Guest View: Dr. Danielle Roberts Branded With Good Intentions & the 10 Female Saints of the New World Order

Here is an image exemplifying all of the women still in NXIVM:

I don’t know how come Freud had penis envy on his mind, but he unable to get along with any male colleague for long, and he had huge disagreements almost routinely and then would vigorously discredit the work of his competitors. He grew up completely indulged by his mother, had his own study as a boy, in a houseful of mostly sisters who were crowded into the other few rooms and taught by Sigismund’s mother to kowtow to him moment-by-moment, as the daily routine.

Yes, Freud was given the name “Sigismund” at birth. It means knowledge (or wisdom, even) of the world (mund.) Gradually his first name morphed into “Sigmund,” probably simply as it’s easier to pronounce and was a more socially “neutral” representation of an ancient name. Now “Freud” of course, is most likely a derivative of Freund, or “friend.” Freud was not a friendly fellow, at all, although he was not responsible for the disappearance of the “n” from his surname.

Still, this all worked out well, in the end for Freud, as “freund” would have been comically inappropriate for Siggy. He was only called Siggy until he was about 6 or 7, by his older sisters. That nickname went out the window because he was never found to be “cute” again, past that tender age, plus he despised cuteness, himself. He was the Boss.

His father was known by his wife and all of the children as a hopeless ne’er-do-well and a useless, dysfunctional pain in the ass. Very often, he didn’t live at home at all, and he was both unwelcome there and resented for not ever pulling his weight. Kinda like the modern sitcom portrayals of the stumbling, dumbass dad who never can get with “the program” or do anything “right.”

Siggy was a grouchy prick who had a fascinating amorous life, if one does not include his wife. The “father of psychoanalysis” lived with three definitions of women rotating through his head and providing him with personal justifications, for how come he categorize ( ach! so authoritatively) his own confusions and misbehaviors, regarding women in general.

Women were either his “lowers” who ought to shut up, get out of his way and serve his wants and requirements, domestically. Then he preserved his other two feminine categories to include what he called the female “hysterics,” those who were to be treated profusely at times to dubious therapeutic “experiments,” with or without witnesses or familial interferences. Frequently the therapies did not work out in the female patients’ favor, one could say. Here, for now, I’ll refrain from any masturbatory or pornographic descriptiveness, okay.

Then, of course, Freudy-boy kept another, more private subset of females, those with whom he wanted to have sex and/or affairs. He did his utmost to keep his sexual adventuring secretive, and sometimes, quite obviously, noticeably, Freud was trying to sneak around to conduct his affairs out-of-sight and rather dictatorily. More than once, he stashed a lover in some hotel in a city not named Vienna. Then sometimes she would be stuck there for weeks before he could find time to show up and service himself. His wife and her sister, who was one of his most unsuccessfully hidden inamoratas, and even his most-favored daughter, Anna, were well aware of Sigmund’s sexual habits. Their distinctive roles in Freud’s life were, however, rigidly defined, always.

No wonder Freud papers and biographical details continue to be guarded and unreleased, long after these materials were scheduled to be published for public perusal. So it is very likely to remain. Most of Freud’s current day descendants are not hurting financially, anyhow.

Sigmund could tolerate no man as his equal, nor any woman. There are the Freud legends, and then there was Freud, himself. Anxiously, persistently buffing his own own chops. This isn’t to discredit his immense amount of written work or some of Freud’s contributions.

But I do think that his penis envy was just another one of Sigmund’s personal “situations” scrubbed up by his prose abilities and refashioned to appear psychoanalytical and of value to more than soley himself. Fine and dandy, but his pomposity and insistences about his primal, primary supremacy is a leaky frigging sieve. These are, of course, the observations of an “inherently unworthy” woman, me.

Do not even begin with this penis envy nutbag bullshit with me. Do not push any gender-neutral recommendations down my throat. Not for either sex or for those who are not heterosexual. There is reasoning to be found within nature, with the magnetic attraction of “opposites” attracting one another.

There does not happen to be any prominently “gender-neutral” birds, not in any place where I have been, during three times, around our world. Even bats have their spontaneous rules of attraction amongst themselves. The squirrels in our big backyard and all of the birds, butterflies and even our avocado trees are not at all unisexual. In fact, if one chooses, watching magnetism between the complementary but quite different sexes, can be fun to see, at all hours, day and night.

Excuse the fuck out of me, for having great enjoyment in simply being feminine. No one imposed my nature upon me. You will not find me wearing dungarees or a beard or hocking and spitting into a tobacco can. Terribly sorry if that is “old-fashioned.” Also, coming from a family with generations of mostly men, these are the most fantastic and fascinating of human beings, every bit as wonderful, as marvelous, as dreamy and magnificent as their feminine counterparts.

The hell with conformity, and that is all that “gender neutrality” dignifies to me, the squelching of nature, herself, himself. Not joining Nicki Clyne’s lineup of jumbled bullcrap about how marvy-doo it can be to want, “as a woman” to be just like a man. Where’s the pleasure? Blow it out your hind-end with that fartdust. Happy as I am. If need be we may have a spat over this, but why bother.

Y’all do you and you and you and leave me alone. Also, screw Helen Reddy, never needed that song. I am. Woman. Loving every minute of it! Nature is beautiful, eh.

There are numerous problems with these comments:

I doubt Dr. Roberts will ever touch a cauterizing pen again. At least not without being traumatized herself. — I think she took a case of cauterizing pens with her to Mexico. Or perhaps bought a case in Mexico because they’re cheaper down there.

Cut her some slack. They were trying to be bad-ass bitches. While Raniere’s behaviour was illegal, there is absolutely no proof that Dr. Roberts had any guilty knowledge of it. — They may have tried to be bad-ass bitches, but they failed. Miserably. Roberts herself probably had to provide “collateral,” which is known by most people as blackmail. By the way, blackmail is illegal.

After all, If Sarah Edmondson and Mark Vicente didn’t know about Raniere’s corruption, why would Dr. Roberts? — Edmondson and Vicente found out about Raniere’s corruption soon after being aware of the blackmail, so would Roberts.

It is quite probable that she didn’t. — It is quite probable that she did.

And like Clare Bronfman, why would she do something so abominably stupid that it would destroy her reputation, career and livelihood, while holding her up to public displeasure? — You can ask the same question to the other NXIVM “doctor” who got fired as an insulation salesman. The answer is because all three of them (plus many others) are incredibly stupid and evil.

Obviously, all of these women were tricked into doing some foolish things while believing they were acting within the boundaries of the law. — They weren’t even thinking of the law, only their Vanguard.

No doubt you disagree, but I can’t find a reason yet to vilify her. — I can’t think of a reason to not vilify her.

***

Here is another comment from

A Female Who Knows: — A more accurate name is “A Female Who Knows NOTHING.”

Dr. Roberts helped create a new order for women where they could be strong. — Except they were made weak.

As they say, “badass warrior bitches.” — Such as the ones who were about to give Raniere a group BJ in Mexico and scattered like the cockroaches that they are? How about the others who have stayed in the shadows every since his arrest?

They want to be brave and tough. — They should realize by now that they aren’t and never will be brave or tough.

Keith Raniere was the originator of this great ideal. — Raniere was the originator of his brand of taking advantage of others, financially, physically, emotionally, and psychologically.

It took a certain kind of man to show women they could be like men yet have compassion. — It took a certain kind of “man” to pretend to help others while scamming them.

Danielle Roberts was the epitome of this. — Writhing under Robert’s cauterizing pen while being blackmailed demonstrates Roberts is neither brave nor tough.

She is a true badass warrior. — Then Roberts should publicly step forward and claim her position.

She risked lots to put brands on women. — Such as inhaling burnt flesh, poop, and piss smells.

The branding was for women’s own good. — Good for being marked as a fool and blackmail victim.

It was a test of strength and loyalty. — It was a test of stupidity and being victimized.

Nicki, Rosa Laura, Monica, Cami, Dani, Loreta, Michele, Jimena, Carola, and Dr. Danielle are prototypes of a new world order. — Dream on, if they ever raised their heads again publicly it would be a whack-a-mole exercise.

Each represents a different aspect of femaleness. — No, they are the same aspect of stupidity.

They are women brave and thoughtful, not fickle, weak, emotional, entitled princesses. — Then tthey should prove it and express themselves publicly.

Marc Agnifilo spoke truth when he said, “If it had been men branding each other, no one would have complained.” — Most men who brand each other don’t have blackmail as part of the recipe.

This is what women have to endure. — Women have to endure blackmail was involved.

Dr. Roberts deserves credit for sticking to her beliefs. — Roberts not only deserves credit, she is getting it, public scorn.

She believes the Sorority helps her and will help others. — You can’t help others when blackmail is involved.

In the spirit of a kindly physician, she is helping women achieve what she achieved. — Robert’s “kindly spirit” involves other women being linked to illegal blackmail.

Keith has been unfairly imprisoned. — Raniere had his day in court and entertained the entire courtroom when they laughed AT him.

It is up to women to fulfill the legacy he gave them. — The legacy Raniere gave them is putrid.

I believe in time Keith will be venerated. — I don’t believe that. At all.

Christ was executed by his government. Joseph Smith was murdered by a mob. — Raniere is being properly punished for his crimes.

Keith is imprisoned. — And that’s a good thing.

The founders of new thought are persecuted. — Rehashed Scientology, MLM scams, and Raniere’s brand of kink is hardly “new thought.”

Keith still has followers. Dr. Roberts and Nicki Clyne are two. — They are also both in hiding.

Dr. Roberts risked her reputation to be part of a Sorority she believes in. — And now Roberts is paying the price, her reputation is ruined, and rightly so.

She got branded. — A mark of the [stupid] beast.

She knew what she was doing and making the branding ceremony painful was on purpose. — Not only painful, but also illegal, because of the blackmail involved.

It was to initiate women into a true Sorority, painful but meaningful. — Yes, a meaningful crime. It’s called blackmail.

There were weak sisters among us. — All of the “sisters” are weak. Some are just more stupid than others. Namely, the ones still involved in NXIVM and DOS.

Allison, Lauren, Nicole, Jaye, India, Audrey, Soukie, Sarah but, overall, women continue to stand tall. — I don’t see any of them standing tall, they are cowering in the background.

The women who left the Sorority were ones who couldn’t be badass and strong. — The ones who stayed are also wimpy and weak.

The ones who remain are the nucleus of a new era of women. — And as useful as an unfertilized egg.

I think it’s evil Frank Report continues to hound brave women. — Saving people from being blackmailed is not evil. Quite the opposite.

But they are warriors. — So were the Mexicans at San Jacinto: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_San_Jacinto

Nicki can take it. Dr. Danielle can take it. In time, we will prevail. — Running away isn’t “taking it.” It’s called being cowardly.

If Frank Report is remembered at all 100 years from now, it will be remembered like the mob in Carthage or the Sanhedrin and Pontius Pilate. — If Frank Report is remembered 100 years from now, it will be remembered as exposing the NXIVM scam and punishing the perps.

The saints of the new female world order will be remembered. Nicki Clyne, Daniela Padilla, Rosa Laura Junco, Loreta Garza, Monica Duran, Camila Fernandez, Michele Hatchette, Carola Garza, Jimena Garza, and Dr. Danielle Roberts. 10 beacons of light for future humanity. — Those females will also become better known as perps.

They will be worshiped in the future. So, for now, blast away and add to your evil. — I’m sure Satan is their biggest fan. LOL

To the first commentator. Even if the doctor won’t break her oath and cause harm in the future, she must be opposed with all vigor. She and Clyne both served a man who is a known pedophile, racketeer, and destroyer of lives – Hutchinson and Snyder are dead.

To everyone:

I would like to point out to my fellow Frankreport readers/commentors that attacking two individuals for sharing their thoughts on Nxivm subjects does nothing to advance the the public discourse.

I personally believe that they should have a right to speak without being attacked on the Frankreport; if Frank Parlato decides to post their comments.

Attacking the two individuals that decided to share their thoughts with insults rather than facts is not right.

I do not know if the commentors are legitimate or not; Attacking them is counter productive either way.
********

To Frankreport commentors,

I know a numbers of you will think I am being hypocritical. I am not. I only ridicule assholes or people who act like assholes.

The two individuals that responded to the Frankreport may be legitimate or may be trolls; Either way they did not act like assholes, but merely stated their opinions.