumor true, Monte, and that was why Hildreth gave his virginal Kristin to be ravished lavishly by Vanguard?
The sacred mystery.
Did Mark Hildreth lose Kristin to Lord Vanguard? Or did he actually recruit her for him then offer her up to his lord? And getting what in return?
I still believe that VanTheGod’s dick-size comment means there probably was some kind of sex going on with him and the SOP boys. And noting Vanguard’s controlling nature and joy in humiliating others, it was oral or anal tribute.
I doubt it – he never went for men. Always preoccupied about the size of his dick though – wanting to hear his women acknowledge his dick as bigger and better than other men. He lies like a rug; no comparing of dicks happened. He just wants everyone to admit his superiority. Thinks the size of his dick somehow makes him impressive when he’s actually just a very small minded man. Poor thing wanted to be seen as a demigod; now he’s a nothing in a cage and probably feeling very very sorry for himself. Karma catches up eventually…
—He just wants everyone to admit his superiority—
You may be right, L, but what better way for a cuck to admit Keith’s superiority than kneeling before him and—?
Monte Blu is a troll. No woman would ever write a thing like this, except if it is irony. Monte Blu is a man, so not part of Raniere’s harem.
Shadow before you stick your fat mouth into this keep in mind Monte was not talking about you. With you what would be rape is not with Vanguard. So STFU
Pea, this might shock you but most men do not rape women.
They might seduce women or sweet talk women into a sexual encounter but they do not rape women.
Sorry to disappoint you.
Finally a piece that makes sense.
Pea Onyu
February 6, 2020 at 7:01 pm
Finally a piece that makes sense.
That’s because you wrote it, Pea.
Right?
Monte, just one question…
Does this mean it won’t be considered ‘rape’ if an attractive man taps into Vanguard’s butthole in prison?
Vanturd will write a poem titled, The Handsome Thrust.
It felt like rape but then I came all over myself…I think I’m gay.
List of things to do: Wash his socks, rub his back the way he taught me, cook his noodles with the Cheetos sprinkles on top
Grease my ass up just like he taught me
Eat less so my poop shoot doesn’t make a mess 💩
I hope that wasn’t supposed to rhyme.
Now, would you like me to make you a rhyming poem? In regards to his ass being worked on so he can move drugs for his white supremacists Freinds?
The vanguard he elevates rape
As a boon – until caught by the nape
By a big scary con
Who makes him bend down
To offer his ass like an ape.
And once the lesson is learned,
I think the vanguard has earned
The eternal joy
Of being the toy
Of every man jack in the place. Burned!
So Monte Blu, aka Nicki:
If Keith Raniere is raped in prison and somehow has an orgasm in the experience, does that make it right?
Did your fantasies about A Pimp Mack involve rape, or was it more like you being Ward Cleaver and her being June settling down in a nice house in Winnetka?
You drip hatred for America and American middle class values.
I’m pretty, so can I rape Monte Blu? Like October or November? And if you resist, it will only take longer.
Sincerely S.
Tell me that this isn’t far more entertaining than the Indian guru story. Both are flaccid, but only Raniere can make a complete fool out of himself. Be sure Raniere’s judge sees this story, he’s bound to add at least another decade to Raniere’s sentence. LOL
Dear Monte Blu,
I would rather masturbate with a cheese-grater than read your article.
Please do the world a favor and piss on the third rail.
Note: It will work. The TV show Myth-Busters and the website Snopes are both wrong. Alternatively you can stick your dick or your tongue in a light socket.
Sincerely,
Nice Guy
Blue,
I have read your previous articles. I don’t need to make that mistake again. 😉
I would rather you masturbate with a cheese grater than pick up the phone. LOL
A tip from personal experience: Don’t mastubate after eating Cheetos.
Cheetos!!! LMAO!!!
That’s good enough to be a bit in a comedian’s standup act.
Thanks for the laugh!!!! 😉
What’s the downside?
…your dick looks like Trump’s face.
Don’t you remember? He’s not orange any more, ever since he brought back the incadescent light bulb: https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNRKYw9uVaIEp9Mxl28UMtLuoxzGfA%3A1581077209369&ei=2VI9XruPFsXEswXYgKSICw&q=incadescent+trump+orange&oq=incadescent+trump+orange&gs_l=psy-ab.3…14775.19411..19570…4.0..0.319.2744.0j5j6j1……0….1..gws-wiz…….35i304i39.yNGuqos5GVs&ved=0ahUKEwj737TLs7_nAhVF4qwKHVgACbEQ4dUDCAs&uact=5 LOL
Scott,
Downside?
The answer is the coefficient of friction rating of. 0.6 < or = is bad.
It’s called Physics dumb-ass.
You must love masturbating with a cheese grater. The lower the coefficient of friction is, the less the resistance to movement. No wonder you flunked physics! Your teacher probably told you to call them on the phone if you had any questions about understanding the coefficient of friction, right? LOL Or perhaps you’re too stupid to have ever taken a physics class, which is also very believable. LOL
Now, WHO is the dumb-a$$ again? LOL (I am LITERALLY Laughing Out Loud as I type this!)
Thank you, Frank, for sharing this. The depth of the pathos in the sordid affair of Raniere the Vampire which you so brilliantly and bravely exposed and defeated is just coming to light. Articles like this by Defenders of the Vampire show the complexity of the lunacy in which the victims of this Satanic Cult were mired! Frank, thank you for your Labour of Love. May you be richly Blessed.
I find the lunacy rather simple.
Well, compared to you, the lunacy is simple.
Well, compared to you, everyone is brave. LOL
Ayo(Blu),
Flog the pony and ride the whale.