Allison Mack gave collateral to two entities, but she only asked for the collateral from one of them back.
Allison Mack wants her collateral back from the US Courts.
It’s only fair. She kept her end of the deal with them.
She gave ample collateral as surety for her $5 million bail bond.
The FBI arrested her early Friday, April 20, 2018, in Brooklyn. She went to MDC and spent four days in the holding center.
She got collateral for her $5 million bail, and the court released her on Tuesday, April 24.
Allison Mack leaves the court after her release on $5 million bail.
The court scrutinized her collateral as hard as the collateral she offered to Raniere.
When she joined DOS, she offered collateral as follows:
(1) A letter about Mack’s mother and father that would “destroy their character.”
(2) A contract that transferred ownership of Mack’s home if she broke her commitment to Raniere.
(3) A letter addressed to social services alleging abuse to Mack‘s nephews.
(4) Many graphic nude photos.
(5) A contract transferring custody of any children birthed by Mack to Raniere if Mack broke her commitment to Raniere.
The custody of unborn children is reminiscent of the Grimms’ Fairly Tale, Rumplestilskin.
Rumplestiltskin was an imp who offered to turn straw into silk in exchange for the firstborn child of the miller’s daughter.
The collateral Mack offered the courts for her bail was financial surety.
Mack’s collateral to the court included:
1) the mortgages for two properties with a combined estimated market value of approximately $1,730,000;
(2) Lien on an individual retirement account owned by Mack of $585,000.
Judge Nicholas Garaufis sentenced Mack to three years in prison on July 27, 2021. She lives at FCI, Dublin, a low-security US prison for female inmates in Dublin, California.
A prison cell at Dublin
Her lawyers, William F. McGovern and Sean S. Buckley wrote to the court:
Given that the case is now resolved, we respectfully request that Your Honor sign the attached proposed order, which
(1) exonerates Ms. Mack’s bond,
(2) orders that all property posted as security on the bond be released from liability, and
(3) orders Pretrial Services to return Ms. Mack’s passport. Counsel has spoken with Assistant United States Attorney Tanya Hajjar, and the government has no objections to these requests.
We appreciate the Court’s consideration and, as always, are available to answer any show ed up in court and reported to prison on time. That was what the bail money was for.
A DOS Failure
Allonzo I love the fact you checkout every single article page multiple times!
Fu toolbag!
Could you amplify your comment a little bit?
I’m particularly interested in knowing, was there always a toolbag involved?
She should absolutely get her money returned. But this is the government- it’s not America’s government. It’s China’s.
Hey dummy-
That’s why we’re by Taiwan.
Qanon is so last year. LOL
Go back to Flat Earth.
‘By’
“ (1) A letter about Mack’s mother and father that would “destroy their character.”
(2) A contract that transferred ownership of Mack’s home if she broke her commitment to Raniere.
(3) A letter addressed to social services alleging abuse to Mack‘s nephews.
(4) Many graphic nude photos.
(5) A contract transferring custody of any children birthed by Mack to Raniere if Mack broke her commitment to Raniere”
This shows how sadistic all of those involved in DOS are. Did Nicki Clyne collect such collateral? How is she not held accountable? Anyone who collects information that can use children as collateral – and child abused as collateral are void of morals and dangerous.
Mack’s collateral to the court included:
1) the mortgages for two properties with a combined estimated market value of approximately $1,730,000; Frank Parlato
What do you want to bet that those mortgages are on properties held by Allison Mack’s family?
I can see the letter to the Judge now.
Dear Judge:
Please show mercy to dear poor sweet Allison.
She was always intellectually curious and generous in loaning money.
In addition she showed foresight in getting mortgage liens to back up the loans she made.
In fact she has us by the balls and with those liens she can squeeze hard enough and our balls will literally fly off and become Rocky Mountain Oysters.
So show mercy to Allison so she will show mercy to us.
Isn’t it colossally embarrassing to do this? Give collateral with nude photos and contracts, etc, because someone told you he was immensely more intelligent than yourself then end up in jail because your I.Q. was in fact too low, just like that person who ordered you to give collateral diagnosed you?
Can it get any more idiotic???? Does Alison understand what’s going on? Would her grasp of the situation surpass that of a well trained German Shepherd??? Not being sarcastic. This outcome would not have existed had she had a better grasp of it than that.
Is this less surreal than a Salvador Dali painting??
Yeah, it’s really bizarre. There’s almost no rational explanation for such idiocy, it makes you want to believe that Raniere was using black magic love potions on some women, because ironically, it seems to be the only thing that makes sense.
Alex-
ROLMAO!
Comedy Gold!
Judge Garaufis will most likely return Allison Mack’s bail when it is lawful to do so. He has been a fair Judge in this case.
Clare Bronfman has asked for her bail money and passport back.
It is not uncommon for criminals to pay bail and when the timing is right to ask for it back.
As far as her DOS collateral, it is highly unlikely any court of law will ever give Raniere any belongings of any DOS slave because they broke their vow to him.
Nor should anyone believe a story written about family members. Slaves were told to make up stories by their Masters all the time.
Alanzo spent a decade acquiring a Scientology education.
…….You can attain the same level of education, by watching all 3 seasons of Star Trek.
This is not 100 percent true. Star Trek was only two and half seasons.
Frank-
Your viewpoint is most illogical. Technically speaking the show appeared for three seasons.
The number of episodes is immaterial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series
***
Damn it, Spock, I’m a blogger, not a statistician.
LMAO!
Allison who?
Skull-in, I think.
Once a Pimp, Always a Pimp!
Mark My Words:
The Grifter Pimp Allison Mack is planning on fleeing America at the first opportunity.
Just like her friend and mento Sara Bronfman.
That’s why she wants her passport.
What is the impact of Allison Mack moving overseas before the civil suit is settled?
Shadowstate-
You are a correct!
Allison Mack is demanding the return of her passport. When she is released from the hoosegow will she flee America to become a “citizen of the world”? Are the Bronfmans paying for her flight from America to some international sanctuary? What is the Grifter Allison Mack up to?
She is in jail.
Good news, bad news, I guess. The retirement account might be exempt from seizure, but Glazer could potentially petition the court for prejudgment liens to be filed against the real properties, if they are in fact in Mack’s name.
As to why Nikki Clyne would want to flaunt that new Jeep on social media, well, I have no clue.
Why does the Grifter Pimp Allison Mack want her passport back?
Why is the Grifter Pimp Allison Mack so eager to flee America?
Who is financing the Grifter Pimp’s evacuation from America?
The Bronfmans?
Some shady Latino businessman?
Since Allison Mack is no longer completely “broke” those who are suing her should know what assets are available to satisfy their judgments.
1) the mortgages for two properties with a combined estimated market value of approximately $1,730,000;
(2) Lien on an individual retirement account owned by Mack of $585,000.
Fair enough. If that was the legal agreement for Allison.
It’s nice to be a millionaire when you’re a criminal. Where are the newly minted Nxivm Cult criminal justice Advocates now?
“We Are As You.” In that we are also rich or just sucking wealth off that full Bronfman financial tit and we only care about what happens to our wealthy criminal friends.
Never see the cult Dead-enders dancing to bring awareness so that poor people have the same legal advantages wealthy people do when they are accused or convicted of a crime.
Poor people in the criminal justice system are the true, ” Forgotten Ones”.
Not Keith. Not Clare. Or Allison. Or Nancy. (Insert joke here that Kathy Russell is a little bit forgotten. But that’s probably to her advantage as Kathy moves on in her life).
These wealthy law breakers have had (and continue to have) every financial advantage a criminal could want.
In terms of the other blackmail/ collaeral being returned isn’t there a legal order coming up once Keith has exhausted his appeal attempts?
Alanzo-https://youtu.be/7YvAYIJSSZY
Let us re-read the list of Mack collateral:
When she joined DOS, she offered collateral as follows:
(1) A letter about Mack’s mother and father that would “destroy their character.”
(2) A contract that transferred ownership of Mack’s home if she broke her commitment to Raniere.
(3) A letter addressed to social services alleging abuse to Mack‘s nephews.
(4) Many graphic nude photos.
(5) A contract transferring custody of any children birthed by Mack to Raniere if Mack broke her commitment to Raniere.
This is the crap that Suneel, Nicki Clyne et al. are trying to defend as a good and empowering thing for woman. That nothing is morally wrong with this. Something even your worse enemy would not think to ask of you (besides the nude pics anyway). This is how morally bankrupt they are that they see demands like this and go “I don’t understand what the problem is, they volunteered it”. As if giving up things like this makes demanding it acceptable.
What hetero male in a position of power doesn’t want to see the hotties in his orbit naked? If Raniere’s collateral was only nude pics like some horny internet troll, that I would understand. I want to see Mack naked. Not saying its good to make naked pics a requirement for anything, just a little more understandable. But he didn’t stop at horny BS. He went for absolute control. That they cannot recognize that will always continue to boggle my mind.
As always my problem with them isn’t that they think Raniere was railroaded and want to fix it. You can have moral issues with someone and still want justice as theoretically a bedrock principle of the justice system. Its that they genuinely think his behavior was virtuous and innocent and continue to try to convince others of this.
Exactly! Spot on analyses.
When she joined DOS, she offered collateral as follows:
(2) A contract that transferred ownership of Mack’s home if she broke her commitment to Raniere.
(5) A contract transferring custody of any children birthed by Mack to Raniere if Mack broke her commitment to Raniere.
Anyone who signs a contract under vague terms such as ‘breaking her commitment’ to Raniere deserves to have that contract enforced. Who did she think was going to be the arbiter of whether the commitment was broken? Right.
On the other hand, the women who have left DOS and who are still sleeping uneasy lest their collaterals are released can probably relax. If anything is released, they can sue their ‘upline’ for blackmail and illegal release of private information. There is enough evidence now in the public domain to show who was holding the collateral, how it was collected, and the lines of responsibility. You cannot hold the Sword of Damocles over someone’s head when it is public knowledge you collected said Sword for nefarious purposes without implicating yourself. Checkmate.
“[Mack] has $585,000 in a retirement account. And if I read this correctly, she holds mortgages worth $1.7 million.”
Not after Glazer’s civil suit, she won’t.
There is no chance of the plaintiffs winning the civil suit. The two leads have been on offense for five years, throwing punch after punch, without anyone hitting back.
When they get nailed with counterpunch after counterpunch and their dirty laundry gets exposed, in court, on the public record, they’ll drop out or it will be dismissed.
Aristotle, how many people do you think Sarah recruited into the organization? How much money did she make off of them? How many EMs did she give students, despite not having a license to give therapy? How long did Sarah continue recruiting for DOS after knowing about the allegations about Keith, after knowing about the branding and the collateral?
If Nippy overcooks the food or doesn’t do the dishes on time, does Sarah make him sleep on the floor like Mark made Bonnie?
—There is no chance of the plaintiffs winning the civil suit.
Kevin and Alonzo, understand the law better than
Supreme Court Justices!
***
In reality, paralegals understand the law better than Kevin or Alonzo.
“Kevin”: For someone who claims to know very little about this case….you seem to have a lot of nitty-gritty details about the case!
Clifton Parker,
Right?!
That fool be changing stories constantly and thinks no one be noticing the inconsistencies.
“how many people do you think Sarah recruited into the organization?”
And how many women did Sarah brand on the pussy? How many did she blackmail? How many did she tell “you have a beautiful cunt” as she emailed the humiliating naked pic to her boyfriend the cult leader, who is now serving a life term behind bars.
Mack and her co-defendants are going to get crucified in civil court. Mack pleaded guilty in criminal court, where conviction requires a unanimous verdict. Civil court requires only a simple majority.
She admitted her guilt in criminal court and she can’t dispute it now. She confessed to terrible crimes, egregiously cruel. As I understand it she isn’t contesting the civil case. That means a summary judgement against her.
Mack has already kissed her fortune bye-bye. There are those among the plaintiffs who deserve their chunk of it.
Mack can get a job at Wal-Mart when she’s paroled. That’s all she deserves. Live out her life as an ex-con, keep her head down and disappear in shame and anonymity.
Aristotle, how many people did Sarah recruit into the organization?
How many did Mark recruit into the organization?
Directly and indirectly, how many people in the parent company’s pyramid ended up there due to a connection to Sarah or Mark, or someone in their chain?
You can avoid the question if you want to. Sarah and Mark won’t get that benefit, not as the lead plaintiffs in the case.
And when they refuse to answer, or lie and get caught, or tell the truth, and the number turns out to be astounding, it’s going to put the whole thing in jeopardy for the other plaintiffs, some of whom might have legit complaints against KR, the Salzmans and the Bronfmans.
From what I understand, the other Bronfman sister is already in England buying up properties (believe the villagers in the area are up in arms, to no avail) & establishing a NXVIM CULT COMPOUND there & there is already a NXVIM CULT COMPOUND in France where the Cult continues to suck people & money up!! Please correct me if I’ve misstated anything. The grift continues under the Brofman sisters. Keith gave them (well, they bought it at great expense from Keith) the mind control keys & they are (or one sister continues, in preparation for Clare’s arrival) to build the foundations of NXVIM Europe.
I want to marry Allison for her money.
El Ciclón y la Araña
October 1, 2022 at 7:15 am
I want to marry Allison for her money.
All that glitters is not gold. ShadowState1958
Shadowstate-
Araña shares the same name as Bangkok’s landscaper.