Former Smallville actress Allison Mack is a direct slave to sex-slaver Keith Raniere – now in federal prison awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Mack was named as a co-conspirator in Raniere’s criminal complaint. Several sources familiar with, or involved in the case, say Mack will be indicted before the end of April.
Why would a nice girl from Smallville be indicted?
Allison Mack was the recruiter of women into Raniere’s sex-slaver group called DOS [Dominus Obsequious Sororium – Latin for Master Over the Slave Women]. Mack recruited by describing to women a life coaching program meant to make women stronger. Mack lied to women – many of whom trusted her because she was a TV actress. To join her ‘all-women’ group, they were asked to provide ‘collateral’. A nude picture which would be kept confidential to assure the woman would never tell about the existence of the women’s group.
Once they gave collateral, women were told about DOS. Mack never told them that a man, Raniere, was its leader.
Allison Mack became far different than her character on Smallville, She became a brutal slave master in a sinister sex-slaver cult.
To learn about DOS, the women gave one nude photo. If they wanted to join, it was described as a wonderful coaching program – led by Mack and other women of substance and beauty – they had to give more collateral, all of which would be released only if they told others about DOS. Some women thought it would be excellent to be coached by Mack, a famous actress and other women – like actress Nicki Clyne and model India Oxenberg. They did not learn until later that behind it all was Raniere.
After the women provided collateral, they then learned they were to be slaves to Mack and other women who would coach them. They also learned that they were expected to bring in other slaves and told they must provide more and more collateral – to be uploaded to an online storage account or saved on thumb drives.
They now found that they were slaves in a real sense of the word. DOS slaves were required to provide collateral beyond what had initially been described. DOS slaves were not told they had to provide collateral every month, but they were required now to do so by Allison Mack.
It soon turned darkly sinister for some, but not all, of the women.
According to the FBI, “DOS slaves continued to provide collateral because they feared the collateral they had already provided would be released. Collateral included sexually explicit photographs; videos made to look candid in which the prospective slaves told damning stories (true or untrue) about themselves, close friends and/or family members; and letters making damaging accusations (true or untrue) against friends and family members and assigning the rights to assets.”
Mack helped slaves develop ideas for what would be appropriate collateral and instructed slaves to lie to make collateral more damaging. Mack required slaves to pose nude for close-up pictures of their vaginas. Mack sent these to Raniere on her cellphone. Sometimes, Raniere texted that the nude photographs Mack sent were not graphic enough or that slaves were not smiling enough, and had to be retaken.
One slave told the FBI that she saw a text exchange on Mack’s phone between Raniere and Mack, in which Mack sent a nude photo she had taken of several slaves and Raniere wrote back, “All mine?” with a smiling devil emoticon.
This was the world Allison Mack and Keith Raniere created. And it got worse. Many DOS slaves were branded with a cauterizing pen during a process that took 20-30 minutes. The brand spelled out Allison Mack’s initials – along with Keith Raniere’s.
The branding “ceremony” involved slaves being totally naked and taking turns holding each other down while the branding was filmed. The branding took place at Mack’s house. DOS masters informed slaves that video footage of them being branded and naked pictures of the women bearing their brands were also collateral.
After they were in deep, Mack gave slaves assignments. She told some they had to be celibate – unless she gave orders otherwise. Mack told slaves they could not masturbate without her permission. She gave orders through emails and texts. The FBI has obtained these. They do not paint a pretty picture of Allison Mack. She comes off differently than she did on camera as Chloe Sullivan in Smallville.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
The guy is a stupid looking dickhead
What a dumb fucking cunt
[…] herself oversaw ritual, forced branding ceremonies that were performed at her home. The brands on victims had Mack’s and Raniere’s […]
[…] herself oversaw ritual, forced branding ceremonies that were performed at her home. The brands on victims had Mack’s and Raniere’s […]
I agree. The Feds are masters at making people sweat.
One example, they like to turn or leverage families and couples. For instance, they may tell one Salzman they will send another Salzman up the river as well. They end game being If they cooperate, they will leave the other family member out of scrutiny.
I think AM, India, and Nicki are too far gone to fully comprehend anything wrong has been done, but I’d like to see India be the one to help herself, if only for her mothers sake.
Anyone have any idea why she hasn’t been arrested yet? What is their gameplay?
Prosecutors don’t have to unseal indictments or name co-conspirators early on. Mack could be mentioned in the indictment, or in a superseding indictment.
This gives Prosecutors and FBI a chance to gather more evidence, build the case, conduct surveillance, watch money transfers, etc. The problem that Allison Mack has is her celebrity – she’s easily recognizable and uses social media. Not very many places she can hide except for third-world sh!tholes. How long do think a starlet and ‘Guru’ would last in DR Congo, Yemen, or isolated Philippine island? Not very long.
All in due time Ceres. All in due time…
I guess I always thought in such a scenario the Feds would first arrest the second in command to gain more evidence and charges against them. I probably watch too many movies! But if they want all possible charges against Keith, why wouldn’t they arrest his second in command first and then be able to offer her a plea deal for all the information she can give?
The bias is always against men. The legal system, and the culture in general, is heavily biased against men and in favor of women. Men receive longer sentences for the same crimes, etc. “Toxic masculinity” is OKAY to say, even though it’s incredibly sexist. Males are only 40% of college admissions now, but “feminists” remain silent. Not a good time to be born with a penis, but you won’t hear Lady Gaga write a “born that way” song about it. Bunch of propaganda, corruption of a toxic society that demonizes men and boys. See Christina Hoff Sommers and Warren Farrell on the War Against Boys and The Myth of Male Power for more information.
Lets be clear here. Everyone BESIDES Keith is a victim who has been coerced into doing XYZ for him.
Fear is a strong motivator and he had a lot of collateral over these women. We aren’t talking about a few naked pics.
We are talking about signed over their entire assets ( money, homes, investments ).
We are talking about letters that could land them in prison ( falsely saying they had abused people).
We are talking about letters that could devastate their families
And pornographic material.
Yes, Allison will have to face the consequences of her actions and role in this but I do believe she didn’t start out with the intention and was guided by Keith after being brainwashed. (remember hypnosis was a large part of their program).
Lets also remember Allison is not alone in this. Nicki Clyne is another one involved so is India Oxenberg.
agreed.
Doesn’t the collateral prove it wasn’t consensual? I mean if people are engaging in consensual slavery, why do you need blackmail material on them?
I have to believe in my heart that there is no way they are going to get away with this. The evidence corroborating the witnesses’ testimony should make it a slam dunk. As long as everything is procedurally correct…
Still rooting for exculpatory evidence for Parlato and Tighe. Expecting headlines: Parlato charges dismissed. Tighe conviction overturned and he is released.
Even if he skates with a “consensual defense”, there will be scores of other charges that will await him.
I agree with the other posting as well, what’s the hold up on Nancy, AM, and Lauren’s arrest?
Also, When do the Elliot’s have the grand jury appearance?
Maybe the feds are trying to turn one or more of them in return for either immunity or reduced charges. You can bet the remaining adoring followers will line up in droves to testify for their Beloved – so the prosecutors have to have hardcore, credible testimony not only from victims but from some of the higher ups. Just my hunch. Plus I think they take all the time necessary to build the cases – it doesn’t hurt that a number of people are sweating bullets and breaking down as they fear arrest at any time. PS – One of the very worst, if not the worst, KR accomplices / enablers is Clare Bronfman, and she may very well be untouchable with her international ties. That’s a tragedy.
Right On OCD! Someone heavily involved is going to turn and become Feds’ witness. They will tie up the loose ends, corroborate the money trail, put the meat on the bones.
Not looking good for VanTurd and Nefarious Nancy. I really think Nancy is going to get hammered. About time tho…
It could be said that the collateral was only “consensual” the first time it was requested. Additional demands for collateral were coerced by holding over them, the threat of exposure. And, reportedly, the victims were not told that these demands would be ongoing.
I wonder if Mack and Raniere found that this collateral was a weapon they could not actually use. Any release of collateral to friends and family members outside of the bubble would be horrible for the victim, but it would also carry the risk of exposure of DOS and its practices.
Once the collateral is released, the victim has nothing to lose anymore by telling.
As far as we know, no collateral was actually released. I’ll bet they wanted to release it, but realized they couldn’t.
I guess it was never about the victims. The release of collateral would mean that it could be used against the leaders as well. As long as they keep it on their personal hard drives, they could go with the my girlfriend has send me these nudes excuse.
After releasing it, on the other hand, they would be in an area in which this defense does not work anymore. What I would like to know is how many further victims will come forward and appear in court. KR must have collateral on dozens of people who are now in a position to strike back.
Having a bus load of women claiming their collateral was obtained in an unlawful way and used against them would make a case KR will not be able to defend against.
It seems like the Feds have many more indictments to lay down. Mack, Nancy & amp; Lauren Salzman among others. I wonder what the hold up is?
“Hey Nancy we found half a million in unreported income in your basement. Wanna come with us?”
We should send him some Milk Of Magnesia and KY Jelly.
Advocating in favor of sexual assault is a bit hypocritical, wouldn’t you say?
The “justice” system is biased against males and in favor of females; it’s colloquially referred to as the “pussy pass”.
It’s clear Lauren Salzman was the organizer of the brandings, so she should have been in jail first. Male sexuality is demonized, however, so it’s easier to put all the blame on the one born with the penis.
Lauren Salzman was doing it for his benefit, likely at his instruction. If Lauren organized a slave ring for him then if he was any kind of man at all he would have stopped it right there. She has significant fault and deserves to face the music as well. But KR is the one at the top, it has nothing to do with his junk.
I would beat her ass. What a psycho
Ok, it is now officially midnight on the east coast. .. What is the current over / under on Vantard’s deflowering.?
There, ok, I said it.
I bet that doesn’t happen till after he is sentenced and his “new” life begins.
Wow. thanks for this new info, had no idea
“Because brainwashing is such an invasive form of influence, it requires the complete isolation and dependency of the subject, which is why you mostly hear of brainwashing occurring in prison camps or totalist cults. The agent (the brainwasher) must have complete control over the target (the brainwashee) so that sleep patterns, eating, using the bathroom and the fulfillment of other basic human needs depend on the will of the agent. In the brainwashing process, the agent systematically breaks down the target’s identity to the point that it doesn’t work anymore. The agent then replaces it with another set of behaviors, attitudes and beliefs that work in the target’s current environment.”
“Neuroscientists believe some people can be more easily brainwashed than others, but under the right conditions, it is possible for anyone to become brainwashed. Those most susceptible are are insecure or guilt-ridden, or have a low self-esteem. People who have a healthy outlook about themselves are much harder to brainwash.”
Haven’t we already heard this story?
We should continue to hear this story until this sadistic c–t ends up in federal custody along with the cross eyed garden gnome she is so dedicated to.
Just a small thing. I am cross eyed, due to an unfortunate genetic flaw. It does not make you an evil person. What makes you an evil person is to be born a sociopathic monster who evolves into a cult leader. (FYI, the monster’s cross eyes are barely detectible compared to mine – yikes!) If he were an ethical and compassionate person, no one would care what he looked like.
When I first visited Frank Report and read this stuff, I thought it was the ravings of a lone deluded madman, of the conspiracy-nut kind, being someone who’d never heard of Raniere before. It all seemed too wild and farfetched to be true, far removed from what I thought Allison Mack was like. Well, I was wrong.
It goes to show how very little we know about people we watch on tv.
Very true Andy and Reader. Very true indeed.