Vicente: India Was Enamored With Unstable Allison Mack

Allison Mack [l] and India Oxenberg [r] -

This is the next in our series on Mark Vicente’s testimony in the trial of Keith Alan Raniere. He is being examined by AUSA Mark Lesko.

In this selection, Vicente talks about Allison Mack and what he perceived as her generally unstable mental condition, as well as the prominence she had in the leadership of various Nxivm groups. He also testifies about India’s infatuation with Mack and about a woman named Debra who Raniere evidently had hoped to lure into his sex cult.

Debra is an actress and Frank Report is not naming her since she clearly did not join DOS and, in fact, found Raniere repulsive.

Mark J. Lesko

 

Mark Vicente

Q   Did you witness the defendant being physically intimate with Allison Mack?

A   I did….

***

Q  Do you recall when you first met Ms. Mack?

A   Yes. I don’t recall the exact year, but it was at a volleyball game. She had just flown in from… Seattle on the Bronfman jet, and she had just come from the airport to … meet…  me and Raniere.

Q   What was Allison Mack’s role in NXIVM?

A   Well, in the beginning she was… a student who became a coach, who eventually became a proctor. She was one of the heads of Jness…. she was one of the leaders. She was the head of humanities in Albany.

Allison Mack left her acting career to become a teacher of acting for the Source.

Q   Was that a committee?

A   …yes. And then she also was the head of the company called The Source… the acting program. And then she also … involved in a company called The Knife. The Knife of Aristotle was a media analysis company.

Q   Who promoted Allison Mack to proctor?

A   I don’t recall …. but I do remember having a discussion with Lauren Salzman about it. … I remember when she was going to be promoted, I remember saying … ‘are you serious, that’s insane. There’s something not stable about her. And … she’s got this gaggle of women that she’s mentoring that are not doing well.’ I was very concerned. I don’t recall who exactly gave the final sign-off on the promotion, though.

Q   Who had ultimate authority to decide on who would progress on the path?

A   … Raniere…..

Q   Was Allison Mack a member of the defendant’s trusted group?

A   She was.

Q   When was The Source developed?

A   The Source was developed sometime at 2014.…

Q   And did The Source have curriculum?

A   The Source had curriculum. What would happen with that curriculum is Raniere would meet with us. Myself or somebody else would videotape the meeting. And that would be turned into the actual curriculum. And then once he had done…. “the download of all of the material,” that was turned into like written things and videotapes and then we began running trainings.

Q   And the focus was on actors?

A   The focus was on actors. We were told later musicians and… public speakers, but it was mostly performance. You know, being in front of people, how to best use the instrument of presentation or performance.

Q   Did the curriculum developed for The Source, was that an adaptation of the defendant’s tech system as applied to actors?

A   To some degree. There were certain things in there that were part of some of the other curriculum. There was a section that was from Ultima reverence …. emotional flexibility, how to deal with…  feelings that you struggled with. And then there was this….focus on … looking like you’re having the feeling but you don’t have to show it, just look like you’re having it. So again, like you don’t have to be feeling any grief just… look — what do people look like when they’re grief stricken. Then do that. What do their heads do, arms do, do they look down? And basically, you know, teach actors … to model. I was used to the more inside out, which was with field of thing body, find a moment in your life. This was more, well, a shortcut. Just look like you’re having the emotion and the audience will believe you.

Q   Did Allison Mack eventually move to Clifton Park?

A   She did eventually….

Q   Do you recall approximately when this happened?

A   …it was pre-2013 but I don’t remember the exact year.

Q   And where did Allison Mack reside in Clifton Park?

A   So she moved into 7 Generals Way, actually, along with my wife and I.

***

Allison Mack left her life in California and Vancouver to reside in small town Albany to be closer to Keith Raniere. She bought this modest townhome in the Knox Woods subdivision where Raniere resided. It was later forfeited to the federal government after her conviction.

Q   Did you stop living with Allison Mack at 7 Generals Way?

A   Yes.

Q   What happened?

A   She had said at one point she needed to do some more private work and she needed to be alone. So she moved a few blocks away to Grenadier Court…. She said she needed privacy to do some of the different projects she was working on.

Q   Did Allison Mack get along with your wife?

A   At the beginning, I think, yes. Later, not so much.

Q   Was your wife involved in The Source?

A   Yes.

Q   Was there conflict between your wife and Allison Mack regarding The Source?

A   There was. The concerns my wife had related to the divisions that were occurring in the company….  there were like 12, maybe 13 people that all felt like that was part of their company, and then suddenly there were their divisions, of like, no, you people are not in charge, these people are in charge. And it got … messy. She had concerns about the way it was handled, the way… some people had been … pushed to the side as unimportant… just having no value in this company at all. And she brought that up a few times, and she was challenged a great deal about that. And she also had concerns about Allison’s… psychology about her… erratic behavior and whether she … would be able to lead well.

Q   At some point do you recall a meeting involving yourself, Allison Mack, your wife and the defendant?

A   Yes. He offered to do an arbitration between Allison and my wife, and I was there…. I had said to him things were not… working. There’s a lot of unresolved issues with this company and a lot of people feel very slighted. So he said, ‘well, maybe I should jump on board,’ which is pretty unusual. Most of the time he would say ‘it’s not good if I would do an arbitration because I’m final point. After me is the point of no return’…. For some reason he felt that he would do the arbitration.

Keith Raniere arbitrated the conflict between Allison Mack and Bonnie Piesse. Raniere concluded that Allison was out to destroy Bonnie.

Q   What was an arbitration at NXIVM?

A   An arbitration at NXIVM is basically figuring out what is the issue that each person is having, and then trying to help them understand how the issue they’re having is related to their … issues… their inner deficiencies, their life issues… and to get each party to take responsibility for what’s theirs and then see if there’s any action that needs to be taken….

So it wasn’t just, ‘well, okay, each of you talk.’ It’s ‘each of you talk and now let’s look at other unresolved things with respect to each of you that you need to look at that may be affecting the way you’re seeing things.’….

Q   So what did the defendant say at the arbitration meeting involving yourself, Allison Mack and your wife?

A   Well, he started the meeting by saying, ‘well, let’s just start with ground rules. Does everybody at the table believe that everybody at this table have good intent?’ And, of course, everybody said yes. If you said no, it would be a huge problem. Saying no was a huge problem because it looks like, oh, you project, if you think somebody has bad intent, oh, well, clearly you’re the one with bad intent, so of course you said yes.

And then he began to elicit from each person …different things. He basically had Allison admit that she… hated my wife, was trying to destroy her. Was very jealous of her. And then… he said to my wife… basically … ‘there’s things you’ve been through like loss of innocence, I’ve seen this kind of thing.’ And then he tasked … Allison with finishing it, that what she done was a real problem and that she needed to really look into herself and fix this — this impulse that she has to destroy another woman. You know that has to be fixed. So that was the way I remembered ending was basically she has to go fix this.

Q   You referred to a person named India. Do you know India?

A   I did know India for quite some time.

Catherine & India Oxenberg

Q   Is India the daughter of the well-known actress?

A   Yes, she is.

***

Q   How did you meet India?

A   I met India in Los Angeles ….  Maybe…  2011, 2012… We would do introductory presentations. And we were doing one in Santa Monica and India and her mother came …  to the presentation along with a lot of other people. And myself and Sarah were doing the actual presentation, and at the end of the presentation, India decided that she wanted to join and do an intensive. So that was … the first time that I met her.

Q   Did India have a relationship with Allison Mack?

A   She would come to have a relationship when she spent more time at Albany. She — she ended up being tutored by Allison Mack or Allison Mack took a particular interest in her and took her under her wing….. I had a lot of concerns about that.

Q   So India traveled to Albany to take NXIVM programs?

A   She did. She did the first five days in Los Angeles and she may have done the remaining 11 days in Albany, I don’t recall, but then she began doing some Level 2s. She joined Jness as well. And she ended up doing a lot of curriculum.

Q   While she was in Albany, are you aware that India had gone on a walk with the defendant?

A   Yes….. India was part of the Los Angeles center and she had all these different dreams and things she wanted to do, and my wife and I were trying to help her. I was shooting material of her. She wanted to create [a] talk show … talking to amazing people in the world and…. she wanted to create this cooking line. So she had a lot of dreams and … I was thinking … that’s what we want to do…. we want to help people make their dreams come true. So I found that India was struggling with leadership so we put her in charge of certain things in the center and see if she could step up as a leader. Then she went to Albany and suddenly just gave everything up…. I remember going, ‘What about your dreams?’ ‘I’m sort of changing my focus’ …she said. She [said she] took a walk with Keith and [said], ‘I’m much clearer now.’

… I spoke to [Raniere] …. I said, ‘I’m very concerned. We’re just beginning to get to this place where she might begin to take leadership, which would help her in her life and suddenly … she gives everything up and now she’s going to Albany. What happened on that walk?’ He said, ‘well, I don’t remember very much’… he was very, very vague about it, and I say ‘I’m very concerned. She’s kind of giving up everything she cares about to go live in this little place and I don’t know if that’s going to be that good for her.’ And, you know, in usual fashion, he said a bunch of things like, ‘well, maybe I don’t know what’s going on.’

Allison Mack [l] and India Oxenberg [r] –
Q   I think you mentioned that you had some important concerns about India’s relationship with Allison Mack?

A   Well, I was very concerned… I saw with India was that she became enamored with Allison Mack. The kind of enamor where you don’t just admire someone because they were skilled, like fall in love with Allison Mack, you are my everything. And I said to myself, something’s unhealthy about that. I don’t know that it’s healthy for her to look at Allison Mack as some kind of… deity who knows all. Knowing Allison…. I didn’t think that Allison should necessarily be mentoring young women, so yeah, I had concerns.

Q   You discuss those concerns with the defendant?

A   I did.

Q   What did you say?

A   I remember saying something like, ‘I don’t think that she should be mentored by Allison. I don’t think it’s healthy. I think Allison has a series of issues that I’m concerned with and I don’t think she should be teaching India or some of the other people.’

Q   What was the defendant’s response?

A  … I remember him saying something like…  it’s not really my concern. It was the strange thing … he knew about everything, but then when I questioned about him about some things, then he didn’t know about it. So it was a mystery.

Q   Did India become involved in a NXIVM-related company in Clifton Park?

A   Yes. So one of the companies that she was involved …was … a company call Delegates…. Delegates was like a task rabbit, you know. You call somebody, I need my laundry picked up, or I need to be picked up from the airport, kind of thing. So India was basically put in charge of Delegates. That was her company. People would call her or text her and tell her what we needed and she would look at the workforce that was available and then assign them. So that was her company.

Q   And who worked for Delegates?

A   The people that worked for Delegates were mostly the younger people in the community. A lot of the LeBaron girls were working for Delegates, and then some of the other younger members. They were … younger people that didn’t really have a career choice yet that were working for her.

Q   And the LeBaron girls were from the community in Mexico?

A   The community of LeBaron, Chihuahua, yeah.

Q   Do you know a person named Debra?

A   Yes.

Q   Who is Debra?

A   Debra is somebody who was a student initially in the Los Angeles center. And then also came to Albany to take some trainings as well….

Q   Did you ever have a discussion with the defendant about Debra?

A   I did. I’d had a conversation with her about the concern she had and I remember — I called … Raniere. And I said I have some concerns…

***

Q   …. can [you] tell us what Debra told you?

**

A   I had a phone conversation with Debra and she told me that there’s a function on Facebook where you can poke somebody. She told me that Raniere had poked her… several times. That he had asked if he could Skype with her. And that also when she was in Albany and she attended volleyball, he walked off the game mid-game and sort of fawning all over her and she was very creeped out.

She also told me that she had a concern, because somebody called Amanda had tried to enroll her into a secret society, and Amanda wanted for her to give some form of collateral…. blackmailing material to keep her silence about the society. And she was deeply concerned about these things. So that’s what she shared with me.

Q   Did you subsequently have a conversation with the defendant about what Debra had told you?

A   I did. So in the conversation with him, I said to him something to the effect, you know, ‘what are you doing with her? You’re scaring her. You poked her on repeatedly on Facebook.’ He said, ‘Well, it was just once.’ And I said, ‘And what about Skype? I tried to Skype you for years and you said you don’t have Skype.’

And then also I began talking to him about this secret society and somebody trying to enroll her in something that required, you know, blackmailing material. And I was very concerned about it. And he said to me, ….  it was a fairly long conversation about a number of things; you know, including my understanding at that point that he might be the head of this society, and … he said to me: ‘Well, could you tell me who it is?’ And I said: ‘I can’t. Because if you are indeed the head of this society and this is true, if I tell who it is, you might release their collateral to the world in some way, and that’s a huge problem.’

So that was a grave concern to me. And he said: ‘Well, he would investigate it.’ We had a private conversation about things going on with the women that he said he would investigate and, again, he was saying: ‘I’ll investigate it.’

And I remember further saying to him: ‘I’m really worried about these women. They look like zombies.’ I remember him saying: ‘You have to define what a zombie is.’ And I realize I gave him a general practice of deflection. So I said: ‘Okay, call me crazy then.’ He says: ‘Well I’m not calling you crazy, we have to figure these things out.’ And I had the sense that he was just evading me.

Q   …. when was that discussion…?

A   … April 2017, I think.

 

***

END

Allison Mack and India Oxenberg leave a Jness meeting at Apropos in fall of 2017.

This selection gives us another insight into Nxivm and Raniere – in the years leading up to his destruction. He was operating in secret his DOS scheme and manipulating women to get them to come to Albany – like Allison, India and Debra.

Allison got completely engulfed. India, in large part due to her mother’s efforts, escaped.

She would have been very likely charged had it not been for her mother’s intervention – charged like Allison was – for attempted sex trafficking. She had been described in the original criminal complaint, identified only as co-conspirator #2. Allison was co-conspirator #1.

Vicente right along had doubts. He had doubts about Mack’s stability and ability to lead and mentor other women. He spoke to Raniere and was rebuffed.

He had doubts that India should uproot and abandon her big dreams to go to tiny Albany to live in the shadow of Mack. He expressed it to Raniere and was rebuffed.

Debra smelled a rat from the onset and spoke to Vicente about it. He encouraged her to not get dragged in and spoke to Raniere about it and again was rebuffed. Happily, Debra did not get sucked in and gave no collateral.

Through it all, Vicente is beginning to see that Raniere may not be the superior being he had thought he was. And that Raniere may have been, after all, nothing more than a liar.

As we shall see in a future post, the breaking point came and Vicente went from being a loyal follower to a potent adversary who had a large hand in the takedown of this monstrous cult that pretended to be only out to enable and empower its membership but was, in reality, seeking to enslave and ruin them all.

 

The monster with Mark Vicente

 

About the author

Frank Parlato

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave
Dave
3 years ago

Mark Vicente reminds me of Albert Speer. He paints himself as the voice of decency and reason. Speer knew about the Holocaust and Vicente knew about “collateral” and lots more. Both are clever but guilty of supporting crimes.

Kristin's fault
Kristin's fault
3 years ago

If Kristin Krook hadn’t dragged Ally into the sex cult then India couldn’t have become enamored of her.

Actresses who get cast are often asked, who did you blow to get that role? Maybe Krook should be asked, who did you blow to not get mentioned in that trial?

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

It’s been reported here that KK laundered money and recruited young girls and was a coach and the poster girl for the cult and part of the inner circle, then lied about everything! Why wasn’t her name ever mentioned once in the trial? Who is protecting her?

Paul
Paul
3 years ago

Cluster B personality disorders

Cluster B personality disorders are characterized by dramatic, overly emotional or unpredictable thinking or behavior. They include antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder and narcissistic personality disorder.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/personality-disorders/symptoms-causes/syc-20354463

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Point?

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Paul,

No kidding Mack and Oxenberg have personality disorders. LOL

Sounds more like Mr. Shadow. LOL

Mr. Shadow’s Quadratic Equation:

(overly emotional)+ (histrionic)*2(antisocial)
—————————
10* [ (Normal) – (grandiose+narcissism)]

= ( total crazy) product LOL

When I was in the US Navy I would have had Mr. Shadow Sectioned 8. LOL

Some people should stick to Public-Libraries and wave a flag from the sidelines. LOL

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Is Shadowstate crazy? I recently started following Frank Report for the 5G articles. Shadowstate is extremely knowledgeable on a number or topics and issues. How a shame.

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

“What was Allison Mack’s role in NXIVM?
A Well, in the beginning she was… a student who became a coach, who eventually became a proctor. She was one of the heads of Jness…. she was one of the leaders. She was the head of humanities in Albany.”
And that is not fitting with the truth…plus it doesn’t change that it happened after she was mentally abused…
Just a little reminder as the why she is a victim and vicente the idiot.

“A …yes. And then she also was the head of the company called The Source… the acting program. And then she also … involved in a company called The Knife. The Knife of Aristotle was a media analysis company.”
BS for both as the source was not having a proper leader (and some pointed HIM as the head…) and the knife, she was not involved more than once for a short period.

“Q Who promoted Allison Mack to proctor?”
The interesting point would have been when…not who.
And excuse me but the prosecution was turning around and around there as Allison was a front and the scapegoat…She had no power at all.

Vicente, in the other hand had much power (including in one of the group he pretend she had power…Dr porter pointed him as the head of the source, for example.

He is trying to diminish his involvement and use Allison as a scapegoat.

That is probably why he isn’t talking about the when…
He , vicente, was an EXECUTIVE for 10 years when it all happened…and he did participate the crime.

Allison became proctor exclusively for the front, the blaming and potentially to convince her she has lost everything…she got a virtual position with no power nor money involved.

“Q Was Allison Mack a member of the defendant’s trusted group?
A She was.”
When?
From what is know by people aware of it (and he is included), it is after her coercion…mails confirm this.
This is irrelevant and the date not cited is the proof

“Q When was The Source developed?
A The Source was developed sometime at 2014.…”
False, 2013…and it was already active in 2014…she was the front of it because contrary to him and his wife, her career was meaninful to raniere (in this specific domain).

No connection with the story at first and he know that as he was the real puppeteer of this group.

“Q What happened?
A She had said at one point she needed to do some more private work and she needed to be alone. So she moved a few blocks away to Grenadier Court…. She said she needed privacy to do some of the different projects she was working on.”
WHEN? i know when but ignoring the date was the reason i was angry with this whole trial trying to pin the scapegoat (all while knowing it was a scapegoat)

“Q Was your wife involved in The Source?
A Yes.”
Oh yes she was…that why she (and him) , despite his own testimony about raniere destroying Allison turned into a blaming game…she wanted to have the “front” of the group…
But she fail to understand that she would have been the scapegoat then…

Allison took the blame for each of them because of this position and this despite the material proof and testimony showing her lack of involvement and her mental state (confirm by the idiot himself…)

“Q Was there conflict between your wife and Allison Mack regarding The Source?
A There was. The concerns my wife had related to the divisions that were occurring in the company…. there were like 12, maybe 13 people that all felt like that was part of their company, and then suddenly there were their divisions, of like, no, you people are not in charge, these people are in charge.”
Yeah i remember that part where it’s clearly pointed that Allison was the lead but not really…which ,once again, fit with the fact she is the scapegoat and the victim…used exclusively as the “pretty face” of the group.

“And she brought that up a few times, and she was challenged a great deal about that. And she also had concerns about Allison’s… psychology about her… erratic behavior and whether she … would be able to lead well”
All this while he pointed that Allison wasn’t the leader, off course and ignoring that his wife is just a greedy opportunist who would have taken advantage of people…

It’s his own opinion but he support his wife willing to take the lead.

Also , for raniere,the choice was logical as he needed a person he controlled fully and between the collaterals, the mental manipulation and other joyfullness…Allison was the perfect puppet for him.

He pointed enough that she would take the blame and how she was his tool…

“Q At some point do you recall a meeting involving yourself, Allison Mack, your wife and the defendant?
A Yes. He offered to do an arbitration between Allison and my wife, and I was there…. I had said to him things were not… working. There’s a lot of unresolved issues with this company and a lot of people feel very slighted. So he said, ‘well, maybe I should jump on board,’ which is pretty unusual. Most of the time he would say ‘it’s not good if I would do an arbitration because I’m final point. After me is the point of no return’…. For some reason he felt that he would do the arbitration.”
And thank to vicente, raniere had even more power on Allison…he watched her being destroyed, the moment he did the last move to control her (thanks to his and his wife’s help and their fantastic empathy) and decide to blame her for HIS misbehavior.

Difference between Allison and vicente :
Allison was 12 years in, got the virtual “power” in 2015 after COERCION was complete ,never got a financial or power advantage and was abused on the way …
on the side, all while he decided to put blindfold, she was raped and forced into a criminal scheme …forced to collect the collateral

And all this under the coercion, starvation, sleep deprivation and drug

vicente was in for more than 20 years, a REAL executive since 2010, no coercion involved for him (or his wife), no abuse but he had control, he knew the wrongdoing , watch a poor victim being destroyed and blamed her with raniere…
He was the real head of the source (enough proof of that but of course, he prefer to blame it on Allison), he was perfectly fine with participating the crime until 2017…
He also could eat as he wanted, was able to have good sleep and despite the look of the absurd behavior he had for 20 years, he was in control of his mind.

I know Allison from before all this (and before her career already)…she was a down to earth, kinded heart , clever and interesting person…the complete opposite of what she became after all the manipulation.

Lately, the Allison she used to be before people like vicente brought her in the cult (he and sarah had quite a responsability in this) , is back and this is a proof enough, for me, that she was mentally abused to take advantage of her.

He had no excuses for his crime, she was forced to do it…

“Allison with finishing it, that what she done was a real problem and that she needed to really look into herself and fix this — this impulse that she has to destroy another woman. You know that has to be fixed. So that was the way I remembered ending was basically she has to go fix this.”
And once again, there goes a chance of helping Allison and this fantastic person (vicente) is just closing his eyes and end up blaming the victim…

“Q Did India have a relationship with Allison Mack?
A She would come to have a relationship when she spent more time at Albany. She — she ended up being tutored by Allison Mack or Allison Mack took a particular interest in her and took her under her wing….. I had a lot of concerns about that”
WHEN? this idiot is giving nothing…but he accuse her of everything.
Chronology is everything

” I remember going, ‘What about your dreams?’ ‘I’m sort of changing my focus’ …she said. She [said she] took a walk with Keith and [said], ‘I’m much clearer now.’”
And yet he try to blame Allison for it…Allison who was exactly in the position of india at one point…
Second person he could have helped but ignored it…atleast, he isn’t blaming her.

But this asshole blaming Allison (who he saw being destroyed by his life love ,raniere)

“A Well, I was very concerned… I saw with India was that she became enamored with Allison Mack. ”
And it’s Allison’s fault?

“And I said to myself, something’s unhealthy about that”
Yet he did the same with raniere…
” I don’t know that it’s healthy for her to look at Allison Mack as some kind of… deity who knows all. Knowing Allison”
Except that she loved Allison as a friend…He is the one who was praising like a deity raniere…
Way to shift, yet again, the blame!

Who said that the destruction of Allison was maybe needed as raniere action was maybe a form of wisdom…

He sees Allison not doing something wrong but a girl caring for her : ‘it’s unhealthy’
But HE sees Allison being destroyed by raniere : ‘it’s wisdom’

How one is supposed to believe his story?
He hated Allison because his wife hated her…classic actor’s behavior , jealousy for a better career…but usually, they don’t blame the victims.

“So India was basically put in charge of Delegates. ”
Funny how he blamed Allison (despite saying the source was owned by 13 different people) to be the leader of it and even put her in charge of jness (while he decided to ignore the chronology and the fact she was a ‘straw leader’)

But how he try to diminish India’s involvement while in this case, it’s undisputable…

“Allison got completely engulfed. India, in large part due to her mother’s efforts, escaped.”
Because nobody helped her…and everybody put the blame on her when she tried to leave

India was also engulfed…a reminder, she was supposed to be arrested with Allison…she was named on raniere’s warrant as clearly a co conspirator…

“She would have been very likely charged had it not been for her mother’s intervention – charged like Allison was – for attempted sex trafficking.”
Can you please stop bringing this BS charge…it was a preliminary unproven charge and it was dropped because in court, it would have failed…that why they used it for the plea deal.

In counterpart, they (prosecution) obtain that Allison accepted to take the blame (once again…like after raniere, sarah and vicente, cat…what’s one more person putting the blame on the victim).
In reality, when she said in the court bathroom “i took a bullet for the team, i’m used to it”, she refered exactly to this!

Even when people know her position, they still try to blame her (while it’s undebatable that she was one of the biggest victim…but she is deprivated from this right)

What the whole testimonied showed is that vicente is a pathetic person who knew about everything but went along for way too long…
He saw the distress in many cases but he choosed to put his head under the ground and ignore everything…

BETTER YET, this asshole try to find way to blame Allison for his doing.

HE was at the first presentation for India, he pretend to have been her friend but let her sink like Allison…
Only when it’s almost too late he decided to “do something”…

And instead of taking his responsability , he blamed Allison and tried to put her in position she never had…actually, he is putting her as a scapegoat for his own participation.

Allison was right, she was taking bullet for all the team…including this pathetic sissy…this loser who ignored for YEARS the suffering because of the nice check he made as an executive.

In fact, his position is even worst than sarah…because sarah was an executive but she couldn’t see the damage she(and him) was (were) doing…
He was front seat and was just eating his popcorn…

But you know what? it’s ok because he don’t need to take the blame for HIS actions…he can always blame Allison (or another victim).

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Give it up, Mack plead guilty and never went to trial. LOL

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Mack never went to trial and took a plea deal and I took a settlement. Why roll the dice and become a bigger loser? LOL.

Allison should call into my radio show because we seem to have the same taste in men and women. Also I need help battling MLM (Men Lovee Men) type organizations. LOL

I like women and men with big feet. LOL

smtolle
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

She’s not a victim. Stop ths crap unless ypu want to end taking responsibility for.women for.good.

smtolle
3 years ago

Reading this blog, I’m starting to wonder if we made a mistake giving women the right to vote.

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago
Reply to  smtolle

Why did you just starting wondering recently? LOL

Ice-nine
Ice-nine
3 years ago

I’ve always felt since you broke that Lebaron story (super kudos for scooping the whole planet on that one Frank) that there was a ton of content around that cult, their relation to NXIVM, and who the hell knows what else is going on down there. I hope you one day dive more into it.

shadowstate1958
3 years ago

Allison Mack is STILL MENTALLY UNSTABLE
Recently she posted this photoshopped picture on the Charger426hemi1 web psge calling herself Queen Allison.
She is pictured like Cleopatra Queen of the Nile.
comment image?_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram.com&_nc_cat=110&_nc_ohc=I_3SaVevYvUAX947x0j&oh=780331ccc2e18342b5a17cc1331c11da&oe=5ECD46DC

The Charger web page started in May 2018 right after Mack was released on bail.
Right away commenters knew that Charger was a member of NXIVM.

nemoisnobody
@charger426hemi1 Sorry but children were involved. Mexican children. You should be saying “I don’t believe children were involved” instead of stating that as if it was a fact. It’s not worrying, it’s a simple question that you refuse. Are you a NXVIM member who has been branded and vowed undying support and loyalty?

charger426hemi1
@nemoisnobody yeah its a simple question but there is no simple answer, i do not look that far into the future i live for now, not what may or may not happen in the future. Whether I’m a member or not is not of any importance to anyone else
92w1 like

nemoisnobody
@charger426hemi1 It is a simple answer. Nobody should stand with anyone that has been found guilty and proven of child sex trafficking. It’s good to live for now, but i have a feeling there will be many great changes coming up 😞
92wReply

devanshibanerjee
yeah so the knife media is created by keith raniere. lmk where ur getting ur “facts” from lol
98wR

charger426hemi1
@devanshibanerjee that’s 1 quote and it’s true you can’t deny that
98w

devanshibanerjee
@charger426hemi1 I’m not denying the quote. I was referring to the source you got it from. I just think that’s either very ironic or that you may somehow have personally been involved with nxivm and it’s members

https://www.instagram.com/p/BjD0BynD66a/

Charger426hemi1 is a member of NXIVM.

Charger426hemi1 is Allison Mack.

Allison Mack thinks she is Cleopatra Queen of the Nile.

Allison Mack is STILL MENTALLY UNSTABLE

scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram.com/v/t51.12442-15/e35/c0.204.480.480a/s150x150/99083038_778752169322626_7638529298760857706_n

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

At least Mack doesn’t look as stupid with darker hair. LOL

Perhaps that’s her strategery when she goes to prison, have darker hair so she isn’t picked on as much. I’m sure the other women will be happy to cooperate and help her mix feces into her scalp so her blond roots don’t show. LOL

It’s going to be some party in prison, Mack! LOL

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

This is how scams keep going, “Debra is an actress and Frank Report is not naming her since she clearly did not join DOS and, in fact, found Raniere repulsive.” If Debra was a real human she would want to go on the record. LOL

For all of you “people” who think Vicente should have done more, sooner, I say that Scott has been advocating that YOU do something about Amway and other MLM scams for two years on this website, and for 15 years all over the internets. So you’re just like Vicente. LOL

NJ
NJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

I am Debra (the Debra that’s mentioned) & I don’t have to do anything. Thanks, Frank, for not mentioning my last name.

Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

The headline, “Vicente: India Was Enamored With Unstable Allison Mack.” Vicente was enamored with Raniere, many NXIVM people were enamored with many other NXIVM people and it was all a farse, much like Enron, Amway, etc., and I haven’t even read the story yet. LOL

About the Author

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in hundreds of news outlets, like The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CBS News, Fox News, New York Post, New York Daily News, Oxygen, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, The Sun, The Times of London, CBS Inside Edition, among many others in all five continents.

His work to expose and take down NXIVM is featured in books like “Captive” by Catherine Oxenberg, “Scarred” by Sarah Edmonson, “The Program” by Toni Natalie, and “NXIVM. La Secta Que Sedujo al Poder en México” by Juan Alberto Vasquez.

Parlato has been prominently featured on HBO’s docuseries “The Vow” and was the lead investigator and coordinating producer for Investigation Discovery’s “The Lost Women of NXIVM.” Parlato was also credited in the Starz docuseries "Seduced" for saving 'slave' women from being branded and escaping the sex-slave cult known as DOS.

Additionally, Parlato’s coverage of the group OneTaste, starting in 2018, helped spark an FBI investigation, which led to indictments of two of its leaders in 2023.

Parlato appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, Beyond the Headlines with Gretchen Carlson, Dr. Oz, American Greed, Dateline NBC, and NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, where Parlato conducted the first-ever interview with Keith Raniere after his arrest. This was ironic, as many credit Parlato as one of the primary architects of his arrest and the cratering of the cult he founded.

Parlato is a consulting producer and appears in TNT's The Heiress and the Sex Cult, which premiered on May 22, 2022. Most recently, he consulted and appeared on Tubi's "Branded and Brainwashed: Inside NXIVM," which aired January, 2023.

IMDb — Frank Parlato

Contact Frank with tips or for help.
Phone / Text: (305) 783-7083
Email: frankreport76@gmail.com

Archives

19
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x