FBI Agent: Killing Qasem Saleimani Isn’t Murder Despite What Fox News’ Leland Vittert Says

Solomonkey was a 2 bit thug and he and the ahyatolya let their alligator mouth overload their gnat behind.

Open mouth, insert hellfire missile.

Let’s have some straight talk on #Soleimani, shall we?
1. Suleimani took command of the Quds Force over 20 years ago and his job is to reshape the Middle East in Iran’s favor: thru military force, by assassinating rivals and arming allies.
2. His twenty year focus is directing
a network of militant groups that has killed hundreds of U.S in #Iraq and others.
3. I know of only ONE American who has ever met him, John Maguire, describing him as soft-spoken yet the most powerful man in the MidEast. Thoughtful, strategic, smart, charismatic – 100% dedicated
4. He personally runs #Iran’s war in #Syria and brought in thousands of #Quds Force when #Assad’s army began to fail.
5. Suleimani and #Nasrallah of #Hezbollah #Lebanon are old friends and cooperate globally where Hezbollah has performed terrorist acts at Iran’s behest.
6. His power comes from his impeccable revolutionary credentials and his close relationship with #Khamenei, The Supreme Leader, who has referred to Suleimani as “a living martyr of the revolution.” Suleimani is a hard-line supporter of Iran’s authoritarian system but is rich
and has built the #IRGC into an economic powerhouse.
7. He hates #Israel and Jews and is well known to its intelligence services as a superbly effective operative; in some ways, he is both hated and admired
8. #Suleimani has orchestrated terrorist attacks in places as far flung
as #Thailand, #New Delhi, #Argentina, #Lagos, and #Nairobi— at least fifty attempts in the past 20 years. The most notorious was in 2011 against #KSA Ambass #AdelalJubeir when #Iran hired a drug cartel to blow him up at in D.C. Suleimani’s agent turned out to be a #DEA informant
9. #Suleimani was pragmatic. He worked indirectly with #RyanCrocker of State Dept in helping the U.S target the #Taliban and in selecting Shia officials for the new #Iraqi Gov’t.
10. That cooperation was short lived, however. In 2004, the Quds Force began flooding Iraq with
“explosively formed projectiles “ that accounted for nearly twenty per cent of U.S Iraq combat deaths. Roadside E.F.P.s were made by skilled technicians in Iran and were supplied by #QodsForce. They also resulted in tens of thousands of maimed U.S and Iraqi soldiers.
11. In recent years, the #IRGC has posted social media videos of #Soleimani directing attacks in #Mosul and against #IraqiKurd forces. He has traveled widely and has unprecedented autonomy in carrying out his military-terrorist mandate.
12. Those who refer to his death as “political assassination” of a “foreign official” are either grossly ill-informed or willfully blind. In my experience, his involvement in targeting U.S military personnel alone has made him a legitimate target of at least TWO U.S Presidents,
Although @realDonaldTrump is the first to have succeeded. On at least two occasions in which I am aware, previous operations in other administrations were canceled due to intel or other complicating factors.
11. Given the prominence of #Soleimani in all of #Iran’s extra-territorial operations, both military and civilians have considered the implications of directing operations aganist him on multiple occasions, including 2nd and 3rd order impacts/retaliation from various adversaries.
12. I hope this is useful. There is an excellent profile of #Soleimani from Dexter Filkins @NewYorker from 2013 that gave a good feel for #Soleimani using excellent sources.

The Epoch Times

Trump Derangement Syndrome Skyrockets Over Soleimani

Roger L. Simon January 4, 2020 Updated: January 5, 2020

Remember “politics stops at the water’s edge”?

In the Trump era, that patriotic phrase isn’t only dead, it’s decomposed.

And ironically so, since the latest manifestation of this decomposition is over the termination of Qassem Soleimani, the terror mastermind who was, on analysis, even more dangerous to the United States and the world than Osama bin Laden and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, monumentally evil as they were.

Neither bin Laden nor al-Baghdadi ever had remotely the power at their disposals—even when the latter controlled his caliphate—that Soleimani did as the military leader of by far the greatest state sponsor of terrorism. They weren’t even close to the man who was head of Iran’s Quds force and the second most powerful person in that country of 80-plus million, with all its attendant weaponry and technology and ties to China and Russia.

Besides the thousands of Americans who either died or were maimed for life because of Soleimani, hundreds of thousands across the Middle East have met their fates at least in part through this man’s ministrations.

The once-shining state of Lebanon is practically decimated through the rise of his Hezbollah, a fate he was replicating in Iraq. And then there’s Yemen and his Houthi and their simultaneous war against Saudi Arabia and their own people. And, of course, Israel, where he kept the Jewish state in a crossfire between his clients Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and, again Hezbollah (when Hezbollah wasn’t busy exporting drugs into the United States).

It’s worth remembering that Soleimani was in charge of all these operations at once, a veritable superstar of terror.

On top of all that, he had as much influence as anyone in keeping the Syrian Civil War alive. Current death (under)count: 400,000. Number of refugees: 5.7 million. He may have changed Europe as we knew it forever.

And let’s not forget Iran itself, where only in the past few weeks, Soleimani’s footprints were all over the deaths of thousands of peaceful anti-regime demonstrators. Nobody knows how many. And torture as well—something that the Islamic Republic has made a specialty since 1979. Only the other day, they again executed a man for homosexuality.

Yet the supposedly liberal and progressive Democrats are all in a dither about the assassination of Soleimani. After all, Trump did it. It has to be wrong.

Not only would these same Democrats obviously have applauded the action if it had been done by one of their own, equally obviously, many of them would have attacked Trump even if had he assassinated Hitler in 1940, blaming the president for escalating the conflict.

It’s that simple—and nauseating—and every honest person in America knows it, especially the vets, almost all of whom have friends incinerated by one of Soleimani’s roadside bombs, if they aren’t themselves walking around on prosthetic devices.

And this leaves aside whatever Soleimani’s plans were that constituted the proximate cause of the assassination. If past performance is any indication, he had many.

Meanwhile, the Democratic candidates are demonstrating uniform cowardice in the face of the action. Is there one of them you would want to have beside you in a foxhole?

It would seem to have been impossible, but as bad as it’s been for the past three years, Trump Derangement Syndrome has reached unforeseen levels.

But a deeper cause of this increased derangement may stem from events that began Sept. 11, 2012—the Obama administration’s behavior in the aftermath of the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya.

As most will recall, the administration sent Susan Rice to inform the nation that the lethal terror attack occurred because of a spontaneous emotional reaction to an amateur anti-Islamic video that barely anyone had ever watched. It wasn’t a planned attack by a terror group, Rice said. That was a despicable lie.

Kenneth Timmerman wrote in the New York Post in June 2014, “My sources, meanwhile, say Suleymani [sic] was involved in an even more direct attack on the U.S.—the killing of Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Benghazi, Libya.”

Timmerman goes on to detail a complicated and clever plot behind Benghazi worthy of the evil mastermind Soleimani. (Read it here.)

If this is true—and it seems vastly more likely than Rice’s “explanation”—then what just occurred at Baghdad Airport is a prime, and highly justified, example of that old saw: what goes around comes around.

Wow just a few months ago the demofucks and their left wing deep state media allies were pissing and moaning the President Trump wanted to pull 500 or so troops out of Syria. What a bunch of evil hyocrites

Of course the leftist assholes on this blog would agree with this demented anti american fuck

https://disrn.com/news/kaepernick-accuses-military-of-terrorist-attacks

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/01/14/this-humiliating-iran-photo-says-it-all/

Next day the fucking traitor O-hole led by his fuckin Iranian handler Jarret started the 150 billion payment to his Mullah masters.

Kerry over there the last couple of years doing the deep state dirty work. Logan act needs to be used on this fucking traitor.

I’m not American, but I have a question:

If the president has sworn an oath to defend the republic against all threats, foreign and domestic;

And the president is assailed by a partisan congress is conducting a faux impeachment for political purposes;

If during the process of impeachment that president is required to notify the congress of a national emergency,

but does not have the confidence that the congress will act on behalf of the nation, but rather will act for partisan political reasons,

What rules govern the presidents behavior ?

Does not a partisan political impeachment justify the ignoring permission from congress, which therefore acknowledges the fact that the impeachment is a political sham.

And if so, couldn’t the congress itself be impeached, in that it’s partisan political infighting is hampering the correct functioning of government, and endangering the republic during a time of national crisis?