Reports of 2100 Children in Underground Cages Rescued By Navy Seals and Child Slaves on Colonies on Mars – Should We Censor the Improbable?

Anyone here ever heard of Thomas Reardon, who invented Internet Explorer and partnered with Bill Gates/ Microsoft and made a fortune? What are he and his worker bees up to now?

Here is a quote about his group, CTRL- labs, and it was published by a woman who died Oct. 14, 2019, Erin Valenti. Valenti was found in the backseat of her rental car, supposedly enroute to the Palo Alto airport and then to be on her way home. A tech company owner herself, she put out a few interesting remarks at Tinker Ventures, her business. These remarks, her final ones, are worth an article in and of themselves. In fact every bit of info about her AND her husband are worth exploring.

But here is what she published from a CTRL- labs publication, Reardon’s “neuroscience and behavior” center of industrious dedication, and Reardon is no mere dabbler. Go into his own academic qualifications, personal background (very little info available) and business ventures, and see for yourselves.

Here we go:

“The future of brain-machine interfaces is non-invasive. Instead of surgical implants, CTRL- labs uses state-of-the-art detection and machine learning to read your neurons from outside the body. The first step will be technology precisely picking up the signals from inside your body to control devices outside of it with little more than natural gestures. The next step – and we are already closer than most people realize – will be reading the intention directly from your brain.

” CTRL-labs is pioneering something entirely new at the intersection of biology and code. He did this by assembling a rare cadre of scientists and technologists: PhDs in computational neuroscience; biomechanics paired with hackers and coders; experts in signal processing, machine learning and human-computer interaction; and industrial designers.”

Another woman, Rachelle Bergeron, was killed the same day as Erin Valenti. Rachelle, an American, age 36, was the Attorney General of the island of Yap, part of the federated States of Micronesia. She was speaking to her constituency about HOW to recognize human traffickers and how to resist or to stop them.

She and her dog, as I mentioned some days ago, were executed. Then she was put on the back of a flatbed truck(!) and transported to a hospital, doa.

These things don’t get much publicity, and any revelatory stories are usually submerged rapidly. The human trafficking victims are (allegedly) used for forced labor, in abysmal conditions. They are used for sex-trafficking, especially if they’re infants and children. The traffickers supply, as more and more evidence indicates, specimens for biotech and human behavioral /adaptation- to-tech-control experimentation. The victims are also being used for organ harvesting.

The victims, it appears, are also being used for more inhumane and obscene torments than even what I have described here. Charitable foundations are used “altruistically” to scoop up human fodder all over the world. Even an African Chieftan told an investigative reporter that the number one problem that his people are and have been facing has been the disappearances of their children. Since 2014, the trails of tears have broadened more and more, with especially young people and very little ones, vanishing, with little or no recourse. Those “resources” seem to be ineffective, or perhaps, simply well-blocked or unavailable.

Valenti, who reached her family not long before dying, left some quotes behind. “Mind control = neurocontrol.” “We are all in the Matrix, it’s all a game, a thought experiment.” Most of all, she left a link on her Tinker Ventures site to the above-cited Reardon CTRL- labs.

With freedom comes responsibility.

I am completely against censorship and concur people need to use their brains when they read stories and look at the sources cited as well as the platform running the story. Anyone can write anything and put it out for public view. Just because it’s published doesn’t means it’s true.

I also believe when people come across stories filled with errors or outright lies the author should be called out and the record corrected. I hope Frank is asking for changes in the story where he’s become a main character. The problem that comes into play when that isn’t done is the lies can be repeated by the next person who doesn’t bother to check facts or get their own sources and just lifts information pretending to be the facts. The misinformation spreads like an STI.

The person who wrote the story mentioning Frank has written it as though she consumed as much information she could without checking its veracity and then projectile vomited it and pretended it was an earth-shattering news story.

Great post, Frank. Strangely, I have not received my invitation to Ben’s next party. It must have gotten lost in the mail.

I’m 100% against censorship. The primary differences between NXIVM and the other conspiracy theories are there were multiple sources of information and Frank had first-hand, insider experience with the organization. I view the wild stories with a single source as entertainment until/unless other sources corroborate it. The source also has to be considered, not all sources are equal. For example, is the source known to be a sane, thinking person? Ben had his chance and blew it. The next time he comes forward I won’t give him much attention. The same with Natalie.

Frank, the problem is, that as your piece illustrates, anyone can fabricate a conspiracy theory, including the use of false or delusional claims to make them sound authoritative. So there are more conspiracy theories floating around, than any one person could possibly have time to evaluate and fact-check as necessary.

And conspiracy theories are not necessarily harmless. Innocent people end up suffering, such as being subject to NXIVM-style harassment, or having shots fired at them; arguably, domestic terrorism like the Oklahoma City bombing stems, at least in part, from conspiracy theories. And in Europe in the last century, millions if not tens of millions of people died because of what were essentially baseless conspiracy theories.

I don’t think there’s an easy answer, but it has to lay in part on publishers, media and journalists exercising some discretion, and responsibility to inform, rather than just turning a fire hose of mixed fiction and fact on the crowd, and seeing what happens.

The unfortunate possible, if not even likely, alternative – which we already see playing out in other countries – is that a confused and overwhelmed public will adopt the seemingly simple and reassuring answers offered by paternalistic authoritarians, and freedom of the press will come to an end, with those who have theories about what are essentially anarchic approaches, left to discuss their ideas from the relative safety of prisons and gulags.

However, the first concrete suggestion that comes to mind, is that perhaps unsupported conspiracy theories ought to be prominently labeled as such. And maybe other types of pieces might warrant some categorization in the media, as well.