Through his comments and contributions to this site, Anony Maker keeps our readers well informed about the Jeffrey Epstein case. Here are some of his latest contributions.
***
By Anony Maker
I don’t see anything seriously wrong with these images of Jeffrey Epstein and Woody Allen with his wife Soon Yi, beyond what might be expected of digital photographs that were probably produced for sale to tabloids.
The copyright tag in the lower left of one of the photos indicates they were taken by a professional paparazzo [Elder Ordonez], who would have been using high-end equipment like telephoto lenses which create the illusion of foreshortening, plus he or the tabloids he sold photos to may have done some digital image enhancement just to make the subjects of the photos stand out better for publication purposes – similar to the sort of thing we saw amateurishly done in the Maxwell images.
I have a fair bit of experience working with and analyzing digital images, and went through these in more detail in a writeup that I expect will be posted here eventually. I don’t see anything out of the ordinary, and doubt that anyone would have photoshopped figures into a whole series of images take years ago (I found them published at least as far back as 2015). If there’s anything suspicious, it’s that some of the images here have been cropped and don’t show other people visible in the versions published earlier, and there are none from the series showing the full face of the woman on the left.
The photographer is using a lens with a very short depth of focus, so that only one person is in sharp focus, which also creates the illusion of foreshortening – this is most obvious in the banner and last image, of Epstein.
Sometimes that effect is also created or emphasized in post-production, which can make figures seem a bit odd on close examination, perhaps also at work in that same image – but that’s been done since the black-and-white days, when photographers and newspaper photo departments used to take sharp pencils to negatives to outline faces and figures (or create the infamous “Bat Boy”).
Also, as much skill as it takes to photoshop major figures into an image virtually undetectably, it would be a real feat to create a sequential series of images that appeared convincing. A quick search online reveals that there are not just the 3 images from that street scene, but at least 2 additional ones, taken fractions of a second apart; in one the woman on the very left, rather than Allen’s wife, has virtually disappeared behind Epstein’s large frame. As is visible in the last image and noted in some of the published ones, they are copyrighted and credited to Elder Ordonez/INFphoto.com, who would be the one to ask about the photos – he’s apparently a “major celebrity photo contributor” and not all that hard to find:
https://www.instagram.com/elderordonez1
https://photoarchivenews.com/news/splash-news-extends-relationships-with-major-celebrity-photo-contributors/
***
The Ghislaine Maxwell photos were very amateurishly and obviously photoshopped, by someone (probably Maxwell’s attorney friend who took the pictures, or someone at her media agency) who apparently thought that they needed to be cleaned up a bit for sale to the tabloids. However, changing out the movie poster undetectably would have required the work of a highly experienced professional, and I think it’s more likely that there’s just typical human confusion over when the poster shown in the photograph was actually put up in the bus shelter and, then, replaced.
Besides having done a fair bit of “photoshopping” (using Adobe as well as freeware tools) as a volunteer at an entertainment non-profit – where we had to sometimes edit or create composite photos of performance groups.
I’ve also done quite a bit of forensic-type photo analysis following an especially resourceful cult group that uses photographic tricks and does a fair bit of “photoshopping,” mostly to try to make crowds at events look bigger. This is not terribly sophisticated (popping a few extra small, blurry heads in here and there) and also making banal cosmetic fixes like cleaning up visual distractions in the vicinity of their Dear Leader.
One of the things I’ve learned along the way is that if you look at almost any digital image long enough you’re likely to find at least one thing that seems weird, and between the photographic techniques used and the oddities of digital photography including how cameras’ image sensors work and the compression algorithms applied to photographs, there are almost always multiple anomalies that show up in digital images on close analysis (though it helps to have high-resolution versions, which we don’t here).
It can even start to become sort of a Rorshach Test if you’re not careful.
Epstein Gurney Photos
LOL, there are people who think pictures of the earth taken from space are fake because they believe it’s flat – there are lots of fools in the world. They’re also the sort of gullible, logically challenged people who are prime candidates for cults – which of course typically have conspiracy theories as part of their beliefs.
If that’s not Epstein on the gurney, dead or alive, then how did they get him out of the prison – dead or alive? Actually, putting him on the gurney, dead or alive, would have been the easiest set-up. You really need to think your conspiracy theorizing through at least a bit, rather than making yourself look completely foolish….
It’s actually a classic example of how shoddy and poorly thought through much if not most conspiracy theorizing is, and how obsessed its proponents get into trying to read things into factual evidence like photographs where there is actually nothing out of the ordinary. That, or, typically in combination, to propose theories that don’t even make sense when fully thought out, or taken to their logical conclusion.
So, I guess it comes down to me explaining how such a conspiracy theory ought to work, for those who still might not get it: if clever conspirators trying to spirit Epstein away alive, sent either an Epstein dummy or doppelganger (smuggled in first), the relatively easy way out of the jail on a gurney, then they still would have been left with the problem of getting the live Epstein out of a high-security federal facility. Even Hollywooscriptwritersrs have figured out that the best-seeming ruse is to have the live, sedated (or even somehow temporary heart-stopped) taken out on a stretcher. There is actually no version of even a comparatively coherent and internally consistent conspiracy theory around this, in which it makes sense for anyone other than Epstein to be on the gurney, dead or alive.
***
Rockefeller and Conspiracy
There is certainly collusion – often based on a convenient convergence of mutual interests – and occasionally some real conspiracy, though usually limited in scale and ultimately exposed.
I’ve studied Rockefeller and he is an interesting case, as he tended to fall for con men’s investment schemes, and not do so well in general with the stock market – his advisers and family finally had to limit the amount of money he had to play with. But he was brilliant at anything that had to do with manipulating things he could fully control, from industrial operations that shaved every penny imaginable to conspiratorial monopolies that could rig markets, and, of course, the occasional underhanded financial deal.
There are reports that Epstein was a genius at avoiding taxes, and I suspect that among other things, it will eventually turn out that he set up tax schemes, such as in the Virgin Islands, for people with big money, and took cuts – that may even be much of what he did for Wexner. If so, that’s another thing that a lot of influential people might rather not have revealed.
***
Epstein’s Story [at Least] Lives on
The Epstein story continues to have “legs” both in the US and abroad – including apparently with law enforcement.
The MIT scandal continues, and is explained:
MIT whistleblower Signe Swenson says staffers referred to Epstein as ‘Voldemort’
https://nypost.com/2019/09/12/mit-whistleblower-signe-swenson-says-staffers-referred-to-epstein-as-voldemort/
Why MIT Media Lab thought it was doing right by secretly accepting Jeffrey Epstein’s money
“Sometimes very smart people have a very bad idea.”
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/11/20860717/mit-media-lab-joi-ito-epstein
Leslie Wexner continues to say very general things, trying to distance himself from Epstein and put him in the past, but nothing that really provides much of an explanation of the relationship that virtually made Epstein:
‘So sick, so cunning, so depraved’ — Victoria’s Secret boss Les Wexner is speaking out about his ties…
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/victorias-secret-les-wexner-embarrassed-by-jeffrey-epstein-ties-2019-9-1028519371
Shady New York businessmen’s go-to bank, used for a favorite corrupt ruse:
Jeffrey Epstein Used Opaque Charity Account at Deutsche Bank for Own Benefit
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jeffrey-epstein-used-opaque-charity-account-at-deutsche-bank-for-own-benefit-11568286004
Further analysis of the results of MuckRock’s FOIA request:
The Jeffrey Epstein investigation was more expansive than previously thought, documents show
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/11/us/jeffrey-epstein-investigation-us-marshals-documents/index.html
More overseas fallout:
The Royal Family Is Scrambling Over Prince Andrew’s Jeffrey Epstein Connections
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwew9j/queen-elizabeth-scrambling-over-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-connections
There is another important developing angle of the Epstein story.
Interestingly, the info comes from FOIA requests made by MuckRock. As noted in a new Vanity Fair article, there is continuing intense media interest in the Epstein story – which hopefully bodes well for uncovering more of the truth.
Apparently, girls were being flown to the Virgin Islands, which starts to explain where the young women sighted there came from, though I suspect many may have been from overseas as well. From what I remember of one of the reports, they may not have been properly accounted for in Epstein’s flight manifests.
There’s a comprehensive, recently posted, account here:
Jeffrey Epstein Might Have Taken Girls as Young as 11 to His Private Island Last Year
“An air traffic controller witnessed Epstein traveling with pre-teen girls.”
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmj3e3/jeffrey-epstein-might-have-taken-girls-as-young-as-11-to-his-private-island-last-year
FOIA Request Apparently Reveals Jeffrey Epstein’s Last Mugshot, Plus Details of Investigation
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/foia-request-apparently-reveals-jeffrey-epsteins-last-mugshot-plus-details-of-investigation/
There are continual reports of investigative activity in France:
French Cops Appeal for Victims and Witnesses to Help Jeffrey Epstein Probe
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-french-cops-appeal-for-victims-and-witnesses-to-come-forward
An investigative journalist doggedly tracked down confirmation that the curious structure on Epstein’s island was a sort of music room, with a piano in it (at the end of a summation of the various speculative theories that have been floated):
Jeffrey Epstein’s island temple had a piano and a picture of the Pope
“Jeffrey Epstein’s island temple inspired dozens of conspiracy theories. We spoke to someone who went inside.”
https://www.insider.com/inside-jeffrey-epstein-private-island-temple-2019-09
And there are no news updates on the investigation into Epstein’s death, in spite of someone posting a comment elsewhere citing supposed “sources” and an “insider,” that I’m guessing came from a conspiracy theory website.
Finally, in my favorite conspiracy theory, there’s this that’s new:
Ancient Aliens (September 05 2019 ) The Reptilian Agenda
“Could they still be among us, hiding in plain site – and if so, what is their agenda?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd72MKzp9UU
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
I just stumbled upon a new photo from the Epstein + Woody Allen series, in which the woman’s face left of Epstein is clearly visible (and some other people in the background).
Would you care to comment on it? Thank you.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/i83q1p/jeffrey_epstein_and_woody_allen_in_nyc_in/
Would a ‘burst shot’ be a good name for the kind of shot this paparazzo took?
Let’s wade into the sea of doubt, and see if Mack is in the same boat as Maxwell – possibly if not probably out of the country, or dead.
Diane Lipson reported from the last court date, that the person who appeared did not look like the Allison Mack she had seen before. That was taken as meaning that she was eating more healthily and looking better, but should have been investigated as evidence of her replacement with a body double or doppelganger.
Then there was the strange episode with her attorney asking for release of her passport, supposedly so that she could renew her driver’s license. But passports aren’t needed to renew a driver’s license – according to the State Department, only 36% of Americans even have a passport – unless for instance the driver license bureau is going to be so suspicious of whether the person applying is really who they claim to be, that extra backup might be needed to try to convince them to issue the new ID to the applicant. And of course the other reason to have one is to leave the country – it would be easy to return a sloppy fake to the authorities, who wouldn’t know any better, and then have the unimpeachable original for an escape.
So I thought I’d go back to the last set of photographs supposed to be of Mack alive and at home in the US, at her parents’ house in California, to see what those tell us. Sure enough, I can find something suspiciously wrong with every one of them – much like in the Maxwell case, particularly the highly sophisticated switching of the movie poster in the bus shelter.
I found the set of original images are here: https://realtimeimages.photoshelter.com/gallery/Excl-Smallville-actress-Allison-Mack-is-seen-wearing-an-electronic-ankle-bracelet-25-July-2018/G0000pEonaSs3miM/C0000_vKSdyWEbpU
Here are my notes about the problems with each of the photos:
001 [moved to its proper place in sequence, below]
002 – blowup detail of apparent ankle monitor that does NOT correspond to any of the other images. SUSPICIOUS
003 – (presumptive parents) – supposed partial figure at far left has same shirt color and cuff, and skin tone, as full male figure, blurred skin edges but sharp fabric edges. PHOTOSHOP “CLONING” – plus supposed dog looks like Yoda, strange ears with dark lines at base (esp. right) that appear to be photoshopped on.
004 – (supposed delivery) – door is at a strange angle at bottom, appears to be open, though it doesn’t appear so at top. SUSPICIOUS ANOMALIES
005 – (supposed delivery) person is wearing oversized hat and large sunglasses that completely obscure identity. Short sleeve white shirt with two blue strips does NOT correspond to any uniform to be found for USPS, UPS, FedEx or DHL. INCONSISTENCIES INDICATING STAGING/SET UP/FAKING
[001] – (supposedly Mack) Top and underside of figure’s extended right foot, front of left leg, and other areas less obviously, have dark cutlines [NOT natural shadows] as from figure taken from another photo and “dropped in” to scene. Line of unnatural color change on neck immediately above necklace. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE, DIFFERENT HEAD ONTO BODY
006 – (supposedly Mack) Underside of figure’s extended right foot, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Line of unnatural color change on neck immediately above necklace. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE, DIFFERENT HEAD ONTO BODY
007 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s extended right calf, right wrist and parts of hand, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Line of unnatural color change on neck immediately above necklace. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE, DIFFERENT HEAD ONTO BODY
008 – (supposedly Mack) All of figures’s extended right leg, back of left knee, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
009 – (supposedly Mack) All of figures’s extended right leg, back of left knee, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. SCENE ALTERATIONS, PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
010 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s extended right leg, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. SCENE ALTERATIONS, PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
011 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s right leg, left side of face, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Line of unnatural color change on neck immediately above necklace, cutline around collar. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. SCENE ALTERATIONS, PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE, DIFFERENT HEAD ONTO BODY
012 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s right leg, left side of face, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Line of unnatural color change on neck immediately above necklace, cutline around collar. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. SCENE ALTERATIONS, PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE, DIFFERENT HEAD ONTO BODY
013 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s right calf, back of lower torso, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Cutline around collar. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. SCENE ALTERATIONS, PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
014 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s right calf, back of torso, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
014 – (supposedly Mack) Back side of figures’s right calf, back of lower torso, left calf at top of supposed ankle monitor, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. Reflections on door mail slot different than in all preceding photos. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
015 – (supposedly Mack) Left shoulder, back of right thigh, lower back of left calf, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
016 – (supposedly Mack) Left hip, lower back of left calf, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
017 – (supposedly Mack) Left hip, lower back of left calf, and other areas less obviously, cutlines as above. PHOTOSHOPPING OF FIGURE INTO SCENE
001, 006 – 014 NOTE that in ALL the images of figures supposed to be Mack showing the front of the face, the eyes are closed. IMPOSSIBLE, LIKELY PHOTOSHOPPED HEAD SHOTS FROM CORPSE
001, 006 – 017 NOTE that in ALL the images of figures supposed to be Mack, the back foot is kept in the same place. “Anchoring” like that has long been used in trick photography and Hollywood special effects in order to provide a visual and technical point of reference around which to build forgeries and illusions. Ankle monitors DO NOT work like “invisible fences” for dogs with a precise tripline, they rely on proximity to a base and/ or GPS, and Mack COULD NOT have been so stupid as to misunderstand that, or to think that if her home detention order specifies that she can’t even go out on the porch, that keeping one foot on the threshold while stepping out, is somehow compliant; the anchoring of her back foot can ONLY have calculated, sinister implications.
NOTE THAT ABOVE IS BASED ON CURSORY INSPECTION OF THE IMAGES AND FIRST IMPRESSIONS, DETAILED ANALYSIS MAY YIELD ADDITIONAL ANOMALIES, INCONSISTENCIES, IMPOSSIBILITIES AND PROOFS OF DEATH
So we can conclude that Mack was dead prior the supposed July 2018 photos at her parents house, with head shots having been taken of her corpse with eyes closed for use in later photoshopping. A body double or doppelganger was then photoshopped into pictures of the doorway of her parents’ home, with the corpse head shots photoshopped on. The double, who also made a brief and appearance in court that largely fooled observers, now has Mack’s driver’s license and passport, and Mack’s death can be covered up by announcing her supposed escape at the right moment, excused in the official narrative and MSM as being the result of mistakes, just like in Epstein’s death.
That, or we’re reading too much into things – and apparent anomalies or manipulations can be found in almost any digital image taken for the tabloids these days, along with the sort of oddities and coincidences that occur in any real-life situation.
NEXT UP: Is there a plausible theory tying Mack’s death to Maxwell and/or Epstein? Does anyone doubt now that I can come up with one?
DISCLAIMER: The above content is certified to meet or exceed the standards for conspiracy theories. It may contain shortcomings of fact, evidence, logic and analysis within accepted limits for those accustomed to a diet of conspiracies.
Oh, and that graphic sensationally titled “EPSTEIN GURNEY PHOTOS FAKED” is another example of shoddy, easily deconstructed conspiracy theorizing.
If you get into Google Street View for New York Downtown Hospital, now Lower Manhattan Hospital – New York Presbyterian, for the address that translates to their emergency receiving dock, 69 Gold St, New York, it’s easy to verify that is in fact the location – it’s a dirty mess, with a bunch of orange gurneys against the wall to the right of the door, and the blue “Restricted Access” signs (which at the bottom say “use Gold St. entrance” – another missed clue).
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7098192,-74.0047091,3a,30y,309.27h,89.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_-NBwp4J-hLAwtmuoFnp-g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
So whoever took the time to put together that graphic, didn’t bother to check Google Maps, or cross-reference the street references on the two big signs visible. Stupidity, delusion, or calculated disinformation? Maybe that’s what needs to be investigated, who is making up and spreading stuff like that, and why.
The assumption that an outside emergency room wall couldn’t be dirty, and therefore that proves something is wrong with the photograph, is an error of thinking and analysis typical to conspiracy theories, a version of the the Divine Fallacy, that involves arguing for a conclusion on the grounds that it is somehow unimaginable for it not to be otherwise (often tied to the presumption that the world is always neat and orderly, and if not that is necessarily a sign of something sinister at work):
Personal Incredulity
“Because you found something difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, you made out like it’s probably not true.”
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity
The assumption that emergency vehicles wouldn’t be prohibited from idling outside an emergency room – particularly when it’s in a sort of enclosed bay where exhaust fumes could accumulate dangerously, as is the case at NYP – is similar:
Idling of Emergency Vehicles
“The New York State and New York City laws limit the amount of time a truck or bus may idle….
Unless in emergency operation, ambulances and first response vehicles ARE NOT exempt from the provisions of these environment conservation laws.”
https://www.health.ny.gov/professionals/ems/policy/05-01.htm
That’s also in part a form of the fallacy of jumping to conclusions, or hasty conclusions, without taking adequate time to reason, research or verify.
I expect soon to have an elsewhere promised follow-up about how Allison Mack could be in the same boat as Maxwell – not having recently been seen alive, and all the last published images of her showing suspicious inconsistencies and signs of possible photoshopping on close examination.
Checking into developments in the Epstein case, there doesn’t seem to be anything significant except that another prestigious Boston-area school is now enmeshed in the donations controversy, and another of his odd supporters or apologists has come forward:
Harvard Reviewing Nearly $9 Million In Donations From Epstein
https://www.wbur.org/edify/2019/09/13/jeffrey-epstein-donor-harvard-university-lawrence-bacow-letter
Famed Computer Scientist Richard Stallman Described Epstein Victims As ‘Entirely Willing’
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9ke3ke/famed-computer-scientist-richard-stallman-described-epstein-victims-as-entirely-willing
There’s also a piece about a female researcher at the MIT Media Lab whose program was the beneficiary of some of Epstein’s largesse, that I find insightful into how his donations were justified and contexualized:
‘“Joi assured me that Epstein was an approved donor who wished to devote his fortune to science and technology, in part to make amends for wrongs he committed earlier in his life.”
….
MIT required that Epstein’s gifts to her lab be kept confidential, “so as to not enhance his reputation by association with MIT, and with the understanding that he would not be considered a sponsor of our group’s research or have any involvement in how the funds were spent.”’
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/09/13/meeting-with-epstein-led-gift-and-now-regrets/0SPYm0hSg8iNh3JdDwPICP/story.html
My guess is that Epstein touted those supposedly “confidential” gifts to friends and acquaintances, in an effort to trade on them as social capital in what seems to have been his prime modus operandi, worming his way into circles of the ultra-wealthy and influential through often mis-represented credentials and accomplishements – it probably got presented to Bill Gates, for instance, that Epstein was a behind-the-scenes major donor to MIT, framing it as that he was admirably publicity-adverse rather than that institutions dared not speak his name (MIT referred to him as “Voldemort”). It occurs to me that it also would have put him in a position where ultimately he could have claimed public credit for his net donations if it suited his purposes, and MIT would have had to just stand by.
AnoyMaker,
Great well thought out article (comment post).
I would like to see a true conspiracy theorist attempt rebutting your facts and points…….
……However……
…….We both know that a rebuttal of your article is not coming at any point in the future.
Clearly, you are a paid shill and not truly worth taking one’s time to debate because the government has furnished you with prepared cover facts and convenient explanations to shape the narrative.
(Sarcasm) 😉
I enjoyed this article. I hope you have a great weekend!
nitguy, thanks for the thanks! Glad there is some appreciation for my work – besides Frank being so generous as to feature some of these pieces.
I’m not paid, so I guess that makes me just a mere dupe of the government and/or the conspiracy puppetmasters….. 😉
Through his comments and contributions to this site, Anony Maker keeps our readers well informed about the Jeffrey Epstein case
LOL…If bullshit were money, this guy would be a filthy rich mother fucker. Parlato needs to talk to some sources here in New York.
MDC,
Name one thing that AnoyMaker lied about or falsified…..
Or please go Troll Along™
Really, a troll accusation from the king of low IQ trolls???? It was pointed out that the con artist anoymaker peacemaker etc etc is not an expert on the Epstein case or photo shopping for that matter. Pointing out that someone is a bullshitter is not trolling when it is factual. Get lost troll
Typical drive-by troll, asserting some authority but providing no facts or evidence. If there are people in “New York” who Frank ought to talk to, he provides his e-mail address and phone number and is apparently willing to talk to anyone.
You have to wonder if some people are paid by the post, by the Internet Research Agency (the “Trolls from Olgino” employed by the Kremlin) or the Bronfmans.
Or maybe various cult members lurk here, liking to look down on others as deluded fools, while believing that Ramtha or the reptilian aliens are the real deal.
AnoyMaker,
We both know your detractors offer no counter facts or counter points.
You should not let there banterish theatrics bother you.
nitguy, don’t worry – I don’t.
I know that some of them are trolling to get a response – though some it seems just sort of drive by catcall, or the equivalent of muttering at slur at someone passing by on the street, whatever perverse gratification that gives some people. Plus then of course there’s the question of paid social media disinformation and disruption agents who, if not here, are actually out in other venues exploiting flaws in the structure of free societies including conspiracy theorizing.
I respond occasionally when it amuses me to do so, or I think it’s an opportunity to call out their tactics. While I know the generally accepted advice is not to feed trolls, my experience is that some of them seem to be discouraged by just having their fundamental boorishness pointed out.
Come to think of it, I think I’m going to start making the point that we need to consider looking at conspiracy theories differently, now that we know that some of them are being stoked as tools of real-world conspiring, attempts by state-level actors to undermine our free and democratic societies. Thanks for inspiring me!
Anonymaker,
There is a degree of truth to your last paragraph if you live in Russia,China or Iran.
Agree. This guy spews verbal diarrhea all over this blog until it stinks like raw sewage. Yea this clown is an expert on Epstein……….right. All the goof does is paint those who doubt the “official” narrative as conspiracy kooks. Evidently he has not been paying too much attention to the happenings going on around the world. This clown eats u everything the phony New York Times shits out. The paper of so called record who are the real conspiracy kooks.
Tom,
Please grab your ankles and turn that frown upside down……
Anony Maker:
Thank you for this insightful piece.
I miss the Weekly World News (WWN) and similar publications.
How am I supposed to know how “Bat Boy” is doing without the WWN?
LOL
Epstein’s popularity among New York’s elite, even after his pedophilia was exposed, shows the moral bankruptcy of America’s elite.
One would hope that America’s elite would avoid the disgraced ppedophile like the plague but they were happy to socialize with him behind closed doors.
The noted business writer James B. Stewart met with Epstein a year before the pedophile dies.
And Epstein boasted of his friendships with Woody Allen and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman.
Epstein had photos of himself with Woody Allen and the Crown Prince.
The mysterious financier refused to say if he was advising the eccentric business tycoon Elon Musk and the Tesla automotive company.
“The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-interview.html
I assume that Epstein is dead but there is still plenty of room for theories about how he died and why were normal security protocols not followed for a high value prisoner who was a friend to Presidents, Royalty and business tycoons.
As for the Rockefeller family many of the tactics used by old John D. Rockefeller to amass his fortune would be illegal today.
And the Rockefelller family has taken great pains to hide the dubious activities of the family’s real founder.
The real patriarch of the Rockefeller family was William Avery Rockefeller, not John D.
William Avery Rockefeller earned the nickname “Devil Bill”.
William Avery was a con artist cracked from the same mold as Joseph Smith and Keith Raniere.
William Avery Rockefeller, was a snake oil salesman and a bigamist.
In fact Devil Bill was even accused of raping a woman at gun point.
“William Avery “Devil Bill” Rockefeller Sr. (November 13, 1810 – May 11, 1906) was an American businessman, lumberman, herbalist and salesman who went by the alias of Dr. William Levingston.”
“Devil Bill once bragged, “I cheat my boys every chance I get. I want to make ’em sharp.”[8] Although Bill abandoned the family while Lucy, John, and William Jr. were teenagers, he remained legally married to Eliza until her death. In 1856, having assumed the name Dr. William Levingston, he married Margaret Allen (1834–1910) in Norwich, Ontario, Canada. Bill and Margaret had no children together. Before leaving his first wife, he also had two daughters with his mistress and housekeeper Nancy Brown.”
“On July 26, 1849, in the city of Auburn, New York,[12] William Devil Bill Rockefeller was indicted for a rape which had occurred at gunpoint.[13] His victim had worked in the Rockefeller household;[14] her name was Ann Vanderbeak.[13][14] In the 1905 book Memoirs of an American Citizen, Robert Herrick says an improper relationship had been rumoured to exist.[15][16]”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rockefeller_Sr.
Anony Maker, I love this article and thank you. I admire what you put together very much! In the same way that I’d be unhesitant to recommend Frank Parlato or Tony Ortega as sources, one fellow whom I listen to in London, Shaun Attwood, is doing very, very good work. He has a sound body of experience behind him and is dedicated, persistent and quite intelligent. Attwood is on You Tube, in case you haven’t heard him and are interested. Yesterday he left his “desk” and went to Ghislaine Maxwell’s London flat, where at one point, a cleaner opened the door and spoke to him briefly. Shaun got the chance to film a bit of the interior of Maxwell’s now rather infamous place.
The white bannister on the stairs where Prince Andrew had his arm around Virginia’s waist was filmed by Shaun’s camera man. I hope that you don’t mind this humble recommendation, offered in case you’re interested and might find Attwood as worthwhile as I find him to be. He is determined, he is calm, he is analytical and again, most of all, he has experience behind him, and compassion is part of his passion. He doesn’t say this, but one can see it. He has something money cannot buy. I love to hear someone who really concentrates.
Finance and business haven’t been a big part of my interests or experience, so when I find someone who explains these subjects with reference to any case, it is much appreciated. By chance I ran across a lady, Amazing Polly, who is very coherent, organized, uses visual aids and has really been working Epstein and Maxwell, etc., etc. and their history of business activities, and Poll manages to go way back, plus she has copies, documents to show what she explains. I have no idea what other subjects she covers on You Tube, however, she is very bright and a fine explainer of what she wants people to understand, about the background of where and how money is and has been being directed by some of the players in this long and involved saga.
You might not need Polly’s kind of analytical work about finances, etc. at all, but I’ve always been an artistic sort, with little comprehension or fascination regarding money and its enterprises, so Polly has been a big help to me already, with just one of her well-woven talks.
My early efforts to find out about Epstein’s relationship to Wexner have been pretty fruitful, moreso than looking into Stephen Hoffenberg’s involvement with Epstein. Still working on it but have the feeling to stay on the quiet side just now. It feels to be a highly personal story here about Wexner. The emphasis is on just how very personal it seems to have been. Wexner even plans his disenchanted remarks about Epstein with extreme caution. Perhaps the man is dealing with too many feelings of guilt from his own conditioning. Some of the biggest mouths of denial have the most to hide. Wexner tries so hard to keep to the line that he was terribly deceived by Epstein. From what I see so far, that us a half-truth and one that would have been best left unmentioned.
Anyhow, thank you, Anony, for making this think-tank even better.
Sorry. “… that IS a half-truth…”