A Sea of Doubt: Are 2013 Photos of Jeffrey Epstein with Woody Allen in NYC Photoshopped – Just Like Ghislaine Maxwell Photos in LA?

The New York Post published pictures of a man being wheeled on a gurney – which were reportedly of Jeffrey Epstein.

It may be indeed be Epstein and he may indeed have committed suicide – just as it was reported.  There are some – perhaps of the tinfoil hat variety – who suspect that old Jeffrey, 66, did not leave the prison dead but is still alive.

Nobody has dispositive evidence it seems and those who believe in the veracity of our government will certainly find the notion that Jeff is still alive – possibly smuggled out of the prison – to resume a new life, with a new identity – for services rendered to Israel or even the US – to be completely preposterous.

On the other hand, there are more than a small percentage of people who doubt the official version of the story – that Jeffrey committed suicide.

Some think he may have been murdered – and of those who do, they are split between whether it was a US government “suiciding” of Epstein or a murder for hire from one of several possible individuals – with money – who wanted Epstein not to go to trial.

The public does not know what is true, but it is interesting that the mainstream media has pretty much adopted the official story and refers to Epstein as a suicide. Perhaps he is.

It was the New York Post who somehow managed to get photographs of Epstein being wheeled out dead or near dead [without a sheet covering his face as is normal for the dead].

The Post reported that “Paramedics frantically tried to revive convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein early Saturday morning after he was found unresponsive in his cell in downtown Manhattan, exclusive photos shot by The Post reveal… A call was placed to first responders around 6:30 a.m. as MCC staff tried to revive him, said the FDNY and Bureau of Prisons.

“Photos of Epstein taken around 7:30 a.m. show the convicted pedophile still wearing his orange prison jumpsuit as he’s wheeled on a gurney into New York Presbyterian-Lower Manhattan Hospital.

“The images show a drawn, ashen face with closed eyes, and EMTs using a breathing apparatus in an attempt to revive the multi-millionaire convicted pedophile.

“Epstein was later declared dead at the hospital.”

How the Post got the exclusive photos are not clear.

Image result for new york post photo of epstein dead gurney
There are some who think the person on the gurney is not actually Epstein and have taken the time to point out that while the man looks similar it is not Epstein. {Photo New York Post].

 

Jeffrey Epstein – when he was clearly alive.

Following the explosive exclusive the Post got – in procuring Epstein’s death – and the photos of him dead or nearly dead, the Post got another so-called exclusive which actually turned out to be a hoax.

The Post ‘found’ Ghislaine Maxwell – Epstein’s girlfriend, co-conspirator, possible handler, confederate spy and what not – at – of all places – a Los Angeles fast-food restaurant called In-N-Out.

The story on its face sounded implausible and Frank Report was one of, if not the first to call “bullshit’ on the story.  [I Call Bullshit – Ghislaine Maxwell Just Happened to Be at Burger Joint Reading CIA Deaths’ Book When NY Post ‘Found’ Her?]

There was no way Ghislaine would be out and about – it seems to me – her, the world’s most notorious and possibly most hated woman – dining at her leisure at a burger joint.

But the New York Post gave it a no wiggle room treatment  – Jeffrey Epstein’s gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell spotted at In-N-Out Burger in first photos since his death.  She was there alright and they had pictures to prove it.

The Post even discovered what book she was writing and got a quote from her.

Here is what the Post wrote: “The Post found the socialite hiding in plain sight in the least likely place imaginable — a fast-food joint in Los Angeles.

“Maxwell, 57, the alleged madam to the multimillionaire pedophile, was scarfing down a burger, fries and shake al fresco at an In-N-Out Burger on Monday while reading “The Book of Honor: The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives,’ a nonfiction best-seller by journalist Ted Gup.

“Sitting alone with a pet pooch, she was surprised to have been found and told an onlooker, ‘Well, I guess this is the last time I’ll be eating here!’”

The rest of the story describes Maxwell and Epstein and is unrelated to her burger appearance in Los Angeles. The Post never explains how it got the pictures or how they “found” her.

I broke the story a few days later that the photo – which is clearly photoshopped – may have been taken by Maxwell friend Leah Saffian, because, among other clues, her dog Dexter is in the picture.  Source: California-UK Attorney Took Pictures of Ghislaine Maxwell for NY Post [and Attorney’s Dog in Photo Too]

Leah Saffian – did she take the pictures of Ghislaine Maxwell? If she did – when did she take them?

I wrote that the photos of Maxwell were likely altered and The Daily Mail seems to have proven they were.

The Daily Mail wrote, “Ghislaine Maxwell was [allegedly] snapped for the first time in three years last week, it was claimed a fellow diner had ‘chanced’ upon her at a Los Angeles burger bar.

However -“… an advertising agency claimed a poster on a bus shelter behind Ms. Maxwell had been photoshopped in.

“The socialite is seen in front of a poster for Good Boys, a film that opened in the US on Friday.

“But when The Mail on Sunday visited the area on Friday, the bus stop was displaying an advert for a local hospital.

“Advertising agency Outfront Media said the hospital ad had been there since July 28 – with Ms. Maxwell said to have been photographed on August 12.

“Spokeswoman Carly Zipp said: ‘We think the poster in the Maxwell picture was photoshopped in. We checked… and we have no evidence or record of Good Boys ever being there…”

Ghislaine Maxwell Was Not at a Burger Joint in Los Angeles in August

I gave my analysis of it in this story: Daily Mail Discovers Ghislaine Maxwell Burger Joint Pics Photoshopped – That’s Not What the NY Post Claims!

The poster for Good Boys, near the upper right corner, seems to have been photoshopped in since the ad agency that owns that location said they never had that poster there.

What perhaps the Daily Mail did not fully realize [or perhaps they did but did not emphasize it] is the importance of the photoshopped Good Boys poster – since the movie opened in August. The poster alone gives plausibility to the date Maxwell was there in Los Angeles – in August – at the In-N-Out burger joint.

Without the poster, the picture of Maxwell could have been taken months ago – or years ago.

The purpose of the photos it would seem are to misdirect the public into thinking Maxwell was in Los Angeles.

Maybe she was – but if she was, then why photoshop a current movie’s poster into the picture? It is peculiar to say the least.

And in a case where everything is peculiar – the public is entitled to doubt.

Woody Allen and Jeffrey Epstein

So this brings us back a few years in time to 2013 – when the New York Post [via Page Six] ‘found’ Jeffrey Epstein and Woody Allen and his wife Soon Yi walking on the street in New York.  The Post article is entitled Woody Allen pals around with child-sex creep

The Post wrote, “Schlubby director Woody Allen was seen palling around Manhattan with billionaire convicted child-sex creep Jeffrey Epstein.

“Epstein put his arm around the cradle-robbing director-actor [Allen] and quietly talked as the pair strolled on the Upper East Side Sunday with Allen’s 35-years-younger wife, Soon-Yi, in tow.

“'[Epstein] was hugging him and talking close to his ear . . . [He] had his arm on Woody’s shoulder,’ a spy told The Post.

“’They appeared to have been walking together’’ along Madison Avenue beforehand, and the three then started ‘talking and laughing’ as they neared Epstein’s East 71st Street townhouse, the source said.

“Allen, 77, and his 42-year-old wife — the adopted daughter of ex-love Mia Farrow — live on East 70th Street.

“They all went into Epstein’s building after the walk, the source said.”

Here is the picture that accompanies the article:

In the Daily Mail, another less cropped photo appears:

And this looks like yet another photo which appeared in the Daily Mail – reporting on the Post story..

 

Since the story – like the Maxwell story – depends on someone – in this case a “Spy” – having spotted Epstein and Allen together – it begs the question – are the Allen -Epstein photos – like the Maxwell photos – photoshopped?

It almost seems like Epstein – who is walking ahead of Allen and Soon Yi – not walking with them – might have been “dropped in” by a good photoshop expert.

I wonder if any of our readers can add something to this discussion?

If it was photoshopped – then should we also doubt that Allen and Soon Yi also dropped in at Epstein’s mansion?

The point of all this is not to over-worry about whether the possible suicide Jeffrey Epstein was friends or not with the possible child molester Woody Allen – but rather to examine the way news is presented and whether or not healthy skepticism is not indicated in some, if not most of what we are told are facts and, therefore, we should believe.

And if not believing the official story always rightly qualifies one for the tinfoil hat.

Image result for tinfoil hat
Please don this hat or one reasonably like it – if you are unprepared to believe the official versions of stories presented by your government – or if you have any doubts about any of the mainstream media’s reporting of anything that is ‘beyond doubt.’

About the author

Frank Parlato

Frank Report’s founder and lead writer Frank Parlato is one of the internet’s most decorated investigative journalists. His writing and investigations have helped expose major criminal organizations and scandals.

Frank’s work has been cited in major publications all over the world, including The New York Times, New York Post, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CNN, Rolling Stone, and more.

He is also the publisher and editor-in-chief of Artvoice, The Niagara Falls Reporter, Front Page and the South Buffalo News.

40 Comments

Click here to post a comment

Leave a Reply to niceguy Cancel reply

  • Wading into the sea of doubt, I realized that Allison Mack may be in the same boat as Maxwell – we have no recent confirmed sightings of her alive. Even at the last court date, Diane said the person who showed up looked rather different than the Allison Mack she had seen before – perhaps we should have taken that literally, and started investigating right then.

    So I went and found the series of images supposedly taken of her at her front door, and on close examination, all of them shows signs of possible photoshopping or other suspicious set-ups – indeed making the cases similar. I’ll try to post a detailed analysis of that shortly, on my more recent topic.

    For that matter, when have Raniere, either of the Salzmans, or Nicky Cline last been confirmed as seen as alive – and not looking like a possible impostor or doppelganger? The could all be dead, stacked up in an underground freezer somewhere (perhaps Epstein’s secret cryogenics facility), waiting to be unthawed at the right time and trotted out as “suicides,” “accidental deaths,” heart attacks, or just missing – and actually put at the bottom of the Hudson wearing cement boots. Do we know anything for certain about anyone?

    • Typical- another bait and switch by Frank and his pals. Roger still pulling your strings, Frank? Sigh….

      Anonymaker
      Sad to see you are just another far-right crazy, but I’m certainly not the least bit surprised, knowing how you “people” operate.

      • Flowers, that post of mine is a perhaps somewhat too subtle sort of parody or satire of some of what gets posted here. I think my comments that were recently featured as pieces, set forth my perspective more clearly.

        The last paragraph proposing really off the wall conspiracy theories, and, hopefully the final question “Do we know anything for certain about anyone?” should give some idea of what I’m really getting at.

        But maybe some of the seriously crazy that passes here makes it too hard to do a send-up without risk of being misunderstood.

    • Just an observation,

      Great article thanks for the link to Mother Jones!

      Stuart Pivar is like the Frankreport’s own Acteon. Maybe Stuart Pivar is Acteon.

      They both believe 14 or 15 year old girls should decide for themselves if they would like to have sex for pay or if they are paid they can’t claim rape.

      Stuart and Acteon are two men who deserve to develop ball cancer.

  • Two things of note: Renowned pathologist Dr. Cyril Wecht, of international fame for his consultations on some pretty high profile deaths (Kennedys, Elvis, etc.) and friend of Dr. Baden, gives his opinion of the Epstein death photo and the surrounding autopsy shenanigans of which he is suspicious. (Spoiler alert: He thinks Epstein is dead given a look at the gurney photo, is skeptical of suicide, questions the quick conclusion of the coronor.) Here is his interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQkD7EQKHSY

    Another fascinating side note: Steganography the practice of concealing messages or information within other non-secret text or data

    A tech guy on Twitter named Luke_Slytalker ran some programs on the photo of Ghislane that the NY Post published and found a possible “key” embedded in the photo that could be a message for whoever knows to look for it. Just like the CIA book Ghislane was “allegedly” reading at the table (if we take an unknown person’s word for it) this would be considered steganography as well. The meta data of the photo also provided evidence of possible communications to unknown persons.

    https://twitter.com/_Luke_Slytalker/status/1169050767103102976?s=20

  • The Epstein story continues to have “legs” both in the US and abroad – including apparently with law enforcement.

    The MIT scandal continues, and is explained:

    MIT whistleblower Signe Swenson says staffers referred to Epstein as ‘Voldemort’
    https://nypost.com/2019/09/12/mit-whistleblower-signe-swenson-says-staffers-referred-to-epstein-as-voldemort/

    Why MIT Media Lab thought it was doing right by secretly accepting Jeffrey Epstein’s money
    “Sometimes very smart people have a very bad idea.”
    https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/11/20860717/mit-media-lab-joi-ito-epstein

    Wexner continues to say very general things trying to distance himself from Epstein and put him in the past, but nothing that really provides much of an explanation of the relationship that virtually made Epstein:

    ‘So sick, so cunning, so depraved’ — Victoria’s Secret boss Les Wexner is speaking out about his ties ..
    https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/victorias-secret-les-wexner-embarrassed-by-jeffrey-epstein-ties-2019-9-1028519371

    Shady New York businessmen’s go-to bank, used for a favorite corrupt ruse:

    Jeffrey Epstein Used Opaque Charity Account at Deutsche Bank for Own Benefit
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/jeffrey-epstein-used-opaque-charity-account-at-deutsche-bank-for-own-benefit-11568286004

    Further analysis of the results of MuckRock’s FOIA request:

    The Jeffrey Epstein investigation was more expansive than previously thought, documents show
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/11/us/jeffrey-epstein-investigation-us-marshals-documents/index.html

    More overseas fallout:

    The Royal Family Is Scrambling Over Prince Andrew’s Jeffrey Epstein Connections
    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwew9j/queen-elizabeth-scrambling-over-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-connections

    • AnoyMaker,

      I am very skeptical about “deep conspiracies”, however rich and powerful men often do collude to pull off financial shenanigans.

      An example…….JD Rockefeller being one of the worst robber esque barons of all time. He engaged in small time stock manipulations just to make an extra buck. Even though JD Rockefeller was the first Billionaire.

      Maybe Epstein was charismatic and intelligent enough to ride the waves of the big guys.

      • I agree, there is certainly collusion – often based on a convenient convergence of mutual interests – and occasionally some real conspiracy, though usually limited in scale and ultimately exposed.

        I’ve studied Rockefeller and he is an interesting case, as he tended to fall for con men’s investment schemes, and not do so well in general with the stock market – his advisers and family finally had to limit the amount of money he had to play with. But he was brilliant at anything that had to do with manipulating things he could fully control, from industrial operations that shaved every penny imaginable to conspiratorial monopolies that could rig markets, and of course the occasional underhanded financial deal.

        There are reports that Epstein was a genius at avoiding taxes, and I suspect that among other things it will eventually turn out that he set up tax schemes, such as in the Virgin Islands, for people with big money, and took cuts – that may even be much of what he did for Wexner. If so, that’s another thing that a lot of influential people might rather not have revealed.

      • Thanks for that. I think I may have posted a link to a related early breaking story somewhere else, and it’s indeed an important developing angle of the story to follow.

        Interestingly, the info comes from FOIA requests made by MuckRock – I think that was noted in the first link I posted, wherever it was. As noted in a new Vanity Fair article, there is continuing intense media interest in the story – which hopefully bodes well for uncovering more of the truth.

        Apparently the girls were being flown to the Virgin Islands, which starts to explain where the young women sighted there came from, though I suspect many may have been from overseas as well. From what I remember of one of the reports, they may not have been properly accounted for in flight manifests.

        There’s a bit more comprehensive, more recently posted, account here:

        Jeffrey Epstein Might Have Taken Girls as Young as 11 to His Private Island Last Year
        “An air traffic controller witnessed Epstein traveling with pre-teen girls.”
        https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmj3e3/jeffrey-epstein-might-have-taken-girls-as-young-as-11-to-his-private-island-last-year

  • First, for some perspective, we’re born into a sea of doubt – short of DNA testing we don’t even know for certain who our parents are, since people are unfaithful, babies get swapped in hospital nurseries, and parents sometimes even conspire to hide adoptions. Cults and other forms of fallacious group think, as well as authoritarian and totalitarian systems, appeal to a desire for a sense of simple answers and even certitude that are actually contrary to the way our complex and messy world works – Scientology, for instance, almost explicitly sells “certainty.” And research shows that around a third of people, or slightly less, are somehow attracted to alternative explanations of the real world; that’s how we end up with people who believe the earth is flat, or hollow with Lemurians (probably including Ramtha) and Nazis living inside.

    I don’t see anything seriously wrong with these images, beyond what might be expected of digital photographs that were probably produced for sale to tabloids. The photographer is using a lens with a very short depth of focus, so that only one person is in sharp focus, which also creates the illusion of foreshortening – this is most obvious in the banner and last image, of Epstein. Sometimes that effect is also created or emphasized in post-production, which can make figures seem a bit odd on close examination, perhaps also at work in that same image – but that’s been done since the black-and-white days, when photographers and newspaper photo departments used to take sharp pencils to negatives to outline faces and figures (or create the infamous “Bat Boy”).

    Also, as much skill as it takes to photoshop major figures into an image virtually undetectably, it would be a real feat to create a sequential series of images that appeared convincing . A quick search online reveals that there are not just the 3 images from that street scene, but at least 2 additional ones, taken fractions of a second apart; in one the woman on the very left, rather than Allen’s wife, has virtually disappeared behind Epstein’s large frame. As is visible in the last image and noted in some of the published ones, they are copyrighted and credited to Elder Ordonez/INFphoto.com, who would be the one to ask about the photos – he’s apparently a “major celebrity photo contributor” and not all that hard to find:

    https://www.instagram.com/elderordonez1
    https://photoarchivenews.com/news/splash-news-extends-relationships-with-major-celebrity-photo-contributors/

    The Maxwell photos were very amateurishly and obviously photoshopped, by someone (probably Maxwell’s attorney friend who took the pictures, or someone at her media agency) who apparently thought that they needed to be cleaned up a bit for sale to the tabloids. However, changing out the movie poster undetectably would have required the work of a highly experienced professional, and I think it’s more likely that there’s just typical human confusion over when the poster shown in the photograph was actually put up in the bus shelter and, then, replaced.

    Besides having done a fair bit of “photoshopping” (using Adobe as well as freeware tools) as a volunteer at an entertainment non-profit where we had to sometimes edit or create composite photos of performance groups, I’ve also done quite a bit of forensic-type photo analysis following an especially resourceful cult group that uses photographic tricks and does a fair bit of “photoshopping,” mostly to try to make crowds at events look bigger, which is not terribly sophisticated (popping a few extra small, blurry heads in here and there) and also making banal cosmetic fixes like cleaning up visual distractions in the vicinity of their Dear Leader. One of the things I’ve learned along the way is that if you look at almost any digital image long enough you’re likely to find at least one thing that seems weird, and between the photographic techniques used and the oddities of digital photography including how cameras’ image sensors work and the compression algorithms applied to photographs, there are almost always multiple anomalies that show up in digital images on close analysis (though it helps to have high-resolution versions, which we don’t here). It can even start to become sort of a Rorshach Test if you’re not careful.

    • LOL there are people who think pictures of the earth taken from space are fake, because they believe it’s flat – there are lots of fools in the world. They’re also the sort of gullible, logically challenged people who are prime candidates for cults – which of course typically have conspiracy theories as part of their beliefs.

      If that’s not Epstein on the gurney, dead or alive, then how did they get him out of the prison – dead or alive? Actually, putting him on the gurney, dead or alive, would have been the easiest set-up. You really need to think your conspiracy theorizing through at least a bit, rather than making yourself look completely foolish….

      It’s actually a classic example of how shoddy and poorly thought through much if not most conspiracy theorizing is, and how obsessed its proponents get into trying to read things into factual evidence like photographs where there is actually nothing out of the ordinary. That, or, typically in combination, to propose theories that don’t even make sense when fully thought out, or taken to their logical conclusion.

      So I guess it comes down to me explaining how such a conspiracy theory ought to work, for those who still might not get it: if clever conspirators trying to spirit Epstein away alive, sent either an Epstein dummy or doppelganger (smuggled in first) the relatively easy way out of the jail on a gurney, then they still would have been left with the problem of getting the live Epstein out of a high security federal facility – even Hollywood script writers have figured out that the best-seeming ruse it to have the live, sedated (or even somehow temporary heart-stopped) taken out on a stretcher. There is actually no version of even a comparatively coherent and internally consistent conspiracy theory around this, in which it makes sense for anyone other than Epstein to be on the gurney, dead or alive.

      • AnoyMaker,

        The most obvious proof that the earth is round like a ball….

        ……The sun stays the same size no matter where you stand on the earth. If the earth were indeed flat the sun would appear smaller or larger depending upon where you stand.

        Believing in flat earth is like believing in magic….. blind faith at work.

      • AnonyMaker:

        This paragraph you wrong is everything

        “It’s actually a classic example of how shoddy and poorly thought through much if not most conspiracy theorizing is, and how obsessed its proponents get into trying to read things into factual evidence like photographs where there is actually nothing out of the ordinary. That, or, typically in combination, to propose theories that don’t even make sense when fully thought out, or taken to their logical conclusion.”

        There is a certain segment of the population who thrives on this kind of behavior and will go so far as to keep regurgitating their outlandish theories over and over again with the belief they make complete sense. They are, seemingly, unaware of how they sound. They will call out anyone who disagrees as being illogical and many become unreasonably angry and aggressive when their views are challenged. Too many people don’t let the facts get in the way.

      • Source is working with those investigating sonny. Your stool shooter is in overdrive splattering feces all over the place. Let me straighten you out, Epstein did not commit suicide. Those that squawk the loudest….polly wanna cracker.

        You have not a fuckin clue. Keep replying to yourself.

        • Ah, someone catcalls from the cheap seats and then scuttles off.

          Are you really a conspiracy theory true believer, someone as certain as a scientologist is about Xenu and the Fifth Invader Force, or just some sort of troll?

          • The government narrative believing numnuts are all out in force. Posting under different names but pitching the same lies. Epstein was murdered. No conspiracy needed, just in the know. Keep spinning fools

  • My conspiracy hat happens to be fashioned from rose gold, Mr. Parlato. After all, aluminum has been linked to dementia. Usually my rose gold helmet hangs from a hook right beside my old Playboy bunny diadem with its satin ears. Hahaha.

    So Woody Allen was described as a schlub by the NY Post, but why avoid it? He has dressed the same way since the 1960s. He is more of a dweeb than a schlub. His photo could be used as an apt illustration for what a dweeb is. He is supposedly 5’5″, yet never seems to have stood up straight, not once in his life. Woody Awful Allen, a malignantly untouchable dweeb, 83 years old and exemplifying that “only the good die young.” A child-molesting dweeb, as far as I’m concerned, who has succeeded in never getting caught, at least not officially.

    Linguistically, Epstein’s death is being obediently called a suicide by media. Repeat it enough and some will take it for granted. Not I.

    • The media fails to mention Mia’s child abuse. What like 4 foster kids committed suicide?!?!

      The new batch of commenters is so Knife Media, I threw up in my mouth a little reading this.

  • I checked, and there’s some actual interesting news in the Epstein case.

    Web site MuckRock posted the results of FOIA requests:

    Girls who appeared to be 11 to 12 seen with Jeffrey Epstein getting off his plane in 2018 as authorities eyed his travel abroad
    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/11/jeffrey-epstein-seen-with-young-girls-getting-off-his-plane-in-2018.html
    FOIA Request Apparently Reveals Jeffrey Epstein’s Last Mugshot, Plus Details of Investigation
    https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/foia-request-apparently-reveals-jeffrey-epsteins-last-mugshot-plus-details-of-investigation/

    There are continual reports of investigative activity in France:

    French Cops Appeal for Victims and Witnesses to Help Jeffrey Epstein Probe
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-french-cops-appeal-for-victims-and-witnesses-to-come-forward

    An investigative journalist doggedly tracked down confirmation that the curious structure on Epstein’s island was a sort of music room, with a piano in it (at the end of a summation of the various speculative theories that have been floated):

    Jeffrey Epstein’s island temple had a piano and a picture of the Pope
    “Jeffrey Epstein’s island temple inspired dozens of conspiracy theories. We spoke to someone who went inside.”
    https://www.insider.com/inside-jeffrey-epstein-private-island-temple-2019-09

    And there are no news updates on the investigation into Epstein’s death, in spite of someone posting a comment elsewhere citing supposed “sources” and an “insider,” that I’m guessing came from a conspiracy theory website.

    Finally, in my favorite conspiracy theory, there’s this that’s new:

    Ancient Aliens (September 05 2019 ) The Reptilian Agenda
    “Could they still be among us, hiding in plain site – and if so, what is their agenda?”

  • Re Woody Allen and Epstein photo:

    If it were a photoshopped photo my guess would be that Woody and his wife were dropped into the photo not Epstein.

    BTW:

    If the photo was taken with an IPhone….
    ……HDR on the IPhone can make photos (digital images) appear photoshopped because image enhancement is old school Photoshoping after all.

    • I agree, it does look more like that, if anything. The copyright tag in the lower left of one of the photos indicates they were taken by a professional paparazzo, who would have been using high-end equipment like telephoto lenses which create the illusion of foreshortening, plus he or the tabloids he sold photos to may have done some digital image enhancement just to make the subjects of the photos stand out better for publication purposes – similar to the sort of thing we saw amateurishly done in the Maxwell images.

      I have a fair bit of experience working with and analyzing digital images, and went through these in more detail in a writeup that I expect will be posted here eventually. I don’t see anything out of the ordinary, and doubt that anyone would have photoshopped figures into a whole series of images take years ago (I found them published at least as far back as 2015). If there’s anything suspicious, it’s that some of the images here have been cropped and don’t show other people visible in the versions published earlier, and there are none from the series showing the full face of the woman on the left.

      • Anonymaker,

        Not being able to see the woman’s face does seem a little off,

        The height and the propertions of everyone excluding Woody and his wife seem accurate to the rest of the environment.

        Woody and his wife are small people however they seem to be out of proportion to the environment around them. They seem smaller then they actually are. Woody Allen is 5’5.

        Unfortunately there are no objects near them that could be used for scale.

  • Frank,

    The gurney photo wasn’t photoshopped.

    It’s not a ‘fake’ impostor in that photo either. You can easily tell that it’s really Epstein dead, based upon comparing it to the ‘live’ photo of Epstein (shown directly underneath that gurney photo) while concentrating on the 6 following items:

    1) Nose structure and lines around lower nose

    2) Eyebrow structure and shape

    3) Lower part of ears is recognizable and distinct

    4) Sideburns shape

    5) High cheekbones

    6) Dark toned, aging skin with grayish hair (by itself means nothing, but in combination with other things means it’s him)

    He’s dead so the skin tone is not gonna match an ‘alive’ Epstein exactly, but you can tell that the dead guy was one tanned, aging mother fucker, with a hair tone and haircut similar to Epstein’s.

    What are the chances that all 6 of these distinct things would match a complete phony asshole that wasn’t really him?

    It’s a real photo, Frank.

    It’s not an impostor.

    It’s also not photoshopped like Maxwell’s photo, since inserting a real ‘sleeping’ Epstein in that position would be too hard cuz there’s too many medics beside him. It would be easily spotted as fake if someone did that.

    I challenge any asshole to prove me wrong, which includes idiotic bitches too like Heidi and Flowers. 🙂

    • To the bastard… sorry…I meant retard,
      I already said in a previous comment that the picture of dead Epstein was authentic. Obviously it is Epstein on that gurney, and obviously his goose is cooked. The creepy perv is dead – not being hidden by the CIA or whatever the tinfoil crowd is claiming. He’s dead. The only question is how he ended up dead…..

      As for the Woody Allen pics, they could be photoshopped, as it’s certainly possible to photoshop someone into a pic like that, and it would be difficult to tell. But what would be the reason to do that?

        • Under close inspection, I’m sure an expert could tell if it was photoshopped or not. However, I know it really is not photoshopped because there were a series of several pics taken of this same scene, so its easy to see that it’s not been edited to add anyone in.
          I just said it would have been POSSIBLE to add him into the photo.

    • Also, typically, much of the speculation is based on reading too much into things, without an understanding of what actually happens in such situations.

      EMTs can’t treat someone as dead, until after a physician or a medical examiner declares them dead. Their standard practice is to treat everyone as patients until transported to a hospital.

      A comment I’m going to post about the vagaries of digital photographs, also applies – there are a variety of oddities in the digital imaging process, from the way cameras’ sensors capture a picture to the various stages of compression an image is subject to, that can introduce all sorts of seeming anomalies.

    • Bangkok—-How are you, nephew? Damn, you are an observant one – kind of. Epstein’s nose is different. Bang, you missed the schnoz.
      You talk about Heidi and Flowers. But what about Lauren Salzman? If you played F marry kill Heidi, Flowers, and Lauren Salzman. Who would you choose to marry? 🙂

    • Yes. The NY Post shows Epstein, very likely dead but not having been declared dead as yet. For whatever reason(s), the people in charge preferred for Epstein to be declared dead outside of the prison and in a hospital. There is no need to wonder how come; it seems rather obvious.

      One can see in the Post’s uncovered gurney photos that Epstein’s ear, his nose and face were somewhat engorged and discolored. This is likely to have resulted from his positioning, suspended face downwards, and the natural effects of no longer breathing, as well as the effect which gravity itself has upon a body, wherein blood pools at the lowest points according to how the body ends up stationary. His ear looks to be somewhat misshapen, overly reddish or purplish, most likely dur to the impact stress from those neck fractures which he acquired.

      Another thing about deceased people with white or silver hair is that, very swiftly, the appearance of that color of hair becomes very bleachy-looking and steely and kind of jarring to see ; there is a distinctive change of hue and texture. The hair itself turns dead-looking, from the end of any scalp oxygenation whatsoever coming from the pores of the skin.

About Frank Parlato

About Frank Parlato

Frank Parlato is an investigative journalist.

His work has been cited in major publications all over the world, including The New York Times, The Daily Mail, VICE News, CNN, Fox News, Rolling Stone, People Magazine, and more.

Frank Report is dedicated to Frank's investigative journalism and the pursuit of truth.

Read more about Frank Report's mission.

Got A Tip?

If you have a tip for Frank Report, send it here.
Email: frankparlato@gmail.com
Phone / Text: (716) 990-5740

Archives

Loading cart ⌛️ ...
%d bloggers like this: