Harvey Weinstien Case Sets Precedent for Future Kangaroo Court Rape Trials

A predator is a predator. Certainly, people are drawn to those that are charismatic, attractive and even highly successful and highly intelligent.

Though Weinstein may have a couple of these qualities with the possibility of being charismatic or personally entertaining at times, how attractive a person is shouldn’t be a factor.

Certainly, a good looking man, successful or highly intelligent one that can easily manipulate, have an increased ability to win or “take” pussy in dubious situations… including ones that have nothing to do with career opportunity.

Most women know business meetings don’t take place in hotel rooms with their boss or gatekeeper wearing a bathrobe and most women know when they are being pressured for sex or seduced and make a decision good, bad or indifferent. It’s called being held accountable for your own actions and sexual freedom.

Weinstein ‘s fuckability factor was high because he was a gatekeeper with power to make Hollywood darlings and nothing to do with his looks. This implies that if the guy is good looking or charming then she wanted it or the threat of non-compliance wasn’t so bad.

On the flip side, many of these women that took Weinstein’s bait (or should that be cock?), wound up better off by comparison to how an ex-husband or ex-boyfriend leaves them financially, as well as with opportunities to pursue their dreams (Oscar parties, social events, etc.) and support (believing in them, socializing with them, trading emails, listening & communicating with them as if they mattered by giving his time & attention, and giving them work positions — besides the sexual ones).

An unattractive man considered one of the most powerful men in Hollywood and political influencer, is using his power to get his cock serviced by women that are trying to get ahead. Take this outside of the entertainment industry, and this same model of behavior has been around since I started working.

It was up to me to sink my fingernails into the forearm and say NO with the very real threat that if I was too nasty I could lose my job.

Later, as a single mother of two, I got my first job promotion offer to discuss that got pushed to a dinner meeting on a Friday night that involved me going to the “Big Boss’s” weekend beach home.

Needless to say, I didn’t get that promotion because I believed in my other talents besides my ability to fuck well (a gift reserved for the man I love) and as a mother of two daughters, I believed in their capabilities being much more expansive than opening their legs and the example started with me.

Often have thought we need to reprogram thinking where it isn’t a sliding scale of responsibility, believability or accountability based on how someone looks, their bank account, social standing, power or fuckability factor.

I also believe we give away collective power to gatekeepers and don’t hold them to high standards of leadership and character (ie. just look at politicians making bank and giving themselves top-notch healthcare for life and raises, as they sell out the US, personal data and freedoms or look at the media glorification, conjecture and fake news).

Gatekeepers impact the trajectory of other people’s lives and most people will never get the chance to address the damage done to them in their career, their confidence, their financial situation, their opportunity to get ahead based on their own merits without sexual harassment and the gas lighting turning them into a difficult person to work with for their non-compliance and being let go or hitting the glass ceiling so hard they have to leave.

Listening to various podcasts, there does seem to be a backlash against women that do no want to readily have sex or exclusive relationship with a competition amongst men over how much pussy they can get or think they can get because of their looks, their bank account, their power, their ability to be protective, their otherwise perceived superiority over other men.

Online dating seems to promote a fast food culture of easy sex offered up with the better looking men and women seen as the ones that have easier access to sex partners. Certainly, all of this plays into the dynamic between a gatekeeper and subordinates.

Your statement sounds so angry that “an uninteresting and homely man abused his position and authority to get access to some of the world’s most beautiful women, forcibly assaulting and raping some.” It feeds into this fast food culture that attractive men (or men with a lot of money) can get the beautiful woman for sex and justifies this current anger men get when women (or a woman) repeatedly don’t want them even if they think they are superior to other men and deserve that woman… it is still disrespecting the word NO and blaming the woman accordingly for making what is perceived as a bad, stupid and regrettable decision for which she deserves punishment by being treated like shit by men and being told a range of comments from she should feel lucky that he views her as sexually desirable as her window of opportunity is closing, to she is classless, lacking good judgment and taste, to she is getting old and only has a few good years left in her and she should take up any sex offers she may get because it could be her last.

Though you didn’t do this and seem genuinely disgusted, your statement hits me as being part of the vein of thought and behavior that is prevalent in dating culture. My issue is don’t put a predator/gatekeeper on a sliding scale based on looks or rape itself based on how beautiful the woman! Thankfully, rapists go to prison, times are changing within the workplace… I suspect how women are treated in dating, relationships, and pursuit of sexual fulfillment will come next to be more openly discussed and addressed culturally… perhaps, we need more pussy and even some cock candles for the work place (or home) for ‘balance’ since we can’t leave hormones, pheromones, chemistry and desire as a contact on our password protected phone… And, thankfully, women are the gatekeepers to their own pussy.