Keith Raniere Declares War on His Federal Prosecutors – Proves That NXIVM/ESP Is Alive and Dangerous as Ever

As predicted, Raniere is now a political prisoner.

His group is trying to extend his appeal to the broader population by bringing up a new defense: the mob’s desire for vengeance. The NYT article forced prosecutors to act. They wouldn’t act at NDNY and when EDNY acted, it overacted, thus ignoring Raniere’s right to an unbiased trial to satisfy the mob’s lust for blood.

The goal of his group is to bring broader support for a new trial with a new legal team representing him.

Some of us have a theory about why Suneel’s suddenly risen to the surface. Some of us hypothesize that Suneel had a significant part, or possibly a leadership role in, the analysis of Keith’s hard drive access statistics. Consider this: Keith had access to Clare’s millions to get the best electronic analysis team on the planet, but this evidence never surfaced in his defense. That leaves two possibilities: Keith had the evidence and wanted to suppress it so he could be declared guilty and have evidence in his pocket for a mistrial motion or this next jabberwocky movement he’s invented, or Keith didn’t have the evidence in hand because Suneel failed to produce it.

As you read through the transcription of Keith and Suneel’s telephone exchanges, any reader could see that Suneel is more or less stuttering out half-sentences to Keith, never once completing a full thought to Keith. If Suneel was put in charge of hard drive analysis and failed to produce sufficient data indicating Keith never accessed the hard drive with Keith’s own laptop (which is a possibility that would indeed paint a far different picture and indicate that the Dani Fernandez testimony was perjury and the Cami photos possibly planted by her older sister Dani to enact revenge for the whole locked in a bedroom incident, which Dani did indeed herself perpetuate by the way – she was a kleptomaniac and kept stealing and looking for ways to steal information online), then Suneel’s failure to deliver on a set of evidence to use in defense would constitute an ethical breach against Keith, and Suneel may have chosen to step up into a spotlight supporter role for the jail dancers and this new we the people movement.

It is a possibility that logically follows from the way Keith enrolls people to do difficult things for him and loops them into further labor (usually free labor) to “heal their breach” against him. Oddly, this system is a system of victimhood, painting Keith as the ultimate victim of everyone around him, because they broke their commitment to do what they said their were going to do, or as Jim Del Negro puts it, “you broke a promise to Keith.” This black-and-white topsy-turvy surface analysis has an obvious flaw in the premise that Keith has no responsibility in what he asks people to do, and as an outsider looking in this seems obviously crazy cakes, but to those still inside, still dedicated, they cannot or will not see this system playing out over and over again — this is sad.

With each passing day that gets closer to his sentencing, it’s now become a question of how high can he build the walls of narcissistic self-delusion that surround himself?

Here is the Team for the NXIVM front group Make Justice Blind:

Nicki looks the part of a prim and proper legal eagle.
You would not recognize Nicki from when she is twerking outside the MDC with her Butt in the air.

When you read Nicki’s Manifesto, which is printed below, you will see that Nicki has brass balls.

Make Justice Blind

Our Team

Eduardo Asunsolo
Eduardo is a professional interpreter and voice over artist. He owns a translation business, working with the political asylum office, immigration court and federal court. He lives with his wife and son in Brooklyn, NY and they have a daughter on the way. He studied acting at the revered conservatory NAW New York with Mike Nichols, and graduated with a degree in marketing from ITESM University in México. He has been committed to wrongful conviction advocacy for the past two years and is thrilled to be bringing these initiatives to life.

Nicki Clyne @nickiclyne
Nicki Clyne began her career as an actor, most notably on the hit television series Battlestar Galactica. She has worked as a writer, a news analyst and television host, but it wasn’t until she experienced the failings of the criminal justice system first-hand that she decided to dedicate herself to much needed advocacy efforts in the field. She works directly with people inside prison, as well as produces media that brings awareness to important, and sometimes controversial, issues.

Michele Hatchette @thismixele
Michele was born and raised in Harlem and attended one of the first historically integrated schools in the country. Michele has spent her career in education, agriculture, hospitality, and community building. Most recently, she has become a co-leader of several efforts that seek to reform the ‘justice’ system by exposing and addressing the conduct of the people who make the decisions within the ‘justice’ system.

Suneel Chakravorty @suneelius
Suneel grew up in South Florida and studied mathematics at Harvard College. He started his career as a software engineer at Yipit (now YipitData) in NYC, co-founded a software consulting firm called SimpleFractal, and now trains teams to use machine learning and data science. He believes that the justice system needs to evolve and become data-driven and devoid of prejudice and hate, and that technology and public participation can facilitate this quickly.

Marc Elliot @MarcE_talks
Marc Elliot is an award-winning inspirational speaker on compassion and tolerance who lived with Tourettes Syndrome for 20 years. He ended up beating it completely mind over body with tools from NXIVM. Marc is no stranger to prejudice, both from living with Tourettes and then being a proud supporter of NXIVM. These experiences have inspired him to join these initiatives in the fight against hate.

https://www.makejusticeblind.com/team

Here is the Make Justice Blind Manifesto:

Make Justice Blind

Justice Reform through Public Accountability
The Affidavit contains eight simple statements that every prosecutor should be able to affirm.

A justice system is only as good as the people who enforce its laws. If there are corrupt actors within it, no matter what the laws, the system will be ineffective and unjust.

It is not enough to exonerate innocent people after they’ve spent 30 years in prison. These wrongful convictions should be unacceptable in a civilized society, and the individuals who contribute to this type of injustice should be exposed and held accountable.

The Affidavit is a tool that, through a partnership between the media and the people, sends a message to prosecutors and judges everywhere: we, the people, are watching.

The petition explaining the Affidavit and the specific points of this first application of it can be found below. We are starting with the provable corruption that occurred in Keith Raniere’s case, and intend to apply it to other cases of misconduct as people demand public accountability.

Petition for Media
We the People,
Police the Police,
Prosecute the Prosecutors,
Judge the Judges,
Investigate the Investigators.

A justice system is a system of people – justice comes from the quality of their conduct. No number of rules, structures, organizations, or laws will change that. The quickest method of justice reform is through exposure and public accountability. Through a partnership between the media and We the People, and with a set of well-delineated tools, we can bring about major reform in months, not years or decades.

Within this partnership, the first tool we will launch is an affidavit process that holds prosecutors accountable through media exposure and public pressure. The first case to which this will be applied is not without controversy, but it has one of the biggest spotlights and incontrovertible evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and corruption. It is The United States vs. Raniere et al., which took place in May and June of last year.

Mr. Raniere’s prosecutors will be served the enclosed affidavit, which contains eight simple statements of basic ethical conduct that every prosecutor should be able to affirm easily and automatically. Additionally, there are three statements of conduct specific to this case that the prosecutors, if they acted within the confines of the law, should be able to affirm. This affidavit is necessary and exists because we have evidence proving they will not be able to honestly affirm a single statement.

n addition to this affidavit, there will be a $35,000 Innocence Challenge, a podcast and other provocative public actions that bring hidden transgressions to light and send a message to judges, prosecutors and federal agents that they answer to us, We the People.

Please support prosecutorial accountability by covering this event and keeping the pressure on the prosecutors until their transgressions are addressed. Please email us at team@makejusticeblind.com if you would like to be added to the petition.

The Affidavit

We, the Prosecutors, of the United States vs. Raniere et al, specifically Richard Donoghue, Mark Lesko, Tanya Hajjar, Moira Kim Penza, in upholding our vow of office, and sacred duty to the people of the United States, do hereby affirm and personally initial all that are true with respect to this case (if any of these are denied, please initial, write “denied” next to your initials and, optionally, attach an explanation):

We the Prosecutors of the United States vs. Raniere et al, specifically Richard Donoghue, Mark Lesko, Tanya Hajjar, Moira Kim Penza, and Seth DuCharme, in upholding our vow of office, and sacred duty to the people of the United States, do hereby affirm and personally initial all that are true with respect to this case (if any of these are denied, please initial, write “denied” next to your initials and, optionally, attach an explanation):

1. We, the Prosecutors, did not knowingly make any false or misleading statements to the public or media.

2. We, the Prosecutors, did not knowingly make, or allow any federal agents to make, any false statements to the court.

3. We, the Prosecutors, handled all potential witnesses properly. No witness was in any way intentionally challenged to augment or change his or her opinions or beliefs by us.

4. We, the Prosecutors, never threatened any potential witness with indictment in an attempt to dissuade him or her from participating in, or supporting, the defense.

5. We, the Prosecutors, either had no reason to suspect collusion or hidden financial motives among our witnesses, or we made sure our suspicions were properly investigated. We did not object to any evidence, including cross-examination, that might realistically show collusion amongst our witnesses.

6. We, the Prosecutors, have stated in open court we have victims who feared for their lives. We made sure that these representations were properly investigated and, in each case, we discovered that there were legitimate threats to the life of the witness.

7. We, the Prosecutors, did not allow any of our witnesses to commit perjury about events and/or evidence known to, or possessed, by us.

8. We, the Prosecutors, have never tampered with evidence. All evidence presented had a well-documented chain of custody, with no gaps. All evidence was secure and there were no unrecorded accesses. No evidence presented was modified before or during forensic analysis.

https://www.makejusticeblind.com/affidavit

A word to the wise for Nicki and her friends:

Prosecutors don’t like people barging into their offices with cameras recording them especially at 5 PM which is closing time.
If you have a beef with the US DOJ there is an Inspector General’s office to handle allegations of misconduct.

Years ago a top Federal prosecutor in Chicago named William Hogan was fired for using false testimony in the El Rukn street gang case.

U.S. FIRES TOP PROSECUTOR IN RUKN CASE

Matt O’Connor, Tribune Staff Writer
CHICAGO TRIBUNE

After a lengthy internal investigation of its tainted prosecution of El Rukn street gang leaders in Chicago, the U.S. Justice Department has fired the lead attorney in the case, it was disclosed Wednesday.

Assistant U.S. Atty. William Hogan Jr., once hailed as the star prosecutor who convicted more than 50 Rukns and effectively dismantled the notorious street gang’s leadership, later came under intensive judicial criticism for the way he did it.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1996-05-02-9605020024-story.html