This comes in the nick of time. Raniere plans to file a pro see Rule 33 motion by midnight tomorrow. Chakravorty has been field marshaling experts and persons with new evidence.
Though Raniere will be filing pro see, Tully remains his attorney. Unlike other attorneys Raniere retained in the past, Tully knows prosecutors. He knows the power imbalance between the prosecutor and the average defendant. And power corrupts. He is used to challenging the government and the police and winning acquittals.
Tully, who practices in California, has frequently attacked the one-sided system stacked against defendants. He has written a book on government collusion.
Tully has made it evident he believes the FBI tampered with evidence to convict Raniere. He is competent in explaining it. He understands the technical and process issues at the heart of the Rule 33 motion.
Not at War With the Government
According to the BOP:
In early May 2022, the USP-Tucson Special Investigative Services (SIS) Department was monitoring telephone calls between [Raniere] and Chakravorty in
which they spoke about being “at war” with the federal government with “no holds barred.”
Even more concerning to the SIS was Plaintiff asking Mr. Chakravorty about the quality of the recordings and stating that he had many recordings.
Suneel Chakravorty [Picture above] released this statement to FR and the Albany Times Union.
Keith Raniere and I have had hundreds of phone calls and most of those calls were about how your federal law enforcement agency tampered with evidence. They cheated the jury. But you didn’t see any of those conversations quoted.
They wouldn’t want those published because they show a blueprint of how the government tampered. So yes, it is a war. It’s a fight for justice.
It’s a legal war, a war in the media and for understanding.
We’re fighting to prevent this from happening in other cases and it probably does.
Everybody has forgotten that the real issue here is whether the government can tamper with evidence even against a man who is well-hated. This whole “war” nonsense and selectively quoting is a great red herring. The real question is, did the government tamper with evidence or not?
Obviously, we are conducting a legal war. It is a battle waged with the pen and the court filing, and the government knows it.
I defy the government to release the transcripts of all our calls.
Then you could see it in context, but they won’t do that because it would probably prove to the world that tampering occurred.
Keep in mind also that they say this is some dangerous thing but it is an interesting coincidence that two days after we filed the Rule 33, they cut off our communication.
Ask them for all the tapes and publish them all. I dare the BOP to not just selectively pick a word or two here like ‘war.’ I mean, you’d think you’d have more than just the word ‘war’ and ‘no holds barred’ – four words. They selectively pruned four words out of hundreds of conversations. That’s the best they could come up with.
Keith Raniere and I want a peaceful resolution to the government corruption. We want them to stop planting evidence and doing foul deeds just because they can.
Lt. Anrthony Gallion of USP Tucson said of the action taken by BOP.
On May 3, 2022, as a result of the SIS Department’s findings and in consultation with the BOP’s Counter-Terrorism Unit, the USP-Tucson Warden imposed limitations on Plaintiff’s contact list, limiting Plaintiff to 10 active contacts, not including counsel, and all contacts were removed from Plaintiff’s list except Marianna Fernandez and 9 verified attorneys.
FR learned the 10 contacts are:
Marianna Fernandez – the mother of his youngest son and nine of his former attorneys.
Jennifer Bon Jean
Correcting One Mistake
“The SIS Department may determine whether any requested individuals are affiliated with NXIVM, ESP, DOS or any other NXIVM-affiliated organizations, as prohibited by the special conditions of supervised release in the Judgment.
If it is dangerous for Plaintiff to have access to particular individuals once released, it is also a security risk to allow Plaintiff to have access to these same individuals while incarcerated.”
No More Donuts or Dancers
Chakravorty told FR he would not bring coffee, donuts, or dancing girls to USP Tucson.
As for dancing girls, prisoners wouldn’t be able to see them from inside the prison at Tucson. MDC overlooked the street. UPS Tucson is set back with high fences around it. Even if they could see the women, it might be advisable to pass on the notion. Seventy percent of USP Tucson’s prison population are sex offenders. Therefore, it would not be a suitable plan to taunt them.
USP Tucson is a max-security prison meant to be safe for sex offenders. The need arose because in high-security prisons, sex offenders are in danger.
Inmates target sex offenders for violence and abuse.
The FBI tampering investigation started when Chakravorty met with Raniere after the trial. Chakravorty said he thought FBI Forensic Examiner Brian Booth lied about EXIF data.
He said Booth “misrepresented the reliability of the digital evidence” presented at trial.
They began to meet and speak by phone. They found evidence they believe proves the FBI tampered with evidence.
In January 2021, Chakravorty signed a Power of Attorney contract with Raniere. Chakravorty retained experts to analyze the information and findings of government experts. His role evolved into paralegal and manager of the legal team.
Chakravorty coordinates the tampering investigation. Raniere claims it is essential to attack his conviction. This is a matter of consequence for Raniere.
Meanwhile, there is no reason why the good folks at USP Tucson and Keith Raniere can’t be friends. After all, they will be together for the next 99 years – unless his appeal or Rule 33 motion succeeds. If it is true, if the FBI tampered, it is a matter of consequence for the public too..
Frank, but wait, wasnt Suneel going to provide the evidence of tampering a few months ago? And he was going to do it on your blog? What happened?
Nothing happened. It never does. Every day. Slightly different blog post that proves nothing. Yes. It’s been promised for years and they never deliver.
They’ve got nothing.
It’s so obvious.
Keith will never be a free man again.
How can an attorney file a motion for his client to be pro se on one thing in there case
That goes against everything in legal standings
I want to represent myself but keep my my lawyer and he will file my request for me
What the Frank is happening, something only a Raniere would try to pull
How is a pro se prisoner going to pull off representing himself in a motion?
Oh, I get it, its another angel to get Suneel back to do Raniere’s leg work for him.
Can’t you hear it now. But I can fight this in court because I can’t talk to my POA.
Who the Feank would pull this Raniere move, well Keith Rainier himself.
Since the Judge said Raniere wasn’t having any issues with motions, why not go pro se, kind of sort of, but retain his attorney as back up.
What a total cluster frank
Only Raniere could cook up an idea like this.
In all my years I’ve never heard of pro se & keep my attorney combo meal deal
What a franking idiot Raniere is
Just because Tully has appointment Chakravorty as his paralegal doesn’t mean the BOP Tucson is going to approve this.
If you read document #14 fully there is a procedure to follow and all attorney staff must be approved by the warden.
Has this happened? There are no court documents in the civil case saying so to date.
With Chakravorty and Raniere behavior there is plenty of information that these two cannot be trusted to stick to legal matters.
Chakravorty has already lied on a BOP form to gain access to Raniere. Is this another case of
The boy who hollered wolf and the BOP should just trust that Chakravorty is telling the truth this time?
Fool the BOP once, shame on Chakravorty, fool them again, everyone pays the price at what these two can cook up.
What does Raniere have left, really?
His motions has been filled and now it’s just a waiting game to see what happens as things get ruled on.
“With Chakravorty and Raniere behavior there is plenty of information that these two cannot be trusted to stick to legal matters” … and there lies the heart of the matter. There are things that KR can do legally (Tully) and there are stuff which can only be co-ordinated by Suneel (flying monkeys going after witnesses, planting key-loggers on computers, getting info on others bank accounts (‘you’re being watched’) the kind of things that KR ‘supervised’ in his heyday.
Under what name will Suneel be designated this time?
I am really glad I am not Keith Raniere. Why? Because I could be. I’ve fucked up in my life enough and had enough difficulties with women to be in his position.
Of course, I’ve never branded anyone. I’ve never had a legal team to sue people into poverty. I’ve never created a personal growth growth that was based on lies about my own accomplishments. I’ve never had sex with an underage girl. And, I’ve never taken or collected porno photos of underage girls.
But, I’ve had a series of messy relationships with women that hurt them very much. I’ve used people. I’ve manipulated and lied. In that way I am not any different than Keith. They all deserved better from me.
What this proves is that you are not like Keith at all, at all, we can all be shitbags and for a whole number of reasons.
The dangerous ones are those who cannot admit their mistakes and so cant grow past them.
You are different Anon. You’ve admitted this and can move forward and do better. You are no narc, who would blame everyone but themselves. At the least you now know how not to behave and at the most you could find out why you would have done such things and understand yourself better.
Vatican Promises Next Pope Will Be A Woman Of Color
VATICAN CITY—Amid rumors that Pope Francis will soon abdicate the See of Peter, the Sacred College of Cardinals has pledged to choose a woman of color as the next pope.
Vatican spokesman Monitori Vaticani clarified that cardinals felt it was “about time” for a woman Pope of color to bring her unique woman-of-color perspectives to the Church in Rome.
“Pope Francis has been our most progressive pope by far,” said Vaticani. “But he still had antiquated backward ideas about homosexuality and abortion. The church needs to keep progressing toward greater representation, which is now the only valid moral law still remaining in the world.”
According to sources, a small group of radicalized cardinals has strongly opposed any suggestion that a pope can be female, or that the color of their skin even matters. The majority of cardinals, however, remain committed to electing a BIPOC pope so they can add “SLAY QUEEN” to their regular chants.
Pope Francis has yet to make an official statement on any pending renunciation of his duties, though sources confirm that cardinals are putting together a shortlist of papal nominees anyway because “he’s older than Biden.”
Francis, for his part, has voiced support for the idea of a transgender black woman sitting upon the throne of Peter. “Please remember me as being on the right side of history,” he said.
I rather think that the CIA and Biden would like to have a Ukrainian pope. One like the Polish Pope John Paul II known by his civil name Karol Józef Wojtyła. A Polish nationalist as a tool in the fight against the Soviet Union and communism. Now the CIA and Biden need a Ukrainian nationalist as a pope in the fight against Russia.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EDMONDSON, et al.;
RANIERE, et al.;
NO. 1:20-CV-00485 (ERK) (CLP)
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties stipulate to the
following Order to protect the confidentiality of information in the above-captioned Action
produced by Suneel Chakravorty, a non-party to this litigation (the “Producing Non-Party”):
1. “Discovery Materials” means documents and other tangible things (including
affidavits and photographs), and testimony produced or provided to the Court or the Parties by
Counsel for the Producing Non-Party. The protections conferred by this Order apply to
Discovery Materials submitted to the Court by the Producing Non-Party in response to the March
24, 2022 Order (ECF No. 164).
2. “Party” or “Parties” shall mean the Plaintiffs and Defendants in this Action.
3. “Confidential Information” means (a) all photographs in any form or format
containing images of members of DOS, and (b) information in other Discovery Materials that is
specifically designated by the Producing Non-Party as Confidential Information. The designation
of Confidential Information must be narrowly tailored to address the confidentiality interests at
issue, in accordance with paragraph II.B.1 of Judge Komitee’s Individual Rules and Practices.
Nothing in this Order shall be construed to permit the Producing Non-Party to redact any
Confidential Information from Discovery Materials furnished to the Parties’ Counsel, if the Party
is represented, or to the Party, if that individual is not represented by counsel.
4. “Authorized Person” means a person described in Paragraph 7 below.
5. Discovery Materials subject to this Order shall be used solely for the purposes of
litigating this Action. Every person with custody of Discovery Materials containing Confidential
Information shall maintain such materials in a manner that ensures that access is strictly limited
to persons entitled to receive or possess Confidential Information in accordance with Paragraph 7
of this Order.
6. Designations should be made at the time of furnishing the discovery. Documents
containing information designated as Confidential Information shall be stamped by the
Producing Non-Party with the words “Confidential Information” at the top each page containing
information so designated. When producing any document containing designated Confidential
Information, the Producing Non-Party shall furnish to the authorized persons set forth in
Paragraph 7 the unredacted document bearing the “Confidential Information” stamp on each
page containing Confidential Information, and a copy of such document with proposed
redactions of the designated Confidential Information along with a written explanation of the
reasons for each proposed redaction sufficient to enable the Parties to comply with all
requirements for filing documents under seal.
7. Confidential Information shall be disclosed only to the Court, the Court’s staff,
court reporters in this Action, and to the following Authorized Persons:
(A) Counsel to the Parties and employees of counsel to the Parties with direct
functional responsibility for the preparation and trial of this Action;
(B) The Parties in this Action subject to the terms of Paragraph 8;
(C) Experts and consultants retained by the Parties for purposes of litigating
this Action subject to the terms of Paragraph 8; and
(D) Deposition witnesses subject to the terms of Paragraph 8.
8. Except for Counsel to the Parties and such Counsel’s employees, all Authorized
Persons must read this Stipulation and Order and sign Attachment A hereto prior to receiving
9. A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety or scope of the
designation of Confidential Information at the time designation is made, and failure to do so shall
not preclude a later challenge thereof.
10. Documents containing Confidential Information, including memorandums of law
or exhibits thereto, shall be filed in accordance with the procedures for filing documents under
seal or in redacted form set forth in paragraph II.B of Judge Komitee’s Individual Rules and
Procedures and the Court’s instructions for e-filing documents under seal. In offering a basis for
proposed redactions of Confidential Information, the filing Party may rely solely on the written
explanation provided to the Parties by the Producing Non-Party. If a memorandum or other
document refers to an exhibit that contains Confidential Information, but does not disclose that
Confidential Information, the exhibit shall be filed in accordance with the Court’s procedures for
filing and redacting sealed documents. No Party is required to provide the Producing Non-Party
with advance notice before filing a motion or document containing or referring to Confidential
11. Nothing herein shall be construed to affect in any way the admissibility of any
document, testimony, or other evidence at trial.
12. If, prior to the lifting of the discovery stay in this action, a Party wishes to take
additional discovery from the Producing Non-Party related to the photographs and affidavit
submitted by the Producing Non-Party to the Court, that Party must first obtain permission from
the Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d)(1).
13. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prohibit Plaintiffs, the Producing NonParty, or Defendants from seeking additional modifications of the Order if there is a good faith,
valid basis for doing so.
14. Upon the termination of this Action, every Party or Authorized Person who has
received documents disclosing Confidential Information shall return all copies of such
documents to the Producing Non-Party. In lieu of returning such materials, an Authorized
Person may provide a certification that all such copies have been destroyed.
IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________, 2022
HONORABLE CHERYL L. POLLAK,
CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: June 9, 2022
/s/ Neil L. Glazer
Neil L. Glazer
Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C.
1600 Market Street, Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Telephone: (215) 238-1700
Facsimile: (215) 238-1968
Counsel for Plaintiffs
/s/ Deborah J. Blum __
Deborah J. Blum
Deborah J. Blum, Esq.
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
Telephone: (646) 535-2586
Facsimile: (212) 409-8279
Counsel for Suneel Chakravorty
/s/ Nicole Clyne
1072 Bedford Ave. #87
Brooklyn, NY 11216
/s/ Dr. Danielle Roberts
4120 S. Lake Dr.
St. Francis WI 53235
/s/ Brandon B. Porter
Brandon B. Porter
P.O. Box 1102
500 W. Hickman Road
Waukee, IA 50263
PROTECTIVE ORDER CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing Protective Order. I further certify that I
understand the terms of this Protective Order and agree to be bound thereby. I understand that
access to information designated “Confidential Information” may be provided to me and that such
access is pursuant to the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order. I agree not to further disclose
Confidential Information to any other person, except to my employees and staff working on this
matter, whom I will instruct to keep such information confidential. I further acknowledge that any
violations of this Protective Order by me or by my staff may subject me to sanctions by the Court
entering this Protective Order, including but not limited to attorneys fees and damages for actual
harm caused. I submit to the personal jurisdiction of the Court solely with respect to enforcement
of the terms of this Protective Order. I agree to return or destroy all Confidential Information, and
summaries, abstracts and exerpts thereof, when instructed to do so by the Party who furnished
such information to me.
Dated: _____________________ Name___________________________
Title And Company
Hey, Nicki Clyne:
Have Elon Musk adopt you.
Your money problems will be over!
Happy Father’s Day: Elon Musk’s Son Files to Change Gender and Last Name, No Longer Wants to ‘Be Related’ to Dad
Elon Musk’s son — who now identifies as a transgender woman — is reportedly changing his full name and legal gender identity, stating that he no longer wants “to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form.”
TMZ reports that one of Elon Musk’s children, Xavier Musk, has filed legal documents to change his full legal name. Xavier reportedly identifies as transgender and, having turned 18 in April, will be changing his full name to Vivian Jenna Wilson.
In the legal docs, Xavier says that he wants to be recognized as female, but the name change appears to have been largely influenced by a desire to distance himself from his father, Elon Musk. Xavier stated in the legal documents the reason for changing his name was related to: “Gender Identity and the fact that I no longer live with or wish to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form.”
Neither Musk nor Xavier have previously said anything publicly about their relationship or Xavier’s decision to identify as a woman. However, in December of 2020, Musk tweeted that he supports the transgender community but added that: “All these pronouns are an esthetic nightmare.”
Xavier has a twin brother, Griffin Musk, and the last name Wilson appears to come from the children’s mother and Musk’s ex-wire, Canadian author Justine Wilson. Musk and Wilson were married from 2000 to 2008. The hearing to validate Xavier’s name change is set for Friday, June 24.
Elon Musk’s Transgender Daughter Files to Change Her Name, Dropping Musk
DAUGHTER FILES TO CHANGE LAST NAME …
No Longer Wants to ‘Be Related’ to Him
One of Elon Musk’s children wants nothing to do with him, and has filed legal docs to drop his famous last name — in fact, she’s changing her full name, and legally declaring her gender identity.
The documents were filed in L.A. County by Xavier Musk … at least that was the name she was given at birth, but now — having turned 18 in April — she says she wants her name to be Vivian Jenna Wilson.
In the docs, she says she wants to be recognized as female — but the name change isn’t just about her transitioning, there’s clearly a rift with dear ol’ Dad. Vivian lists her reason for the name change as … “Gender Identity and the fact that I no longer live with or wish to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form.”
FBI Forensic Examiner Brian Booth wasn’t addressing a jury of computer experts. He was addressing a jury of normal everyday people. EXIF data may have been difficult to change without knowledge of computers.
“Chakravorty coordinates the tampering investigation. Raniere claims it is essential to attack his conviction. This is a matter of consequence for Raniere.”
Suneel also also coordinates wiping Clare’s ass for her.
Suneel will still be barred from the contact list. Being accepted by Tully as a paralegal won’t make any difference. BOP will weigh all facts and circumstances in their decision. Suneel will never see Keith or talk to Keith.
A “war for understanding”?
How does that work?
You think you can attack and battle humans into agreeing or converting to your pedophile leader’s twisted beliefs?
You think dominating and waging violence brings about human understanding?
What Nxivm module taught that horrific garbage?
Never gonna happen.
Declaring war is not a great choice to foster understanding in humans.
That will be $20, 000.
In my next intensive we shall explore, “building friendship thru abuse”.
If you sign up right now you will get 0 % off the class. But you will be one of the 1st to sign-up!
So there’s that…
The battle between the BOP and Keith Raniere may be over and the BOP has already won.
Raniere may pretend there is still a war to be fought by continuing to file pointless motions and lawsuits he continues to lose.
Raniere’s cell mate may use more lube if the Bronfmans pay for some of his cellie’s appeals.
Frank may have run out of interesting info about NXIVM.
Frank’s only option may be to continue to publish Keith’s press releases for free.
Inflation may cause the prices of prison commissary goods to increase.
Raniere may not pass Go, nor may he collect $200, though he can collect commissary goods.
Why lie about the photos? The FBI messed up and justice should be seen. I agree with Suneel letting us all see the conversations, not just a few words.
Well done to Frank Parlato, who continues to report factual information that most of the tribal ninnies who read his blog don’t want known.
You keep referring dancing “girls”. There were dancing WOMEN.
Andl there were dancing little b****** Eduardo and Suneel.
There were no “erotic” dancing “girls” for incarcerated pedophile Keith Raniere.
This will not do anything. The court found Raniere would not suffer irreparable harm if he could not contact Suneel.
Even if Tully sponsors Suneel, that factor remains unchanged. Which I am sure Tully understands since it is only now that he is willing to sponsor him.
Like when Thatcher used to walk through with the ‘Aye’ votes for capital punishment – she was safe to do that because she knew it would be voted down by others.
“Sources tell FR that attorney Joseph Tully designated Chakravorty as his paralegal”
Hmmm… “sources”. Would they be Suneel Chakravorty, these sources?
It’s a bit late in the game anyway. This ridiculous pro se motion is due in a matter of hours.
Pro se: The Man Who Represents Himself In Court Has A Fool For A Client. Apparently this latest motion is so absurd that not even Tully would touch it.
Tully is a firebrand lawyer. He attacks the system. He wrote a book and everything (printed by a vanity press- Google it).
He “knows prosecutors”. Well so does anyone who spends time in courthouses.
Honestly it looks to me like this stillborn appeals effort, with its choice of crusading firebrand lawyer and its multiple motions and last-minute filings and letters to the press and yes its saturation coverage on the FR, is mostly a PR effort.
The dead-enders are looking for a way to rehabilitate Raniere’s image. The way they hope to do this is by attacking the government and the media. Neither of which are exactly well-loved by the public.
That’s what’s behind the “FBI tampered!” accusation. And that’s ALL that’s behind it. Certainly there’s no evidence.
So let’s endlessly back the claim that the FBI tampered. I mean, they MIGHT have, right? Anything’s possible, right? So why not assert it DID happen. Because that’s logic. In clown world.
Let me tell you what will happen. Raniere’s appeal will be denied as expected. The motions will be all be dismissed. Raniere will remain in prison. Chakravorty, Clyne and co. will then holler “Injustice! This proves our point! The system is corrupt!”
Because that was their plan all along. And the FR, regardless of intentions, has been enabling them all this time.
It’s amazing that Suneel, being somewhat intelligent, doesn’t realize he’s being used as a puppet. It will be telling when Keith runs out of options. Guess who will get thrown under the bus?
How about the Isaac Edwards scam?
The dead-enders love to talk about alleged lying. But not when they are the ones caught doing it.
The BOP may deny Suneel any visitation rights regardless of his status as a paralegal.
The BOP may have wide leeway established by over a century of legal precedent to run prisons as they see fit.
People may want to read the text of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution and see whether it abolishes slavery in prisons.
May is the cruelest month.
That alone prove Chakravorty is a lair and shouldn’t be trusted