[This report has been developed from information provided from sources. For their protection, they are unnamed. It is up to the reader to judge whether the information presented is factual or not.]
Some readers seem to feel that the prior post about Keith Raniere’s poetical language of mystical sex was meant to mock him. This is untrue.
Some said they laughed aloud. Some admonished the writer for posting it – saying it discredited the serious nature of this website.
Perhaps further clarification is necessary. The post was meant to capture the actual language and teachings of Mr. Raniere with women he will join in their bedroom.
First and foremost, it is necessary to understand that Mr. Raniere presents himself to women with whom he will engage in conjugal relations as their mentor and teacher; their guru, and only secondarily their lover.
While he does require the women to be chaste, and not have any other sexual relationships with men, this, he explains, is because his semen is the connection between him and the woman.
Mr. Raniere explains to women that each of them is connected to him through his semen and thus they are parts of his ‘divine body’.
His having an ejaculation with a woman, it is implied, is similar to “Holy Communion” of the Catholics.
The women of the inner circle or harem are taught that physical communion with Mr. Raniere is not sex in any worldly sense.
The act is initiated in a variety of ways by Mr. Raniere and usually ends with Mr. Raniere ejaculating inside or upon the body or face of a woman.
Mr. Raniere does not teach that a woman is forbidden to have an orgasm. It is taught that it is not important. At least one woman reported she regularly achieved an orgasm with Mr. Raniere; others report they rarely or never did.
Mr. Raniere explains his semen residing inside her or deposited on her skin becomes absorbed into her inner being and becomes her connection to him.
Therefore, his orgasm is an act of giving, not taking. It is to be distinguished from the “selfish lover” who might have sex with a woman without regard to her having an orgasm, being satisfied merely with his own.
Mr. Raniere points out the average man and woman do not understand sexual relations.
In his men’s organization, the Society of Protectors, Mr. Raniere teaches that for a man to ejaculate upon the face of a woman is a consummate example of how a woman proves she accepts a man.
He teaches: The goal of a man having sex is to be accepted by a woman, and only secondarily to reproduce the species. It is the goal of a woman in sex to find a man who will take care of her and secondarily to find a man with characteristics she wants in her desire for reproduction.
Therefore a man will want acceptance by many women while a woman wants to be taken care of by one man whose biological attributes are superior.
By depositing semen on her face, she accepts his semen as a mark that she wants his protection, Mr. Raniere teaches.
Mr. Raniere further teaches that women are grifters, defrauders, swindlers and con artists. At any time a woman is ready to trade up; that is trade one man for another if she feels that a man can take care of her better than the man who is currently taking care of her.
What a woman is really longing for is a man to be her caretaker and protector, he teaches.
In his creation of DOS [Dominant over Submissive], he crystallized his teaching to women by branding women as being under his lifelong care. In return, they must play the woman’s role and be a slave to him, as woman are best suited and desire to be submissive to a worthy man, he teaches.
Mr. Raniere suggests that, with his advanced spirituality, superior intellect and with the wealth [of Clare Bronfman] under his control, he can take care of a woman better than any man. It is therefore better to have one-fiftieth [1/50th] of Mr. Raniere than 100 percent of an ordinary man.
Frank Parlato 
Janine Morrison 
J.J. O'Hara 
Richard Luthmann 
Marie White 
Paul Serran
Please leave a comment: Your opinion is important to us!
Joe why don’t you ask Mr. Raniere about it. After all you work for him. Or ask Diane.
Despite all the incredible reporting that’s going on here, the unfortunate reality is that Clare Bronfman’s money has allowed Raniere to make himself pretty much immune from prosecution for anything – even branding women! So don’t expect any help from the office of Albany County D.A. David Soares, NYS Police Investigator Rodger Kirsopp, NYS Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, local FBI Assistant Director William Sweeney or local U.S. Attorney Richard Hartunian because they’ve all been compromised and/or intimidated one way or another. And don’t expect any exposes by the local newspapers because the last time a reporter had the balls to take on Raniere, that reporter was driven into early retirement. Maybe other readers of this blog came come up with some alternative ideas for putting an end to this travesty and the Frank Report will share those thoughts.
It is good the Frank Report has clarified. The last post was nonsensical. Was it a satire? Was it Raniere’s actually teachings? What??? Thank you Frank Report for taking the time to clarify, and expeditiously respond to readers reactions.
To be sure we understand, Raniere is promoting sex and ejaculation by him as part of the DOS curriculum? For select DOS women?
According to more than a dozen sources, part of Mr. Raniere’s longstanding teaching policy is to have what most people would call sexual episodes with female students. He has explained that his ejaculation on or inside his female students is an integral part of his teaching them. This is standard practice, well understood by many of his women students, and numerous DOS women have also experienced these sexual episodes with Mr. Raniere both before and after they joined DOS.
post the evidence to verify the above statement.
Federal law in Mexico: Age of consent is 12
In Mexico, criminal legislation is shared between federal and state governments. The federal law establishes the age of 12 as the minimum age of consent (sex with someone 12-18 is not illegal per se). Local state laws may override federal law. At state level in Mexico, the minimum ages of consent vary between 12 (and puberty in a few states) and 15.
Article 261 of the Federal Criminal Code states: “Whoever… performs a sexual act in a person under 12 … will be punished with a term of 2 to 5 years in prison”